McConnell leans hard on GOP senators to oppose

The hypocrisy here is painful to see.   McConnell has no problem with outright lying and contradicting what he said only a short time ago.   He is all about getting, keeping, and increasing the right wing power and control over the Supreme Court.    He has admitted that.   He said that control of the congress changes frequently back and forth but control of the courts is for decades.   He voted for Judge Jackson last year.   What has changed?  The position she is up for is the top court that right now is approving or disapproving laws based on the outcome they want, not the constitution and legal structure of the US say is correct.   Many of the right wingers on the court are getting very old.   Thomas was recently in the hospital for an unknown length of time.   They don’t want anyone on the court who is not a right wing ideolog.  

Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell (R-Ky.) is putting public and private pressure on Senate Republican colleagues to oppose President Biden’s nominee to the Supreme Court, despite the historic nature of her nomination to be the first Black woman on the court.  

McConnell has dug in against Biden’s nominee, arguing the vote isn’t about “race or gender” but about Jackson’s record, which he says is too soft on crime and indicates she’ll likely turn into an activist judge on the bench.  

McConnell made an impassioned plea at a recent Senate GOP lunch for his colleagues oppose Biden’s choice, according to senators who attended the meeting.  

One Republican senator said McConnell leaned in hard on Jackson’s nomination. 

“He sought recognition and said, ‘I just want to thank the members of the Judiciary Committee for the great work they’ve done in exposing this judge’s radical record and in particular her record on child pornography cases are alarmingly extreme,’” the source said, recounting McConnell’s message to the conference. 

McConnell talked about Jackson’s record in detail, including her decision to give one offender, Wesley Hawkins, a three-month sentence when federal prosecutors asked for him to be sent to prison for two years.  

McConnell said, “I think the Democrats thought this would be an easy process, confirmation but it’s not going to be because she’s a radical nominee and I would hope that every Republican would look seriously at her record, which I think is troubling.”  

The message is putting pressure on GOP swing voters such as Sens. Lisa Murkowski (Alaska) and Mitt Romney (Utah) to toe the party line and vote “no.”

Murkowski was present at the meeting where McConnell delivered his comments about the nominee but didn’t say anything. The Alaska Republican who is up for re-election this year and faces a Republican primary challenger also declined to comment about Jackson when asked about it by reporters on Tuesday and Thursday.  

Romney says he still has to dig deeper into Jackson’s record before announcing his decision.  

He said he “enjoyed” meeting with her Tuesday and said “her dedication to public service and her family are obvious.”   

Republican strategists and longtime observers of McConnell’s leadership style say he views a unified Republican vote against Jackson as good politics heading into the midterm election and good for his own standing within the Senate GOP conference, which he plans to lead again in 2023 and 2024.  

Scott Jennings, a Kentucky-based GOP strategist who has advised McConnell’s past campaigns, said Biden’s nomination of Jackson “fits into the overall the Democrats are soft on crime and criminals and Republicans aren’t.” 

“That is going to be a big narrative in this campaign.  You’ve already seen that,” he added. “Any time you can throw another piece of evidence on that, I do think it furthers that narrative.” 

Republican aides say Jackson’s record in sentencing child pornography offenders will be a tough one for vulnerable Democrats such as Sens. Mark Kelly (D-Ariz.), Maggie Hassan (D-N.H.), Raphael Warnock (D-Ga.) and Catherine Cortez Masto (D-Nev.) to defend on the campaign trail later this year.  

The more Republicans that vote this week for Jackson, the more political cover it gives to Democrats on the campaign trail.  

So far, Sen. Susan Collins (R-Maine), who represents a state that Biden won by nine points, is the only Republican who has said she will vote to confirm Jackson.  

Democrats have pushed back against this criticism. The argue that Republicans have taken Jackson’s sentencing decisions in seven child pornography cases out of context by harping on the fact that she handed out prison terms below what federal prosecutors demanded and below the advisory guidelines.  

