UN Court Starts Genocide Hearing Against Israel Despite US Calling Case ‘Meritless’

A U.N. court began hearings this week on South Africa’s case against Israel for genocide — a bid to stop the conflict in Gaza and document what the Palestinian ally calls Israeli forces’ “genocidal conduct.” The U.S. calls the case “meritless.” Anita Powell reports; Patsy Widakuswara contributed.

Florida school district removes dictionaries from libraries, citing law championed by DeSantis

https://popular.info/p/florida-school-district-removes-dictionaries

Again the point of making the laws so vague is to instill fear of violating it as no one really knows how much it covers.   That is the point of all these laws from Texas, Florida, and other maga states.  It is so that people have to go to the extremes to avoid lawsuits that the laws makes almost impossible for them to win.  It is all about returning the US to a time when the LGBTQIA was not seen socially nor in media in any positive way.  During that time any media mention of the LGBTQIA had to make them the villain and beware little billy of the homosexual man.  Of course, little Billy was in far more danger from the local Priest who was presumed a holy wonderful man because he preached the good religion, Christianity.  These people pushing these to remove all mention of LGBTQIA from media, books, libraries, rainbows from schools are driven by fundamentalist religion or a desire to return to a time more comfortable for them.  A time that existed only because some people did not have full equality to live openly as who they were in society.  They hate that equality, and they love to engage in oppression of others. 

Then they use the excuse they are preventing indoctrination.  Specifically progressive indoctrination.   But when you have to remove dictionaries, encyclopedias, thesauruses, and Genesis book of records, and any positive mention or anything not cis white republican ideology with forced Christianity what is that?  Right wing republican indoctrination.   It is reeducation camps.  It also is about creating a two tier schools system.  The public system for poor people that prepares them to be low level workers / laborers, and the privet schools for upper incomes wealthy kids who will be the overseers / managers/ owners of the workers.   Hugs.   Scottie


JAN 10, 2024

The Escambia County School District, located in the Florida panhandle, has removed several dictionaries from its library shelves over concerns that making the dictionaries available to students would violate Florida law. The American Heritage Children’s Dictionary, Webster’s Dictionary for Students, and Merriam-Webster’s Elementary Dictionary are among more than 2800 books that have been pulled from Escambia County school libraries and placed into storage. The Escambia County School District says these texts may violate HB 1069, a bill signed into law by Governor Ron DeSantis (R) in May 2023. 

HB 1069 gives residents the right to demand the removal of any library book that “depicts or describes sexual conduct,” as defined under Florida law, whether or not the book is pornographic. Rather than considering complaints, the Escambia County School Board adopted an emergency rule last June that required the district’s librarians to conduct a review of all library books and remove titles that may violate HB 1069. 

Each school in Escambia County has thousands of titles. As a result, many school libraries were closed at the beginning of the school year pending the completion of the review. 

At the completion of that process, more than 2800 books were removed from libraries. (This includes, in some cases, multiple copies of the same book.) These books are being reviewed again by the school district. But that process is proceeding extremely slowly. According to a list maintained by the Escambia County School District, fewer than 100 texts have gone through the final review process. Many of these books remain unavailable to students absent a parental “opt-in.” 

The dictionaries, according to the school district’s data, remain locked away. Their exclusion demonstrates the preposterously broad language of HB 1069. Dictionaries do contain descriptions of “sexual conduct.” Merriam-Webster, for example, defines sex as a “sexual union involving penetration of the vagina by the penis” or “intercourse (such as anal or oral intercourse) that does not involve penetration of the vagina by the penis.” But the idea that we need to exclude dictionaries from schools to protect children defies all logic. 

District staff responsible for the review at each school were given a checklist to determine whether a book should be withheld from students. The checklist suggests reviewers consult “Book Looks,” a right-wing website relied on by Moms for Liberty and other groups to justify the banning of books from school libraries. It was created by “Moms For Liberty member Emily Maikisch,” according to public records reviewed by Book Riot.

The Florida Freedom to Read Project (FFRP) obtained a copy of the checklist from the school district, which FFRP provided to Popular Information.

