It is one thing for a person who commits a crime to be off the ballot, like starting an insurrection against the US. But this is the real weaponizing of the laws to harm political opponents. What are these republicans scared of? They can not fight idea to idea. They can not promote their own ideas because they unpopular, the people don’t want what the republicans are pushing. So republicans resort to dirty tricks. Even the governor said, let her on the ballot. Hugs. Scottie
Vanessa Joy was booted off the ballot because she did not include her deadname on official documents.
The county elections board that disqualified a transgender candidate for Ohio state office because she did not include her deadname on petitions circulated to potential voters is refusing to reverse its decision, even after pressure from the state’s governor and other trans candidates being to run for office without disclosing their deadnames in Ohio.
Despite collecting enough signatures to run as a Democrat for Ohio’s firmly Republican House District 50, real estate photographer Vanessa Joy learned earlier this month that she had been disqualified from the race by the Stark County Board of Elections due to an obscure state law requiring candidates to disclose any name changes that have taken place within the last five years.
People who get married don’t have to disclose their previous names to run for office in Ohio, but apparently trans people do.
Notably, the 1995 law was not mentioned in the Ohio secretary of state’s 2024 candidate guide and has not been included in previous candidate guides in recent years. Nor did the candidacy petition form Joy filled out include any mention of the law or space to list any name changes.
Joy requested a reconsideration of the decision, according to a January 19 statement from the Stark County Board of Elections. The board denied her request, citing an Ohio Supreme Court case that found that the law is “unambiguous,” that the “intent behind the candidate’s use of a different name is not relevant,” and that it could not “add an exception that does not appear in the statutory language.”
“The Stark County Board of Elections is sympathetic to Vanessa Joy’s argument that the campaign election guide put out by the Ohio Secretary of State was not specific enough,” the statement read.
The board added that its “decision must be based on the law and cannot be arbitrarily applied.” However, Joy was one of four transgender candidates running for Ohio office this year. Two others, Bobbie Arnold and Arienne Childrey, had their candidacies for Ohio state House seats challenged under the law. Both have since been cleared to have their names appear on the November ballot. Still, according to the Associated Press, both Arnold and Childrey could technically be removed from office if Joy does not succeed in challenging the law.
A fourth trans candidate, Ari Faber, has not had his candidacy for Ohio’s state Senate challenged. Faber has not legally changed his name and is running with his birth name on the ballot, NBC News reports.
While Joy told the AP that, for now, her campaign is over, she is working with an attorney to get the law changed. “I’m out of the race, but I’m not out of the fight,” she said.
Last week, Ohio Gov. Mike DeWine (R) said that trans candidates should not be disqualified for not listing their deadnames and argued for changes to ensure that future candidates will be aware of the little-known law.
According to the AP, Ohio’s Republican Secretary of State Frank LaRose said that his team will include the law in future candidate guides but opposed changing the law itself.
I am an older gay guy in a long-term wonderful relationship. My spouse and I are in our 36th year together. I love politics and news. I enjoy civil discussions and have no taboo subjects. My pronouns are he / him / his and my email is Scottiestoybox@gmail.com
View all posts by Scotties Playtime
2 thoughts on “Ohio elections board refuses to allow trans woman to run for office because of old law”
When I read about this a couple of weeks ago, it said she was going to re-file to run with new docs, including all her names. It isn’t fair, but so many things aren’t fair for women, who do have to list all their names for so many state functions in most states (the reason being so that a full background check can be run.) I did read then that while OH law requires all legal names known when filing to run, the candidate forms guidelines did not state that, as noted above, so this was considered a simple omission.
Hi Ali. I noticed in the article, they admitted they let others go with through without enforcing the regulations. They did on her. I wonder why?
But more importantly, I had to get a red passport in the Army. My job required the ability to travel to other countries that were US allies with no checks and on a sudden notice. I had to list every abbreviation of my name ever used, including nicknames I used since childhood. Seriously, this FBI check was the most stringent I had ever been through. My White House checks were not so detailed.
The point of this Ali, is do they ask every person to list every way they have been addressed. Such as does Edward have to list Ed and maybe Ted, or like Cruz Rafael? Does a Michael have to list Mike along with other nicknames? I go by Scottie, I like it a lot. I was not named Scottie by the adoptive parents. My birth name on my birth certificate was Scott plus, a name I was forbidden to even learn how to spell or ever use until I left their home. But they never called me Scott. What they called me upsets me, so I won’t repeat it here. But I choose to go by Scottie. I wish it was my official name, often some medical providers will use it, others refuse, which upsets me.
So really my point is unless they force everyone to list on that signature partition every name, nickname, side name, legal name, then they are simply leaving this to interpretation to allow bigotry. Hugs. Scottie
Vanessa JoyPhoto: Screenshot / News 5 Cleveland
Scottie's Playtime 
When I read about this a couple of weeks ago, it said she was going to re-file to run with new docs, including all her names. It isn’t fair, but so many things aren’t fair for women, who do have to list all their names for so many state functions in most states (the reason being so that a full background check can be run.) I did read then that while OH law requires all legal names known when filing to run, the candidate forms guidelines did not state that, as noted above, so this was considered a simple omission.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Hi Ali. I noticed in the article, they admitted they let others go with through without enforcing the regulations. They did on her. I wonder why?
But more importantly, I had to get a red passport in the Army. My job required the ability to travel to other countries that were US allies with no checks and on a sudden notice. I had to list every abbreviation of my name ever used, including nicknames I used since childhood. Seriously, this FBI check was the most stringent I had ever been through. My White House checks were not so detailed.
The point of this Ali, is do they ask every person to list every way they have been addressed. Such as does Edward have to list Ed and maybe Ted, or like Cruz Rafael? Does a Michael have to list Mike along with other nicknames? I go by Scottie, I like it a lot. I was not named Scottie by the adoptive parents. My birth name on my birth certificate was Scott plus, a name I was forbidden to even learn how to spell or ever use until I left their home. But they never called me Scott. What they called me upsets me, so I won’t repeat it here. But I choose to go by Scottie. I wish it was my official name, often some medical providers will use it, others refuse, which upsets me.
So really my point is unless they force everyone to list on that signature partition every name, nickname, side name, legal name, then they are simply leaving this to interpretation to allow bigotry. Hugs. Scottie
LikeLiked by 1 person