Yesterday Ladapo called for banning COVID vaccines due to “DNA integration,” a claim that was immediately ridiculed by vaccine experts and Ladapo’s own DeSantis-appointed predecessor in Florida.
So this is the crazy nutcase that Tildeb used to justify anti-trans hate. He is the Florida Surgeon General, handpicked by DeathSantis because of his anti-covid vaccine stance. He was given the job even though not qualified, and DeathSantis tried to force the state university to hire him at a huge sum of money. He refused to answer questions asked him by the Florida legislature and lied to them when forced to answer. He was part of the demon seed doctor’s team that scammed maga people by charging them huge fees for an online consultation, then prescribed Ivermectin to cure or prevent covid. It has been well proven that Ivermectin doesn’t do anything to cure or prevent covid. He has been soundly mocked by the scientific and medical communities. Remember if DeathSantis is elected to the presidency this is the type of people he hires. Below I will post the first part of the Wikipedia entry on him. Hugs. Scottie
JosephLadapoJoseph Abiodun Ladapo (born December 16, 1978) [1] is the surgeon general of Florida. [2] He has attracted attention for spreading misinformation on COVID-19 and promoting vaccine hesitancy. [
DeSantis’ Florida surgeon general Dr. Joseph Ladapo says covid mRNA vaccines “the Anti-Christ of all products… That’s so wrong, you know, it’s just complete disrespect to the human genome and the importance of protecting it and preserving it, and that is our connection to God.” pic.twitter.com/r1aGzHsBqz
mRNA, of course, is messenger molecules telling some of your immune cells to make specific antibodies. They don’t mess with DNA, they don’t get into your ova or sperm, they just wash out of your body within a few days. That’s what they were telling him when “They talked about a bunch of other things” that he didn’t understand.
The biggest thing about the new mRNA technology is getting the mRNA to survive long enough to make any proteins. The cells have a zillion RNAses waiting to chew up improper RNA not tagged with the exact signal for temporary protection. It has been nearly 20 years since I was a bench researcher handling RNA, and I still remember what a PITA it was to handle.
I am an older gay guy in a long-term wonderful relationship. My spouse and I are in our 36th year together. I love politics and news. I enjoy civil discussions and have no taboo subjects. My pronouns are he / him / his and my email is Scottiestoybox@gmail.com
View all posts by Scotties Playtime
22 thoughts on “Joseph Ladapo: COVID Vaccines Are “The Anti-Christ””
Quack Ladapo next miracle cure for everything will involve putting the lime in the coconut. His appointment should be exhibit #1 for not giving DeathSentence any more offices.
Hi Muttpupdad. Yes, most people don’t know his history. This guy is a scammer who is all about making money for himself, and he doesn’t give a shit or one bit of care for anyone else. Hell he worked for the “demon seed Dr lady”. https://www.thedailybeast.com/stella-immanuel-trumps-new-covid-doctor-believes-in-alien-dna-demon-sperm-and-hydroxychloroquine . She believes in Alien DNA, Demon Sperm, and Hydroxychloroquine, and she publicly says sexual visitations by demons and alien DNA are at the root of Americans’ common health concerns. This is the guy DeathSantis not only hired to be the state Surgeon General plus forced the state university to give him a high paying job / title for which he was not qualified. Hugs. Scottie
Hi Ali. I am sure Dr. Ladapo doesn’t have a clue what is in the bible. He is all about grift and scam. But what do you mean when you say it is not what the bible says. I know my memory of the bible has faded over the years, but I fail to remember it talking about human DNA. Hugs. Scottie
Precisely my point. It says nothing about a vaccine being the anti-Christ. It does describe the anti-Christ, in Revelation as I recall, and that describes a human. Not a vaccine.
We’ll know them by their fruits. The Bible does say that, about false ministers and prophets.
Actually, Ali, the antichrist (per se) is NOT described as a human in the book of Revelation. Rather, John describes a creature with multiple heads and mentions the beast, the false prophet, and the great whore of Babylon. Modern-day evangelists have assigned his descriptions to “the antichrist.”
Also, when (the apostle) John writes about the antichrist in his letters, he is talking about people who possessed the “spirit of the antichrist.” IOW, he used it as aa adverb, not a title.
That doctor is nothing but a scare-monger and obviously knows NOTHING about actual scripture.
