14th Amendment! Trump Is DISQUALIFIED!! | Christopher Titus | Armageddon Update

Once Public Schools are Largely Dead, Here’s What Happens Next…

https://hartmannreport.com/p/once-public-schools-are-largely-dead-ec4

Please notice the three factors that drive republicans, racism, money, religion.  In that order.  Hugs.  Scottie


Republicans will then begin lobbying to “reduce spending” by cutting the amount allocated for the vouchers, locking the emerging two-tier status of publicly funded education into place…

Ohio woman criminally charged after a miscarriage

A grand jury in Ohio is weighing whether to indict a woman who had a miscarriage. She was two weeks pregnant when she miscarried at home, after a doctor told her the fetus was no longer viable. Now she’s facing criminal charges for abuse of a corpse and up to a year in prison. Dr. Kavita Patel joins to discuss what this case means in a post Roe v. Wade world.

The Majority Report … some clips

Trump’s Businesses Got $7.8 Million In Foreign Payments During His Presidency: Report

https://www.yahoo.com/news/trumps-businesses-got-7-8-221119324.html

This is profit.  Yet Republican James Comer claims that Biden getting a loan repaid by his brother and his son when he was not in office is corruption.   He mocked the reporting of tRump doing what they are trying to impeach Pres. Joe Biden for, which again Biden did not gain any profit.  The republicans are so full of bull.  They want to do to Biden what they did to Clinton with the Benghazi hearings.   They held 9 hearings, were going to hold a 10th, even after the first 9 found no wrong doing or crime by Clinton.  But the constant accusations on Fox and other right wing media tarnished her for something she did not do and brought her poll numbers down.  The republicans are desperate to do that to Biden because their candidates suck.   Hugs.  Scottie


Updated ·5 min read
 

 Donald Trump’s businesses received nearly $8 million in payments from foreign governments while Trump was president, according to new research by Democrats on Capitol Hill.

Unlike Republicans in their efforts to pin corruption on President Joe Biden, Democrats on the House oversight committee have receipts — more than 400 pages of them — that show payments to Trump’s businesses from foreign officials likely seeking to influence the U.S. government. 

Trump refused to divest from his business empire when he became president, creating an opportunity for anyone hoping to win his favor to put money straight into his pocket by staying at his hotels.

“When he arrived in the White House, Trump was determined not only to keep this well-branded global corporate empire going but to seize a new and unprecedented opportunity to make it ever more lucrative for himself and his family,” the oversight committee’s Democratic staff, led by Rep. Jamie Raskin (D-Md.), said in their report.

Democrats and nonpartisan ethics experts have long argued that Trump’s refusal to divest violated the U.S. Constitution’s ban on presidents accepting gifts or “emoluments” from kings, princes or foreign states. Trump faced emoluments lawsuits, but the Supreme Court declared the cases moot after he left the White House in January 2021.

Meanwhile, since 2019, Democrats on the House oversight committee have sought records from Trump’s accounting firm reflecting his foreign income. After a federal court awarded access in 2022, Democrats said they’d found records reflecting more than $750,000 in payments from foreign officials at Trump’s hotel in Washington, D.C. Despite a court order requiring more material to be turned over, Republicans quietly shut down document production last year as they launched their quest for dirt on Biden. 

Using documents obtained by the court order, plus already-public records, Democrats tallied $7.8 million in foreign payments from 20 countries during Trump’s presidency. Most of the sum came from Chinese sources, including China’s embassy in the U.S. and the Industrial and Commercial Bank of China, a state-owned enterprise that leased property at Trump Tower in New York. Democrats suggest in their report that the payments from ICBC could have affected the Trump administration’s decision not to sanction the bank for ties to North Korea in 2017.

Democrats stressed Thursday that their report was based on records from only two years of Trump’s time in the White House, and that the $7.8 million is likely an undercount of the full money Trump received from foreign governments.

“What we have is essentially the tip of the iceberg,” Rep. Robert Garcia (D-Calif.) told reporters. “So this $7.8 million is just a small window ― obviously a significant amount of money, but a small window ― into what is likely a fairly large sum of money and gifts.”

Though Democrats presented their report as a continuation of their investigation into Trump’s violation of the Constitution’s emoluments clause, it’s clearly intended as a rebuke of the impeachment inquiry against Biden. The House of Representatives could hold an impeachment vote sometime in the coming months.

