A Parody of Brandy (You’re a Fine Girl). Lyrics by John Emory; Performance and Video Production by Don Caron. “His lawyers say: Donald, judge will fine you If you donβt keep your mouth shut If you plan to say something nasty, better not”
This video again shows that sex is a spectrum in a sliding scale from fully one with all the markers through to the end of the other side with fully all the markers for the other.Β Β Simply because it dangles doesn’t mean internally the person is a male or boy.Β There are more intersex people than red headed people in the world.Β See if she had not had the surgeries to remove her internal testis, she would have developed male features with a vagina.Β Β Hugs.Β Scottie.Β Β
Growing up, Mimi felt ashamed because she wasnβt like other girls. But a chance discovery at 21 changed that. Subscribe to ABC Science YouTube π https://ab.co/2YFO4Go
Our sincere thanks to Mimi (she / they) for telling her story.
Intersex is an umbrella term for a range of chromosomal variations. Variations are a natural biological event, estimated to happen in about 17 in every 1,000 live births. Thatβs 1.7 per cent of the population.
There are over 30 different intersex variations with varying degrees of impact. For some, intersex features are noticeable from birth, while others donβt realize until they try for children. For more information, read: https://www.healthdirect.gov.au/inter…
A coach telling boys it is ok to masturbate and to call it rubbing themselves … wow those 1950s teachers were real groomers by standards of the Lib’s of TikTok. Mom’s of Liberty, and red state republicans.Β Β Hugs.Β Scottie
To me, this sex education high school film, which ran in thousands of schools across America back in the late 1950s, is perfectly reasonable. I saw something in school like it although I had already learned most of what it said from other boys in class talking.
But talking about sperm, ejaculation, the penis, having an erection, masturbation, about puberty in general and boys seems to me like in many schools in America today, they would not allow this conversation. I am interested to hear your comments on whether this is being taught in your child’s school.
Sex education in schools has been around a long time. Some parents and political leaders felt that it should never be taught in the schools. Some parents and political leaders today fear that has gone too far by teaching sex in such a way that alternatives to a man and a woman relationship are being discussed.
This is clearly a film for teenage boys in part because it just talks about the facts. No emotion. No other issues. I feel that even today, this is a manner of speaking that boys feel comfortable with.
In case you are asking, films for teenage girls talk about these issues such as a girls. In a completely different fashion and style. They were smart about that when they made these films.
I was a fairly shy teenager and did not kiss girls after a date until they kissed me. But I know that there were other boys in my class who are far more aggressive. as a teenage boy in the 1950s, I knew extraordinarily little about teenage girls and what their dating experience was like. If you are a teenage boy or a young man watching this, you have a lot more of a sense of what women are like then we did back then. If you are a teenage girl or young woman watching this, things I think have changed a great deal in terms of the ethics and morals this film is trying to convince teenage girls and boys to accept as the way things should be. I would be interested in comments on sexual mores today both in the United States and around the world and how they relate to what is being presented here.
In this video, weβre gonna talk about homosexuality in the Islamic World. While today, the Islamic World and homosexuality donβt seem to go together, in the past, there was a rich tradition of homosexuality being expressed through stories and poetry. While it was never completely allowed, it did become an open secret. So, without further ado, letβs get to it.
This very quickly went to being a right vs left talk about abortion and even teaching girls on how not to become pregnant.Β Again I ask why it is so vitally important for the fundamentalist Christian maga right to prevent young girls learning how to keep from getting pregnant or learning sexual educations about their bodies !!!!Β Β Hugs.Β Scottie
I do not understand the fear fundamentalist Christians republicans have about sex and the nude human body.Β They are terrified by both those things.Β But why?Β There god clearly meant for it to be fun and we are created in his image, hell they even call their god father.Β So does god have a penis?Β If so he must have used it.Β Many religions have embraced sex.Β Β Sadly too many belittle women to benefit men.Β But there was a time when nudity, especially male nudity, was not only accepted, it was expected.Β Boys swam nude even with girls present.Β Kids in school showered together.Β No one thought a kid seeing a penis would destroy their lives, but parents have so traumatized young people now that I knew a boy who would only shower with his underpants or shorts on.Β He dressed in as low a light possible.Β His parents were hyper religious.Β I have read stories from others that also had religious parents that made the topic of sex and any form of nudity forbidden leading to unpleasant consequences as they were growing up.Β From being less when informed on sexual things / how it all worked, to not being able to talk with their parents and family when they need to tell them about being abused or hurt.Β Hugs.Β Scottie
The May 2023Β postΒ states, βConservatives have to lead the way in restoring sex to its true purpose, & ending recreational sex & senseless use of birth control pills.β
The original post included a C-SPAN clip from a Heritage Foundation panel, in which author Mary Harrington promotes what she calls βa feminist movement against the pillβ in order to help return βconsequentialityβ to sex.
The Heritage Foundation has been scouting personnel for a potential upcoming Republican administration. The groupβs resurfaced post sparked outcry from critics and support from conservatives.
