TX GOP Chair Worked For Funder Of Extremist Group

This goes along with my last post, Christian take over of the US pushed by Churches, leaders with money, and wealthy older people who see it as a way to enforce their bigotry to remain a white cis straight 1950s society.   I really want to emphasize the hard right bigotry and hate these billionaires have and the changes they are making to society.  They fund the very rabid right wing media that is trying hard to change all of our society and political leanings, increasing hate for LGBTQIA and hate against blacks / brown people.   They push a pro Christian white cis straight male in charge of society.    Dunn & Wilks also control influential legal, policy, & advocacy organizations. One of those orgs argued in court that pharmacies shouldn’t sell birth control. The lawyer who argued that case later became a federal judge. He banned the abortion pill.   And they’ve even created their own right-wing media bubble. Dunn & Wilks fund Texas Scorecard, the top far-right publication. Wilks owns the Daily Wire and bankrolls PragerU, a right-wing “education” platform they’re trying to force into our schools.   Prager U is now being used in red state public schools as instruction materials.  Florida pushes their message hard.  There is a serious push by really wealthy old Christian bigots to turn the US into a Christian Iran, a Christian Saudi Arabia, a Christian Afghanistan.  Do we the poor majority want to allow this?  Hugs.  Scottie

 
 

January 13, 2024

The Texas Tribune reports:

For more than three months, Republican Party of Texas Chair Matt Rinaldi has vigorously attacked critics of Defend Texas Liberty, and rebuffed calls to distance the state party from the powerful group over its ties to white supremacists. As he did so, Rinaldi was also working as an attorney for one of the group’s two billionaire funders, Farris Wilks, according to filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission.

Since 2021, Wilks has given nearly $5 million to Defend Texas Liberty, which last year was the state party’s largest financial supporter. With Rinaldi’s help, the group has sought to purge the Texas GOP of more moderate voices by bankrolling far-right causes and primary candidates. Publicly, Rinaldi has also been silent about Defend Texas Liberty as the Tribune extensively reported on ties between the group and other white supremacists and Nick Fuentes acolytes.

Read the full article. There’s much more. Give the tweets below a minute to fully load because they illuminate how deep this goes. The final tweet links to a grimly fascinating deep dive into Defend Texas Liberty’s leader.

 

 

Dunn and Wilkes made their billions from fracking.

Y’know that old saw that goes, “If you enter a room and there are 12 Nazis having dinner at the table and you sit down to join them, there are now 13 Nazis at the table”?

Rinaldi, Dunn, Wilks, Strickland and the rest of these guys are the ones who catered the meal.

Two billionaires funding right wing hate groups and Nazis. And both are pastors.

Who said that it is easier for a camel to go through the eye of a needle then it is for a Richmond to enter the kingdom of heaven?

Who said the greatest commandment after loving God was loving your neighbor?

Who said not to store up treasures on earth?

no one of any importance whatsoever to modern fundamentalist Christianity. One could almost wish that they succeed turning Texas into a theocracy and the right wing state. Maybe they can leave the union.

I think it reveals that they don’t even believe their religious nuttery. They just want to use superstition and money to control EVERYTHING, and they also think they’re so smart that no one will pick up on the hypocrisy

The problem is they won’t leave the Union. They will just continue to spread their shit and disease to the rest of America. It’s happening now

Actually, they are heretic “Christians”.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wi…
Wilks’ parents founded their own church (cult?), which denies Christian doctrines like the Trinity and the divinity of Christ, and gives primacy to the Hebrew Scriptures. While they seem to recognize Jesus as a prophet of some sort, they don’t seem to be bound to follow his teachings.

Is there a republican who is not an extremest at this point?

If they’re not actively Nazis, they’re Nazi adjacent or Nazi tolerant.

They are all Nazis.

And look! Wilks is the pastor of his own church cult.
Currently the Assembly of Yahweh (7th day) is a conservative Jews for Jesus-type congregation. It teaches that “the true religion is Jewish (not a Gentile religion)” and its members celebrate the Old Testament holidays rather than those related to the New Testament. The congregation considers the Old Testament historically and scientifically accurate.

So, a white supremacist group is funded by white supremacist billionaires. And the TX GQP chair closely worked with one of them.

That perfectly explains why the Texas GQP refuses to disassociate from Holocaust deniers and neo-Nazis.

I’m beginning to think the klan has been very active in Texas for a very long time.

Sheesh. 😯

I’d take all of the left’s so-called “radicals” over ANY of the right’s extremists or Christian Nationalists.