Along with dictionaries, the books removed from Escambia County school libraries as a result of this process include eight different encyclopedias, two thesauruses, and five editions of The Guinness Book of World Records. Biographies of Beyoncé, Lady Gaga, Oprah Winfrey, Nicki Minaj, and Thurgood Marshall are also locked in storage.

Classic texts like Anne Frank’s Diary of a Young Girl, The Adventures and the Memoirs of Sherlock Holmes, and Agatha Christie’s Death on the Nile are no longer available to Escambia County students. Twenty-three novels by Stephen King have been removed. The dragnet has also swept up books popular with the political right including Atlas Shrugged and two books by conservative pundit Bill O’Reilly. 

The reality in Escambia County serves as a rejoinder to DeSantis, who has described concerns about book removals as a “leftist activist hoax” and a “false political narrative.” 

At the same event, Florida Department of Education Commissioner Manny Diaz argued “[r]emoving clear instances of pornography and sexually explicit materials, often within arms reach of our youngest kids, is not book banning.” How would Diaz describe removing the dictionary?

DeSantis justified his statements by claiming that no school district in Florida had removed more than 19 books. At the time, 148 books had been removed in Escambia County as part of the challenge process. Now, in part due to DeSantis signing HB 1069, more than ten times that many books have been taken off the shelves in Escambia County. And Escambia County is not an anomaly. Orange County, Florida, which includes Orlando, has removed at least 678 books from library shelves.  

Authors and parents fight back

 

Penguin Random House, five authors, two parents of Escambia County students, and the non-profit group PEN America sued the Escambia County School Board last May, alleging that the board’s actions violate the First Amendment. The lawsuit relates to decisions by the school board, prior to the passage of HB 1069, to permanently ban several books from Escambia schools. 

The Escambia County School Board banned most of these books at the request of Vicki Baggett, a high school English teacher in the county. Baggett is responsible for hundreds of challenges in Escambia County and neighboring counties. She also appeared at the June 2023 board meeting and spoke in favor of the emergency rule. 

Meet the Florida English teacher trying to ban 150 books from school libraries

Meet the Florida English teacher trying to ban 150 books from school libraries

·
DECEMBER 20, 2022
Read full story

Baggett has challenged books like And Tango Makes Three, the true story of two male penguins, Roy and Silo, who lived in the Central Park Zoo and raised an adopted chick. In an interview with Popular Information, Baggett said she objected to And Tango Makes Three because it exposes students to “alternate sexual ideologies.” Baggett said she was concerned “a second grader would read this book, and that idea would pop into the second grader’s mind… that these are two people of the same sex that love each other.”

Last year, Popular Information reported that former and current students accused Baggett of being openly homophobic in class. For example, Baggett allegedly told a tenth-grade student that her sister, who had a girlfriend, was “faking being a lesbian for attention” because “nobody’s born that way.” 

Florida English teacher pushing book bans is openly racist and homophobic, students allege

Florida English teacher pushing book bans is openly racist and homophobic, students allege

·
JANUARY 9, 2023
Read full story

More recently, Baggett was involved in a scheme that involved reporting a librarian in a neighboring county to law enforcement for failing to remove a popular young adult novel from the school library. 

Although a material review committee in Escambia County voted 5-0 to reject Baggett’s challenge of And Tango Makes Three, the decision was overruled by the school board, which sided with Baggett. “The fascination is still on those two male penguins,” school board member David Williams said. “So I’ll be voting to remove the book from our libraries.”

The lawsuit alleges that the school board banned and restricted books “based on their disagreement with the ideas expressed in those books.” In so doing, the school board has “prescribed an orthodoxy of opinion that violates the First and Fourteenth Amendments.”

Today, there is an important hearing in the case. A federal judge will consider Escambia County’s motion to dismiss the complaint. In a brief submitted by the State of Florida in support of Escambia, Attorney General Ashley Moody argued that the school board could ban books for any reason because the purpose of public school libraries is to “convey the government’s message,” and that can be accomplished through “the removal of speech that the government disapproves.” This is a novel argument about the purpose of school libraries.