Democrats say that Jackson is one of many federal judges who view the federal advisory guidelines as out of date and in need of updating since they were established in 2003 with the Protect Act because Internet use became more prevalent.  

Al Cross, a professor of journalism at the University of Kentucky and a longtime commentator on Kentucky politics, says McConnell likely sees a good opportunity to stand with some of the rising young conservatives in his conference, such as Sens. Josh Hawley (R-Mo.) and Ted Cruz (R-Texas), with whom he clashed over their efforts to halt the certification of Biden’s election victory on Jan. 6.  

 


“Once Cruz and the others made this a big issue, it gave McConnell and opportunity to practice some solidarity with his caucus,” he said.  

“He’s in a difficult position. He’s got to deal with Trumpers, he’s got to keep the caucus together and any time the caucus can find something to essentially agree on, then that’s probably a good thing for his leadership of the caucus,” he added.  

Cross noted that McConnell is known to view “the unity of the caucus as a prime directive.”  

“I can’t imagine he really believes her judgment in these child porn cases is a disqualifier to be on the Supreme Court but once its been such an issue in conservative media, then it takes on a life of its own,” he said.  

McConnell has come out strongly against Jackson in his public statements, as well.  

“She has a particularly curious view about certain kinds of criminal behavior, in this particular case, people who distributed child pornography,” McConnell told Fox News’ Shannon Bream. “She’s a judicial activist. She’s very smart, she’s very capable. She’s going to be exactly what President Biden wants: A very liberal Supreme Court justice. 

McConnell dismissed the publicly lobbying of Senate Judiciary Committee Chairman Dick Durbin (D-Ill.) who has called on his GOP colleagues to recognize “the historic significance of this nomination” and stressed the importance of Abraham Lincoln’s party, “the grand old party” is “on board.” 

“The Democrats want to make this confirmation about race or gender. We don’t look at judges that way,” he said. “Most all Republicans believe in what’s called a strict construction, that is judges who make their very best effort as [late] Justice [Antonin] Scalia put it to follow the law.” 

Jennings, the GOP strategist who has advised McConnell, said Jackson’s refusal to express her opinion about adding more justices to the Supreme Court was a big red flag for the leader.  

“He’s extremely worried about left-wing, progressive attacks on the institution” of the court, he said. “When she would not take the Ginsburg, Breyer line on keeping the Supreme Court at nine, it was as signal to him that she’s pretty beholden to the liberal allies who have been the very people calling for court packing.”  

McConnell in recent days has repeatedly raised his concerns about Jackson’s refusal to take the same public stance as late Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg and Justice Stephen Breyer against expanding the court.  

5 thoughts on “McConnell leans hard on GOP senators to oppose

  1. “The Democrats want to make this confirmation about race or gender. We don’t look at judges that way,”

    The hell they don’t!! And they most DEFINITELY look at whether the individual is Republican or Democrat … and if the former, qualifications be damned!

    It’s simply AMAZING how Republicans can say things out of both sides of their mouth at the same time!

    Liked by 1 person

    1. Hello Nan. They also look at if the person is white and male. Yes when tRump was President McConnell let a few women pass. If Ruth Bader Ginsburg had not been a female, they never would have picked Barrett to replace her. They are still the party of the good old white boys. Your last sentence is so true. I get brain hurt from how fast they can contradict what they just said or did even though it was recorded. They depend on the people not remembering or being too tribal to care.

      Liked by 1 person

  2. Democrats must stop being soft on crime! Throw Hair Furor in the hoosegow, along with the rest of his crime family, not to mention all those Republican thugs getting rich from Big Oil and other special interests.

    Liked by 2 people

    1. Hello Professor Pupdog. Welcome. I agree with the caveat that we have due process of law first. That is not a problem it is clear that they have committed crimes. But we don’t want to go the route of banana republics that the winner gets to use the power of the state against the loser. We have to have laws and use them. The use / enforce them equally is the part we are missing right now.

      Like

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.