Federal Judge Blocks Idaho’s Gender-Affirming Care Ban From Taking Effect

These laws are not based on medical science nor on any evidence of the conspiracies to turn cis kids into trans kids.  That doesn’t happen any more than straight kids get turned gay by seeing a rainbow flag or reading a book with LGBTQIA characters.   No these laws are based on bigotry and religious doctrines.  How many times do you hear anti-trans people say god doesn’t make mistakes, so you have to be the gender of your body.  But they said the same thing about people being gay decades ago, that people couldn’t be born gay because god did make mistakes.   Guess what, it is not a mistake to be gay if you are gay and it is not a mistake to be trans if you identify as a gender different from what is showing between your legs.  It is ignorance, hate, bigotry, and religious indoctrination masquerading as fake concern for “the children”.   Hugs.   Scottie

“Transgender children should receive equal treatment under the law. Parents should have the right to make the most fundamental decisions about how to care for their children,” Winmill said in his ruling.

“Every family wants what is best for their children, and families who love and accept their transgender youth are no different,” Li Nowlin-Sohl, senior staff attorney for the ACLU’s LGBTQ & HIV Project said in a statement. “These dangerous efforts to control our bodies and our families threaten the well-being of trans youth, the strength of our communities, and the ability of every family to determine what’s best for their child.”


“This victory is significant for Idaho transgender youth and their parents,” one advocate said.

Transgender flag waving over sunny day
VLADIMIR VLADIMIROV / ISTOCK / GETTY IMAGES PLUS
 

A federal court ruled on Tuesday that an Idaho law prohibiting doctors from providing transgender minors with access to gender-affirming care is likely unconstitutional and blocked the law from taking effect. The gender-affirming healthcare ban, which was originally planned to go into effect on January 1, would have made providing puberty blockers and hormone therapies to transgender youth a felony.

“This victory is significant for Idaho transgender youth and their parents, and will have an immediate positive impact on their daily lives,” Leo Morales, executive director of the ACLU of Idaho, said in a statement.

Judge B. Lynn Winmill of the U.S. District Court for the District of Idaho held that Idaho’s anti-trans law likely violated the Due Process Clause and the Equal Protection Clause under the 14th Amendment.

 

“Transgender children should receive equal treatment under the law. Parents should have the right to make the most fundamental decisions about how to care for their children,” Winmill said in his ruling.


RELATED STORY

“Every family wants what is best for their children, and families who love and accept their transgender youth are no different,” Li Nowlin-Sohl, senior staff attorney for the ACLU’s LGBTQ & HIV Project said in a statement. “These dangerous efforts to control our bodies and our families threaten the well-being of trans youth, the strength of our communities, and the ability of every family to determine what’s best for their child.”

Another plaintiff in the lawsuit, Pam Poe, a 15-year-old trans girl, “struggled with depression, anxiety and self-harm” before receiving gender-affirming care which “greatly improved” her mental health. If the gender-affirming healthcare ban went into effect, her and her family would have considered leaving the state.

“This judicial decision is a much-needed ray of hope for trans people amid a years-long onslaught against their rights to access health care and ability to navigate the world around them,” Morales said in a press release. “Everyone should be free to live and thrive in their authentic identity, which means transgender people should not be shut out of accessing medically sound health care.”

Idaho is one of 22 states that have restricted or banned transgender youth from accessing gender-affirming care, according to the Movement Advancement Project (MAP). In a recent report, MAP described the gender-affirming healthcare bans as part of a “war against LGBTQ people in America and their very right and ability to openly exist.” While many of these bans have been temporarily blocked by the courts, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Sixth and Eleventh Circuits have reversed lower court injunctions, allowing bans in Kentucky, Tennessee and Alabama to go into effect.

Research by the Trevor Project shows that debates around anti-trans bills negatively affect transgender and nonbinary youth’s mental health and a majority of those trans youth (55 percent) said anti-trans bills “very negatively” affected their mental health. Gender-affirming healthcare bans don’t just hurt transgender and nonbinary people, but also affect the health and well-being of LGBTQ+ adults, according to a Human Rights Campaign poll. The poll found that 8 in 10 LGBTQ adults said that the bans made them feel less safe and “worsen[ed] harmful stereotypes, discrimination, hate and stigma.”

A MESSAGE FROM TRUTHOUT’S EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR

For 22 years, Truthout has been a platform for new and daring ideas, uplifting voices and producing trailblazing, award-winning journalism. The stories we’ve published over the last two decades have been read by tens of millions of people and inspired the conversations and actions that are necessary for social change.

But to continue publishing meaningful, powerful, inspiring journalism, we still need to raise $65,000 before December 31st — and for a limited time, any donation you make will be matched, dollar for dollar.

This fundraiser is our most important drive, and the perfect time to make your end-of-year donation. Your support is both vitally needed, and deeply appreciated, so if you’re in a position to give, please make your tax-deductible gift today.

—Ziggy West Jeffery

4 thoughts on “Federal Judge Blocks Idaho’s Gender-Affirming Care Ban From Taking Effect

  1. You know how I feel about the issue of genderism, Scottie, so I won’t repeat it. However, in this particular instance, I’m glad to see a judge that has some common sense. Whatever a person believes related to this issue should not be dictated by those who are not directly affected. But of course, we know this isn’t how things operate … and not just in this issue!

    Liked by 1 person

    1. Hi Nan. The issue is about the science, what is true or not. Some people have traditional views that make it hard to accept the modern age of reality, of new understandings of medical fact. It has been the same throughout history on anything new or different. It was the same with same sex relationships. But no matter how much a person doesn’t want to accept the medical information nor accept the social change, it is true and going to keep happening. Time moves forward, time marches on.

      Just as over time the elastic in our clothing stops being able to return to its former state and must be replaced, so are the ideas from 50 plus years ago about sexuality and gender.

      I am glad you see that this ruling is proper. As I explained in my intro, the attacks on treating transgender kids with gender affirming care that is based on medical science / data, that those against it are using traditional stereotypes and religious doctrines as their arguments. They have all been disproven by both studies and medical data.

      I am headed to bed. I just wanted to make sure I did not lose your comment. Have a great evening. Hugs. Scottie

      Like

  2. They say their gawd doesn’t make any misteaks, but then why are there any baybees born with Ta-Sachs, cleft palate, cystic fibrous and other forms of birth defects. The case out of Tejas should be an example to them that shows how wrong they are, but they will never admit to the evidence right before their eyes.

    Liked by 1 person

    1. Hi Muttpupdad. Yes you are correct. Hell my own failing body is proof that I was not intelligently designed.

      I was fixing one older woman’s computer, she was in her early 70s and highly Catholic, attending mass at least 3 or more times a week. She kept telling me how wonderful her god was until I exploded. “Really your god cares so much” I asked, “Then where the hell was he when I was being repeatedly raped and beaten as a child”? I said to her. She looked at me and said … “He has a plan, and it was part of his plan because he loves you, you just need to give your self to him and trust him”.

      I almost walked out. I just stared at this otherwise nice woman who stood there as I just told her of my abuse and said her god wanted it and I should worship him for that. I kept my moth shut for the rest of my time fixing her stuff. Thankfully, she sensed my anger and did not mention her god again. But it made me understand how they rationalize the sexual abuse of little kids by priests, their god had a plan for both people and the abused child should trust and thank him for it. Ours is not to question why, I guess. Hugs. Scottie

      Like

Leave a reply to Nan Cancel reply

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.