 

 

 

Sen. Josh Hawley Goes Full Christian Nationalist

By my dogs that love gravy, we must stop this Christian attack on the secular state of our country.  This people are desperately misinformed yet have worked their way into power and money.   They want a minority Christian rule over the majority using moral police and a Christian Taliban.  This is a full out take over of the US by a driven religious group who are starting from the wrong premise and building a movement out of it.  We have already seen how they want to base our laws on medical care on their religion, even if they don’t know what their religion says about the subject.   I am talking about banning abortion, but also marriage, adoption, gender affirming care for trans people, and yes even what materials can be read by your students and what can be taught them.   Hugs.  Scottie  


January 13, 2024

Sen. Josh Hawley writes for First Things:

America as a Christian nation—that’s a heretical notion by today’s lights. We are a secular country, the experts have insisted—demanded—for decades. But that was never true. The Founders read Roman historians, yes. Some were influenced by Enlightenment philosophies.

But the Bible has been the main source of our national ideals. From the age of the New England Puritans to the Great Awakening that prepared the ground for revolution, Scripture has molded our common life from the first. Consider:

Our ideal of the individual has Christian roots. So too does our constitutionalism. Our great traditions of progressive reform were animated by an ardent Christian spirit—as was conservative resistance to their excesses. Even in our most bitter conflicts, Christian culture has been America’s common ground.

Read the full essay.

It goes on for several thousand words.

 

From the Treaty of Tripoli, signed by John Adams

“the Government of the United States of America is not, in any sense, founded on the Christian religion.”
 

I’m really starting to HATE christians. I’ve known very few who actually walk the walk, and you sure don’t need a religion to do the right thing. In fact religious people will do the WRONG thing because of their religion.

I avoid them completely. Conversation starters like ‘tell me about your relationship with Jesus’, or any phrase that includes ‘sharing the good news’ have me running for the hills. There are good christians out there, they just don’t announce it to everyone because they are too busy being good christians. Wish there were more of them.

 

Of all the bullshit lines I’ve got hit with, my fave was “What’s YOUR form of worship?” asked in a tone making it very obvious her assumption was that of course no one is without a form of worship.

it’s interesting — even Joe Scarbourough, brought up S. Baptist has been saying for awhile now how that church, and other evangelical ones coopted the abortion issue in the Carter presidency … and turned those churches into the political (.. i’ll call them “clubs” ) that they are —devoid of any real Christian meaning.

Yes, it was the 1973 Supreme Court decision on tax exemption of religious organizations (Committee for Public Education and Religious Liberty v Nyquist) that got all of this rolling. It has always been about money and power.

That’s b/c the republican establishment knew that their platform of tax cuts for millionaires/billionaires along with corporations was a losing strategy. They knew that by renewing the horrid “southern strategy” that nixon made use of while allowing evangelicals a voice in dictating social wedge issues (abortion, gay rights), republicans would remain popular amongst low-info as well as suburban voters.

Thumbnail
Thumbnail

And make the churches pay for it!

It’s for its own protection, after all.

Minor quibble: That wall was built over 200 years ago.

Ya, and they’ve been trying to tear it down ever since!

Thumbnail

I’m just going to post this. Someone might have done this before me but just in case…..

Like their elections, if they don’t get the desired result they get so over. Because only 4 of the founding fathers clearly pointed out that there should be a separation of church and state ,They have taken it upon themselves to say “ not a majority “ so we will force our agenda

[N]o religious Test shall ever be required as a Qualification to any Office or public Trust under the United States.

James Madison

James Madison (1836). “The Debates in the Several State Conventions on the Adoption of the Federal Constitution: As Recommended by the General Convention at Philadelphia in 1787. Together with the Journal of the Federal Convention, Luther Martin’s Letter, Yates’s Minutes, Congressional Opinions, Virginia and Kentucky Resolutions of ’98-’99, and Other Illustrations of the Constitution”, p.204

Christianity neither is, nor ever was a part of the common law. Thomas Jefferson

Thomas Jefferson (1829). “Reports of Cases Determined in the General Court of Virginia: From 1730, to 1740; and from 1768, to 1772”, p.140

The government of the United States is not, in any sense, founded on the Christian Religion. John Adams

Article 1 of the Treat of Tripoli.

