Oklahoma Bill Would Make Viewing Porn A Felony

You will live by the doctrines of state Sen. Dusty Deevers (R-Elgin) church.  It matters not if you like seeing nude humans, or if you enjoy touching yourself and having sex with others, it doesn’t even matter what religion you may or many not have, you will like a strict all ideas of sex is bad because state Sen. Dusty Deevers (R-Elgin) does.   You know, because republicans are not public servants but they are your rulers.   The moral police have spoken, the Christian Taliban will be around soon to check your computer.  Hugs.  Scottie


January 23, 2024 ChristianistsExtremists

The New York Post reports:

An Oklahoma state senator has proposed a law that would make watching pornography a felony and ban sexting among people who are not married. The bill, set to be introduced next month by state Sen. Dusty Deevers (R-Elgin), would prohibit consuming or producing sexual content that “lacks serious literary, artistic, educational, political, or scientific purposes or value” in any medium.

The measure defines “obscene material” as the depiction or description of any “acts of sexual intercourse,” including those that are “normal or perverted, actual or simulated.” Content depicting sodomy and masturbation would also be off the table, in addition to videos, movies, video games and text messages that involve “sadomasochistic abuse” and “acts of excretion in a sexual context.”

The Mary Sue reports:

Under the bill, Oklahoma would ban the distribution of virtually any material that displays explicit sexual content if it lacks “serious literary, artistic, educational, political, or scientific purposes or value.” Additionally, Oklahoma would empower any citizen to open a lawsuit against an individual who “produces or distributes unlawful pornography” and/or “knowingly engages in conduct that aids or abets the production or distribution of unlawful pornography.”

A Twitter user could face significant legal risk just for retweeting adult material on Twitter. The Oklahoma state government could allege that Twitter knowingly allowed the distribution of “unlawful pornography” on the site. And theoretically, Oklahoma citizens could try to take Twitter to court in a civil suit, seeking damages. While it’s unlikely that Twitter would outright pull out of Oklahoma, the site could take multiple steps to try to find itself in the state’s good graces.

Deevers, of course, is a Baptist pastor who won a special election last month to represent some hillbilly rural district where the largest town has a population of 2100.

Per the Oklahoman newspaper, Deevers’ campaign was centered around Christian nationalism, banning COVID vaccines, banning abortion, and banning divorce.

Last year he ran a failed campaign for vice president of the Southern Baptist Convention, getting 20% of the vote.

As you can see below, his bill has the enthusiastic support of Ella Maulding, who is an ardent fan of self-proclaimed Nazi Nick Fuentes and who runs social media for the Nazi-adjacent Texas Republican group, Defend Texas Liberty.

 

 

 

Sounds like SOMEONE has a personal computer filled with terabytes of hardcore porn from the deepest, darkest corners of the internet.

Thumbnail
 

In a normal court, I’d be like “Yeah, that won’t pass constitutional muster.” but this court has lost its fucking mind.

I am convinced that rural Christians consume more porn than average Americans.

The statistics from online porn sites say exactly that.

Statistics show that the more fundy and christian an area is, the more porn they watch. So no, this isn’t going anywhere, his fellow legislators love their porn – for many of them, their real life is so restricted that porn is their only healthy outlet.

Iran. Sharia law.

 

4 thoughts on “Oklahoma Bill Would Make Viewing Porn A Felony

    1. Hi Michael. What a world these people must live in? I can not imagine wanting to rule the private lives of others, yet these people demand and even crave it. Why be so scared of a nude body and any form of sex? Hugs. Scottie

      Like

  1. They always think(?) that these laws would never be meant to apply to themselves, so it always comes as a surprise when someone claims that part of their o holy book is put up to be banned. This is because they have only used it to attack other people who may not be following it the way they want them to, It should be required that they be made to read it first so they will be shocked by what it contains.

    Liked by 2 people

    1. Hi Muttpupdad. Yes! They always feel they are above the laws and they have been forgiven any sins, that same forgiveness they deny to anyone else. So the laws apply to you but not to me is their attitude. I can not imagine thinking so much of my self as to want the control over other people’s consensual adult sexual activities. By my dogs that love gravy, that is pure arrogance to think the only proper pleasure is the one you approve of. Hugs. Scottie

      Like

Leave a comment

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.