Republicans have accused Biden of improperly benefiting from his son Hunter Biden’s business deals, through which the younger Biden received millions of dollars from foreign nationals in China and Ukraine during and after Joe Biden’s time as vice president. Republicans have said Joe Biden may have accepted foreign bribes through his son’s work.

Rep. Jamie Raskin (D-Md.) speaks to journalists on the steps of the U.S. Capitol on Dec. 13.
 
Rep. Jamie Raskin (D-Md.) speaks to journalists on the steps of the U.S. Capitol on Dec. 13.

The only problem with the allegations is that there’s not much proof. Republicans have sifted through years of Hunter Biden’s bank records without finding any significant cash flows to the president ― except for four $1,380 transfers that were apparently reimbursements for truck payments the president made on his son’s behalf in 2018. House oversight committee chair James Comer (R-Ky.) has nevertheless said that because Hunter Biden’s money came from foreign sources, the payments to his father were tainted, even if they were loan reimbursements.

As HuffPost has previously reported, the foreign payments that went directly to businesses controlled by Trump himself might be better examples of the kind of corruption Republicans are talking about.

Rep. Jim Jordan (R-Ohio), a leader of the impeachment inquiry against Biden and one of the former president’s top defenders in Congress, deflected a question last year about Trump’s conflict of interest by pointing out that the former president donated his pay back to the government.

“President Trump didn’t take a salary,” Jordan said. “President Trump did so many good things for the country, did more of what he said he would do as president than any president, certainly in my lifetime.”

Raskin on Thursday ridiculed the no-salary argument.

“You don’t get to choose to refuse your salary and then take money from foreign governments instead,” he said. “The founders were emphatic that the president of the United States be someone who gets his money not from foreign governments, but rather from Americans.”

As for the impeachment inquiry against Biden, Raskin called it a hopeless wild goose chase.

“They found nothing, and look what we’ve been able to determine when we finally were able to extract just two years of information,” Raskin said.

Related…

Of course Stinky has received buttloads of cash from foreign governments, while president. Hell, the goddam Saudis were perpetually renting out 2 floors of Trump’s DC hotel, despite no one staying there most of the time.

This is why Trump likely assumed that Biden also received boatloads of foreign cash, because he has, OR he’s following Goebbels’ protocols.

Thumbnail
 
 

So strange how this man, who claims to know nothing about Nazi’s, continuously uses tactics from the Nazi Playbook. What a coinkydink.

 

Or when he’s accused of quoting Hitler, unwittingly reveals that he’s familiar enough with Hitler’s speeches to claim that he has used somewhat different phrasing. He’s ever the dangerous imbecile.

And, if Smelly IS re-elected, he will hand America over to Putin .

I am 100% sure that $8M is just the tip of the iceberg. 

How much did Ivanka earn from her Chinese patents?

Watch the MEDIA let this SLIDE like ALL his other OUTRAGES! Never a WORD of media complaint or warning about his relentless FASCIST rhetoric, even about his stochastic terrorism!

Every DAY we heard about Hillary’s emails in 2016! WHEN do we hear about the REAL danger posed to the national security by the over 100 documents dealing with nuclear secrets that Trump held on to ILLEGALLY after he left office?! MEDIA, WHERE ARE YOU?!

 

 

Johnson Defends Rejection Of $14B For Border Security

There is no compromise to be had with these republicans anymore as they are openly racists.  The only thing they will accept is no more letting brown people in the US.  Period.  Look at all their proposals, remain in Mexico which makes it a Mexican problem the US is causing, no more processing and releasing until hearing which as he whines lets those people into our country, and build the wall which is proven not to work.  

I listened to half of the video because I couldn’t read the article and it was all I could stand of the republican talking points of fear fear fear and Biden doesn’t care, Biden is out of touch, Biden needs to go to the border.  When it was pointed out to him that Biden did go to the border, Johnson replied yes but it was just a photo op.  Well what do you think he and his republican buddies are doing?  The 14 million does have more money for processing asylum seekers so there is not such a big backlog of cases waiting in detention at the border.  It also includes more money for beds, more money to house and care for the people, it has solutions to the problem.  But again the republicans don’t want solutions, they want the problem to run on.  

