How the Nazi Regime’s Pink Triangle Symbol Was Repurposed for LGBTQ Pride

https://time.com/5295476/gay-pride-pink-triangle-history/

Is history repeating itself?  Are the Nazi fascist rising again, using their favorite targets again?    You know the gays, the non-whites, the Jewish people.   Look what is it the fundamentalist Christian nationalist racist bigots want so badly? To return to a time when the white people were given automatic privilege and superiority in the country.   A time socially where white men were automatically assumed to be in charge and women were subservient as well as dependent on men.   When society catered to the white cis heterosexual people with no mention in public of those others.   All they are doing with these ban laws is to return to those days by banning all advancement in society, in our culture.    Here is the most important paragraph in the article, I think.   Hugs

According to the United States Holocaust Memorial Museum (USHMM), that changed when the Nazis came into power in the 1930s. Hitler saw gay men as a threat to his campaign to purify Germany, especially because their partnerships could not bear children who would grow the Aryan race he wanted to cultivate. During that period, gay-friendly bars and clubs started being shut down, authorities burned the books at a major research institution devoted to the study of sexuality, and gay fraternal organizations were shuttered. These efforts only increased after the Night of the Long Knives, the 1934 purge of Nazi leaders who were accused of trying to overthrow Hitler; they included Storm Troopers leader Ernst Röhm, whom the SS murdered, later citing his homosexuality as justification for his murder. A Nazi revision of the 1871 law took effect in September of 1935, outlawing anything as simple as men looking at or touching one another in a sexually suggestive way, and enabled authorities to arrest people even if they had only heard rumors that people had been engaging in such behavior. (Lesbians, however, didn’t face the same criminal penalties.) The Gestapo began to keep “pink lists” of violators.

 

Prisoners wearing pink triangles on their uniforms are marched outdoors by Nazi guards at the Sachsenhausen concentration camp in Germany on Dec. 19, 1938. (CORBIS/Corbis—Getty Images)

Prisoners wearing pink triangles on their uniforms are marched outdoors by Nazi guards at the Sachsenhausen concentration camp in Germany on Dec. 19, 1938. 
CORBIS/Corbis—Getty Images
 
 

With LGBTQ Pride Month beginning June 1 — a month chosen to honor the history of activism epitomized by the Stonewall Riots of June 1969 — celebrants around the world will be getting ready for parades and other tributes. Symbols such as the rainbow flag and the pink triangle will abound; for example, Nike has announced a new line of LGBTQ history-themed sneakers, including two that boast pink triangles.

The brightly colored symbol is now often worn proudly, but it was born from a dark period in LGBTQ history and world history.

 

Just as the Nazis forced Jewish people to wear a yellow Star of David, they forced people they labeled as gay to wear inverted pink triangles (or ‘die Rosa-Winkel’). Those thus branded were treated as “the lowest of the low in the camp hierarchy,” as one scholar put it.

The roots of the Nazi persecution of gay people are deep. Since German unification in 1871, a section of the country’s criminal law widely known as “paragraph 175” had said that men who engaged in acts of “unnatural indecency” could go to jail. In 1877, the German Supreme Court of Justice clarified that to mean evidence of an “intercourse-like act.” But the law was only enforced sporadically. And the fact that it was almost impossible to convict anyone unless he confessed to such a crime in court meant that police just kept a watchful eye on gay bars and events, and Germany ended up becoming home to a vibrant gay community. Historian Robert Beachy argues that, ironically, the law spurred scientific interest in the study of sexual preferences, and that research tended to encourage a more scientific understanding of human sexuality, which further allowed the idea of gay rights to flourish.

