Photo: ShutterstockNearly half of all LGBTQ+ youth feel unsafe in school settings, and over half said they had been bullied due to their queer identities,Β a new report from the Human Rights CampaignΒ (HRC) found.
But even though over half of queer respondents also showed signs of anxiety and depression, majorities of LGBTQ+ youth have also come out to their families and feel hopeful for the future nonetheless.
Approximately 54% of transgender and gender-expansive youth and 46% of LGBQ+ youth surveyed said that they felt unsafe in at least one school setting. Nearly 60% of all LGBTQ+ youth said that they had been βteased, bullied, or treated badlyβ at school over their LGBTQ+ identities.
Only one in five LGBTQ+ youth reported school bullying to a school staff member. While 23.3% of these kids said the adult βdidnβt help me at all,β 20.0% said the adult βhelped me a lot.β
Additionally, 55.1% of survey respondents screened positive for depression, 63.5% screened positive for depression, and 64.7% rated their ability to manage stress as βfairβ or βpoor.β These rates were on average five points higher for transgender and gender-expansive youth. 48.9%Β of LGBTQ+ youth had received therapy in the prior year.
The HRC noted that these findings have likely been affected by the spike in anti-LGBTQ+ legislation nationwide. During the most recent legislative session, 10 have passed transphobic βbathroom bills,β 23 states have passed transphobic βsports bans,β six have passed βforced outingβ bills requiring schools to out trans and gender-expansive youth to their parents, and six have passed βDonβt Say LGBTQ+β bills banning queer content from classrooms.
Despite this, 90.3% of LGBTQ+ youth said they were proud to be part of the LGBTQ+ community, and nearly 83% of queer youth said that they had come out to at least one member of their immediate family.
Trans and gender-expansive youth who feel free to express their gender identity around their families and those whose family members use their correctΒ pronounsΒ and names also reported the lowest levels of depression and anxiety among trans and gender-expansive youth.
Additionally, 56.8% of LGBTQ+ youth said they somewhat or strongly agree that βthe LGBTQ+ community is accepted more and more every day.β
If you or someone you know is struggling or in crisis, help is available. Call or text 988 or chat atΒ 988lifeline.org. TheΒ Trans LifelineΒ (1-877-565-8860) is staffed by trans people and will not contact law enforcement. The Trevor Project provides a safe, judgement-free place to talk for youth viaΒ chat, text (678-678), or phone (1-866-488-7386). Help is available at all three resources in English and Spanish.
Category: Abuse
House Republicans Cite Noahβs Ark In Motion Backing Texas Using Circular Saws, Razor Wire On Rio Grande
Β
TheΒ Houston ChronicleΒ reports:
More than 20 members of Congress want to join a federal lawsuit to help protect Gov. Greg Abbottβs buoy barrier in the Rio Grande, referencing Noahβs Ark and questioning if the river can be considered a βnavigable waterwayβ despite being the fourth largest river in North America.
In a motion filed on behalf of U.S. Rep. Jodey Arrington, R-Lubbock, and other GOP members, lawyers for the conservative Texas Public Policy Foundation have asked to be part of the case and targeted how a key law is interpreted in it.
The U.S. Justice Department sued Abbott last month for deploying a 1,000-foot buoy barrier in the Rio Grande without first getting permission from the U.S. Army Corp of Engineers as required by the federal Rivers and Harbors Act.
From their amicus brief:
Indeed, if one takes the Book of Genesis literally, then the entire world was once navigable by boats large enough to carry significant amounts of livestock. Under the federal governmentβs theory, these anecdotes would render any structure built anywhere in Texas an obstruction to navigation subject to federal regulation.
Arrington was among the 126 Republican House reps who voted to overturn the 2020 election.
Β
A post I was going to make that took a horrible side step.
