This is a very important short video because it shows both what I have been saying about these dressing as drag bans and the goal of the fundamentalist driven right. A trans woman was to give a talk, a presentation, at a library. But due to the new ban on dressing in drag in Montana the library had to cancel the talk because the person was trans.
Governor Greg Gianforte signed the extreme, vaguely worded drag ban just last week. The law bans drag performers, which are defined as “a male or female performer who adopts a flamboyant or parodic feminine persona with glamorous or exaggerated costumes and makeup,” from performing where children are present. It is also the first measure to specifically ban drag story hours in public libraries, meaning it does not only restrict performances that might be more openly sexual.
Jawort is not a drag queen, and the lecture was intended for adults, although children could have attended if they wanted. The library’s decision is a sign that the drag bans are having their intended effect: forcing LGBTQ people out of public view. The law is so confusing, and the punishments are so high, that many people and organizations are trying to avoid the risk.
Notice two things, the law doesn’t say the person or act has to be sexual or have exaggerated sexual characteristics and that even reading to kids is considered a performance. People have tried to argue with me that these drag bans are only to stop kids from seeing burlesque type sex shows. You know, events that could sexualize kids, what ever that means. But reading to kids dressed in a costume in a public library with adults present with parental consent is considered sexual under this ban. How? Well it is a guy dressed in what is thought to be the clothing of the female gender. A person dressed in the other genders clothing would defy or break the strict gender stereotypes from the 1950s that these people are desperately trying to regress the country back to.
This is the goal of the fundamentalist Christian nationalist that have taken over the Republican Party and controls the right, to return to the expected gender norms of the past, and to keep the strict gender roles of the past that they love. No men dressing like a woman or acting womanly, and the same in reverse, no woman dressing or acting manly. It basically outlaws trans people.
Read that last paragraph again please. It outlaws trans people. Next will be to remove the rights from gay people such as same-sex marriage and anti-discrimination laws. The goal as I keep repeating is to drive the country back to the society and social standards of the 1950s. Churches were automatically considered good (Christian churches only of course) and had automatic authority in society. White males were always in charge and could act is what ways they wished towards women and minorities. Women were second class to men and needed a man’s approval in most things and kept the home for the comfort of the man while raising the expected brood of children. Women couldn’t get a divorce without exceptional circumstances, and were stuck in marriages that they did not want and maybe being abused in. Blacks knew their place and kept themselves there. But most important to these people the LGBTQ+ had no rights, gays / lesbians / trans people were not seen or heard from, staying hidden while scared of being found out. When found out, the white males could make their life hell and face no negative consequences.
This is the society these people crave and have obsessively worked for decades. A place with no freedoms or civil rights except for white males, more for those who gave a glancing nod to the Christian church. Oppressive to everyone else, with no personal freedoms to live your life freely if you differed from the church doctrines strict norms and dress codes. For those that have said these laws won’t target cross-dressing and were for protecting kids from being sexualized are not true and never were. Great informative video, I strong hope you will all view it. Hugs
Scottie's Playtime 
Sorta on topic, definitely pertinent fact-checking here. It was linked in “The Root,” I think. https://archive.ph/W4chj
Critics accuse trans swimming star Lia Thomas of having an unfair advantage. The data tell a different story
The NCAA champion has sparked controversy and become a hate figure among conservatives, but statistics show little evidence that she performed any differently to other women, Io Dodds reports
On 17 March, Lia Thomas became the first openly transgender athlete to win America’s top trophy in university sports when she swam to victory in the women’s 500 yard (457 meter) freestyle race.
Ms Thomas, 22, won first place in the National Collegiate Athletic Association’s (NCAA) first division swimming championship, her final competition as a college athlete.
Amid her success, though, Ms Thomas has become a lightning rod in the debate about trans women in sport, as well as a target for much of the American right.
Her right to compete in women’s races, and sometimes her gender itself, has been attacked by sports stars, politicians, activists, her competitors, and even some of her teammates’ parents, as well as protesters at the NCAA championship last week, who argued that her time living as a man gives her an unfair advantage.