If you want to see what a “Christian America” that Josh Hawley talks about looks like, look no further than Mississippi, where Evangelical Christianity is thoroughly infused in it’s government. It been that way for a long time. As I mentioned below, it’s also dead last or near dead last in every economic and social measurement, including high poverty, poor education, terrible health care outcomes, infant mortality, low wages… you name it. Josh Hawley and his fellow Christianists want to replicate Mississippi all over America.

 

Missouri, which Hawley represents, isn’t much better.

Yes. It is unclear to me how the state districts are gerrymandered, but I am sure that they must be. MO never seems to have any competitive state-wide offices, though. This is a big change from past decades.

Those people from red counties are happy enough to come to the blue big city hospitals for their medical care.

Tate Reeves doesn’t want to accept federal funding to feed free lunch-eligible children a lunch during summer break. Super Christian – let them go hungry. That’s Mississippi.

my response to his X: “Dear Josh — read the US Constitution, read Geo Washington’s Letter to the Touro Synagogue, and read the Treaty of Tripoli (circa 1802)

you are Wrong, you are a coward, and you are the worst sort of traitor to the United States of America …’

A truly Christian economy is void of money and not made it the sole motivation of one’s existence. Greed is a sin. A good job is helping the poor and welcoming those in need to one’s home to house and feed without the intention of enslaving them for the free labor.
What kind of fucking Christian is he?

A true Christian economy would not charge interest, for starters.

And there would be jubilee every few years to forgive debt.
How many Rethugs are loath to forgive their children’s education debt?
How many of them work hard to give bankers the upper hand in all negotiations.

“Christian” is a meaningless label. People hide behind it for causes both noble and vile.

 

No more ‘sexually explicit’ books in Carroll County schools, new policy says

https://www.thebaltimorebanner.com/education/k-12-schools/moms-for-liberty-carroll-county-book-policy-YZ4LKA76GFEW7BVBIIN4QY7RGU/

One minority group using keywords to promote a crisis that doesn’t exist to remove books with characters and plots they don’t like.  One minority group pushing for the right to control the children of the majority who disagree with them.   One of the board members claimed it was up to the parents to decide what was sexual explicit not educators, yet he also claimed that he wouldn’t tolerate tax money to be spent on what he called sexually explicit books, which we all know he means books with LGBTQIA characters or plots.   So he is taking the rights from the parents he just claimed had the rights to make that judgement.    Hugs.  Scottie

Opposing parents pushed back against Moms for Liberty’s campaign, saying that removing books is censorship and that one group of parents shouldn’t decide what’s best for everyone. There was even an attempt to challenge the Bible to test the system.

None of the 61 books that were challenged was available to elementary students. They only lived on middle and high school shelves. That was until the superintendent removed them all, except for the Bible, until they went through the review process. 


(SimonSkafar/Getty Images)

Whether it’s a textbook or a library book, it won’t be allowed in Carroll County Public Schools if deemed sexually explicit by school officials. That’s thanks to a new policy passed unanimously by its school board Wednesday.

The vote came after a monthslong campaign by the conservative parent group Moms for Liberty, whose members challenged dozens of school library books they say are inappropriate for students.

The board decided in the fall that staff should tighten the policy on textbook and library book selection and tasked them with creating a definition of “sexually explicit.”

“Instructional materials, including supplemental materials, shall not contain sexually explicit content,” the new policy states. “Sexually explicit content is defined as unambiguously describing, depicting, showing, or writing about sex or sex acts in a detailed or graphic manner.”

The policy doesn’t apply to materials used in the health curriculum.

Opposing parents pushed back against Moms for Liberty’s campaign, saying that removing books is censorship and that one group of parents shouldn’t decide what’s best for everyone. There was even an attempt to challenge the Bible to test the system.

None of the 61 books that were challenged was available to elementary students. They only lived on middle and high school shelves. That was until the superintendent removed them all, except for the Bible, until they went through the review process. She said it’s because reviewing such a high volume of books would take too long. And school officials said removing the Bible would be a constitutional issue.

Kathryn Berling, a parent and school librarian at Taneytown Elementary School, told board members that they nor the school system asked for librarians’ input on the books. While she spoke, a handful of attendees stood with her in solidarity.

Berling noted that librarians were not asked for input when the superintendent took away the books, nor on a new policy put in place at the beginning of the year that requires librarians to complete a time-consuming checklist policing a book’s content before selecting for the library.

The board also, she noted, did not ask librarians about defining “sexually explicit.”

“It’s a shame you cannot trust the professionalism of our CCPS media specialists,” Berling said.