Hi Nan. In my time on YouTube listening to atheist podcasts, many claim the antichrist to be a nation. A group of people. Often I have heard it described as what ever powerful country was in the news at that time. Most people I listened to talked as if the end times along with other references claim the texts were referring to the Roman occupiers and was to happen with in the life span of those alive then. Is that your understanding also? Did I misunderstand something? Hugs. Scottie
I’m basing my remarks on the studying I did for my book. There are multiple “versions” of who or what represents the (so-called) antichrist by various churches and religious groups. Much (most?) of what is presented in modern times is nothing more than stories and scriptures that have been dressed up and modified to suit various denominations. In actuality, there is no such “creature” — EXCEPT within the bible. And, of course, gullible people’s minds.
Hi Nan. Yes it is because of your efforts in your book (which I think is really good and an authority on the subject) that I defer to you on these subjects. It seems that every group has their own interpretation and pushes what seems to favor them.
It seems to me that the more people make claims using the version of their choice that all vary widely, the more distorted and frankly unbelievable / useable the verses become.
Like I said to Ali, my memory of the bible I read and was taught in the two years I was in the SDA church has faded, so I really base most of my “bible knowledge” on atheist podcasts I was very interested in a decade or more ago. But I find all these new findings that the bible is against things that were not even known or an issue during the times the bible was written to seem to me to be quite a stretch and reach. Hugs. Scottie
Well, I was thinking it was written that the antiChrist would be a man. Aside from the other descriptions. I only read Rev. 2x, both before I was 14. The denom. I was confirmed into considered the general message worthy, but gave it enough berth due to the isolation of John on the island before and during its writing. As I was told.
Later in life I was told by a Pentecostal minister that the antiChrist would be dark-skinned but not black, would be good-looking, and would lead the world around to the system then running the USSR. I guess that stuck with me, and I offer my apologies.
Still not a vaccine, though. It doesn’t say anything about a vaccine in any of the books, including the Apocryphal ones. But I am wrong about the human.
Just like so many other things in the bible, there are 101+ “interpretations” of what something means. And those who were taught at a young age are seldom able to get away from those teachings. There’s no getting around it … Christianity is a closed system.
Hi Nan. But wouldn’t you say it is malleable to be used against any group / person / nation state / economic system that the religious leader wants to vilify? It seems more people want to use it as a club against others now than they did as a tool in the past to control / enrich / increase the power of the church and its leaders. Hugs. Scottie
No, I would not say Christianity is malleable. When individuals attempt to use it against the sources you mention, they are simply manifesting its basic teachings. The core of Christianity is make up of unforgiving doctrines and precepts.
Hello Ali. I noticed the same thing. The Anti-Christ became anyone / nation the religious establishment was against at the time. Like other things in the bible, it is vague enough to be anything the believer wants it to be. Hugs. Scottie
It does differ, preacher to preacher, reader to reader. It is malleable, though or especially that varies by everyone’s experiences. My experience with my few exposures to Pentecostal/”Evangelical” services and dogma (required to be present due to family) were horrifying, equally as horrifying as the movie “The Exorcist” for many of the same reasons. My experiences in the denom. in which I was raised were not at all horrifying; it was full of the grace of Jesus. I am aware that some of that has changed in that denom.; it changed enough I left it in my young adulthood. The denom. I joined a little later was fine, but then a popular minister was let go due to calling out people who wanted a “position” on gay rights. I stopped attending then, and I haven’t found a local church that will denounce and help work against war and the death penalty, Gospel regardless, so I still don’t attend. I know this is no skin off anyone’s nose here; I’m just explaining myself a little. I still believe, and believe God knows I’m doing the best I can to not harm anyone, and to help all I can without proselytizing but by showing love. Some people would then believe I’m not really Christian, and that’s fine, they can believe that.
That’s a verbose definition of malleable, though. One definition.
Nan, I have no idea why that’s important. We’re told to not be that way, as I know you recall from your studies. The only reason I’ve “come out of my closet” about it here is because it’s germane to the discussion, and I believe I’m among friends who really don’t care what I believe anyway, as long as it’s not harmful to others. We’ve both been reading here at Scottie’s long enough to know I don’t push that part of me forward very often or very far; today is the farthest I’ve ever gone about this aspect of myself.