 

Dictionaries?

They’re going after **words** now??

Logical consequence of “don’t say gay” and other stupidities.

Also, the logical (and predicted) outcome of intentionally vague laws intended to scare people into over-compliance.

They have to. Words come together to make sentences, and sentences create paragraphs. Then you’ve got people sharing information and getting ideas, and who knows where that could end up? People might start to think.

it’s got Dic in it’s name. that’s going to turn thousands of unsuspecting children gay.

Woidz Я dane-ger-us!

“Can you show me on the doll where the bad word hurt you?”

All the best words are in the dictionary

there might be pronouns inside

Can’t allow those kids to look up what “fag” means when the older kids call them that. Or, god forbid, “homosexual.”

Thumbnail

Is anyone else getting strong Fahrenheit 451 vibes?

More like 1984 vibes

Of course dictionaries violate the Florida law.

They contain knowledge.

Knew that was coming. It was a public library dictionary that helped me label what I was feeling a long, long, long time ago.

The takeaway from your story is an evil book has groomed you.

That’s why we’re banning books.

/S

As a kid, I looked up “orgasm” to see what that was about. Being told it was “the height of sexual pleasure” didn’t help at all.

Indeed. My 7th grade sex education class didn’t explain how a boy knew he was done. My friends and I speculated and came (!) away mystified.

One year later, laying in bed one morning I discovered that missing element.

I knew that I was gay when I was three or four years old. I didn’t know what gay was, and I didn’t know what it meant. I certainly didn’t know about sex. But I knew that I was different from other boys in a way that involved other boys, and I knew that I had better not talk about it whatever it was.

When I was a child, I was a voracious reader. I went through at least two encyclopedia sets. One day, when I was about 10, I was thumbing through the dictionary looking for new words. I found the word “homosexual”, and knew that that word applied to me. It told me that I was not the only one.

And that is what they want to stop. Kids learning anything different other than the religious or right wing party line.

I hope the entry you read back then for homosexual was less judgmental than the one I read as a kid. Mine said being homosexual was about the worst thing in the world, or words to that effect.

I think it was actually accurate and not simply defamatory. But 60+ years ago and I’m a bit bit vague

I had a similar experience as you. Yet as Johnny says immediately below me, the reading I did secretively in the stacks at our public library did not make me feel confident. In fact, I felt there was something wrong with me. I understood it was who I was, but it was a long time till I could find pride in that.

I was a child of the 60’s, born in 1950. It didn’t take a lot for me to ask questions and make my own decisions about it. It was the age.

JFC I can see right wing children’s television.

Q is for Truth! Z is good because our Russian friends use it when de-nazifying. We like Z.

Businesses and Universities around the country will start rejecting applicants from Florida. Having a diploma that you graduated from the Florida school system will automatically get your resume put into the circular file and it should.

Oh, DeSantis apparently made it easier for students worried about antisemitism to transfer to Florida schools.

Guess they have the room because nobody wants to get their degrees in Florida that can help it.

Welcome to Government of the Absurd where spelling doesn’t count. 🙃

“Where everything is made up and the points don’t matter.” Florida is turning into Whose Line Is It Anyway, but a whole hell of a lot less funny.

Banning dictionaries = banning knowledge

Well they’re also banning science and history books, so why not dictionaries? I’m sure Prager U* can produce some word-books with definitions the fascists will like.

*No idea what the U stands for. Unacceptable? Useless?

15 Red States Say F*ck You To Hungry Poor Children

What more can I say.  The republican dream, force poor women to carry every conception to full term / birth, but once born they ignore those same babies in poor families.  They wipe their hands of them, ignoring their needs.  They don’t want to give them medical care, food, schooling, and other “luxuries” but they do want to force them to be Christian.  They do believe in spending money to force schools to display Christian religious texts.  Yet they are desperate to remove any media supportive of anything not cis straight 1950s socially accepted, and to deny necessary, possibly lifesaving medical treatment for kids who have gender identity issues. Hugs.  Scottie


The Washington Post reports:

Moving beyond efforts to block expansion of health care for the poor and disabled, Republican governors in 15 states are now rejecting a new, federally funded summer program to give food assistance to hungry children. The program is expected to serve 21 million youngsters starting around June, providing $2.5 billion in relief across the country. The governors have given varying reasons for refusing to take part.