According to the United States Holocaust Memorial Museum (USHMM), that changed when the Nazis came into power in the 1930s. Hitler saw gay men as a threat to his campaign to purify Germany, especially because their partnerships could not bear children who would grow the Aryan race he wanted to cultivate. During that period, gay-friendly bars and clubs started being shut down, authorities burned the books at a major research institution devoted to the study of sexuality, and gay fraternal organizations were shuttered. These efforts only increased after the Night of the Long Knives, the 1934 purge of Nazi leaders who were accused of trying to overthrow Hitler; they included Storm Troopers leader Ernst Röhm, whom the SS murdered, later citing his homosexuality as justification for his murder. A Nazi revision of the 1871 law took effect in September of 1935, outlawing anything as simple as men looking at or touching one another in a sexually suggestive way, and enabled authorities to arrest people even if they had only heard rumors that people had been engaging in such behavior. (Lesbians, however, didn’t face the same criminal penalties.) The Gestapo began to keep “pink lists” of violators.

Between 1933 and 1945, by the USHMM’s count, an estimated 100,000 men were arrested for violating this law, and about half went to prison. It’s thought that somewhere between 5,000 and 15,000 men were sent to concentration camps for reasons related to sexuality, but exactly how many died in them may never be known, between the scant documentation that survived and the sense of shame that kept many survivors silent for years after their ordeal.

From the few survivors and prison guards who have shared their stories, it’s been learned that those sent to concentration camps were segregated, for fear that their sexual preference was contagious. Many were castrated. Some were used as guinea pigs in various medical experiments to find a cure for typhus fever and a cure for homosexuality, the latter of which led the SS to inject them with testosterone to see if it would make them straight. At the same time, some Kapos (prisoners selected by the SS to keep fellow prisoners in line) are said to have demanded sexual favors from prisoners, who were known as “doll boys,” in exchange for extra food or protection from hard labor.

Yet in the post-war years, fear of arrest and imprisonment didn’t go away. The Nazi law stayed in place until a 1969 West German law decriminalized gay relationships among men over 21. As one of the USHMM’s curators has pointed out, even as the Allied powers carefully worked to scrub Nazism from Germany, they left that part alone — perhaps because they had anti-gay and anti-sodomy laws of their own. Paragraph 175 wasn’t repealed until 1994.

As the gay liberation movement grew in America in the ’70s and the ’80s, so did awareness of the persecution of gays during the Holocaust, as books and data about period started being published.

Former “doll boy” Heinz Heger’s 1972 memoir The Men With The Pink Triangle described SS guards torturing prisoners by dipping their testicles in hot water and sodomizing them with broomsticks. Data on these victims started to be cited in 1977, after a statistical analysis by sociologist Rudiger Lautmann of Bremen University claimed that as many as 60% of the gay men sent concentration camps may have have died. The first reference to pink triangles in TIME also appeared that year, in a story about gay-rights activists in Miami who attached the symbols to their clothes as a show of solidarity while protesting a vote to repeal a law protecting gay people from housing discrimination. When the magazine noted that the symbol was “reminiscent” of Nazi-era yellow stars, a reader wrote in to note that they were in fact analogous, not “reminiscent,” as both the star and the triangle were real artifacts of that time. “Gay people wear the pink triangle today as a reminder of the past and a pledge that history will not repeat itself,” he added.

And while the Miami effort did not succeed, the activists did succeed in bringing national attention to the way they had reclaimed the pink triangle as a symbol of solidarity. In 1979, Martin Sherman’s play Bent, inspired by Heger’s memoir, opened on Broadway; in the play, one of the characters trades in his pink triangle for a yellow star, “which gives him preferential treatment over the homosexuals,” as TIME’s review put it. The magazine called the play “audacious theater” and a “gritty, powerful and compassionate drama.” Sherman later said that he had also based the play on research by Holocaust scholar Richard Plant, who was having trouble finding a publisher who would turn it into a book, as the topic was still considered taboo. It was later published as The Pink Triangle: The Nazi War Against Homosexuals.