If you listen to him, he makes claims that instill fear in people especially white people.  He claims over hundreds of thousands of “known terrorist” have crossed the border and are in the country planning terrorist attacks on US citizens.  When he was corrected that these people were flagged but not known to be terrorists and that their where they were was known, he moved to the large number of crooks from prisons that are coming here.  Again he was corrected by Tapper that has gone on forever under all administrations, so he switched the large number of people crossing the border, 6 million he whined.  Yes six million have come seeking asylum and are waiting hearings.   If we had the money the republicans refuse to vote on they could be processed.  And this country can handle 6 million and millions more.  Every store around here has help wanted signs up.  Let these people work while they wait.  But the republicans want the issue for the elections.  When that did not hit, he moved to illegal drugs, fentanyl, and people trafficking.  Again, addressing fentanyl was in the bill that the republicans won’t pass or even here.  Also fentanyl and other drugs come in by legal crossings, not by asylum seekers.  The republicans like to bring up the coyotes helping people get here because they like to use the word trafficking, which they make sound as scary as possible.  It brings to mind sex trafficking of little girls, little boys, and young women for sex.  Sorry that shit is happening all over the US and not at the border.   Yes they are moving the people to the border and over it.   But hey what do you think DeathSantis and Abbot are doing with the mass immigrant bussing they are doing, yes people trafficking. 

Just before I shut it off Johnson whines that these things he is saying are not just republican talking points they are real bad things happening right now.  Again back to be afraid, be very afraid, along with Biden doesn’t know or care.   Yes all republican talking points.   No solutions, but lots of whining.   Lots of racist dog whistles.  Elect us and we will keep the brown people out.   Hugs.   Scottie  

 

but…but…but…if we actually do something for border security and immigration then we can’t blame the crisis we are creating on Biden!!!

Bingo.

Thumbnail
 

Just like abortion, don’t kill the goose that lays the golden eggs.

Republicans have had over a year being in charge of the House plenty of time to write their own bill on how to fix the border problem. Has anyone seen it? These assholes have no desire to fix anything instead they just want to blame Biden for everything. They are unfit to serve and they have to go.

It’s coming right after infrastructure week.
And the healthcare plan

They’ve lost the ability to write sane bills because all the sane GOP are gone from office. All that is left are morons and people trying to get a Fox News gig after they are voted out.

Their border bill will be along just as soon as they finish working on their healthcare bill, and Paul Ryan’s “Contract With America.”

I believe they are rooting around in Hunter’s tighty whiteys trying desperately to find some vestige of daddy that simply isn’t there and spending the entirety of their efforts on protecting the actions, deeds and words of their mango messiah. It’s a lot of work and money to do both of those things. I’m sure it’s exhausting. Just look at Gym. He looks totally worn out. To be honest, I don’t think Johnson is there to be much of a speaker. He has one job and that is to disavow the election results when they don’t go blumpies way. Not sure how all of that is going to turn out but I’m curious to see if he’ll even be in that seat at the time. rethuglicans are seeing their way out as quickly as they can get. And we’re happy to see them go.

It is also similar to wanting to get rid of Obamacare, with NOTHING to replace it!!!

Republicans already are using the border crisis as their primary campaign argument for the 2024 election. It’s how they hope to help Donald Trump get back to the White House.

The worst thing that could happen to them, politically, would be for Republicans and Democrats of good faith to reach a bipartisan deal on the border.

Republicans led by House Speaker Mike Johnson, all of whom made the trip to make speeches, make the news, make (perhaps) some campaign cash, and accomplish … nothing.

Andy Biggs: ”Shut the border down, or we’ll shut the government down,”

Their base may fall for this but everyone else sees this for what it is….Bullshit.

Thanks to our worthless media, those low-info voters don’t understand that it takes congress to actually enact laws and funding for those laws. They also fail at understanding basic concepts like cause and effect.

Media doesn’t help. But lack of civics education (and crappy history, literature ,and math* education) is a bigger driver in my book. Apathy and the feeling that nothing I do matters doesn’t help the situation.

*I say math, because well taught, math teaches logical thinking and reasoning, history which should look at cause and effect and how nothing happens without a multitude of factors, and literature because it explores empathy and the power of words and meaning.

They think the president controls everything, using a panel of switches and levers.

“That won’t help us win in November,” Johnson proclaimed. “That won’t do a darn thing but help solve the president’s problem.”

Please. This way the situation at the border stays stagnant and they can blame Biden, so it’s a win/win as far as they’re concerned. Shows you how much they really care about the border “crisis,” except as a political tool.

Well, they have to turn somewhere other than abortion after SCrOTUS overturned Roe. And they have to avoid being blamed for that as well. So create / worsen any existing issue to use against Dems.

Remind me again why the GQP didn’t solve immigration when they were in control?