Shortly before Wednesday’s vote, a few board members questioned how staff defined “sexually explicit” in the policy proposal. Sahithya Sudhakar, the student member, said she doesn’t think the definition suffices because graphic content can look different to different people. It’s a risk to content like literature that students read in class, she added.

“I’m worried we’re losing important content in our schools because a single line is taken out of context,” said Sudhakar, who does not have voting rights.

Fellow members Tara Battaglia and Patricia Dorsey, who ended up voting for the policy, echoed her concerns on the definition and asked if there was more they can do to make it less subjective.

But members Steve Whisler and Donna Sivigny saw no issue. Whisler said as an elected official he won’t tolerate any tax dollars spent on “sexually explicit” books.

“It is the job of parents, not educators … to determine what’s sexually explicit,” he said.

 

Kristen Griffith is an education reporter covering Baltimore County. 

 

 

[Board member] Whisler said… “It is the job of parents, not educators… to determine what’s sexually explicit.”

Then why the fuck did he argue and vote for a policy that makes it the educators and school librarians responsibility to police the board‘s definition? Whisler’s just an anti-sex control freak.

 

People who ban books aren’t for liberty.

Their words are always lies to hide the truth.

Neither was Hitler and his “socialist” party. For some reason conservatives love their opposite meaning names.

Ministry of Truth, Ministry of Love, Ministry of Peace, Ministry of Plenty.

It’s how Republicans work.

Thumbnail
  

What’s the foreskin to shekel exchange rate?

well, after they are harvested there is no more inflation!

I was reading books from the adult section of our libraries when I was in 7th grade. I came across depictions of sex acts. Somehow I survived. Thank God. /s

By third grade I was reading at the 12th grade level. Mostly science fiction but many biographies and other non-fiction. I was exposed to many words and terms and descriptions of things that I didn’t completely understand, but the help of the dictionary and my extremely well-read father, I quickly learned. My parents never treated me like a little kid when it came to my choices of reading materials, and I wasn’t in any way traumatized by anything I read in books.

By age 12, I was allowed to go off on my bike, alone or with friends, and frequently would be gone 8 to 10 hours on the weekends. Sometimes we’d be riding clear across town [Columbus, OH] or far out past the suburbs, going almost to Delaware, Grove City, Reynoldsburg and others. I was also allowed to go play down by the river behind the shopping center, where, in retrospect, one might even encounter somewhat shifty characters. I never got kidnapped, raped, assaulted or killed, or exposed to drugs or cigarettes. Most of those things happened at my school. I turned out ok, well-rounded, able to discern right from wrong, to make responsible decisions and other positive attributes.

hell, I was reading from the adult section of the library when I was in grade school. if I could read it, my parents let me and my dad would answer any questions I had about things. they were just happy I was reading. I remember seeing book about cattle breeds around the world and there was a photo showing the weinies of African tribal members, I loved that book!!! LOL

To be thorough, the need to remove the Bible.

Christian privilege at it again.
“[S]chool officials said removing the Bible would be a constitutional issue.” But it’s not a constitutional issue to ban speech unless it’s religious (Evangelical Christian).
These assholes believe they’re both divinely and constitutionality sanctioned to dominate the rest of us.

Tried that here in Utah, it worked but not for long. Christian privilege.

The buy-bull….Talk about a book full of filth, violence and lies! No one should be exposed to it until old enough to realize is a work of fiction created by sun baked brains and changed over the centuries by crazies, drunks, and the power hungry.

“School officials said removing the Bible would be a constitutional issue.”

School officials were wrong. Applying a general law or policy without distinction and without bias against a religion is clearly constitutional. Also, the Bible is neither a textbook nor supplemental instructional material, so it’s presence is superfluous, already.

Idiots. Exempting the Bible in a public school library privileges Christianity over other beliefs, which IS a violation of the Establishment Clause.

Have to wonder if the Talmud and other religious texts are also in the library since the buy-bull is….if not, why not? Hmmmm?

Funny how the Bible is excluded despite all the talks of sex in there.

I guess it’s not within their definition of “sexually explicit” because it’s language is too ambiguous and lacking in detail when it describes sex acts with prostitutes, sisters, half-sisters, sisters-in-law, daughters, fathers, kings, concubines, refugees, war captives, under-age girls, slaves, maids, surrogates, men, donkeys, dogs, and goats.

They begat their brains out in those days.

No TV and lots of wine….oh, what shall we do for fun this evening? ROFL

It’s never the good guys who ban books

If you fear a child reading a book, but not dying of a terminal pregnancies after a rape, you are not for children. Full stop

Yeah, because hiding books is going to work so well with tomorrows generation. You know technology and shit.