By that time, the gay community was facing a very different threat: HIV and AIDS. The activists who formed the organization ACT-UP to raise awareness about this public health crisis decided to use the pink triangle as a symbol of their campaign and alluded to its history when they declared, in their manifesto, that “silence about the oppression and annihilation of gay people, then and now, must be broken as a matter of our survival.” Avram Finkelstein is credited with designing the campaign’s pink triangle — which is right-side up, instead of the Nazi-era upside-down pink triangle — after conservative pundit William F. Buckley suggested that HIV/AIDS patients get tattoos to warn partners in a 1986 New York Times op-ed. Earlier this year, Finkelstein said that the op-ed was a “galvanizing moment,” at a time when there was “public discussion of putting gay men into concentration camps to keep the epidemic from spreading.” This bolder stance required a more boldly colored triangle. He explained that the triangle in the middle of the campaign’s signature “Silence=Death” poster was fuchsia instead of pale pink, as a nod to the punk movement’s adoption of the “New Wave” color. (He said the background of the poster is black because “everyone in lower Manhattan wore black.”)

More recently, pink triangles have been visible during gay rights demonstrations worldwide that were sparked by reports that gay men were being persecuted in Chechnya. For example, outside of the Russian embassy in London on April of 2017, protesters scattered pink triangles with messages written “Stop the death camps.” Three months later, the German parliament voted unanimously to pardon gay men convicted of homosexuality during World War II, awarding €3,000 to the 5,000 men still living, and €1,500 for each year they were imprisoned. The vote came about 15 years after the issuing of an official apology and almost a decade after the unveiling of a memorial to gay Holocaust victims in Berlin. Another well-known memorial is the Pink Triangle Park in the Castro district in San Francisco, which calls itself “the first permanent, free-standing memorial in the U.S. to gay Holocaust victims.”

The last death of someone forced to wear the pink triangle during the Nazi era is believed to have come in August of 2011, with the death of Rudolf Brazda at the age of 98. The symbols of pride that will be proudly worn around the world this month are a reminder of both what he survived and the pride that came after.

The Simpsons – Evolution vs Creationism

I cried also

..this is perhaps off topic: but I have a thread at Talking Points Memo, in “the Hive”: “Pride is Every Day”, and a friend shared this, by ‘anonymous author K’:

Ruminations on the death of Pat Robertson

I don’t like to think
About Pat Robertson going to hell.
That lets him off too easy.
I like to think about
Pat Robertson finding himself
In a heaven he never believed
Would exist.
Where Divine is reading in drag
To the children murdered at
Sandy Hook and Ulvalde.
While Edie Windsor
And Gertrude Stein drink coffee
In the breakfast nook
talking politics with Harvey Milk.
Where Matthew Shepard relaxes by
A stream, reading poetry to
a nameless young man whose family
Never claimed his body
when he died
Of AIDS.
Where the music plays loudly
Welcoming dancers from the Pulse
and Club Q to the floor where they
Twirl and vogue with
All the murdered trans women of color
Whose names we never knew.
Where Jesus puts his arm around
Pat Robertson’s shoulders and
Drapes them with a rainbow feather boa.
And, gesturing around him says
Come, meet my disciples

I’m not a believer.
But I cried.

Child With Two Mothers Left Sobbing After Couple At Student Track Event Accuse Her Of Being Transgender

My dogs that love gravy!   Is this where we are as humans, in politics where 9-year-old children are targeted to prove a political / religious point?  The two articles miss some important points about this incident. 

This child was not in puberty, it wouldn’t matter if she was a boy or girl or trans as at this age most children are the same in development.   No hormones have kicked in to change them either way.   It is only a non-scientific religious view that says that even from birth there is a huge difference between male and female children.  

Also why did the man and the woman with him wait until just as the girl was to do her event?  “”She went to step up to compete for the grade four shot-put final, and right before she went to throw, a grandfather of a student said, ‘Hey, this is supposed to be a girls’ event, and why are you letting boys compete.'”   If the grandfather had an issue with a student participating, shouldn’t he have raised it earlier?   They say he is a grandfather of a student, was he trying to throw the girl off her game so his own grandchild could have a better shot?  