Well if you count separating children and infants from their parents, let some sexual abuse happen, didn’t keep records of the kids and their parents then proceeded to lose children in the process…. they didn’t solve it but made it MUCH worse.

Proving they have no interest in solving the problem. Their only interest is in using it as a political cudgel.

I don’t suppose Tapper asked him WHAT policy? This has nothing to do with policy…it is about fighting (and doing nothing).

If only there had been money set aside for a string of border signs that say “WETBACKS GO HOME!” , Johnson would have gleefully accepted it. Remember, hatred is the point.

Translation: “We really don’t want to do anything that might alleviate the crisis at the border–we need to gin up the chaos for the elections.”

Follow the money. Corporations make billions off of powerless illegal migrants who can’t report wage theft or unsafe working conditions. Their repellent minions use the issue as a racist dog whistle but block all attempts to address the issue.

“You can’t pick and choose” which parts of the bill you want? Bullshit. It is called compromise, and it is how legislation is done. Idiot.

Republicans reject the idea of treating refugees like human beings.

 

Remember, this is the man who married his teen-aged daughter in a “purity” wedding. He put a ring on her finger and she’s not allowed to take it off until he finds her a husband and hands her over.

Ag, hospitality and construction all rely on both documented and undocumented labor. They contribute heavily to the GOP because they like tax cuts and some of them like white Jesus and tax cuts. They do so knowing that their labor supply will not be fucked with.

It isn’t immigration policy or regulations, it’s IMMIGRATION LAWS.
It’s basic civics: who passes laws in our government? Who’s in control of the House?

New rule designed to protect LGBTQ foster children draws GOP opposition 

This is pure Christian bigotry.   They don’t want to be forbidden to harass LGBTQIA homeless kids, tell them they are broken and wrong so they need Christian fixings.  It is all about being able to forbid trans kids to transition even socially, and to send gay and trans kids to conversion therapy.   Ask yourself why it is so important to them to disrespect LGBTQIA kids?  And the fact is, this rule does not keep religious people out of the foster system.  What it does is prevent LGBTQIA children from being placed in homes where they would face abuse due to their being gay or trans.  But it prevents Christian bigots from being able to harass and harm gay and trans kids.  Again that is what the republicans are fighting for, the right to force gay and trans kids to live as straight cis kids while trying to force them to join Jesus.     Hugs.   Scottie

A bill filed in the House and Senate in November by Rep. Mike Kelly (R-Pa.) and Sen. Tim Scott (R-S.C.), a former GOP presidential candidate, would prevent government agencies from penalizing child welfare service providers that are unwilling to “take action contrary to their sincerely held religious beliefs,” including affirming a child’s gender identity or sexual orientation. The duo introduced identical legislation in 2019 and 2021.

Nonreligious service providers, meanwhile, have largely argued that the draft rule is needed to protect LGBTQ young people already vulnerable to abuse.


BY BROOKE MIGDON – 01/03/24 2:14 PM ET

A new rule requiring child welfare agencies to place LGBTQ children in “environments free of hostility, mistreatment, or abuse” based on the child’s sexual orientation, gender identity or expression is drawing opposition from Republicans.

The proposed rule, issued in September by the Department of Health and Human Services (HHS), also would require caregivers to undergo cultural competency training to ensure LGBTQ youths are placed in homes where their identities are affirmed.

In a statement, Health Department Secretary Xavier Becerra said the proposal puts “children’s well-being first.”

Studies have shown that LGBTQ young people are overrepresented in the child welfare system. Lesbian, gay and bisexual children are more than twice as likely to experience foster care placement compared with their heterosexual peers, a 2019 study found, and roughly 30 percent of foster youth identify as LGBTQ, according to the Children’s Bureau, the federal agency responsible for overseeing the child welfare system in the U.S.

About 5 percent of foster youth identify as transgender.

But the rule has met some opposition in the GOP. 

A bill introduced last month by Rep. Jim Banks (R-Ind.), who is currently running for an open Senate seat, would prevent foster and adoptive families from being required to affirm a transgender child’s gender identity. The measure, called the Sensible Adoption For Every Home Act, has four Republican co-sponsors.

Banks in a statement to Fox News said the bill was drafted in response to the HHS proposal, which he said discriminates against prospective caretakers that are “opposed to irreversible sex change procedures on kids.”

LGBTQ rights advocates have denounced the Indiana congressman’s bill and his justification for introducing it, which they say reflects misconceptions about gender-affirming health care for youth and misrepresents what the Health Department’s draft rule aims to achieve.