Florida’s Republican governor Ron DeSantis, who last year approved legislation banning trans women from high school and college women’s sports, even signed a proclamation on Tuesday declaring 500-yard runner-up Emma Weyant the “rightful winner”.
Yet in all this, there has been scant detail about how Ms Thomas’s performance actually compares to other women at her level. The Independent crunched the numbers – and found little evidence that she poses any threat to women’s sport.
How hormone therapy transforms trans athletes’ bodies
Ms Thomas began swimming at the age of five, and came out to her family in summer 2018. She began to use her new name Lia Catherine Thomas, on new year’s day in 2020.
“In a way, it was sort of a rebirth,” she told Sports Illustrated in an interview this year. “For the first time in my life, feeling fully connected to my name and who I am and living who I am.”
It was May 2019 when she began gender-affirming hormone replacement therapy (HRT), which involves taking supplements of estrogen or testosterone to bring a trans person’s hormones in line with that of a cisgender (or non-transgender) person. This is usually the first step in what’s known as “medical” transition, as opposed to social transition (such as changing how you dress).
Men and women typically have naturally different hormone balances, although there is much variation within each sex. As we grow, those hormones cause our bodies to develop in different ways, which is why male athletes tend to perform at higher levels than female athletes.
However, our bodies still retain the capacity to respond to new hormones in adulthood, and so HRT causes radical changes to a person’s secondary sex characteristics.
For trans women, that means growing breasts, thinning body hair, changes to their emotions, shifting body fat into an “hourglass” shape, and – most relevantly to sports – drops in muscle mass and strength.
Both the NCAA and the Olympics allow trans women to compete in women’s events once they have been on HRT for a certain length of time, and as long as tests show their testosterone is below certain levels. There are different rules for trans men, because their pre-HRT performance is similar to cis women and they tend to gain strength and muscle mass from HRT.
Opponents of trans women’s inclusion argue that these changes are not enough to erase the natural advantages of growing up with testosterone. The scientific evidence is mixed, and post-HRT trans women do not currently dominate professional sport.
Ms Thomas skipped the 2020-21 swimming season, and so she has now been on HRT for nearly three years. According to Sports Illustrated, she lost strength and an inch of her height on HRT, making it impossible for her to match her performance.
So how does she perform as a swimmer today?
Thomas won her race – but didn’t break records
Let’s look first at Ms Thomas’s record in the NCAA. While some of her fastest times have been in other competitions, these are the easiest results to access and compare across multiple years and athletes.
All statistics in this article are for “short course yards” races, meaning they were done in a 25-yard pool.
Ms Thomas won the women’s 500 yard freestyle race in 4m 33.24s. She came fifth in the 200 yard race, with 1m 43.40s, and eighth in the 100 yard race with 48.40s.
These were impressive results, but they weren’t record-breaking. Though the overall competition saw 27 all-time NCAA records broken, Ms Thomas’s times weren’t among them.
A whopping 18 of those were broken by Kate Douglass of the University of Virginia (UVA), who now has the fastest times in US college history in the 50 yard freestyle, the 100 yard butterfly stroke, and the 200 yard breaststroke.
“It is easy to see how dominant Kate Douglass has become in the sport,” wrote Swimming World. “Many dominant swimmers have had three titles, and even three records, in one meet. But no swimmer in NCAA women’s history has ever won three different strokes in a single meet that involve the breaststroke, let alone three records.”
Other records were broken by Katherine Berkoff of North Carolina State University and Alex Walsh of UVA, as well as UVA’s medley teams in several events.
According to an Independent search of women’s records listed by USA Swimming, the US’ national governing body for the sport, Ms Thomas’s 500 yard time makes her the 15th fastest college swimmer, about nine seconds behind Katie Ledecky’s record in 2017.
Her swimming times are on par with cis women
How do these times compare to other women in the top ranks of US college swimming?
The Independent compiled a dataset of swim times for all top 8 NCAA women’s finishers over the last six years of competition in various events. 2020 was excluded because all NCAA championships were cancelled that year due to the pandemic.