“This has destroyed our beautiful daughter’s confidence, and she was inconsolably crying during this whole event and continued once it was over and we were leaving. Not to mention, she was unable to concentrate on her track and field finals and the shot-put throw for which she had qualified,” Kari said.

But another thing both articles miss is the open bigotry against the child’s parents, who were a same-sex couple.     Have we devolved so far in to the depth of inhumanity that hatred of the legal way two people live and raise their child makes the child fair game for attacks?   Is that decent or moral.   They went after the child due to the child having two mommies instead of the religiously preferred mom and dad.  “Starr said the man’s wife then started calling her “a genital mutilator, a groomer, and a pedophile.””    So they already knew about the girl and her family, they knew she had same sex parents.  

So this is what the right wing wants, young children attacked with same sex parents too afraid to be open and in the public life of their child.  It is really not just disrespect or deplorable actions on by bigots, it is active terrorism.   The goal was clear and they accomplished it.  They caused a 9 year old child to be afraid, to be unable to do their best, reduced to tears at the hate of people they did not even know.   How anyone can see this and not be as angry as I am is beyond me.  How anyone can justify these actions is something I don’t understand.   But the right does justify it, they glory in it, to them this is a win.  The Matt Walsh types won’t see their fingerprints on this child’s tears, nor the worry and fear of the parents for the safety along with ability of their child to be confident in themselves.  Instead they relish the ability to destroy a family that is different from their demanded model, and they enjoy the fear they create as they think it makes them powerful and correct.   Sick bastards!    Hugs

Last thing.  From the comments I read I followed the news articles found on this asshole.   He is an asshole.  He is rather wealthy and felt no problem with over charging workers / companies coming to fix problems in the areas of his motel.  He seems to be a typical entitled white fundamentalist asshole who thinks god shines only on him and that gives him the right to gouge and cause grief to others.  He is always right and his god agrees he is always right.   My gods has the prosperity gospel religion spread so wide that the teachings of the one in the bible itself no longer matters?    Hugs

Castanet reports:

Two Kelowna moms are speaking out after their 9-year-old daughter was verbally assaulted at a track and field event on Thursday at Kelowna’s Apple Bowl. The mothers, who choose not to identify their daughter, say she was competing in a shot-put event when a grandfather of one of the other participants started yelling at her.

“She went to step up to compete for the grade four shot-put final, and right before she went to throw, a grandfather of a student said, ‘Hey, this is supposed to be a girls’ event, and why are you letting boys compete.’ My daughter is cisgender, born female, uses she/her pronouns. She has a pixie haircut,” said mom Heidi Star.

Star says the man then carried on to demand certification to prove that her daughter was born female. Star said the man’s wife then started calling her “a genital mutilator, a groomer, and a pedophile.”

Read the full article.

According to Star, her daughter was left “inconsolably crying.” The school superintendent says that the man will be banned from future school events. Kelowna, population 211,000, is located in British Columbia, around 250 miles northeast of Vancouver. Hit the link.

 

 

9-year-old daughter was verbally assaulted at a track and field event

Thumbnail
 

Feel the love of Jesus

Proves systemic transphobia

 

Yes. Picking on a child is so manly

Fucking horrible

This happened in much more liberal Canada. Imagine if this happened in Florida?

It’s spreading all over. In Norway there have been threats to Pride events, and the words and phrases are taken from the US far right.

I am convinced that the whole trans panic these bigots are perpetrating is just an excuse so they can look into children’s underpants. Accusations of “groomer” and “pedophile” are deflections.

they seem to be already staring at the children’s groins. He looks like he was having Roid Rage moment.They are gone. Picking on Kids is malicious .

Show us your cunt!
And let me verify it personally with a finger insert, to make sure.
Perfectly Christian thing to do.

Are those boobs “real” or “implants”???

Remember, these are the guys who value a woman’s worth by her virginity – obsession with other people’s genitals is built into the religion.