Iowa Gov. Kim Reynolds (R) said she saw no need to add money to a program that helps food-insecure youths “when childhood obesity has become an epidemic.” Nebraska Gov. Jim Pillen (R) said bluntly, “I don’t believe in welfare.” Other states declining to participate are Alabama, Alaska, Florida, Georgia, Idaho, Louisiana, Mississippi, South Carolina, South Dakota, Texas, Vermont and Wyoming.

Read the full article. 

 

 

Pro-life now includes starving the children.

Republicans have repeatedly shown voters their true colors, and yet those voters keep backing them. It boggles the mind. Especially when those same Republicans quote things like what’s attributed to their religion. Except they forget their Jesus preached about helping those in need. Because f*ck those people, right?

Jesus preached about helping those in need

Not White Republican Jesus.

Thumbnail
 
 

“Suffer the little greenbacks to come unto me.”

Morally bankrupt Republicans are just setting up the deplorable conditions so their inbred wealthy donors have a cheap form of entertainment watching us all suffer.

I’ll bet Nebraska Gov. Jim Pillen (R) believes in Federal farm welfare.

You are correct! According to this website, PIllen Farms took out almost $1.4Million in PPP loans. It’s unknown if they were forgiven or not.

How many of those affected parents will still vote red to make the libtards cry?

How many of those affected parents won’t vote?

A bunch as they are poor and have a differentially hard burden with travel, documents, staying registered and access to polls.

Iowa Gov. Kim Reynolds (R) said she saw no need to add money to a program that helps food-insecure youths “when childhood obesity has become an epidemic.”

 

It cost $2 million and you have a 1.8 billion surplus you ghoul.

Iowa Gov. Kim Reynolds (R) said she saw no need to add money to a program that helps food-insecure youths “when childhood obesity has become an epidemic.”

it makes perfect sense when you understand that kids that don’t have enough to eat are fat.

I’ve said it before and I’ll say it again: There’s something in Conservative/Republican philosophy that viscerally hates children and young people.
They’re psychopathic in their determination to make life worse for young people.

Other people’s children, that is.

If their own kids were LBGT, they’d throw their own kids out of the house too

It happens

Making sure all fetuses are born ensure their supply of torture entertainment.

These Governors are all good Christians – at least they’ll be proud to tell you so.

They’re the pro-forced birth party. Precious gifts until they’re born, then the little leeches are just a drain on the system. Why don’t they go out and get jobs?

The party of “I got mine, fuck everyone else.”

How dare poor hungry kids think they deserve money that could be better used by the mega wealthy with more tax cuts.

Those private planes don’t buy themselves.

Todays GOP- Cruelty really is the point.

If they could figure out a way to personally profit from the program, they’d be in favor of it.

 

Let’s talk about Hunter Biden surprising the GOP and winning….

Tennessee Bill Would Ban Pride Flags In Public Schools

He is trying hard not to say the quiet part out loud.   He really just wants a white Christian straight cis male run society.  He is struggling with the changes in society that the majority of the people accept and wants to force his minority view on everyone by making it the law.  He wants his small minority to rule the majority.  He wants to roll back rights and equality.  It is flat out bigotry, the same bigotry that led to slavery, Jim Crow laws, anti-miscegenation laws, and laws forcing a religion on other people’s children in hopes it will install in them the same hates against the LGBTQIA that they have.  These laws are about stopping children learning tolerance and acceptance of people who are different, of people who are LGBTQIA.   It is a way to let bullying go unchallenged and leaving the targeted LGBTQIA with no support or defenders.  As it has been mentioned repeatedly, no color flag or book or movie ever turned anyone gay or trans.  It is a shame that these people have managed to get into positions of power and think they have the rights to rule others lives, that they have the right to dictate how others must think or live.  I wonder if the Christian flag will be one of the exemptions?   Hugs.  Scottie


January 8, 2024

Nashville’s ABC affiliate reports:

Republican State Rep. Gino Bulso (R-Brentwood) has filed a bill to ban all flags in schools that aren’t the official Tennessee or United States flag. Bulso said he drafted the bill after hearing concerns from constituents about pride flags being displayed in schools.