“No part of this says anything about changing the sex of a child,” said Allen Morris, policy director at the National LGBTQ Task Force. “It’s talking about making sure that [LGBTQ youths] are not in an abusive home or somewhere that’s going to mistreat them.”

Other Republicans have argued that the proposed rule would discriminate against faith-based providers.

A bill filed in the House and Senate in November by Rep. Mike Kelly (R-Pa.) and Sen. Tim Scott (R-S.C.), a former GOP presidential candidate, would prevent government agencies from penalizing child welfare service providers that are unwilling to “take action contrary to their sincerely held religious beliefs,” including affirming a child’s gender identity or sexual orientation. The duo introduced identical legislation in 2019 and 2021.

Sen. Marco Rubio (R-Fla.), one of the bill’s 17 Republican co-sponsors in the Senate, wrote in a December editorial that the measure would effectively overrule the Biden administration’s “new woke standards.” Rubio’s Lifting Local Communities Act, introduced last January, would similarly bolster the ability of religious organizations that receive federal funding to operate in accordance with their religious beliefs.

In a Dec. 8 letter to Becerra, however, 19 Democratic senators voiced their support for the Health Department’s proposed rule, writing that its stipulations are needed “to protect children in the foster care system more than ever.”

“As members of Congress we are committed to ensuring all children, including LGBTQIA+ children, thrive in safe and stable environments,” the senators, led by Sen. Ron Wyden (D-Ore.), wrote in the letter.

Compared with their cisgender and heterosexual peers, LGBTQ children and adolescents in the child welfare system are more likely to report poor treatment related to their sexual orientation or gender identity. In a 2014 study of LGBTQ foster youths in Los Angeles, nearly 38 percent reported poor treatment connected to their sexual orientation, gender identity or gender expression.

Twenty-eight states and Washington, D.C., have explicit laws or policies in place to protect LGBTQ youths in foster care from discrimination based on sexual orientation and gender identity, and another six have laws prohibiting discrimination based on sexual orientation only, according to the Movement Advancement Project, a nonprofit organization that tracks LGBTQ laws.

In 13 states, state-licensed child welfare agencies may legally refuse to place and provide services to children and families — including LGBTQ people and same-sex couples — if doing so conflicts with their religious beliefs. 

Republicans at the state level have also sought to push back on the rule.

In a November letter to the Children’s Bureau, more than a dozen Republican state attorneys general said the Health Department’s proposal discriminates against Christian caretakers and provides solutions to a problem that does not exist.

The letter, led by Alabama Attorney General Steve Marshall (R), references a 2021 Supreme Court ruling that sided with a Philadelphia Catholic social services agency that had refused to accept same-sex couples as foster parents.

“This proposed rule seeks to accomplish indirectly what the Supreme Court found unconstitutional just two years ago: remove faith-based providers from the foster care system if they will not conform their religious beliefs on sexual orientation and gender identity,” the attorneys general wrote in the Nov. 27 letter.

A Health Department spokesperson declined to comment on the letter but said members of the public are encouraged to express their views on the draft rule. A 30-day public comment period ended Nov. 27.

Responses to the proposed rule from Christian organizations have been mixed, although most submitted to the Health Department center around concerns that the rule, if implemented, would discriminate against faith-based providers and hinder the recruitment and retention of foster families, many of whom are religious.

“Among the most concerning — and most likely — negative impacts of the proposed regulations would be a significant chilling effect on the involvement of people of religious faith in the foster system,” one group wrote in a Nov. 20 letter to Becerra. “This rule would push many of them away.”

Nonreligious service providers, meanwhile, have largely argued that the draft rule is needed to protect LGBTQ young people already vulnerable to abuse.

“With all of the pain, rejection, broken promises and separation that many youth in foster care experience, a targeted and specific plan for LGBTQI+ youth’s health and wellbeing through safe and appropriate placements can ensure youth are acknowledged and affirmed when they express their needs,” wrote a coordinator for a Cleveland-based nonprofit that works with foster youth.

“Then, when this plan is followed through, youth will actually experience their needs being met, their voices mattering and a caring network of individuals,” they wrote. “This is vital for all youth, but especially youth who identify LGBTQI+ because we know that so often this is not the case.”

But some nonreligious and Democratic organizations have been critical of the proposal, which they say does not go far enough because it still allows for individuals who do not support LGBTQ identities to become foster parents.