My 1st impression of his photo was that he was using steroids. His verbal assault on a child sways me to believe that too.

It is not the Democrats pushing these “show us what is in your panties” laws. It is not Democrats who are pushing — and getting — laws that criminalize breathing while trans.

There are MANY reasons to dislike and distrust the Democratic Party, but this at least is not one of those reasons.

When I saw the headline I wondered which shithole American state did THIS happen in?

In case you missed this over the weekend 🔥

AMEN . . . They were driven by the love of white baby jesus to make that 9 year old cry.

I think this is a bit more accurate

Thumbnail
 
 

Lincolnwood Public Library declines to remove books with LGBTQ content from children’s collection

https://abc7chicago.com/lincolnwood-library-childrens-books-il-news/12504956/

Yes the left is starting to fight back instead of giving in to the attempt by the religious right to erase those they don’t like or agree with from society.   Also people are seeing through the fake claim that they are just trying to protect children from being sexualized.  They don’t want to just mold their children, they want the right to mold your child in their image.  They are demanding the right to take away your parental rights to raise your child, even as they are demanding more and more rights for themselves to dictate what children are taught.   Be clear this is about removing any reference to the LGBTQ+ from first schools and then all of society.   They are already moved on to banning drag, which in their written laws means wearing the clothing normally associated with a gender not assigned at birth in public.  Why?  It doesn’t sexualize kids if a man wears a nice skirt, but it does challenge the strict gender norms these fundamentalist are trying to return all the country to.  These fundamentalist religious groups got a huge head start on their attempt to outlaw even the mention of what they don’t agree with, they pushed a false narrative on the public that many have bought into because they were not hearing the other side.  Now we who are on the side of progress and advancement need to make sure people get the full story and real goals of these people.  We have our work cut out for us, but to save the present and build the future we have to fight back.  For the sake of the gay, lesbian, trans, and all the other non-cis and non-binary kids we must fight and win the right for them to see positive role models and see themselves represented in books and movies.  We must grant these LGBTQ+ children the safety and security that we should give all children.   Hugs

https://abc7chicago.com/lincolnwood-library-childrens-books-il-news/12504956/

https://abc7chicago.com/video/embed/12505241

A standing room-only crowd gathered at the Lincolnwood Village Hall Monday for a heated debate about a book with LGBTQ+ content on the public library’s children’s collection.

The monthly library board meeting was moved from the library to the village hall to accommodate a large turnout after last month’s meeting got heated and ended early with police being called.

Once again, library board members and the public came face to face.

“The library has decided that they, not you the parent, knows what is best for your child,” said Bryan Johnson, Lincolnwood resident.

“Gay people and drag queens have a right to exist and be themselves and have books written about them,” said Jen Mierisch, Lincolnwood resident.

At the board meeting, some attendees voice objections to certain titles with LGBTQ+ themes that are part of the library’s children’s collection. At least one formal challenge was filed against a book called “The Hips On The Drag Queen Go Swish, Swish, Swish.”

The nursery rhyme book features characters in drag, and was read aloud during a library-sponsored story time over the summer.

“I’m not here to ask for a ban on any books,” said resident Rahila Siddiqui. “I’m here to fight for my right to choose when my elementary school children should be exposed to complicated topics like drag queens.”

“If parents prefer their children not read a book, that’s their decision. But that does not give them the right to impose their short-sighted beliefs on anyone else’s children,” said Susan Ginsburg, Lincolnwood resident.

After reviewing the book, library officials declined to remove it from the children’s department. The library director told ABC7 such action would constitute censorship, adding, “Our goal is to respect everyone in our community and what they want to read.”

“When you’re at Macy’s and you don’t like a purple shirt, you can’t demand that they take it away. Just don’t buy it,” said Judy Abelson, Lincolnwood resident.

Library officials said they also declined a patron’s request to remove another book that some consider anti-transgender. That patron has now dropped that formal challenge on censorship grounds.