Bulso said the country used to have a “very strong consensus” on what the nation’s values are, and these are the values he believes most parents taught in schools.

“Certainly, you know, 50 years ago we had a consensus on what marriage is; we don’t have that anymore. One-hundred years ago, we had a consensus on sexual morality; I don’t think we have that anymore. So the values that I think most parents want their children exposed to are the ones that were in existence at the time that our country was founded,” he said.

Read the full article.

The epitome of homophobia, transphobia is legislators working on tax payer dollars to pass a law to eliminate rainbow flags 🌈 in public schools when it isn’t a problem to begin with!!!! We are citizens too!

I think most parents want their children exposed to are the ones that were in existence at the time that our country was founded

Like enslaving people?

Like selling people?

Like denying Blacks and women the right to vote?

Ahh, yes. The good times.

Colors.

We are talking about colors.

Think about that. Not rape. Not guns. Not murder. Not abortions. Just colors.

So, this wouldn’t count either…

Thumbnail
 

And what those colors stand for are equal rights. Apparently we no longer have a consensus for equal rights.

Remember, flags don’t make people gay!
Conservatives is so stoopid!

Betcha he doesn’t want to ban the Confederate Flag.

Or the Gadsden flag. Or the Nazi flag. Or the “Christian” flag.

I lived in that world he yearns for and it was a shit show for everyone but straight white men.

And he’s a straight (or at least able to pass for straight — you can’t always tell, you know) white man.

What does your argument have to do with flying a rainbow flag??? I know you are all about discrimination…but this is a different era from when you grew up grandpa. You were the bully in school who used to beat up gay students, all the time you were secretly closeted. We know you.

Few things in life are “simple.” Easy to understand.

But here’s one of the simple, easy to understand things:

“If, in 2024, it’s Republican, it’s evil.”

Sing it with me:

Democrats HELP

Republicans HARM

Ross, you coined it.

And boy oh boy… did ya hit the jackpot with that one.

The nation used to have a very strong consensus on limiting roles for “decent” women, so fuck that noise.

He’s aware it isn’t the 1700’s, right?

More like the 1600s. No Enlightenment and lots of “witch” killings.

the country used to have a “very strong consensus” on what the nation’s values are,

Values such as EQUALITY for ALL!!!

Certainly, you know, 50 years ago we had a consensus on what marriage is; we don’t have that anymore. One-hundred years ago, we had a consensus on sexual morality; I don’t think we have that anymore.

 

I’m sure he laments that 175 years ago we could keep n*****s as slaves.

50 plus years ago a marriage could only be of the same race

> 50 years ago we had a consensus on what marriage is

Back 50 years ago you had adultery, infidelity, and **SHOCK!** same-sex relationships! You know, “Uncle Henry and his roommate Jack.”

Saint Ronnie and his first wife got divorced 74 years ago.

“So the values that I think most parents want their children exposed to are the ones that were in existence at the time that our country was founded.”
Including slavery, women as their husbands’ property, and Native American genocide.

so, no Christian Flag?

” the official Tennessee or United States flag”

Thumbnail

But I’d bet the “Christian” flag would still be allowed. Probably flown along with the U.S. and Tennessee flags.

Thumbnail

The values when the country was founded? No divorce for anyone without a great deal of trouble, Black people were slaves but counted as 3/5 of a person, and women couldn’t vote.

But I guess he’s not referring to the value of strict separation of church and state.

Dickhead Bulso said he drafted the bill after hearing concerns from constituents about pride flags being displayed in schools.

Also, Dickhead Bulso disregarded the views of constituents who were in favor of pride flags being displayed in schools.

So when a natural rainbow appears above a school, are teachers supposed to shoot at it with their AR-15s or what?