And now that I wrote all that, I guess your question may go to my statement that some may believe that I am not Christian and that is fine… that is the truth as to me. I read atheists also, though, and one in particular, of whom I’m a fan, will tell a person to their face that if they don’t take all the dogma about whatever the IFB or whoever is pushing, they aren’t really Christian even if they think they are. That atheist went to Bible college, got a degree, and preached for many years before finding for himself that he doesn’t and cannot believe. I may be a bit sensitive due to that (and other atheists who believe the same,) he’s never called me out because I don’t comment there and would never try to push religion there anyway, as he’s warned against doing so. If he was as good a preacher as he is an ass-ripper about religion on his blog, well! He’s “saved some souls!” (Kidding.)
Hello Nan. First I disagree the bible is not malleable and open to interpretation. It is so contradictory that everyone can find a passage to prove or disprove everything/ anything. The Old Testament god acts like an angry warlord tyrant full of fury and vengeance. Demanding and unreasonable. The New Testament god is sweet and nice, forgiving and accepting. The current translations don’t match the few parts we have of the originals or their meanings. People seem to pick which god they like best and use the stuff they find that backs that up. But like all things supernatural, that too seems open to interpretation.
As to your question, why is so important to be considered “Christian”? I don’t think I said it was. I looked over the conversation and I was talking about him belonging to a scam group started and controlled by a rather nutty religious woman who claims sex with demons causes some sickness / disease. I said, “I am sure Dr. Ladapo doesn’t have a clue what is in the bible. He is all about grift and scam.” I personally don’t care if a person is a Christian or other religion or not. But I think many are like DeathSantis, who now claims to be a super fundamentalist Christian, doing things because god told him to return the country to a godly time. Yet when he was to be sworn in they had to rush to buy a bible because the DeathSantis family did not have one. How is that a true believer? That is what offends me. Hugs. Scottie
Hello Ali. I believe in people living as their authentic true self as long as they are not harming others. For you, that is being a nice person, what you believe a Christian should be. I don’t feel it is my right to decide who is what. I don’t get to say who is trans or not, that is up to the person to say. I can not assign a gender to a person, again it is for them to decide. I feel the same for who is or is not a Christian. If a person says they are a Christian, I accept it, same as if they tell me that they are a Muslim, Buddhist, or any other religious denomination. I think there are different kinds of Christians and how they use their religion towards others. Some like you and Roger are what I would call loving Christians, helpful, uplifting, you find joy in your faith, other people, and in life. The other kind I call Hate Christians, such as the NIFB. They worship a hateful god who is full of anger, they use his words not to uplift like you and Roger do, but to tear down and destroy. They attack to drive away people that they don’t agree with, rather than welcome people into the fold to show them love.
Ali, you are a wonderful person and I enjoy your time here on my Play Time. Please don’t feel you need to hide the fact of your religious faith. I am not religious, I am an atheist. I believe in science and so far there is no evidence to support the supernatural and as for the bible so much of it is incorrect, simply unable to have happened, and changeable / malleable that I discount that it was written by a deity or supreme being. But that is my belief, and I don’t insist others have it. Ron my wonderful spouse believes in the supernatural. He gets comfort and joy from that so why would I take it from him, he harms no one with his beliefs. I feel the same with other things people do, if they don’t harm others then I don’t care what they do or like or believe in. Hugs. Scottie
Scottie's Playtime 
Quack Ladapo next miracle cure for everything will involve putting the lime in the coconut. His appointment should be exhibit #1 for not giving DeathSentence any more offices.
LikeLiked by 2 people
Hi Muttpupdad. Yes, most people don’t know his history. This guy is a scammer who is all about making money for himself, and he doesn’t give a shit or one bit of care for anyone else. Hell he worked for the “demon seed Dr lady”. https://www.thedailybeast.com/stella-immanuel-trumps-new-covid-doctor-believes-in-alien-dna-demon-sperm-and-hydroxychloroquine . She believes in Alien DNA, Demon Sperm, and Hydroxychloroquine, and she publicly says sexual visitations by demons and alien DNA are at the root of Americans’ common health concerns. This is the guy DeathSantis not only hired to be the state Surgeon General plus forced the state university to give him a high paying job / title for which he was not qualified. Hugs. Scottie
LikeLiked by 1 person
But that’s not what the Bible says, Dr. Ladapo.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Hi Ali. I am sure Dr. Ladapo doesn’t have a clue what is in the bible. He is all about grift and scam. But what do you mean when you say it is not what the bible says. I know my memory of the bible has faded over the years, but I fail to remember it talking about human DNA. Hugs. Scottie
LikeLiked by 1 person
Precisely my point. It says nothing about a vaccine being the anti-Christ. It does describe the anti-Christ, in Revelation as I recall, and that describes a human. Not a vaccine.