Illinois Gov Signs Bill Outlawing Book Bans By Libraries

Yes yes yes, we need more laws like this.   Here are some great quotes from the https://abc7chicago.com/illinois-book-ban-bill-public-library-libraries-near-me/13373993/ article.  Hugs

“Book bans are about censorship, marginalizing people, marginalizing ideas and facts. Regimes ban books, not democracies,” Pritzker said.

“Parents and only parents have the right and responsibility to restrict their children and only their children’s access to library resources,” said Secretary Giannoulias.

“Those pushing book banning say they are doing it to protect people. Well that’s just not true. Book banning is most frequently used to silence the voices of the LGBTQ+ community as well as people of color,” said State rep. Anne Stava Murray (D-Downers Grove).

Chicago’s ABC affiliate reports:

Governor JB Pritzker signed historic legislation Monday that would ban libraries from banning books. The law is the first of its kind in the nation, and would cut off funding to any libraries that remove books currently on the shelf.

The law was pushed by Secretary of State Alexi Giannoulias, who is also the state’s librarian, and is a response to the backlash in many local school districts against controversial books, particularly some championed by the LBGTQ community.

“Book bans are about censorship, marginalizing people, marginalizing ideas and facts. Regimes ban books, not democracies,” Pritzker said.

Read the full article.

 

 

Thumbnail
 

And yes, in blue state Illinois, we have had library meetings interrupted and harassed by the outside groups, just like the rest of the country

Skokie and Lincolnwood both border the north edge of Chicago

https://abc7chicago.com/lin…

Vitriol From An Asshat In Spokane

Hey everyone – hit like and subscribe to see what we produce next!

I’m an Anglican Priest in the Diocese of Nova Scotia and Prince Edward Island and I get to serve in the Parish of St Margaret of Scotland, in the beautiful city of Halifax, NS, that sits on the ancestral and unceded territory of the Mi’kmaq people.

My pronouns are he/him/his. My theology is primarily Christo-centric – Jesus is at the centre and it is against Him that all values are bounced off. I believe all people are created in the image of God and are children of God and are heirs to the throne of God – no conditions – therefore every single person we meet deserves our love, and respect.

Pinned by Rev Ed Trevors

Rev Ed Trevors2 weeks agoAn article… https://www.kxly.com/news/spokane-sermon-goes-viral-for-violent-anti-trans-message/article_74d97ad8-f907-11ed-8a37-a3dc71ff6f01.html

Homophobic Father Confronts Gay Son

Barbara Johnson tells the story of a her advice to a Wealthy CEO who threatens to cancel his Son’s Harvard Graduation Party because he discovered his son was is “Gay”.

LA School Board President Delivers Epic Pro-LGBTQ Rant: How Dare You Make Kids Afraid Because YOU Are

Sorry everyone.  Today has been rather bad for me.   I couldn’t sleep last night, but got up early and went to a lab to have my blood drawn.   After I can home and ate my breakfast I just got so tired and over whelmed I spend most of the day in bed.  I got up and mangaged to get this post done because I think it is so important.  But my heart seems to be slaming in the viens of my neck, I am so tired.   I had some instant oatmeal for supper and now I am going to bed even though it is only 6 PM.   I love everyone and hope to do better getting the news out tomorrow morning.   Best wishes, loves, and hugs.    Scottie

 

The Los Angeles Times reports:

Los Angeles school board President Jackie Goldberg pulled out an oversized children’s book titled “The Great Big Book of Families” and turned a public meeting into story time, her own not-so-subtle statement to critics of LGBTQ+ education. “In real life, families come in all sorts of shapes and sizes,” she read, as the text by British author Mary Hoffman explained. Some children live with “mummy and daddy,” or just their mummy or daddy. Goldberg soon got to the line “Some children have two mommies or two daddies.”