Earlier this month, FSC Director of Public Affairs Mike StabileΒ flaggedΒ the 2023 post, replying, βItβs not just abortion, trans healthcare or porn. One of the most influential conservative groups in the country is now calling for the government to βend recreational sex.ββ
Leading conservative culture-war crusader Christopher RufoΒ defendedΒ the 2023 statement, posting, ββRecreational sexβ is a large part of the reason we have so many single-mother households, which drives poverty, crime, and dysfunction. The point of sex is to create children β this is natural, normal, and good.β
The term βrecreational sexβ originates in religious β particularly Catholic β discourse that considers the sole purpose of sex to be procreation. The mainstreaming among conservatives of a war on βrecreational sexβ parallels a current effort to revive enforcement of the infamous 19th-century censorship Comstock Act in order to restrict access to abortion medication, birth control and contraception, as Rolling StoneΒ reported.
As XBIZΒ reported, the Heritage Foundation leads βProject 2025,β a coalition of conservative organizations whose road map for the next Republican presidential administration includes a call to immediately outlaw all pornography and imprison people who produce and distribute it.
Project 2025βs βMandate for Leadershipβ blueprint, including the call to criminalize all adult content, was first reported on by Brynn Tannehill in an August 2023 feature for Dame magazine.
In the piece, Tannehill quotes the introduction to the conservative policy road map, which declares that pornography βhas no claim to First Amendment protectionβ and states, βPornography should be outlawed. The people who produce and distribute it should be imprisoned. Educators and public librarians who purvey it should be classed as registered sex offenders. And telecommunications and technology firms that facilitate its spread should be shuttered.β
It was a flat out lie she told to inflame the maga voter who will only listen to right wing media hosts who lie and distort the truth.Β For a long time her office kept claiming the story was true, long enough that no right wing media will cover the retraction, so the right wing voter will believe it really was during the current presidential term.Β Β Hugs.Β Scottie
WASHINGTON, DC – DECEMBER 07: U.S. Sen. Katie Britt (R-AL) speaks at a press conference on border security at the U.S. Capitol on December 07, 2023 in Washington, DC. (Photo by Kevin Dietsch/Getty Images
Β
U.S. Sen. Katie Britt (R-AL) has until now been silent regarding whether she falsely linked Joe Biden to a cartel sex-trafficking story, but that’s over as of Saturday.
Β
On Friday, one independent journalist raisedΒ questionsΒ about Britt’s story, told in response to Biden’s State of the Union address, about a woman who had been sex-trafficked by a Mexican cartel. While her speech seemed to imply this happened in the U.S. under Biden, the report suggested it happened under George W. Bush’s presidency, and in Mexico.
One Alabama columnist tried to get an answer from a Britt spokesman, but ended up getting what conservative attorney George Conway called aΒ “non-denial denial”Β instead of straight talk.
Now, however, the Washington Post has reportedly confirmed the truth:
“Sean Ross, Brittβs communications director, confirmed that she was talking about Karla Jacinto Romero β who has testified before Congress about being forced to work in Mexican brothels from 2004 to 2008,” the outlet reported Saturday. “(AΒ viral TikTok by journalist Jonathan KatzΒ first revealed that Britt was speaking about Romero.) In a phone conversation and a statement, Ross disputed that Brittβs language was misleading.”
The Post, however, vehemently disagreed.
“Brittβs account of Romeroβs experience was a centerpiece of her rebuttal to Bidenβs address. The way Britt sets up the story, there is no indication that she is talking about a woman who was working in brothels in Mexico during the George W. Bush administration,” according to the Post’s fact check. “But Biden has nothing to do with Romeroβs story.”
The article continues by suggesting Romero was “never trafficked in the United States.”
“In a high-profile speech like this, a politician should not mislead voters with emotionally charged language,” the article states. “Romeroβs story is tragic and may be evocative of other Mexican girls trapped in the sex trade in that country. But she was not trafficked across the border β and her story has nothing to do with Biden. Brittβs failure to make that clear earns her Four Pinocchios.”