Please forgive me, This is not how I wanted to start this post.Β Earlier I had a great plan and took pictures, and was so happy I was kind of humming to my self.Β Then as I sat down to do this post when on the other computer screen came a video I shouldn’t have watched, I should have shut down.Β It was a news station report on two young boys fostered (me adopted) and the physical abuse they suffered.Β They suffered no sexual abuse, but the descriptions of the physical abuse sent all my former great happy thoughts fleeing as I totally understood their thoughts they might die and their struggles with the pain inflicted on them, I started to cry and shake and then damn it the vortex came.Β It howled and tried to consume me, I floundered looking for something some handle, anything in my mind to grab so it wouldn’t take me and I could with stand it.Β Fight it off.Β Β
I put music on the other computer, wiping off the abuse video, I have no idea the songs I can not think on them.Β The screen says the best soft rock of the 70s,80s,90s.Β But I am calming down, remembering what I wanted to post, the great idea I have.Β Β I must stop sobbing, Ron must not come out and see me like this.Β Such a great day, great week, and yet …Β
By my dogs that love gravy I wonder how my heart, my body can take these sudden panics, the mental sounds of the vortex coming for me, my body’s desperate attempt to flee or just to curl up in a ball and let it happen.Β My heart rate is again down to 76.Β According to my Apple Watch that monitors it, my heart rate went to 158.Β Anyway.Β Β I am calm enough to do the post I wanted to do.Β But damn, I need to be more careful on the news I see coming across the many web feeds.Β But I did not select the video, I was watching a new channel on the fires in Hawaii.
I want to just add that I was one step from activating the emergency Scottie needs help signal.Β That is to Randy.Β Β For those that never followed my old blog I had a breakdown in 2014.Β I started self harming again and was trapped in my head by the vortex, reliving my childhood abuse.Β I won’t and sorry can not describe it, but Randy who was working long night shifts keep his phone on all the time, called me repeatedly if he did not hear from me, texted me, and took hours long phone calls from me desperately trying to stop the nightmares in my head from the memories.Β He went without sleep so many days just to be there for me.Β When I say Randy is the best brother ever, I mean it, and that is part of the reason why.Β It is not an exaggeration to say that after drawing a sharp knife or razor blade across my skin drawing blood instead of doing it again I would reach out to Randy instead.Β It got to where instead of the blades, I reached for him.Β Anyway those days are past now.Β For good I hope.Β Yet it still gets scary sometimes.Β Β Β
Ok Ron got up, kept asking me what was wrong, I denied anything was wrong and told him my allergies were acting up.Β He seemed like he was going to pursue it but then dropped it, and I am glad.Β Β I just don’t want to deal with all that now at this time.Β Β I am trying hard to let the past sink back in to the deep depths of the deepest part of the ocean in a chest wrapped in many layers of big chains, weighted down by as many happier thoughts as I can push against it.Β Β
Ok my head is clearing and I want to do the happy bread post I started to do.Β Β Hugs to all who want them.Β Β Scottie
A few thoughts before I do the weekly Sunday cleanings on the computers. This morning I scrambled to get through two windows of a combined total of 78 tabs, so I wouldn’t lose them due to cleaning. Hugs

Texas Judge Orders Airline Lawyers to Take Training From Far-Right Hate Group
By my dogs that love gravy this is so asinine I really doubted it could be true.Β First the trend by religious people to think they have the right to push their god and religious driven opinions on everyone else is increasing to a level that is stunning.Β That a judge thought it was OK for a religious Christian woman to spam and harass her co-workers with her church views and offensive pictures is also something I don’t understand.Β The judge was appointed by trump if that helps to understand she is a fundamentalist Christian nationalist. But what really scares me is the actions of the judge who went full fundamentalist Christian on the defendants to the point of forcing a religious indoctrination on them.Β Β HOW IS THAT LEGAL?Β Forcing a nonbeliever on threat of the court to not only attend forced religious indoctrination, but to also pay for it.Β Plus it seems a large part of the woman’s story was made up as it is becoming increasingly a tactic by religious fanatics to get their cases in court.Β Plus the religious hate group was no way involved with the case but the judge forced his fundamentalist views and support of the religious hate group to force them into the case.Β Β What has Texas and this country become?Β Β Hugs
The lawyers must take religious freedom classes from the Alliance Defending Freedom, the right-wing Christian group that has systematically rolled back civil liberties.
KENT NISHIMURA/LOS ANGELES TIMES/GETTY IMAGESKristen Waggoner, president of the Alliance Defending Freedom, speaks to members of the press outside the Supreme Court on December 5, 2022.ΒAΒ Trump-appointed Texas judge hasΒ orderedΒ three senior Southwest Airlines lawyers to take eight hours of βreligious-liberty trainingβ from the far-right Christian hate group Alliance Defending Freedom.
In his late Monday ruling, U.S. District Judge Brantley Starr specifically mandated the lawyers take the training as part of court-ordered sanctions for religious discrimination. He described ADF as one of several βesteemed non-profit organizations that are dedicated to preserving free speech and religious freedom.β The Southern Poverty Law Center hasΒ designatedΒ ADF as an extremist hate group.