Thumbnail

As a voracious young reader, I had pretty much checked out everything in the kids section of our public library by age 10 and moved into the adult stacks.The librarians panicked the first time I brought a stack of Agatha Christie and John Creasey mysteries to the check out desk and refused to let me have them without parental permission. Infuriated, I ran to get my mom. She rolled her eyes and just said, “Let him read them”.

Until puberty hit, I skimmed over the sexy bits, then had an “a-ha” moment when I finally connected the naughty descriptions in the books with my own naughty bits. I think the only significant affect it had on me was using a lot of British sex slang until the 7th grade librarian asked me if I knew what “twat” actually meant.

P.S. The librarian became a lifelong friend. RIP Mrs. Pavitt.

 

 

Gov. Abbott says Texas isn’t shooting migrants because Biden ‘would charge us with murder’

https://www.houstonchronicle.com/politics/texas/article/abbott-migrants-shooting-remark-18603280.php

The law he touts that would allow local police to arrest people they “think” are not here legally and a local judge gets to order their immediate removal.   Guess what that means in reality?  Arrest all brown people, charge them, quickly send them to Mexico at gun point … learn later they were here legally, or maybe even citizens.   Ah who cares, they republican leaders get their nice white straight cis ethnostate where they are complete rulers over how people live.   Hugs.  Scottie.

The third-term Republican responded that the state is using “every tool that can be used, from building a border wall to building these border barriers.” He also touted the new Texas law empowering state officials to remove people from the U.S. who they suspect of being in the country illegally. 

“… the new deportation law, which is set to take effect in March and threatens to upend longstanding precedent leaving immigration enforcement solely to the federal government. The law would allow any law enforcement officer in Texas to arrest migrants accused of unlawfully entering the state from Mexico and empower judges to order their removal”. 


By Benjamin Wermund,Washington Bureau
 
 
 
 
Department of Public Safety troopers stand guard over migrants in a detention area Tuesday, Dec. 19, 2023, in Eagle Pass as a surge of migrants push across the border.

Department of Public Safety troopers stand guard over migrants in a detention area Tuesday, Dec. 19, 2023, in Eagle Pass as a surge of migrants push across the border.

William Luther

WASHINGTON — Gov. Greg Abbott says Texas is doing everything to stop border crossings short of shooting migrants because the Biden administration would “charge us with murder.”

“We are deploying every tool and strategy that we possibly can,” the governor said in an interview with conservative commentator Dana Loesch. “The only thing that we’re not doing is we’re not shooting people who come across the border because of course the Biden administration would charge us with murder.”

The comments came during an appearance on Loesch’s show last week in which Abbott was asked what he believed was the “maximum amount of pressure” he could implement to secure the border.

The third-term Republican responded that the state is using “every tool that can be used, from building a border wall to building these border barriers.” He also touted the new Texas law empowering state officials to remove people from the U.S. who they suspect of being in the country illegally. 

The clip was aired on Loesch’s program again Thursday without the line about shooting migrants. A version of the audio was also posted on social media by Heartland Signal, a progressive radio show based in Chicago. 

Abbott said Friday that he was asked to point out where he was drawing the line on what the state can legally do to secure the border.

“I pointed out something that is obviously illegal,” Abbott said. “It’s that simple.” 

The comments come as the Biden administration has sued the state to stop a slew of Abbott’s border security efforts, including the new deportation law, which is set to take effect in March and threatens to upend longstanding precedent leaving immigration enforcement solely to the federal government. The law would allow any law enforcement officer in Texas to arrest migrants accused of unlawfully entering the state from Mexico and empower judges to order their removal. 

Abbott also has strung miles of razor wire along the border and deployed a wall of buoys in the Rio Grande, which the Biden administration is also fighting to have removed in a separate court battle. 

But Abbott still has faced pressure from some conservatives to do more, and some in the GOP have called for the use of deadly force to stop suspected traffickers. Republican presidential candidate and Florida Gov. Ron DeSantis urged as much during a campaign stop in Texas last summer, saying those breaking through border barriers and displaying “hostile intent” should “end up stone-cold dead as a result of that bad decision.”

The Texas Department of Public Safety last month found no wrongdoing by agency officials after six troopers working for Abbott’s border security initiative alleged mistreatment of migrants last summer. 