 

Epstein’s List!! | Christopher Titus | Titus Podcast

Once Public Schools are Largely Dead, Here’s What Happens Next…

https://hartmannreport.com/p/once-public-schools-are-largely-dead-ec4

Please notice the three factors that drive republicans, racism, money, religion.  In that order.  Hugs.  Scottie


Republicans will then begin lobbying to “reduce spending” by cutting the amount allocated for the vouchers, locking the emerging two-tier status of publicly funded education into place…

DeSantis: Kids Used To Bring Rifles To School In The 1950s And Therefore We Didn’t Have Mass Shootings

This is nuts!  What a pandering liar.  No one who ever went to a public school thinks that kids walked the halls and sat in classes armed.  What crazy hillbilly fever dream is this.  Think of the hormones of kids raging, fights happening all the time, now add guns.  Oh yes it would be like it is today with angry upset kids having too much access to guns.   Hugs.  Scottie

New rule designed to protect LGBTQ foster children draws GOP opposition 

This is pure Christian bigotry.   They don’t want to be forbidden to harass LGBTQIA homeless kids, tell them they are broken and wrong so they need Christian fixings.  It is all about being able to forbid trans kids to transition even socially, and to send gay and trans kids to conversion therapy.   Ask yourself why it is so important to them to disrespect LGBTQIA kids?  And the fact is, this rule does not keep religious people out of the foster system.  What it does is prevent LGBTQIA children from being placed in homes where they would face abuse due to their being gay or trans.  But it prevents Christian bigots from being able to harass and harm gay and trans kids.  Again that is what the republicans are fighting for, the right to force gay and trans kids to live as straight cis kids while trying to force them to join Jesus.     Hugs.   Scottie

A bill filed in the House and Senate in November by Rep. Mike Kelly (R-Pa.) and Sen. Tim Scott (R-S.C.), a former GOP presidential candidate, would prevent government agencies from penalizing child welfare service providers that are unwilling to “take action contrary to their sincerely held religious beliefs,” including affirming a child’s gender identity or sexual orientation. The duo introduced identical legislation in 2019 and 2021.

Nonreligious service providers, meanwhile, have largely argued that the draft rule is needed to protect LGBTQ young people already vulnerable to abuse.


BY BROOKE MIGDON – 01/03/24 2:14 PM ET

A new rule requiring child welfare agencies to place LGBTQ children in “environments free of hostility, mistreatment, or abuse” based on the child’s sexual orientation, gender identity or expression is drawing opposition from Republicans.

The proposed rule, issued in September by the Department of Health and Human Services (HHS), also would require caregivers to undergo cultural competency training to ensure LGBTQ youths are placed in homes where their identities are affirmed.

In a statement, Health Department Secretary Xavier Becerra said the proposal puts “children’s well-being first.”

Studies have shown that LGBTQ young people are overrepresented in the child welfare system. Lesbian, gay and bisexual children are more than twice as likely to experience foster care placement compared with their heterosexual peers, a 2019 study found, and roughly 30 percent of foster youth identify as LGBTQ, according to the Children’s Bureau, the federal agency responsible for overseeing the child welfare system in the U.S.

About 5 percent of foster youth identify as transgender.

But the rule has met some opposition in the GOP. 

A bill introduced last month by Rep. Jim Banks (R-Ind.), who is currently running for an open Senate seat, would prevent foster and adoptive families from being required to affirm a transgender child’s gender identity. The measure, called the Sensible Adoption For Every Home Act, has four Republican co-sponsors.

Banks in a statement to Fox News said the bill was drafted in response to the HHS proposal, which he said discriminates against prospective caretakers that are “opposed to irreversible sex change procedures on kids.”

LGBTQ rights advocates have denounced the Indiana congressman’s bill and his justification for introducing it, which they say reflects misconceptions about gender-affirming health care for youth and misrepresents what the Health Department’s draft rule aims to achieve.

“No part of this says anything about changing the sex of a child,” said Allen Morris, policy director at the National LGBTQ Task Force. “It’s talking about making sure that [LGBTQ youths] are not in an abusive home or somewhere that’s going to mistreat them.”