The truth is the US has a big problem with the human body and seeing it.Β It was not always this way.Β The modesty at all costs movement is what is harmful and should have warnings.Β The problem with porn is not that people see it, it is not even that minors see it.Β It is the way the right and even some on the left fetishize it to be some grand high point of evil.Β Β By doing that, going to such lengths to show kids we are hiding it from them we are making it seem so much more than it is.Β It is nude people showing their bodies and doing mostly normal acts.Β In most porn it is acting, and if people could see all the behind the scenes stuff it would take any joy out of it, just as watching a movie being made would ruin the fun of it.Β What we need to do is be honest with minors about their bodies, the bodies of the sexes / genders, and human sexuality.Β Treat it normally, don’t freak them out over seeing a booby or a butt.Β Β Seeing a penis will not rot the mind of any kid, freaking out over them seeing it will.Β Β Plus it helps cut down child abuse if a kid feels comfortable talking with another adult about what someone is doing to them or making them do.Β Β So many survivors never told because they were too ashamed and felt it was taboo to talk about.Β Look at a quote from the article below, do these people really believe this garbage? Harmful to brain development?Β Never proven, no medical data.Β I am sorry, I think they have confused fundamentalist religion with fun porn.Β Besides be honest, does anyone watch the entire porn movie?Β Really?Β Β But they do sit through the entire sermon and give the preacher money.Β You be the judge as to which one “is associated with low self-esteem and body image, eating disorders, impaired brain development, and other emotional and mental illnesses.”Β Β I can not stand these constant attempts to push their extreme fundamentalist church doctrine idea of calling normal things obscene and pushing their hyper regressive ideology on every one else.Β Β Look if they don’t want to see people nude, don’t want to see people having sex, then don’t watch it.Β Just don’t go to those websites!Β Why force everyone to live by your rules, to live just like you do.Β Β People in lockstep marching together.Β What a horrible place to live.Β Β Hugs.Β Scottie
It also orders such websites to post controversial health warnings that pornography “weakens brain function,” “is proven to harm human brain development” and “is associated with low self-esteem and body image, eating disorders, impaired brain development, and other emotional and mental illnesses.”
The lawsuit comes after the Fifth Circuit last year reversed a lower-court injunction blocking the law.
Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton speaks in Washington at a rally in support of then-President Donald Trump on Jan. 6, 2021, prior to the U.S. Capitol insurrection. (Jacquelyn Martin/AP) Β
Republican Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton this week sued a major online porn distributor in an effort to enforce a new state law mandating age verification and purported health warnings on adult websites.
TheΒ lawsuit, filed in state court in Austin on Monday, accuses the adult-entertainment company Aylo of violating House Bill 1181, a new state content-warning law for websites. A Montreal-based company, Aylo runs a number of major online porn brands, including Pornhub.
Among other rules, HB 1181Β requiresΒ that porn websites “use reasonable age verification methods” to “verify that an individual attempting to access the material is 18 years of age or older.” It also orders such websites to post controversial health warnings that pornography “weakens brain function,” “is proven to harm human brain development” and “is associated with low self-esteem and body image, eating disorders, impaired brain development, and other emotional and mental illnesses.”
According to the lawsuit, minors who visit Aylo’s pornographic websites are either “immediately presented with sexual material” or “are asked to complete the trivial step of clicking an ‘enter’ button.” As a result, the suit says, Aylo has completely failed to comply with HB 1181.
The suit seeks an injunction forcing Aylo to use age verification and display the required health warnings. Texas also wants hefty fines, including $1.6 million in civil penalties plus $10,000 per day dating back to Sept. 19, 2023 β the day when the Fifth Circuit first greenlit the law.
In a news release announcing the suit, the Texas attorney general’s office accused Aylo of not imposing “reasonable age verification measures to protect minors from being exposed to obscene materials.”
βTexas has a right to protect its children from the detrimental effects of pornographic content,β AG Paxton stated in the news release. βI look forward to holding any company accountable that violates our age verification laws intended to prevent minors from being exposed to harmful, obscene material on the internet.”
Aylo declined to comment on the lawsuit.
The lawsuit comes amid a broader push in Texas and other Republican-controlled states to restrict content that lawmakers deem obscene. During the state legislative session last year, Texas also passed restrictions onΒ drag showsΒ andΒ booksΒ it calls “sexually explicit.”
Last year, a coalition of porn-industry insiders β including a free-speech group focused on pornography βΒ wonΒ an injunction blocking the law.
Their original suit, filed in federal court in Austin, described HB 1181 as part of a “long tradition of unconstitutional β and ultimately failed β governmental attempts to regulate and censor free speech on the internet.” Rather than imposing new content restrictions, “Texas could easily spread its ideological, anti-pornography message through public service announcements and the like,” the suit argued.
U.S. District Judge David Alan Ezra, a Reagan appointee, ultimately found those arguments persuasive. Among other factors, he determined that rules requiring health warnings in 14-point font were overly burdensome and ambiguous, as “text size on webpages is typically measured by pixels, not points.”
In his ruling from August, Ezra also cited Section 230 of the Communications Decency Act β a longstanding standard that protects online publishers from liability for content produced by third-parties. Without explaining its reasoning, the conservative Fifth Circuit overruled that injunction, including with a one-pageΒ administrative stay in September. Those orders paved the way for Texas to enforce the law, including with this latest suit.
Clearly the man speaks from personal experience and exhibits the signs of “impaired brain development” to this day. He doesn’t even have the brain power to keep both eyes open at the same time.
Pornhub has added North Carolina and Montana to its block list as both states implemented age-verification laws on Jan. 1. A similar ban was imposed in Arkansas in August, joining Mississippi, Virginia, and Utah.
Now hold on there, bubba louie! I live in texas…and how am I supposed to spend my golden years with no porn??? Paxton is just doing shit so the christians will vote for him.
More BS pseudoscience clap-trap from a state with no cognitive functionality. Just ban it in Texas and be done with…though I suspect a lot of those cowpokes will start livin’ up to that name if you do.
Scottie's Playtime 