Multiple groups in comments submitted to the Health Department referenced a 2021 survey of young people who concealed their LGBTQ identities prior to placement over fears of “how their social worker may react” and “concerns about losing their placement.”

“The flexibility allowed within the rule presumes that those who are LGBTQI+ and not yet out would be served well when placed with any family — including those who opt out of being ‘safe and appropriate,’” the executive director of one children’s rights organization wrote. “However, not requiring that every provider be a safe and appropriate placement for LGBTQI+ children will mean that LGBTQI+ youth are placed in inadequate placements.”

Banks and other Republicans are also seeking to reinstate a ban on transgender military members. Earlier this year Banks founded the House Anti-Woke Caucus.

 

Thumbnail
 
Other Republicans have argued that the proposed rule would discriminate against faith-based providers.

 

Thank God it would!!

What they are really complaining about is it would take away over 30% of their government grift.

LGBTQ kids shouldn’t be within a hundred yards of a faith based foster service.

They read

“environments free of hostility, mistreatment, or abuse”

and immediately thought “that means us christians!!”

How very, very telling that their hate is more important to them than helping kids who need a family.

Similar to this:

Many LGBT youth end up in foster case because their “parents” etc. reject them.
The notion they should be set up for more abuse or worse cuz religious freedom is straight up bullshit.

The Pro-Child Party*

* – “Child” only applies to white, male, straight, cis-gendered, christian, children.

. . . raised in the families of their birth. The GOP aren’t fans of supporting foster children. They complained about automatically extending benefits to high school graduation, and a six month transition. They didn’t like opening up public colleges to them.

Pro-Child like Pro-Life. Only in their terms, and only at times it can be used to oppress others.

And pro parental rights. Parents have an absolute and inviolate right to do what they deem best for their children… but only insofar as that furthers the white supremacist Talibangelical agenda.

They’re so pro-life that in cases of unviable pregnancies they want mothers to die in childbirth. I dunno ’bout you guys, but if I had a wife, a sister, or a niece, I’d want the doctors to do everything they could to save her life.

They’re so pro-life that in cases of unadopted kids who are no longer babies, they call them “unadoptable” (read: unlovable).

They’re so pro-life that they rip immigrant families apart and but babies, children, and adults in cages in squalid conditions. And then don’t even both to keep track of who is who and where they’ve been placed.

“Other Republicans have argued that the proposed rule would discriminate against faith-based providers.”

This is why I hate the combination of Citizens United, Hobby Lobby, and Catholic Charities v. Philadelphia. Faith-based organizations are not persons, have no right to freedom of religion, and have no standing in child placement. The only basis for child placement decisions in PA state law, and the only basis for child placement decisions in practice should be the welfare of the child. Not the parents, not the state, and not the fucking private provider.

Death cults probably shouldn’t be a part of a kid’s mental development, just sayin’

I’m not surprised. In their eyes LBGTs merely “chose” to be LBGT, and all they need is good straight parenting to “fix” them

And we all know how well that works out

“Train up*” a child…

*That means beat the Jesus into them.

For some right-wing Christians, it certainly does–uncritical obedience, too.

 

The Secrets of Homosexual History in America

The True History of Male Gay Brothels

Same sex relationships and male gay brothels were normal until Christianity took hold.  Then the bigotry started.   Sexual activity was an accepted part of everyday life, until regressive repressive Christians ruined it for everyone.   And they are still at it today.  Hugs

Welcome back to 🤪Crazy Histories🤪
As long as humanity has existed, there have been physical and romantic relationships between people of the same gender. And like straight people, those of varying sexualities have also looked for release in more promiscuous places. They say the oldest job in the world is prostitution, and these gay brothels that date from antiquity to modern day certainly prove that… #ancienthistory #historydocumentary #homosexual

Republicans are torturing pregnant women with lethal diagnoses….

There is an ongoing lawsuit in Texas in which 20+ women are challenging the legality of the state’s restrictive abortion law under the state’s constitution. Thank you, Dani, for sharing your story and sending me this article. Each plaintiff – including a personal friend of mine who is also a fellow obgyn – had medically complex pregnancies, including cases where the fetuses could not survive outside of the womb. These women deserve our attention and acknowledgement for their bravery in coming forward – especially when doing so could lead to extreme backlash from their communities, friends, and even family.

The Center for Reproductive Rights brought the case and Texas Attorney General/cartoon villain Ken Paxton is opposing it as usual. Let’s talk about it.