The complaints included an email from a DPS medic describing “inhumane” treatment of migrants he witnessed while deployed in Eagle Pass. The email said troopers had been ordered to push small children and nursing babies back into the Rio Grande and told not to give water to asylum-seekers even in extreme heat. The agency’s inspector general found that most of the incidents raised by the troopers did happen, but concluded that DPS officials did not violate law or agency policy. 

 
 
 
 
 
 

Benjamin Wermund is the Washington correspondent for the Houston Chronicle and San Antonio Express-News. He can be reached at ben.wermund@houstonchronicle.com. He covers the Texas delegation and the many ways the state and its leaders shape national politics and policy. He’s a Texas native and a diehard Spurs fan.

That the Governor doesn’t consider murder a bad thing…
Should concern ALL Texans.

He trafficks humans w/out criminal liability…
He drowns humans w/out criminal liability…
He uses razor wires on humans w/out criminal liability…

Almost as if he’s above the law, himself.

So, no ethical or religious concerns over killing people struggling to survive, just don’t want to go to jail. Way to Christian there, Greg.

People like Abbott are precisely the reason why laws exist. He has no moral compunction against murder, but luckily realizes it could land him in prison.

 

RNC Posts Fake Quote To Make Biden Appear Senile

January 12, 2024

The far-right Washington Free Beacon writes:

President Joe Biden told Pennsylvanians on Friday that he works for the government in the Senate, a comment likely to fuel concerns about the gaffe-prone president’s mental fitness. “My name’s Joe Biden. I work for the government in the Senate,” said the 81-year-old president as he met employees at a coffee shop in the Keystone State. Biden, the oldest president in American history, represented Delaware in Congress’s upper chamber from 1973 until 2009, when he left to serve as President Barack Obama’s vice president.

Read the full article. As you can see below, the quote is an utter fabrication by the Republican National Committee, which has since deleted their stupid lie but not before it was picked up by multiple cultist sites like the one above.

 

Remember this quote from the “Trump Meme Team.”

“It doesn’t have to be true, it just has to go viral.”

Honestly, is this stupid lie going to change anyone’s mind? The deplorables, who suck this shit down, already aren’t going to vote for Biden and Biden supporters know it’s almost certainly lie. Or just another Joe-gaffe, no big deal.

So, how nice for them that this “went viral.”

It’s not jut the one lie; it’s the accumulation of them that form a totally fake narrative that will convince their stupid dupes that it’s true.

What do you expect from the party of total scum?

Thumbnail
 

I thought it was Genital.Obsessed.Perverts.

 

I thought it was Greedy Old Pricks. Or Guns Over People.

No shame. And that’s a damn shame. They disgrace our Nation every day. I wish them troubled sleep.

Certainly not integrity or truth, or anything remotely approaching it.

This is only the start, with AI the trolls at GQP headquarters in Moscow are working overtime to try to match with fiction the complete insanity that actually flows from the mouth of the mango malignancy.

Russia’s living on borrowed time. When Putin dies or gets thrown out of power, watch for China to grab Eastern Siberia. They’re already building a railroad to the Bering Strait

I’m sure there is answer for this from them!!

Thumbnail
 

It was going around right wing media earlier that Biden claimed to have started the civil rights movement. Of course he said nothing of the sort.

What he really said was that he started visiting a black church during the civil rights movement.

They like to lie about everything.

there isn’t a lie they won’t tell

Everything — morals, dignity, truth, respect, lawfulness, tradition, convention, patriotism, humanity, everything — is secondary to winning with these assholes.

And yet they’re still treated as acting in good faith by most media outlets, even ones that are occasionally critical of them. This has to change if America is ever to emerge from this nightmare.

No more when they go low we go high.

Politically shank them with a sharpened spoon if necessary

 

Their own history is the well-sharpened machete. Yet the Dems refuse to wield it.

Biden is senile but our very sane, cogent candidate cannot pronounce “Yosemite” or “hamburgers” and wants to nuke hurricanes—three of a million glaring oopsies Fuck à l’Orange has made.

They’ve been getting away with calling all of us child molesters without a bit of pushback for nearly 50 years. They don’t need truth.

Couldn’t the DNC just run ads featuring unaltered, widely-witnessed & published videotapes of Tchump slopping his usual word-salad blather out of that shithole he calls a “mouth”? Maybe add a CC-translation, to emphasize what unhinged nonsense oozes forth from Tchump’s syphilitic-rotting brain?

The RNC lies because the RNC hasn’t been brought to heel…

When will their Chair be charged for conspiracy to disenfranchise voters in the State of Michigan?

Lacking this, they will continue to throw shit into the blender.

 

Anti-Trans Bills Are Getting Worse Than Ever

The “Great Negotiator” Strikes Again

Wow, how hard on the head this cartoon hits.  So clearly what tRump would do based on what he says.   Hugs.  Scottie

Florida GOP Bill Would “Legally De-Trans” Individuals

Aside from the normal hate and bigotry towards the LGBTQIA that religious republicans normally show, this guy adds a new wrinkle.  And it goes back to the point I made that some people can not accept change.   While not really old at 59 he shows he can not adjust to modern times.  He says, “From time immemorial, we have known that your sex was dictated by your biology,” Black said. “All I am doing is putting into Florida Statute, what we have always known, and only recently, a few people have become confused about.”  He seems to reject any advancements since time immemorial.  You do know that at one time humans thought thunder and lightning were caused by gods, we also thought the world was flat, we were sure that sickness and disease were caused by spirits and demons, religious leaders at one point were so certain that the earth was the center of everything with the sun orbiting the earth that they burned anyone to death who said otherwise … so much more we always knew, took as concrete never changing fact, and we were totally wrong about.  Just as he is about gender, sex, trans issues, and anything his religious teaching say about the LGBTQIA people.  He rejects modern science and medical best practices but instead demands that proven harmful conversion therapy be mandated by law.   “”It would also require coverage of so-called conversion therapy by requiring health insurance policies to cover mental health services “to treat a person’s perception that his or her sex is inconsistent with the person’s sex at birth” by affirming their birth sex”. Hugs.  Scottie


January 12, 2024

Jacksonville’s ABC affiliate reports:

A Northeast Florida lawmaker wants to legally define the words “man” and “woman” based on biological sex at birth. Jacksonville Rep. Dean Black filed the proposed What Is A Woman Act this week, which would also impose new requirements related to transgender individuals on state agencies and insurance companies.

House Bill 1233 requires state agencies to revoke any identification cards, like driver’s licenses, that don’t match up with a person’s sex on their birth certificate.

“From time immemorial, we have known that your sex was dictated by your biology,” Black said. “All I am doing is putting into Florida Statute, what we have always known, and only recently, a few people have become confused about.”

NBC News reports:

Black’s bill would also require any health insurance policy in the state that covers transition-related “prescriptions or procedures’’ to also cover “treatment to detransition” from such procedures.

It would also require coverage of so-called conversion therapy by requiring health insurance policies to cover mental health services “to treat a person’s perception that his or her sex is inconsistent with the person’s sex at birth” by affirming their birth sex.

The bill would also require any school district or state agency “that collects vital statistics for the purpose of complying with anti-discrimination laws or for the purpose of gathering accurate public health, crime, economic, or other data” to identify the birth sex of people in the data set, potentially restricting data collection on trans people.

Dean Black last appeared here for a bill that would allow DeSantis to remove any elected official who votes to remove Confederate monuments.

In October 2023, Black called for banning elected officials from participating in Pride events after Jacksonville’s newly-elected mayor led her city’s parade.

 

This freakish GQP obsession with other people’s crotches is fuckin creepy.

G.enital
O.bsessed
P.erverts

My favorite is all the dudes who scream about trans women using women’s bathrooms. Uh………dudes? We don’t see each others’ genitals in the bathroom anyway. Because we use stalls. With locks. I have no way of knowing if the woman in the stall next to me is trans. Why would I care?

They want Laith to use the women’s washroom?

Thumbnail
 
 

No. They don’t want him to exist at all

 

Notice how their obsession is overwhelmingly with trans women. Trans men, not so much. This is evident in his proposed legislation being titled the “What is a Woman” act.

Once again, misogyny is the root of all hatred of sexual minorities.

But having a “guy” piss near you puts you at risk of pregnancy!

/s

They also seem to think that it’s a big party in there, when all we’re doing is peeing, pooping, and menstruating. Most of us don’t even talk to anyone in there.

 

Take out all urinals. Put in stalls. Make every bathroom unisex. That way, men will have to wait in line just like women do now.
(I went to a football game where they had port-a-potties while they were building the bathrooms. Port-a-potties, of course, are unisex. But there was one that was for women only, and of course I waited in that line for it. The other ones were disgusting.

Which makes me wonder why they would want transmen using a woman’s rest room, a lot of them are more stereotypically masculine than many cis men.

They seemingly have better facial hair than I do, that’s for sure. So jealous of trans men.

They’re only telling everyone that they look at other people’s dicks in the men’s washroom. What’s wrong with them doing that? Oh, right…

They don’t realize that they’re saying men can’t control themselves around women and are constantly suppressing the urge to rape someone. Hell, Mike Huckabee said something like this a few years ago.

THIS!!!

WTF does it matter to me what’s inside a stranger’s pants unless I want to get into them?

Well they have no plans to fix any of the real problems in the country. So they invent ones to enrage their base.

I wouldn’t be surprised if someday that red states require a mandatory genital’s check to make certain that you are male or female per their standards on gender and ID. Sigh.

They HAVE tried that with CHILDRENS’ sports.

 

The Ohio legislature just did that with children’s sports.

Uh, this bill would do exactly that.

This freakish GQP obsession with ruining other people’s lives is fuckin’ criminal.

Speaker Johnson knows when his teen son is ovulating. 🤡

And dontcha love when people utterly ignorant of history start a sentence with, “From time immemorial, we have known . . . .”

Thumbnail
 

“Filed the What Is A Woman bill…”

Oh FUCK YOU YOU FUCKING FUCKHEAD.
Signed, a cis woman tired of being used as your cudgel against trans people.

Next on his agenda, a “Do Women have Souls?” bill.

We already have the “Women are Expendable” laws in many Red States that goes into effect every time conception occurs. So that’s a possibility.

Not only is he an asshole, but he’s simply fucking wrong. Factually incorrect, whether he knows or accepts it. Humans can be born with XX, XY, XO, XXY, (Klinefelter’s Syndrome) or XYY chromosomes. Take your “there are only two genders” bullshit and fuck off for all eternity.

also, XXX, androgen-insensitivity, and physical development anomalies.

It’s almost like these politicians aren’t even doctors…. Who knew… 🤔🤷

But they all pretend to be preachers and there is a lot of crossover between religion and the practice of medicine.

Not that these idiots care about science, but SciShow did a great episode on this topic a few years ago.    

 

 

Are You Suffering from TDS? Trump Derangement Syndrome

Moms for Liberty wants funds cut to Alabama libraries that let kids check out ‘pornographic material’

https://www.al.com/educationlab/2024/01/moms-for-liberty-wants-funds-cut-to-alabama-libraries-that-let-kids-check-out-pornographic-material.html

I will call note to the plans of these hate groups.  The statement outlines the primary mission for Alabama’s two chapters of Moms for Liberty in 2024: to apply for library board appointments, submit reconsideration forms for books they consider inappropriate, and discuss issues with local government officials who control public libraries, such as county commissions and city councils.  Also note what they call pornographic material.  It is simply any media that has LGBTQIA characters, plots, or even mentions them in a positive way.   It is a way to mask their flat out bigotry and hate.  Please understand had restricts been on when kids can come to the library or that they must be accompanied would have stopped me from one of my safe spaces to go to after school and I wouldn’t have been able to read because I couldn’t have books at home.   Also as I got older the few books I did find on abuse and having gay characters or information about being gay saved my sanity which was teetering on a very thin edge over a cliff.   Hugs.  Scottie


Children's books on library shelves

Children’s section at the North Shelby Public Library in Mt. Laurel

The conservative political group Moms For Liberty sent a letter last week that asked the state legislature and the public library service to withhold funds for libraries that allow children to check out “pornographic” materials. It also wants the Alabama Public Library Service to create software that prevents a minor from checking out books outside of their age range.

 

The statement outlines the primary mission for Alabama’s two chapters of Moms for Liberty in 2024: to apply for library board appointments, submit reconsideration forms for books they consider inappropriate, and discuss issues with local government officials who control public libraries, such as county commissions and city councils.

 
 

“It is time for the Alabama legislature to utilize the power of state funding and directives to APLS to push towards meaningful and long-lasting changes that protect minors and empower parents to have their voice heard,” the release said.

 
 

APLS director Dr. Nancy Pack said it’s possible for local libraries to install software to limit minors from checking out adult books, but she thinks children and teens would still find a way around the system to check out the materials they want.

 
 

“The only way that you are going to keep children from checking out materials that the parent feels are inappropriate for their child is to have parental guidance and for the parents to have a sit down talk with their children saying this is what you may check out,” Pack said.

 
 

Emily Jones, of the Madison County chapter of Moms for Liberty, said the organization doesn’t want to remove books from libraries, “rather that books be placed in a manner that allows parental oversight when sexually explicit material is included.”

 
 

That goes for all books, she said, including non-children’s Bibles.