Other Republicans have argued that the proposed rule would discriminate against faith-based providers.

A bill filed in the House and Senate in November by Rep. Mike Kelly (R-Pa.) and Sen. Tim Scott (R-S.C.), a former GOP presidential candidate, would prevent government agencies from penalizing child welfare service providers that are unwilling to “take action contrary to their sincerely held religious beliefs,” including affirming a child’s gender identity or sexual orientation. The duo introduced identical legislation in 2019 and 2021.

Sen. Marco Rubio (R-Fla.), one of the bill’s 17 Republican co-sponsors in the Senate, wrote in a December editorial that the measure would effectively overrule the Biden administration’s “new woke standards.” Rubio’s Lifting Local Communities Act, introduced last January, would similarly bolster the ability of religious organizations that receive federal funding to operate in accordance with their religious beliefs.

In a Dec. 8 letter to Becerra, however, 19 Democratic senators voiced their support for the Health Department’s proposed rule, writing that its stipulations are needed “to protect children in the foster care system more than ever.”

“As members of Congress we are committed to ensuring all children, including LGBTQIA+ children, thrive in safe and stable environments,” the senators, led by Sen. Ron Wyden (D-Ore.), wrote in the letter.

Compared with their cisgender and heterosexual peers, LGBTQ children and adolescents in the child welfare system are more likely to report poor treatment related to their sexual orientation or gender identity. In a 2014 study of LGBTQ foster youths in Los Angeles, nearly 38 percent reported poor treatment connected to their sexual orientation, gender identity or gender expression.

Twenty-eight states and Washington, D.C., have explicit laws or policies in place to protect LGBTQ youths in foster care from discrimination based on sexual orientation and gender identity, and another six have laws prohibiting discrimination based on sexual orientation only, according to the Movement Advancement Project, a nonprofit organization that tracks LGBTQ laws.

In 13 states, state-licensed child welfare agencies may legally refuse to place and provide services to children and families — including LGBTQ people and same-sex couples — if doing so conflicts with their religious beliefs. 

Republicans at the state level have also sought to push back on the rule.

In a November letter to the Children’s Bureau, more than a dozen Republican state attorneys general said the Health Department’s proposal discriminates against Christian caretakers and provides solutions to a problem that does not exist.

The letter, led by Alabama Attorney General Steve Marshall (R), references a 2021 Supreme Court ruling that sided with a Philadelphia Catholic social services agency that had refused to accept same-sex couples as foster parents.

“This proposed rule seeks to accomplish indirectly what the Supreme Court found unconstitutional just two years ago: remove faith-based providers from the foster care system if they will not conform their religious beliefs on sexual orientation and gender identity,” the attorneys general wrote in the Nov. 27 letter.

A Health Department spokesperson declined to comment on the letter but said members of the public are encouraged to express their views on the draft rule. A 30-day public comment period ended Nov. 27.

Responses to the proposed rule from Christian organizations have been mixed, although most submitted to the Health Department center around concerns that the rule, if implemented, would discriminate against faith-based providers and hinder the recruitment and retention of foster families, many of whom are religious.

“Among the most concerning — and most likely — negative impacts of the proposed regulations would be a significant chilling effect on the involvement of people of religious faith in the foster system,” one group wrote in a Nov. 20 letter to Becerra. “This rule would push many of them away.”

Nonreligious service providers, meanwhile, have largely argued that the draft rule is needed to protect LGBTQ young people already vulnerable to abuse.

“With all of the pain, rejection, broken promises and separation that many youth in foster care experience, a targeted and specific plan for LGBTQI+ youth’s health and wellbeing through safe and appropriate placements can ensure youth are acknowledged and affirmed when they express their needs,” wrote a coordinator for a Cleveland-based nonprofit that works with foster youth.

“Then, when this plan is followed through, youth will actually experience their needs being met, their voices mattering and a caring network of individuals,” they wrote. “This is vital for all youth, but especially youth who identify LGBTQI+ because we know that so often this is not the case.”