“A great book,” she said after reading it from cover to cover. “I recommend it.” Her statement set up the unanimous school board approval of a resolution listing all the ways the nation’s second largest school district intends to raise awareness about the LGBTQ+ community. Goldberg’s reading occurred on the same day that violence erupted outside the Glendale Unified school board meeting — which had its own gay pride resolution on the agenda — and once again, fights broke out among demonstrators.

Attitude reports:

She recounted from the assembly: “At the little discussion at the school after that, as soon as the book was over, one little girl sitting at my knees said ‘I have two mommies.’ A little boy on my other side said: ‘I have five grandmas. You better treat me the same way you treat everybody else. That’s how we live in this country.”

Getting more visibly emotional and angry Goldberg expressed her tiredness, shared by the LGBTQ community, of hearing the screaming on this type of issue. “What do you think that did to them?!” It made them afraid!” she screamed. “How dare you make them afraid because you are!” She continued: “I’m sorry I told you this was personal.”

Her son was once harassed for having two mommies. The fact that Goldberg’s grandchildren aren’t is a sign of progress. “Nobody has to accept me. I’m not looking for your acceptance,” she also said. “But you better treat me the same way you treat everybody else. That’s how we live in this country.

I insist that you watch every second this.

 

Again if you missed watching this short heartfelt clip please do!!!

Longer version

Wow. Thanks for posting this longer version. So powerful but also very emotional. Gave me tears as I listened to her. We really need more of this everywhere. She is awesome and everything she says is so true.

 

 

 

Kids don’t just learn in the classroom. Kids also talk to each other on the playground where no grownup can hear.

I hear some of them know about the internet too.

More simply, they have always tried to argue that acknowledging something aloud is the same as advocating for that thing.

The same hysterical arguments were made regarding sex and drug education… that talking frankly about these things to kids is, in their minds, advocating for kids experimenting with sex and drugs… and that the only way to truly keep kids safe from sex and drugs is refusing to even discuss them outside of a ‘Those things are evil!’ context.

In their (small/hateful) minds, teaching kids that LGBTQ people are ‘acceptable’ is the same as pushing kids to give it a try.

The Right’s entire M.O. is premised on the false notion that if children never hear that gay people exist and that being gay is an immutable human characteristic like left-handedness and a natural variation of the human condition, they won’t end up being gay. They are not open to any argument that suggests they are wrong, which is why we’ve been treading water for the last half century, at least. I don’t see how we get past this impasse if the other side isn’t open to reasoned argument.

Thumbnail
 

I went to Catholic school until the 6th grade. I’ll never forget my first grade teacher, a nun, swatting a left-handed student for writing with his left hand. She scolded him, telling him that was a mark of the Devil. Somehow that particular dogma just magically went away without any comment from the Congregation of the Doctrine of the Faith. Go figure.

 

That kid’s parents should have shown up and beaten that nun’s hand with her own ruler until she didn’t have a hand left to hold it.

 

More importantly, the dogma of anti-Semitism, which dates right back to the Gospels, also disappeared. As did the Church’s defense of slavery and segregation. Holy Mother The Church Inc. evolves whether they care to admit it or not.

I was born left-handed, but trained from the cradle to be right-handed.

 

In school, my grandfather actually had his left hand tied behind his back, so he would use his right hand for everything

 

Our politicians could take a lesson from Jackie Goldberg. That is the kind of pushback we need to stave off the right-wing lunatics. Fuck decorum. Speak the damn truth.

What I take from this is we need to start YELLING THE FUCK BACK AT THESE PEOPLE!!!!

Thumbnail
 

I HATE when the GQP cultists start a sentence with “we the people.” They’re trying to co-opt the Preamble without understanding what it means.

* Offer not valid in Florida

(love the T-shirt, though)

Early Week in Review.

Thumbnail
 

I saw this yesterday

Thumbnail
 

To be fair, the right-wing base is really fucking stupid.

A large fraction believe Noah’s Ark was real and that anthropogenic climate change is not. They believe that Trump won the last election and that Hillary Clinton murders babies for adrenochrome.