The mandated hate-group training is the latest phase of a lawsuit brought byΒ flight attendant Charlene Carter, who sued Southwest for firing her in 2017 after she sent confrontational anti-abortion messages to her unionβs former president. Carter argued she had been discriminated against based on her religious beliefs, and U.S. District Judge Brantley Starr sided with her in December, ordering she be reinstated.
Starr, who was appointed by Donald Trump in 2019, also ordered Southwest to issue a statement telling its employees that the airline βmay notβ engage in religious discrimination against them. Instead, Southwest said that it βdoes notβ do so, prompting Carter to demand additional sanctions against the company.
Carter had made no request for Southwest to undergo religious liberty training. ADF is not representing Carter, nor is it otherwise related to the case at all, so itβs unclear why Starr felt the need to involve the group.
Itβs hard to overstate ADFβs role in rolling back civil liberties. One of its lead lawyers is Erin Hawley, who is married to far-right Senator Josh Hawley. ADF helped overturnΒ Roe v. WadeΒ and then sued to removeΒ mifepristone, one of the drugs used in medication abortions, from the national market. That case is still in limbo, as the Fifth Circuit Court has yet to issue a ruling.
ADF also represented the plaintiff in the recent Supreme Court caseΒ 303 Creative v. Elenis. Web designer Lorie Smith was suing to have the right to refuse services to LGBTQ people. The design request she claims she received that prompted her suit appears to have beenΒ entirely fabricated.
Β
Jack Smith Has an Indictment. Trump Has a Massive Plan for Revenge
I followed the link to this article from Ten Bears post.Β This is a serious plan from the republican right wingers to weaponize the government against their enemies just like the Jim Jordan / Matt Gaetz / Boebert types keep screaming that the left is doing.Β The difference is Biden is keeping hands off of the DOJ, letting justice be the rule of law.Β Instead the right has the plans below to target and attack those who have different opinions while allowing themselves to break the laws at will.Β Β Β Hugs
Sounds Like 1930s Germany To Me …
The thrice-indicted former president and his allies have long been drawing plans to undo Smith’s investigations, as well as to punish everyone involved
BY
ASAWIN SUEBSAENG, ADAM RAWNSLEY
AUGUST 4, 2023

DONALD TRUMP IS a long, long way from winning the GOP primary, let alone retaking the White House. But he always has revenge on his mind, and his allies are preparing to use a future administration to not only undo all of Special Counsel Jack Smithβs work β but to take vengeance on Smith, and on virtually everyone else, who dared investigate Trump during his time out of power.
Rosters full of MAGAfied lawyers are being assembled. Plans are being laid for an entire new office of the Justice Department dedicated to βelection integrity.β An assembly line is being prepared of revenge-focused βspecial counselsβ and βspecial prosecutors.β Gameplans for making Smithβs life hell, starting in Jan. 2025, have already been discussed with Trump himself. And a fresh wave of pardons is under consideration for Trump associates, election deniers, and β the former president boasts β for Jan. 6 rioters.
The preparations have been underway since at least last year, with Trump being briefed on the designs by an array of attorneys, political and policy advisers, former administration officials, and other allies. The aim is to build a government-in-waiting with the hard-right infrastructure needed to turn the Justice Department into an instrument of Trumpβs agenda, according to five sources familiar with these matters and another two people briefed on them.
Trumpβs spokesperson did not respond to a request for comment on this story.
One idea that has caught thrice-indicted former presidentβs attention in recent months is the creation of the so-called βOffice of Election Integrity,β which would be a new unit inside the Justice Department. It would be tasked not only with relitigating Trumpβs lies about his 2020 election loss, but also with aggressively pursuing baseless allegations of election βfraudβ (including in Democratic strongholds) in ways that Trumpist partisans believe the department has onlyΒ flirted with in the past.Β
This idea was recently pitched to Trump by a longtime Republican activist and an attorney whoβs known the ex-president for years, according to two sources with knowledge of the matter. (Republican officials have also begun voicing their own support for state-level offices of election integrity. Florida Gov. Ron DeSantis made the proposal a reality in his state. Officials in Tennessee, Missouri, and Wisconsin have proposed the offices, and the Texas Public Policy Foundation, a conservative think tank, proposed a similarly named office.)
