because we do need accuracy. This doesn’t change anything, for me, because it never says what the president actually said, it only throws light on a change. I’ve transcribed many a court hearing, and in such situations, it’s understood that everything is processed phonetically. (Clarification took place in a court hearing if need be.) In this situation, that would bring us back to “supporters,” rather than “supporter’s,” the president’s intent regardless. However, all the clarifications by the appropriate people still state the comment was “supporter’s.” I don’t know why we shouldn’t believe the current president, who has little to nothing to lose by either statement, but everybody has to make their own decision on it. Since there is more maybe-news that the AP feels it has to feature, again without equal coverage of the other side, I have to put it here, since I’ve already made a post. So, to see what AP believes it has found, simply click below: