#BorderCrises

For Republicans a problem at the border is worth more than a solution.

Once Public Schools are Largely Dead, Here’s What Happens Next…

https://hartmannreport.com/p/once-public-schools-are-largely-dead-ec4

Please notice the three factors that drive republicans, racism, money, religion.  In that order.  Hugs.  Scottie


Republicans will then begin lobbying to “reduce spending” by cutting the amount allocated for the vouchers, locking the emerging two-tier status of publicly funded education into place…

Ohio woman criminally charged after a miscarriage

A grand jury in Ohio is weighing whether to indict a woman who had a miscarriage. She was two weeks pregnant when she miscarried at home, after a doctor told her the fetus was no longer viable. Now she’s facing criminal charges for abuse of a corpse and up to a year in prison. Dr. Kavita Patel joins to discuss what this case means in a post Roe v. Wade world.

The Majority Report … some clips

Experts Roast FL Surgeon General’s Latest Batshittery

Like all people who put their feelings before the facts, that value their feelings / dislikes / hates over medical science, Ladapo is convinced only he is correct on these things no matter what or how hard people try to explain things to them.  They refuse to hear what they don’t want to.   In the case of Ladapo his pay check requires him to be against the medical science, approved medical facts, and accepted best practices of the majority of medical providers.   Hugs.  Scottie


January 4, 2024

The Washington Post reports:

“We’ve seen this pattern from Dr. Ladapo that every few months he raises some new concern and it quickly gets debunked,” said Ashish Jha, dean of Brown University’s public health school who led the White House’s national coronavirus response. “This idea of DNA fragments — it’s scientific nonsense. People who understand how these vaccines are made and administered understand that there is no risk here.”

Florida’s health department did not respond to questions about whether Ladapo’s new stance would affect vaccine access for the state’s patients, or whether his decision to repeat debunked claims could create doubts about other routine vaccinations. Scott Rivkees, a DeSantis appointee who preceded Ladapo as Florida surgeon general, called Wednesday’s announcement “surprising and disappointing” and at odds with settled science.

Read the full article.

 

I feel sad for the regular people in Florida being used as a pawn by the Florida government to create a batshit crazy talking point for the GQP to exploit their ignorance. It’s gotten people killed and will continue to do so as covid spreads.

The right people are still getting vaccinated .

Another problem is hospitals in Florida are full of Covid patients

Not a good time to have even a non Covid emergency down there

Was in FL last month (couldn’t be helped) and got sick.
Went to urgent care because there was no way in hell I was going to the ER down there.

This does not suprize me. How do you know this? It;s not being reported locally, that I know of -but I’m not watching the news really.

Florida is an extremely fragile state, with inevitable disaster looming. We live on the beach. 5 weeks ago, they just had 365 trackloads of sand per day x 7 days to refurbish the dunes in our tiny area (maybe 1/4 mile) and one week later half of the sand was already gone. 3 million just washed out to sea. No climate change here folks -nothing to see. High tides with wind can easily wash across the back streets on the Canal in Indian Rocks Beach. They use water here like it is an endless resource, allowing the freshwater aquifier to be depleted as water demand from urban areas and unsustainable agricultural practices continually increase and cause salt water intrusion. Hard to fathom really.

I don’t think ‘scientific integrity’ means what she thinks it means.

SMFH

She channels Humpty Dumpty, who says to Alice, “When I use a word, it means just what I choose it to mean—neither more nor less.” Pushaw, like Humpty, has a whimsical approach to language and meaning, and does not let herself be overly bothered with reality… which does lead to tragic fatal falls.

Especially, in the quote in the picture of the article, he says “when the vaccines are known to be contaminated with foreign DNA”… no, dumbass. It’s mRNA, not DNA. Ribonucleic, not dioxyribonucleic. Big difference.

So much scientific integrity that he altered a study to get the results he wanted. Now that’s integrity!

Johnson Defends Rejection Of $14B For Border Security

There is no compromise to be had with these republicans anymore as they are openly racists.  The only thing they will accept is no more letting brown people in the US.  Period.  Look at all their proposals, remain in Mexico which makes it a Mexican problem the US is causing, no more processing and releasing until hearing which as he whines lets those people into our country, and build the wall which is proven not to work.  

I listened to half of the video because I couldn’t read the article and it was all I could stand of the republican talking points of fear fear fear and Biden doesn’t care, Biden is out of touch, Biden needs to go to the border.  When it was pointed out to him that Biden did go to the border, Johnson replied yes but it was just a photo op.  Well what do you think he and his republican buddies are doing?  The 14 million does have more money for processing asylum seekers so there is not such a big backlog of cases waiting in detention at the border.  It also includes more money for beds, more money to house and care for the people, it has solutions to the problem.  But again the republicans don’t want solutions, they want the problem to run on.  

If you listen to him, he makes claims that instill fear in people especially white people.  He claims over hundreds of thousands of “known terrorist” have crossed the border and are in the country planning terrorist attacks on US citizens.  When he was corrected that these people were flagged but not known to be terrorists and that their where they were was known, he moved to the large number of crooks from prisons that are coming here.  Again he was corrected by Tapper that has gone on forever under all administrations, so he switched the large number of people crossing the border, 6 million he whined.  Yes six million have come seeking asylum and are waiting hearings.   If we had the money the republicans refuse to vote on they could be processed.  And this country can handle 6 million and millions more.  Every store around here has help wanted signs up.  Let these people work while they wait.  But the republicans want the issue for the elections.  When that did not hit, he moved to illegal drugs, fentanyl, and people trafficking.  Again, addressing fentanyl was in the bill that the republicans won’t pass or even here.  Also fentanyl and other drugs come in by legal crossings, not by asylum seekers.  The republicans like to bring up the coyotes helping people get here because they like to use the word trafficking, which they make sound as scary as possible.  It brings to mind sex trafficking of little girls, little boys, and young women for sex.  Sorry that shit is happening all over the US and not at the border.   Yes they are moving the people to the border and over it.   But hey what do you think DeathSantis and Abbot are doing with the mass immigrant bussing they are doing, yes people trafficking. 

Just before I shut it off Johnson whines that these things he is saying are not just republican talking points they are real bad things happening right now.  Again back to be afraid, be very afraid, along with Biden doesn’t know or care.   Yes all republican talking points.   No solutions, but lots of whining.   Lots of racist dog whistles.  Elect us and we will keep the brown people out.   Hugs.   Scottie  

 

but…but…but…if we actually do something for border security and immigration then we can’t blame the crisis we are creating on Biden!!!

Bingo.

Thumbnail
 

Just like abortion, don’t kill the goose that lays the golden eggs.

Republicans have had over a year being in charge of the House plenty of time to write their own bill on how to fix the border problem. Has anyone seen it? These assholes have no desire to fix anything instead they just want to blame Biden for everything. They are unfit to serve and they have to go.

It’s coming right after infrastructure week.
And the healthcare plan

They’ve lost the ability to write sane bills because all the sane GOP are gone from office. All that is left are morons and people trying to get a Fox News gig after they are voted out.

Their border bill will be along just as soon as they finish working on their healthcare bill, and Paul Ryan’s “Contract With America.”

I believe they are rooting around in Hunter’s tighty whiteys trying desperately to find some vestige of daddy that simply isn’t there and spending the entirety of their efforts on protecting the actions, deeds and words of their mango messiah. It’s a lot of work and money to do both of those things. I’m sure it’s exhausting. Just look at Gym. He looks totally worn out. To be honest, I don’t think Johnson is there to be much of a speaker. He has one job and that is to disavow the election results when they don’t go blumpies way. Not sure how all of that is going to turn out but I’m curious to see if he’ll even be in that seat at the time. rethuglicans are seeing their way out as quickly as they can get. And we’re happy to see them go.

It is also similar to wanting to get rid of Obamacare, with NOTHING to replace it!!!

Republicans already are using the border crisis as their primary campaign argument for the 2024 election. It’s how they hope to help Donald Trump get back to the White House.

The worst thing that could happen to them, politically, would be for Republicans and Democrats of good faith to reach a bipartisan deal on the border.

Republicans led by House Speaker Mike Johnson, all of whom made the trip to make speeches, make the news, make (perhaps) some campaign cash, and accomplish … nothing.

Andy Biggs: ”Shut the border down, or we’ll shut the government down,”

Their base may fall for this but everyone else sees this for what it is….Bullshit.

Thanks to our worthless media, those low-info voters don’t understand that it takes congress to actually enact laws and funding for those laws. They also fail at understanding basic concepts like cause and effect.

Media doesn’t help. But lack of civics education (and crappy history, literature ,and math* education) is a bigger driver in my book. Apathy and the feeling that nothing I do matters doesn’t help the situation.

*I say math, because well taught, math teaches logical thinking and reasoning, history which should look at cause and effect and how nothing happens without a multitude of factors, and literature because it explores empathy and the power of words and meaning.

They think the president controls everything, using a panel of switches and levers.

“That won’t help us win in November,” Johnson proclaimed. “That won’t do a darn thing but help solve the president’s problem.”

Please. This way the situation at the border stays stagnant and they can blame Biden, so it’s a win/win as far as they’re concerned. Shows you how much they really care about the border “crisis,” except as a political tool.

Well, they have to turn somewhere other than abortion after SCrOTUS overturned Roe. And they have to avoid being blamed for that as well. So create / worsen any existing issue to use against Dems.

Remind me again why the GQP didn’t solve immigration when they were in control?

Well if you count separating children and infants from their parents, let some sexual abuse happen, didn’t keep records of the kids and their parents then proceeded to lose children in the process…. they didn’t solve it but made it MUCH worse.

Proving they have no interest in solving the problem. Their only interest is in using it as a political cudgel.

I don’t suppose Tapper asked him WHAT policy? This has nothing to do with policy…it is about fighting (and doing nothing).

If only there had been money set aside for a string of border signs that say “WETBACKS GO HOME!” , Johnson would have gleefully accepted it. Remember, hatred is the point.

Translation: “We really don’t want to do anything that might alleviate the crisis at the border–we need to gin up the chaos for the elections.”

Follow the money. Corporations make billions off of powerless illegal migrants who can’t report wage theft or unsafe working conditions. Their repellent minions use the issue as a racist dog whistle but block all attempts to address the issue.

“You can’t pick and choose” which parts of the bill you want? Bullshit. It is called compromise, and it is how legislation is done. Idiot.

Republicans reject the idea of treating refugees like human beings.

 

Remember, this is the man who married his teen-aged daughter in a “purity” wedding. He put a ring on her finger and she’s not allowed to take it off until he finds her a husband and hands her over.

Ag, hospitality and construction all rely on both documented and undocumented labor. They contribute heavily to the GOP because they like tax cuts and some of them like white Jesus and tax cuts. They do so knowing that their labor supply will not be fucked with.

It isn’t immigration policy or regulations, it’s IMMIGRATION LAWS.
It’s basic civics: who passes laws in our government? Who’s in control of the House?

New rule designed to protect LGBTQ foster children draws GOP opposition 

This is pure Christian bigotry.   They don’t want to be forbidden to harass LGBTQIA homeless kids, tell them they are broken and wrong so they need Christian fixings.  It is all about being able to forbid trans kids to transition even socially, and to send gay and trans kids to conversion therapy.   Ask yourself why it is so important to them to disrespect LGBTQIA kids?  And the fact is, this rule does not keep religious people out of the foster system.  What it does is prevent LGBTQIA children from being placed in homes where they would face abuse due to their being gay or trans.  But it prevents Christian bigots from being able to harass and harm gay and trans kids.  Again that is what the republicans are fighting for, the right to force gay and trans kids to live as straight cis kids while trying to force them to join Jesus.     Hugs.   Scottie

A bill filed in the House and Senate in November by Rep. Mike Kelly (R-Pa.) and Sen. Tim Scott (R-S.C.), a former GOP presidential candidate, would prevent government agencies from penalizing child welfare service providers that are unwilling to “take action contrary to their sincerely held religious beliefs,” including affirming a child’s gender identity or sexual orientation. The duo introduced identical legislation in 2019 and 2021.

Nonreligious service providers, meanwhile, have largely argued that the draft rule is needed to protect LGBTQ young people already vulnerable to abuse.


BY BROOKE MIGDON – 01/03/24 2:14 PM ET

A new rule requiring child welfare agencies to place LGBTQ children in “environments free of hostility, mistreatment, or abuse” based on the child’s sexual orientation, gender identity or expression is drawing opposition from Republicans.

The proposed rule, issued in September by the Department of Health and Human Services (HHS), also would require caregivers to undergo cultural competency training to ensure LGBTQ youths are placed in homes where their identities are affirmed.

In a statement, Health Department Secretary Xavier Becerra said the proposal puts “children’s well-being first.”

Studies have shown that LGBTQ young people are overrepresented in the child welfare system. Lesbian, gay and bisexual children are more than twice as likely to experience foster care placement compared with their heterosexual peers, a 2019 study found, and roughly 30 percent of foster youth identify as LGBTQ, according to the Children’s Bureau, the federal agency responsible for overseeing the child welfare system in the U.S.

About 5 percent of foster youth identify as transgender.

But the rule has met some opposition in the GOP. 

A bill introduced last month by Rep. Jim Banks (R-Ind.), who is currently running for an open Senate seat, would prevent foster and adoptive families from being required to affirm a transgender child’s gender identity. The measure, called the Sensible Adoption For Every Home Act, has four Republican co-sponsors.

Banks in a statement to Fox News said the bill was drafted in response to the HHS proposal, which he said discriminates against prospective caretakers that are “opposed to irreversible sex change procedures on kids.”

LGBTQ rights advocates have denounced the Indiana congressman’s bill and his justification for introducing it, which they say reflects misconceptions about gender-affirming health care for youth and misrepresents what the Health Department’s draft rule aims to achieve.

“No part of this says anything about changing the sex of a child,” said Allen Morris, policy director at the National LGBTQ Task Force. “It’s talking about making sure that [LGBTQ youths] are not in an abusive home or somewhere that’s going to mistreat them.”

Other Republicans have argued that the proposed rule would discriminate against faith-based providers.

A bill filed in the House and Senate in November by Rep. Mike Kelly (R-Pa.) and Sen. Tim Scott (R-S.C.), a former GOP presidential candidate, would prevent government agencies from penalizing child welfare service providers that are unwilling to “take action contrary to their sincerely held religious beliefs,” including affirming a child’s gender identity or sexual orientation. The duo introduced identical legislation in 2019 and 2021.

Sen. Marco Rubio (R-Fla.), one of the bill’s 17 Republican co-sponsors in the Senate, wrote in a December editorial that the measure would effectively overrule the Biden administration’s “new woke standards.” Rubio’s Lifting Local Communities Act, introduced last January, would similarly bolster the ability of religious organizations that receive federal funding to operate in accordance with their religious beliefs.

In a Dec. 8 letter to Becerra, however, 19 Democratic senators voiced their support for the Health Department’s proposed rule, writing that its stipulations are needed “to protect children in the foster care system more than ever.”

“As members of Congress we are committed to ensuring all children, including LGBTQIA+ children, thrive in safe and stable environments,” the senators, led by Sen. Ron Wyden (D-Ore.), wrote in the letter.

Compared with their cisgender and heterosexual peers, LGBTQ children and adolescents in the child welfare system are more likely to report poor treatment related to their sexual orientation or gender identity. In a 2014 study of LGBTQ foster youths in Los Angeles, nearly 38 percent reported poor treatment connected to their sexual orientation, gender identity or gender expression.

Twenty-eight states and Washington, D.C., have explicit laws or policies in place to protect LGBTQ youths in foster care from discrimination based on sexual orientation and gender identity, and another six have laws prohibiting discrimination based on sexual orientation only, according to the Movement Advancement Project, a nonprofit organization that tracks LGBTQ laws.

In 13 states, state-licensed child welfare agencies may legally refuse to place and provide services to children and families — including LGBTQ people and same-sex couples — if doing so conflicts with their religious beliefs. 

Republicans at the state level have also sought to push back on the rule.

In a November letter to the Children’s Bureau, more than a dozen Republican state attorneys general said the Health Department’s proposal discriminates against Christian caretakers and provides solutions to a problem that does not exist.

The letter, led by Alabama Attorney General Steve Marshall (R), references a 2021 Supreme Court ruling that sided with a Philadelphia Catholic social services agency that had refused to accept same-sex couples as foster parents.

“This proposed rule seeks to accomplish indirectly what the Supreme Court found unconstitutional just two years ago: remove faith-based providers from the foster care system if they will not conform their religious beliefs on sexual orientation and gender identity,” the attorneys general wrote in the Nov. 27 letter.

A Health Department spokesperson declined to comment on the letter but said members of the public are encouraged to express their views on the draft rule. A 30-day public comment period ended Nov. 27.

Responses to the proposed rule from Christian organizations have been mixed, although most submitted to the Health Department center around concerns that the rule, if implemented, would discriminate against faith-based providers and hinder the recruitment and retention of foster families, many of whom are religious.

“Among the most concerning — and most likely — negative impacts of the proposed regulations would be a significant chilling effect on the involvement of people of religious faith in the foster system,” one group wrote in a Nov. 20 letter to Becerra. “This rule would push many of them away.”

Nonreligious service providers, meanwhile, have largely argued that the draft rule is needed to protect LGBTQ young people already vulnerable to abuse.

“With all of the pain, rejection, broken promises and separation that many youth in foster care experience, a targeted and specific plan for LGBTQI+ youth’s health and wellbeing through safe and appropriate placements can ensure youth are acknowledged and affirmed when they express their needs,” wrote a coordinator for a Cleveland-based nonprofit that works with foster youth.

“Then, when this plan is followed through, youth will actually experience their needs being met, their voices mattering and a caring network of individuals,” they wrote. “This is vital for all youth, but especially youth who identify LGBTQI+ because we know that so often this is not the case.”

But some nonreligious and Democratic organizations have been critical of the proposal, which they say does not go far enough because it still allows for individuals who do not support LGBTQ identities to become foster parents.

Multiple groups in comments submitted to the Health Department referenced a 2021 survey of young people who concealed their LGBTQ identities prior to placement over fears of “how their social worker may react” and “concerns about losing their placement.”

“The flexibility allowed within the rule presumes that those who are LGBTQI+ and not yet out would be served well when placed with any family — including those who opt out of being ‘safe and appropriate,’” the executive director of one children’s rights organization wrote. “However, not requiring that every provider be a safe and appropriate placement for LGBTQI+ children will mean that LGBTQI+ youth are placed in inadequate placements.”

Banks and other Republicans are also seeking to reinstate a ban on transgender military members. Earlier this year Banks founded the House Anti-Woke Caucus.

 

Thumbnail
 
Other Republicans have argued that the proposed rule would discriminate against faith-based providers.

 

Thank God it would!!

What they are really complaining about is it would take away over 30% of their government grift.

LGBTQ kids shouldn’t be within a hundred yards of a faith based foster service.

They read

“environments free of hostility, mistreatment, or abuse”

and immediately thought “that means us christians!!”

How very, very telling that their hate is more important to them than helping kids who need a family.

Similar to this:

Many LGBT youth end up in foster case because their “parents” etc. reject them.
The notion they should be set up for more abuse or worse cuz religious freedom is straight up bullshit.

The Pro-Child Party*

* – “Child” only applies to white, male, straight, cis-gendered, christian, children.

. . . raised in the families of their birth. The GOP aren’t fans of supporting foster children. They complained about automatically extending benefits to high school graduation, and a six month transition. They didn’t like opening up public colleges to them.

Pro-Child like Pro-Life. Only in their terms, and only at times it can be used to oppress others.

And pro parental rights. Parents have an absolute and inviolate right to do what they deem best for their children… but only insofar as that furthers the white supremacist Talibangelical agenda.

They’re so pro-life that in cases of unviable pregnancies they want mothers to die in childbirth. I dunno ’bout you guys, but if I had a wife, a sister, or a niece, I’d want the doctors to do everything they could to save her life.

They’re so pro-life that in cases of unadopted kids who are no longer babies, they call them “unadoptable” (read: unlovable).

They’re so pro-life that they rip immigrant families apart and but babies, children, and adults in cages in squalid conditions. And then don’t even both to keep track of who is who and where they’ve been placed.

“Other Republicans have argued that the proposed rule would discriminate against faith-based providers.”

This is why I hate the combination of Citizens United, Hobby Lobby, and Catholic Charities v. Philadelphia. Faith-based organizations are not persons, have no right to freedom of religion, and have no standing in child placement. The only basis for child placement decisions in PA state law, and the only basis for child placement decisions in practice should be the welfare of the child. Not the parents, not the state, and not the fucking private provider.

Death cults probably shouldn’t be a part of a kid’s mental development, just sayin’

I’m not surprised. In their eyes LBGTs merely “chose” to be LBGT, and all they need is good straight parenting to “fix” them

And we all know how well that works out

“Train up*” a child…

*That means beat the Jesus into them.

For some right-wing Christians, it certainly does–uncritical obedience, too.