But some nonreligious and Democratic organizations have been critical of the proposal, which they say does not go far enough because it still allows for individuals who do not support LGBTQ identities to become foster parents.

Multiple groups in comments submitted to the Health Department referenced a 2021 survey of young people who concealed their LGBTQ identities prior to placement over fears of “how their social worker may react” and “concerns about losing their placement.”

“The flexibility allowed within the rule presumes that those who are LGBTQI+ and not yet out would be served well when placed with any family — including those who opt out of being ‘safe and appropriate,’” the executive director of one children’s rights organization wrote. “However, not requiring that every provider be a safe and appropriate placement for LGBTQI+ children will mean that LGBTQI+ youth are placed in inadequate placements.”

Banks and other Republicans are also seeking to reinstate a ban on transgender military members. Earlier this year Banks founded the House Anti-Woke Caucus.

 

Thumbnail
 
Other Republicans have argued that the proposed rule would discriminate against faith-based providers.

 

Thank God it would!!

What they are really complaining about is it would take away over 30% of their government grift.

LGBTQ kids shouldn’t be within a hundred yards of a faith based foster service.

They read

“environments free of hostility, mistreatment, or abuse”

and immediately thought “that means us christians!!”

How very, very telling that their hate is more important to them than helping kids who need a family.

Similar to this:

Many LGBT youth end up in foster case because their “parents” etc. reject them.
The notion they should be set up for more abuse or worse cuz religious freedom is straight up bullshit.

The Pro-Child Party*

* – “Child” only applies to white, male, straight, cis-gendered, christian, children.

. . . raised in the families of their birth. The GOP aren’t fans of supporting foster children. They complained about automatically extending benefits to high school graduation, and a six month transition. They didn’t like opening up public colleges to them.

Pro-Child like Pro-Life. Only in their terms, and only at times it can be used to oppress others.

And pro parental rights. Parents have an absolute and inviolate right to do what they deem best for their children… but only insofar as that furthers the white supremacist Talibangelical agenda.

They’re so pro-life that in cases of unviable pregnancies they want mothers to die in childbirth. I dunno ’bout you guys, but if I had a wife, a sister, or a niece, I’d want the doctors to do everything they could to save her life.

They’re so pro-life that in cases of unadopted kids who are no longer babies, they call them “unadoptable” (read: unlovable).

They’re so pro-life that they rip immigrant families apart and but babies, children, and adults in cages in squalid conditions. And then don’t even both to keep track of who is who and where they’ve been placed.

“Other Republicans have argued that the proposed rule would discriminate against faith-based providers.”

This is why I hate the combination of Citizens United, Hobby Lobby, and Catholic Charities v. Philadelphia. Faith-based organizations are not persons, have no right to freedom of religion, and have no standing in child placement. The only basis for child placement decisions in PA state law, and the only basis for child placement decisions in practice should be the welfare of the child. Not the parents, not the state, and not the fucking private provider.

Death cults probably shouldn’t be a part of a kid’s mental development, just sayin’

I’m not surprised. In their eyes LBGTs merely “chose” to be LBGT, and all they need is good straight parenting to “fix” them

And we all know how well that works out

“Train up*” a child…

*That means beat the Jesus into them.

For some right-wing Christians, it certainly does–uncritical obedience, too.

 

Biden Admin. Tells On Itself With Disturbing Admission About Israel

This video was recorded weeks ago.   Yet at this point Israel had destroyed 98,000 buildings, and most if not all would have had people in them or near them.  At this time the Palestinian death toll is over 20,000 and 1/3 of them are children.   Hugs.  Scottie

Ari Tolany, research consultant for Women for Weapons Trade Transparency, to discuss her recent piece that she co-authored in In These Times entitled “How Israel Got an Endless Supply of U.S.-Made Smart Bombs.”

Tolany walks Sam through the particular proliferation of Precision Guided Missiles in these overseas stockpiles, and the contradictory nature of why these missiles are manufactured (reducing collateral damage) and how they have been used by US allies – namely Saudi Arabia and Israel – before wrapping up with a brief conversation on the importance of international investigation in actually holding the US accountable for their bombs.