They’ll cling onto a false premise like a hungry tick, and no amount of facts, data, or antipsychotic meds will dislodge them.

Exactly. Just try debating with them. I stopped that a long time ago. They are completely resistant to truth and facts.

It’s the same playbook as sex education, ie … if you don’t teach them about sex they won’t have sex. Then they are shocked when they discover that their 16 year old is pregnant.

And then scramble to get her an abortion, but can’t because the politicians they voted for abolished that option.

So, when did the haters “choose” to be heterosexual?
What was this process like for them?
Did they try both gay and straight sex before making up their mind?

I swear the root cause of conservatism is a missing empathy gene. They are incapable of seeing anything from a perspective other than their own.

That is exactly what connected them strongly with Trump.

Keith Olbermann’s ‘Conservatism In Nine Words’ –

“Need help? Screw you!
I’m screwed? HELP ME NOW!”

Of course you know that the ant gay Saticoy Elementary Parents instagram group who protested last week feature make fun of and demonized Goldberg for being who she is. Those Christianism and in this case, Armenians, are lethal. They are the same “Leave Our Children Alone” t- shirt group that caused so much trouble for the Glendale SChool District Board the week following when all the board wanted to do was past a Pride resolution, but if course some how that all about sex and grooming. These people are really sick.

Longer version

Just a reminder:

Vote Democratic, get LGBT advocates.

Vote Republican, get theofascist haters.

Yet how difficult it is chasing the will o’ the wisp of ‘mainstream’ public opinion, when even the more progressive media still shy away from calling out the far right for the malignant genocidal cancer that it is.

The mainstream public gets exercised over the price of eggs (which seem to have come back down recently), and gasoline, and are easily duped and manipulated by a lot of the anti-trans rhetoric.

Even parts of our community are conned by the propaganda into thinking that trans children are a threat to cis children. And the Caitlyn Jenner types who are out there spewing the GQP’s vicious lies do not help. Even the Biden Administration’s proposed order partly throws trans kids under the bus.

Even the better advocates, like Katie Porter, are not equipped with the facts and figures to fight back. Watching her the other week looking brave but only weakly parrying the braying Piers Morgan on cissexist Bill Maher’s Real Time made me wish she had the ammunition to shoot them both down,. convincingly.

Yours — good and thoughtful observations, Joann. Thanks.

Re the “calling out” on commercial TV of (how you put it…) “the far right for the malignant genocidal cancer that it is” — even on, say, MSNBC — you see very little, if any, of that. The commercial sponsors don’t like it. MAGAts buy suppositories, soap, cereal and Medicare supplemental plans, too. Best not to offend them.

Re the general public’s knowledge/understanding of trans people and their issues, it’s almost non-existent.

There’s this thing called “Progressive Blog Myopia.”

We here in the progressive blogosphere know about trans people and their issues. We think, “Well surely everyone understands.”

I guarantee you, Joann, that 90% of the rest of the country knows shit about the subject.

Democrats HELP

Republicans HARM

ot: JMG culture moment

Thumbnail
 

“On the wings of a dove dog!”

What she had to say is my life in a nutshell. I can’t believe that I’m over 70 and we are now going backwards on my civil rights. I am sick up to here with it, too.

It is about fear. Fear of change. Fear of acceptance. They’re petrified in their traditions. Because of fear.

 

 

 
 

Matt Walsh DEVASTATED over Tennessee Drag Ban being ruled UNCONSTITUTIONAL (HUGE VICTORY for LGBTQ+)

I love how when Matt Walsh compares fully dressed drag queens reading to kids as obscene and sexual, lance reminds everyone about a place in public that many people of different sexes go wearing hardly anything, men in speedos and thongs, women in string bikinis all with kids around.   Yet no outcry from the maga conservative religious right.  Why because it is the beach or a pool and there is no association with the LGBTQ+ who are the real targets of the right.   Hugs