The peddlers of misinformation are high on their own supply Read on Substack
(Thanks to BruceDesertRat who comments here, for linking this really useful Substack!)
Well, I was going to post about proposals for bank deregulation, but I think that can wait for a bit. The news of the moment is the looming prospect that the federal government will shut down over the weekend.
Weāll have to see how much damage this does, but itās already clear that assuming the worst happens ā and itās hard to see how it wonāt ā this will be the dumbest shutdown ever. Iād say that the incoming Musk administration (so far Musk, not Trump, appears to be calling the shots) is trying to hold itself up for ransom, but it doesnāt even rise to that level. This isnāt like 1995, when Newt Gingrich shut down the government in an attempt to extract cuts in Medicare and Medicaid ā a move that seemed (and was) a foolish act of petulance, but at least had a ghost of motivation.
No, Musk is demanding ā apparently successfully ā that Republicans in Congress renege on a deal they had already agreed to, a continuing resolution that would keep the federal government going for the next few months. Why? Because, Musk says, of the outrageous provisions in that CR.
Except none of the items Musk is complaining about are actually in the bill. No, Congress isnāt giving itself a 40 percent raise. No, the bill doesnāt fund a $3 billion stadium in Washington. No, it doesnāt block future investigations into the Jan. 6 committee. No, it doesnāt fund bioweapons labs.
I have an embarrassing admission to make. I thought that Muskaswamyās obvious problems with getting DOGE going would have inspired, not humility ā never that ā but at least a bit of caution. That is, I imagined that Musk would by now have at least an inkling of two things.
First, finding big-ticket examples of government waste is hard, because the government mostly spends money on things people want. Hereās a nice chart from the Center on Budget and Policy Priorities, showing where the money goes:

Yes, the federal government is an insurance company with an army.
Second, you shouldnāt trust claims about the budget coming from Some Guy on the Internet. You might have imagined that the worldās richest man could have a couple of fact-checkers on retainer to help ensure that he isnāt making clearly stupid assertions. But nooo.
In a barrage of posts on X Musk pushed misinformation about a more or less routine, place-holding bill that was basically a way to keep the ship of state afloat until Trump takes charge. Maybe this was in part a power play, an attempt to make Republicans in Congress show fealty to a man who clearly imagines that heās the real president ā and Trump, by meekly endorsing Muskās position, did in fact convey the impression that Musk is leading the guy who is supposed to be in charge by the nose. But this political theater will have real consequences, for America, for Trump, and for Musk himself.
Musk has asserted that shutting the government down for a month would do no harm. And itās true that Social Security, Medicare and Medicaid funding ā which is where the bulk of the money goes ā will continue. But many services people rely on will be disrupted, especially if the shutdown goes on for more than a month, which seems all too likely given Republicansā razor-thin House majority and the dominance of misinformation in many membersā thinking.
Maybe Musk himself doesnāt expect to experience any hardship, but put it this way: Iām glad that I wonāt need to renew my passport any time soon, that I donāt expect to be trying to get through airport security for a while, and especially glad that I donāt rely either on food stamps or on small business loans. For all of these things have been disrupted in past government shutdowns.
Do Musk and Trump know any of this? Almost surely not.
Beyond the specifics, my guess is that antics like the potential shutdown will do much more damage to the Musk/Trump administration than they realize. (Thereās also this other guy ā JV Dance or something? ā but he clearly doesnāt matter.)
First, since the election financial markets have clearly been betting that Trump will do very little of what he promised during the campaign ā that we wonāt really have a trade war, just some minor trade skirmishes, that weāll have symbolic deportations rather than a mass roundup of immigrants, and so on. Markets have, in effect, discounted the disastrous consequences that would follow if Trump honored his own promises.
But a government shutdown in response to completely false claims about whatās in an innocuous short-term funding measure suggests that the peddlers of misinformation are high on their own supply. Trump may really believe that foreigners will pay tariffs, that U.S. trade deficits subsidize the rest of the world, that thereās a reserve army of American workers available to fill the gaps deportation would create. I donāt want to put too much weight on the latest market fluctuations, but it is starting to look as if investors are questioning their own complacency.
Second, many, probably most people who voted for Trump believed that he really is the character he played on The Apprentice ā a highly competent manager. The other day I said that Trump was elected by low-information voters; this wasnāt a slur on Americansā intelligence, it was a reference to survey results showing that Trumpās edge depended entirely on support from voters who donāt pay much attention to politics:

How will these voters react if, as seems all too likely, the second Trump administration is instead marked by rolling chaos?
Anyway, itās pretty remarkable. Inauguration Day is still a month away, yet the chaos monkeys have already taken over. (snip)