In other words, this data only includes the absolute best college swimmers in these events. It goes back far enough to cover Katie Ledecky’s 4m 24.06s record in the 500 yard race and Missy Franklin’s 1m 38.10s record in the 200 yard race, both of which still stand today.
In this field, Ms Thomas’s time in the 500 yards is the eighth fastest out of 56. That is notable because there are only seven events in the dataset, meaning there are some where her time would have only place her third.
In the 100 yard race, her time is 55th out of 56 in The Independent’s data, and her time in the 200 yard race is the 31st out of 5.
Her 500 yard time of 4m 33.24 is just above the average (4m 36.07s), while her 100 yard time of 48.18s is just below average (47.06s), as is her 200 yard time of 1m 43.24s (compared to 1m42.85).
The Independent also looked at numbers for the 500 yard men’s race, where Ms Thomas has competed at a high level in both men’s and women’s events, from 2015 to 2021. There, her finishing time is more than 20 seconds below the men’s average.
How fast did Thomas swim before going on HRT?
Some critics of Ms Thomas’ participation have pointed to her record before transitioning, when she competed in men’s races, claiming that moving into the women’s has improved her overall position.
Nancy Hogshead-Makar, an Olympic gold medalist swimmer and women’s sports activist, wrote that Ms Thomas was “never in that category of standout athlete”, while the editor of Swimming World said Ms Thomas had ranked 554th in the men’s 200 yard freestyle, 65th in the 500 yard freestyle, and 32nd in the 1650 yard freestyle.
Yet those comparisons may not be fair, because HRT appears to have changed Ms Thomas’s capacity over long distances. In men’s races, her best events were the 1,000 yard and 1,650 yard freestyle, whereas at this year’s NCAA championship she did not compete in those at all, according to Swimcloud.
Kyle Sockwell, a former NCAA swimmer who helped draw attention to a fake Twitter account impersonating one of Ms Thomas’s NCAA competitors, also noted that her 200 yard freestyle time was not at a full championship competition and was not “tapered”, meaning she did not reduce her training to rest just before the race, as many swimmers do to maximise performance.
(snip; embedded tweet; I don’t seem to copy-paste those well.)
According to a search of USA Swimming records, in the last season where Ms Thomas competed in men’s events, she came in ninth across the entire country in the 1,000 yard freestyle and 29th in the 1,650 yard freestyle.
“Lia Thomas was an elite and competitive swimmer while on the men’s team at the University of Pennsylvania,” says Mr Sockwell. “[The 1650 yard] event would have had Lia in the top 30-34 in the country and right on the bubble of making NCAAs.”
Schuyler Bailar, the first openly trans swimmer in the NCAA men’s first division, who is now reportedly a friend and adviser to Ms Thomas, similarly wrote: “ Lia was absolutely a standout athlete when she was competing on the men’s team… it is far from abnormal or unlikely for an athlete to go from being ranked 11th to 1st in the span of a few years.”
Ms Hogshead-Makar also drew attention to the difference between Ms Thomas’s pre-HRT times and her times today. Her best time in the 500 yards was 5.6 per cent slower than before transition, while her 1,000 yards time was 7.5 per cent slower and her 1,650 yards time was 7.2 per cent slower.
That is less than the 10 to 11 per cent gap Ms Hogshead-Makar says is usually found between men’s and women’s races. However, according to the LGBT sports news site OutSport, the difference in NCAA men and women’s records varies by distance: 11.2 per cent for the 200 yards, 7.2 per cent for the 500 yards, and 6 per cent for the 1,650 yards.
It is also possible that Ms Thomas’ old times do not represent how fast she’d swim if she had never begun HRT. They date from an earlier point in her evolution as a swimmer, and therefore would not reflect any improvements in her technique or mindset since then.
“This is our only real case study where a competitive male swimmer has transitioned to female and been very competitive as well,” warns Mr Sockwell. “It’s all very new.”
‘No one says a cis woman can’t compete because she won’
These statistics seem largely in line with those of trans athletes across the world. Although trans women have been allowed to compete in women’s Olympics since 2004, none have won a medal.