 

Texas can ban emergency abortions despite federal guidance, court rules

https://www.reuters.com/world/us/texas-can-ban-emergency-abortions-despite-federal-guidance-court-rules-2024-01-02/

Remember this is for emergencies when the pregnant patient is dying!  The keywords are emergencies and dying!  Yet the republicans in Texas and in the Texas courts are so “pro-life” they are demanding a woman die rather than abort a non-viable fetus which can not survive outside the womb because it is not a baby yet.  The keywords there are non-viable, can not survive, and not a baby yet.  So we need to stop calling these people pro-life, and admit they are forced birth.  Their ruling if you read the article says that the doctor has to balance the needs of the woman AND the needs of the fetus, but the court ruling calls it an unborn baby and give it priority over a living woman.  The fetus is not a baby yet if it is non-viable, and if it is certain to die before being born, cause the death of the person carrying it, or will not survive long after being born then you can disregard anything it might need even if viable right then at exam time.   But the court claims that the policy rule is silent on what to do if the state bans abortion.  But that is not true.  The policy rule says doctors must give an abortion to save the life of the woman!  But Texas simply doesn’t want to do that!  This is 100% about controlling women, making women livestock for men, simply breeding mares for men’s issue.  A woman by herself has no rights, her duty is to the man who owns her at the time, it starts out as her father and then becomes her husband.  That is why they call it giving away the bride!  A female from birth is property and good only to serve and breed.   In the minds of republicans. 

I think the ruling is also over broad.  It bans the Biden administration from enforcing the policy against the two religious doctors groups anywhere in the country not just in Texas.  How can that be legal?  The constitution specifically calls on the government to protect the welfare of the people.  Apparently the Texas courts don’t that applies to pregnant people.     Hugs.  Scottie


A closed abortion clinic in San Antonio

An operating room sits empty at Alamo Women’s Reproductive Services, an abortion clinic that closed its doors following the overturn of Roe v. Wade and plans to reopen in New Mexico and Illinois, in San Antonio, Texas, August 16, 2022. REUTERS/Callaghan O’Hare/File Photo

The U.S. government cannot enforce federal guidance in Texas requiring emergency room doctors to perform abortions if necessary to stabilize emergency room patients, a federal appeals court ruled on Tuesday, siding with the state in a lawsuit accusing President Joe Biden’s administration of overstepping its authority.

The ruling by a unanimous panel of the 5th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals comes amid a wave of lawsuits focusing on when abortions can be provided in states whose abortion bans have exceptions for medical emergencies.

 

The U.S. Department of Justice declined to comment. The office of Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton and two anti-abortion medical associations that challenged the guidance – the American Association of Pro-Life Obstetricians & Gynecologists and the Christian Medical & Dental Associations – did not immediately respond to requests for comment.

The Biden administration in July 2022 issued guidance stating that the Emergency Medical Treatment and Active Labor Act (EMTALA), a federal law governing emergency rooms, can require abortion when necessary to stabilize a patient with a medical emergency, even in states where it is banned. The guidance came soon after the U.S. Supreme Court overturned its landmark Roe v. Wade ruling, which since 1973 had guaranteed a right to abortion nationwide.

 

Texas and the associations immediately sued the administration, saying the guidance interfered with the state’s right to restrict abortion. A lower court judge in August 2022 agreed, finding that EMTALA was silent as to what a doctor should do when there is a conflict between the health of the mother and the unborn child and that the Texas abortion ban “fills that void” by including narrow exceptions to save the mother’s life or prevent serious bodily injury in some cases.

 

Circuit Judge Kurt Engelhardt, writing for the 5th Circuit panel, agreed, writing that EMTALA also includes a requirement to deliver an unborn child and it was up to doctors to balance the medical needs of the mother and fetus, while complying with any state abortion laws.

The law “does not provide an unqualified right for the pregnant mother to abort her child,” he wrote.

The ruling upheld a lower court order that blocked enforcement of the guidance in Texas and also blocked the administration from enforcing it against members of two anti-abortion medical associations anywhere in the country.

 

The federal court’s decision comes a month after Texas’s highest state court ruled against a woman seeking an emergency abortion of her non-viable pregnancy. That court is currently considering a separate lawsuit by 22 women about the scope of the emergency medical exception to Texas’s abortion ban.

A federal judge last year reached the opposite conclusion in a similar lawsuit in Idaho, blocking that state’s abortion ban after finding it conflicted with EMTALA. The 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals is expected to hear the state’s appeal of that ruling later this month.