And when it comes to Special Counsel Smithβs office β which just handed Trump his third indictment, this one related to efforts to overturn the 2020 election β the former president and his fellow travelers already know what they want: They want the FBI and DOJ to name names.
This year, close advisers to Trump have begun the process of assembling lists of the names of federal personnel who have investigated the former president and his circle for years, and are attempting to unmask the identities of all the DOJ attorneys and others connected to Smithβs office. The obvious purpose of this, according to one source close to Trump, is to βshow them the door on Day 1 [if Trumpβs reelected]β β and so βwe know who should receive a subpoenaβ in the future.
Such subpoenas would of course be instrumental in Trumplandβs vows to its voters that, should he return to power, Trump and his new attorney general will launch a raft of their own retaliatory βspecial counselβ and βspecial prosecutorβ probes to investigate-the-investigator, and to go after their key enemies. As it were, Jeffrey Clark, a former DOJ official and a central figure in Trumpβs efforts to subvert the legitimate 2020 presidential election results, has been on Trumpβs informal shortlist for plum assignments,Β including even attorney general, in a potential second administration.
Sources familiar with the situation tell Rolling Stone that Trump and his close ideological allies β working at an assortment of MAGA-prone think tanks, advocacy organizations, and legal groups β are formulating plans for a wide slate of βspecial prosecutors.β In this vision, such prosecutors would go after the usual targets: Smith, Smithβs team, President Joe Biden, Bidenβs family, Attorney General Merrick Garland, FBI director Christopher Wray. But theyβd also go after smaller targets, from members of the Biden 2020 campaign to more obscure government offices.
βThere are almost too many targets to keep track of,β says one Trump adviser familiar with the discussions. Trump and members of his inner orbit have already outlined possible legal strategies, examining specific federal statutes they could wield in a Republican-controlled Justice Department to go after Manhattan DA Alvin Bragg, who delivered Trumpβs first indictment of this year.
The FBIβs investigation of over a thousand rioters who breached and trashed the Capitol on Jan. 6 β officially the largest criminal investigation in Justice Department history β is another area where Trump has stated he would like to reverse course. βI am inclined to pardon many of them. I canβt say for every single one because a couple of them, probably, they got out of control,β Trump told host Kaitlan Collins during a CNN town hall in May.
When the broader topic of possible second-term pardons has come up behind closed doors, Trump has at times said that such pardons should be signed at the start of the term, not saved for the later on, according to those whoβve heard him discuss it since last year. Aside from the rioters themselves, Trump has also privately floated issuing a wave of pardons to higher-ranking figures who were scrutinized in Special Counsel Smithβs two main investigations.
βThis would be like hitting the delete-key on all of DOJβs work on these investigations,β a person intimately familiar with the conversations told Rolling Stone in March. In the past several months, when confidants have quipped to Trump that he may have to βpardon yourself,β should he return to the Oval Office, the ex-president has sometimes simply smirked and replied that theyβll have to wait and see.
Another major focus of some of these counter-probes would be βgrand jury violations,β says one person familiar with the matter. The counter-probe of those alleged βviolationsβ is the surest sign yet that in a second Trump administration, the Justice Department would seek to investigate the special counselβs use of grand juries in the Mar-a-Lago and January 6 cases. (Indeed, Trump has already vowed to sic a special counsel on President Biden if he beats him in 2024.)
Some of these βspecial prosecutorsβ wouldnβt even be based out of the Justice Department, as special counsels typically are. In some of these private Trumpworld legal plans, some of the βspecial counselsβ would be based out of places like the White House. This idea is nearly identical to the controversial position that Trumpist lawyer and conspiracy theorist Sidney Powell tried to convince then-President Trump to give her in the aftermath of the 2020 election.
Some lawyers and operatives close to Trump have pitched themselves for these kinds of roles, telling either Trump or some of his closest advisers that theyβd be more than happy to take the gig in Trumpβs possible return to power in 2025.
And along with having dreams of sweeping retribution and purges, the upper ranks of Trumpworld have spent years putting together projects to vet and prepare a new generation of appointments β for βspecial prosecutorβ posts, as well as much else β and administrative talent.
In this informal vetting for Justice Department candidates, former senior Trump aides and well-connected activists have sought lawyers with a track record of loathing DOJ, particularly what they deem its supposedly βliberal,β βleft-wing,β or βMarxistβ elements. Between these different Trump allies, different private spreadsheets have been created in recent years, some laying out dozens of possible contenders, while some include upwards of a hundred names, sources with direct knowledge of the situation say. Former top Trump White House policy adviser Stephen Miller and other key Trump diehards have contributed names to several of these lists.