Yet numbers can only tell us so much. Trans advocates argue that even if trans women were winning more competitions, that would not prove they had an unfair advantage, nor would it justify their exclusion from women’s events.
Indeed, it would be strange to contend that trans women should only be allowed to compete in women’s sports as long as they never win anything.
“This argument should never have to be made,” said Mr Bailar on Instagram this week. “No one says a cis women is allowed to compete because she ‘didn’t dominate.’ They say ‘wow, look how much Katie Ledecky wins by, she’s untouchable, that’s amazing!’
“This isn’t to prove that trans women can’t be great athletes, or win, or even dominate. It is to prove that people are lying to you in order to turn you against trans women athletes.”
In a blog post, Mr Bailar also notes that exceptional athletes are often biologically unusual, from the long-armed Olympic swimmer Michael Phelps to the intersex runner Caster Semenya, who has been subject to baseless claims that she is is secretly a trans woman and was barred from the Olympics unless she undergoes hormone therapy.
The average height of a top US women’s basketball player is around 6ft, according to the Washington Post, with the tallest player in 2022 being 6ft 9in. That is not only taller than the average American woman’s height of 5ft 4in but also the average man’s height of 5ft 9in.
Describing Katie Ledecky, who is cis, Olympic champion swimmer Ryan Lochte even said: “She swims like a guy. Her stroke, her mentality – she’s so strong in the water. I’ve never seen a female swimmer like that.”
Hence, trans advocates ask, why should a woman’s gender history be treated differently from these other natural bodily variations, especially when trans women in top competitions are already required to regulate their hormones to stay in play?
That is a question statistics alone cannot answer.
Thomas breaks silence over attacks on her swimming success
Ms Thomas spoke out against the attacks on her success, saying that “trans women are not a threat to women’s sport”.
Ms Thomas said in an interview with ABC’s Good Morning America broadcast on 31 May that she hopes to compete in the Olympics trials.
“I don’t need anybody’s permission to be myself,” the University of Pennsylvania swimmer said in response to claims that she has an unfair advantage.
She noted that some cisgender women are taller, have larger feet and hands, and also have more testosterone than other swimmers.
“You can’t go halfway and be like ‘I support trans people but only to a certain point’,” she told ABC.
“If you support trans women and they’ve met all the NCAA requirements, I don’t know if you can say something like that,” she added.
“Trans women are not a threat to women’s sport,” Ms Thomas said.
“There’s a lot of factors that go into a race and how well you do. The biggest change for me is that I’m happy and sophomore year where I had my best times competing with men, I was miserable,” she added. “Having that be lifted is incredibly relieving and allows me to put my all into training and racing.”
“Trans people don’t transition for athletics. We transition to be happy and authentic and to be ourselves,” Ms Thomas told Good Morning America. “Transition to get an advantage is not something that factors into our decisions.”
Ms Thomas said she was willing to end her swimming career to transition, adding that she wasn’t sure that she would be permitted to compete as a woman.
She said she became a slower swimmer after starting hormone replacement therapy.
Mayo Clinic doctor Michael Joyner told The New York Times that “you see the divergence immediately as the testosterone surges into the boys”.
“There are dramatic differences in performances,” he added.
“There are social aspects to sport, but physiology and biology underpin it,” Dr Joyner said. “Testosterone is the 800-pound gorilla.”
He told Good Morning America that “body size, hand size, foot size, and perhaps bone density,” all factor into performances, “but the main thing is the interactions of exercise training and skeletal muscle”.
“I think that evidence so far would suggest a period of a year, two, three or even four years” of hormone replacement therapy “is insufficient,” he said.
“I’m not a medical expert but there’s a lot of variation among cis female athletes. There are cis women who are tall, muscular and have more testosterone. Should that also disqualify them?” Ms Thomas responded.
“It’s been a goal of mine to swim at Olympic trials for a very long time. I would love to see that through,” she told ABC.
Whew! I know that’s long, but it’s all here except for the tweets, which are generally reiterated within the article, anyway. I guess if a person really wants to know, the info is here.
LikeLike