Reporting By Brendan Pierson in New York; Editing by Alexia Garamfalvi and David Gregorio

Gilead was meant to be fiction, it wasn’t meant to be a blueprint

The Republican Party has already been using “1984” as an instruction manual for at least two decades if not longer. Why would they stop there? Why wouldn’t they also choose to throw “The Handmaid’s Tale” in there for good measure?

So Republicans are officially the Party of Death. They’re okay with killing women who have complicated pregnancies. Horrific ruling.

Typical of what they do.

Once again: states that banned abortions with exceptions for rape, incest, or to save the life of the mother WILL NOT honor those exceptions. It’s all a charade.

Remember the logic for testing witches? Weigh her down, toss her in the pond, and if she dies, she was innocent. If she survives, she’s a witch, so execute her.

Obviously, you don’t know whether emergency action is required to save a woman’s life until you don’t do it and she’s dead. Until she’s dead, then you can’t know if an abortion was actually needed to save her life.

Besides, these people have made it abundantly clear since, well, forever, that their concern for life ONLY extends to the unborn. Once you’re alive – whether you’re the mother or the child – the only interest they have in you is fucking you over.

Since ecclesiastical SCOTUS brought us this nightmare we can’t look to them to save us. We gotta rip out all Christian Nazis from state houses. Gonna be a very tough thing with gerrymandered districts.

Ladies (and gentlemen) we need to remember $#!+ like this next November and get out there and VOTE VOTE VOTE VOTE VOTE VOTE VOTE! Pass it on! (with 4-part harmony and feeling

Actually, we are costars. Women and LBGTs are both getting murdered by the right

These pro-lifers sure do like the idea of killing the mothers of these ‘babies’.

Back in the 80s, when I would attend pro-choice marches, we used to chant
Right to Life
You’re name’s a lie
You don’t care
If women die
That was 40 years ago, and nothing has changed.

It’s been going on for a while now.

Years ago, there was a pregnant woman who was found to be nonresponsive but the state forced the hospital to keep her “alive” until the fetus, which itself had a low or no probability of live birth, could be delivered.

I found an article about this: https://www.outsidethebeltw…

Thumbnail
 

Companies planning to relocate to Texas take note.

Employers keep flocking to Texas. All they care about are low wages, weak unions, low taxes, and lax regulations.

Also, “Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton, a Republican, said former President Donald Trump would have lost in Texas in the 2020 election if his office had not successfully blocked counties from mailing out applications for mail-in ballots to all registered voters.”

It’s against the law to save a woman by aborting her pregnancy that’s going to kill her. I’m at a loss for words at the moment…… The right are taking away women’s rights and lgbtq rights at deadly consequence. Take note of you live with HIV because the meds that are keeping you alive will not be available if we continue to give these monsters power. I hope Biden stacks the court and we return to safe sanity again.

Dave Rubin whines about Suppression Olympics while CANCELLING Harvard

First, I was up all night.  I got four hours sleep yesterday afternoon, and half an hour this morning.  I have put a lot of this on my new big white board for a video I hope to do soon.   That said, this video is a great and important watch.   It details how the Fox right who claims all pro Nazi stuff is free speech and defends everything tRump spews is good is attacking University students for saying apartheid is bad.  Also how they try hard to besmirch higher education and anything saying Israel is doing anything wrong.   Again this is from the people who say nothing about tRump having meals with know Nazi white supremacists and never says a bad word about DeathSantis not disavowing the Nazis who support him.   Hugs.   Scottie

Biden Admin. Tells On Itself With Disturbing Admission About Israel

This video was recorded weeks ago.   Yet at this point Israel had destroyed 98,000 buildings, and most if not all would have had people in them or near them.  At this time the Palestinian death toll is over 20,000 and 1/3 of them are children.   Hugs.  Scottie

Ari Tolany, research consultant for Women for Weapons Trade Transparency, to discuss her recent piece that she co-authored in In These Times entitled “How Israel Got an Endless Supply of U.S.-Made Smart Bombs.”

Tolany walks Sam through the particular proliferation of Precision Guided Missiles in these overseas stockpiles, and the contradictory nature of why these missiles are manufactured (reducing collateral damage) and how they have been used by US allies – namely Saudi Arabia and Israel – before wrapping up with a brief conversation on the importance of international investigation in actually holding the US accountable for their bombs.