Rolling Stone has reviewed one of these internal spreadsheets that has circulated among Trump lieutenants, and the roster is heavy on individuals connected to America First Legal, the Center for Renewing America, and other Trump-backing entities.
Prominent allies of the former president are open about plans to tie the Justice Department more tightly to the White House.
βI recall talking to a senior official in the Trump administration, who said after all of [these investigations] are over, weβve got to think of a way to bring the Justice Department back into the government,β says Tom Fitton, president of the conservative nonprofit Judicial Watch and a close ally of the former president.
The Justice Department has typically enjoyed a degree of insulation from White House control, a norm aimed at avoiding the politicization of prosecution. But Fitton argues that the department should be more βresponsiveβ to a presidentβs priorities, a belief that Trump and various influential conservatives embrace enthusiastically. βIs the Justice Department going to operate as an entity outside the White House as opposed to an entity thatβs controlled by the president, as the Constitution requires?β he says.
Putting it another way: βWhat weβre trying to do is identify the pockets of independence and seize them,β Russ Vought, a former top Trump official who heads the Center for Renewing America, told The New York Times in a story published last month.
βI think thereβs an argument that what the Justice Departmentβs doing to Trump now is criminal,β Fitton tells Rolling Stone, suggesting β of course β that a future administration should launch an investigation into Special Counsel Smithβs work.
Fitton also says the department should revisit Special Counsel John Durhamβs investigation into the FBI probe of the Trump campaign in 2016. Durham, he argues, was a βfailureβ and acted only as βa glorified inspector general.β
Once, Special Counsel Durham was supposed to be Trumpworldβs savior, someone who Trump, his allies on Capitol Hill, and large swaths of conservative media were counting on to expose and imprison βDeep Stateβ foes. But when the Durham probe ended earlier this year with lackluster results for a vengeance-hungry GOP, he became much less a hero and more a cautionary tale to the right.
As one conservative lawyer who has discussed βspecial prosecutorβ ideas with Trump in recent months tells Rolling Stone, the guiding principle of this project is simple: βNo more John Durhamβs β never again.β
Texas Women Win Case Against Abortion Ban
https://jessica.substack.com/p/texas-women-win-case-against-abortion
Thanks to Ali for the link.Β Important news.Β Β Hope it holds.Β Hugs
Judge’s ruling allows for abortions in dangerous & doomed pregnancies
Texas will definitely appeal; but for now, people in the state with dangerous or doomed pregnancies should be able to get care.
I am so grateful for the women who laid their pain bear in public for the chance to change this law just a littleβbut so distressed that they had to fight so hard to be given this bare minimum of humanity. It makes me feel a bit ill, to be honest, that these are the kinds of βwinsβ we have to hope for.
The lawsuit, brought by theΒ Center for Reproductive Rights, required women to relive the horrors they were forced to endure because of the stateβs abortion ban. One woman,Β Samantha Casianoβwho was forced to give birth despite the fact that her baby had anencephaly and was missing parts of her brain and skullβended up vomiting while recounting her experience. She said that talking about what happened βjust makes my body remember and it just reacts.β
Lawyers defending the state, meanwhile, were extraordinarily cruel. One attorneyΒ said, βPlaintiffs simply do not like Texas’ restrictions on abortion.β Another not only frequently interrupted as the women spoke about their experiences, she also askedΒ each one individuallyΒ if Attorney General Ken Paxton had personally denied them an abortion. Plaintiff Amanda Zurawski, who nearly died after being denied an abortion, said, βI survived sepsis and I don’t think today was much less traumatic than that.β
There is a reason Texas tried to stop these women from telling their stories: there is no arguing with their experiences, no turning away from the horror these laws have caused. As happy as I am for the people in Texas who might be able to get the care they need as a result of this decision, I keep thinking about Terryβthe young woman I spoke to in Juneβand how this ruling came too late to help her:
An American Nightmare: Young, pregnant & living in Texas
Content Warning: Descriptions of severe fetal abnormalities Some names have been changed to protect the identities of those interviewed.
You can read the judgeβs rulingΒ here, and Iβll keep you updated as I find out more about the practical implications of the decision.
A huge thank you to the women who came forward, and to the lawyers and activists who helped them.