We’ll know them by their fruits. The Bible does say that, about false ministers and prophets.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Actually, Ali, the antichrist (per se) is NOT described as a human in the book of Revelation. Rather, John describes a creature with multiple heads and mentions the beast, the false prophet, and the great whore of Babylon. Modern-day evangelists have assigned his descriptions to “the antichrist.”
Also, when (the apostle) John writes about the antichrist in his letters, he is talking about people who possessed the “spirit of the antichrist.” IOW, he used it as aa adverb, not a title.
That doctor is nothing but a scare-monger and obviously knows NOTHING about actual scripture.
LikeLiked by 2 people
Hi Nan. In my time on YouTube listening to atheist podcasts, many claim the antichrist to be a nation. A group of people. Often I have heard it described as what ever powerful country was in the news at that time. Most people I listened to talked as if the end times along with other references claim the texts were referring to the Roman occupiers and was to happen with in the life span of those alive then. Is that your understanding also? Did I misunderstand something? Hugs. Scottie
LikeLiked by 1 person
I’m basing my remarks on the studying I did for my book. There are multiple “versions” of who or what represents the (so-called) antichrist by various churches and religious groups. Much (most?) of what is presented in modern times is nothing more than stories and scriptures that have been dressed up and modified to suit various denominations. In actuality, there is no such “creature” — EXCEPT within the bible. And, of course, gullible people’s minds.
LikeLiked by 2 people
Hi Nan. Yes it is because of your efforts in your book (which I think is really good and an authority on the subject) that I defer to you on these subjects. It seems that every group has their own interpretation and pushes what seems to favor them.
It seems to me that the more people make claims using the version of their choice that all vary widely, the more distorted and frankly unbelievable / useable the verses become.
Like I said to Ali, my memory of the bible I read and was taught in the two years I was in the SDA church has faded, so I really base most of my “bible knowledge” on atheist podcasts I was very interested in a decade or more ago. But I find all these new findings that the bible is against things that were not even known or an issue during the times the bible was written to seem to me to be quite a stretch and reach. Hugs. Scottie
LikeLiked by 1 person
Well, I was thinking it was written that the antiChrist would be a man. Aside from the other descriptions. I only read Rev. 2x, both before I was 14. The denom. I was confirmed into considered the general message worthy, but gave it enough berth due to the isolation of John on the island before and during its writing. As I was told.
Later in life I was told by a Pentecostal minister that the antiChrist would be dark-skinned but not black, would be good-looking, and would lead the world around to the system then running the USSR. I guess that stuck with me, and I offer my apologies.
Still not a vaccine, though. It doesn’t say anything about a vaccine in any of the books, including the Apocryphal ones. But I am wrong about the human.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Just like so many other things in the bible, there are 101+ “interpretations” of what something means. And those who were taught at a young age are seldom able to get away from those teachings. There’s no getting around it … Christianity is a closed system.
LikeLiked by 2 people
Hi Nan. But wouldn’t you say it is malleable to be used against any group / person / nation state / economic system that the religious leader wants to vilify? It seems more people want to use it as a club against others now than they did as a tool in the past to control / enrich / increase the power of the church and its leaders. Hugs. Scottie
LikeLiked by 1 person
No, I would not say Christianity is malleable. When individuals attempt to use it against the sources you mention, they are simply manifesting its basic teachings. The core of Christianity is make up of unforgiving doctrines and precepts.
LikeLike
Hello Ali. I noticed the same thing. The Anti-Christ became anyone / nation the religious establishment was against at the time. Like other things in the bible, it is vague enough to be anything the believer wants it to be. Hugs. Scottie
LikeLiked by 1 person
It does differ, preacher to preacher, reader to reader. It is malleable, though or especially that varies by everyone’s experiences. My experience with my few exposures to Pentecostal/”Evangelical” services and dogma (required to be present due to family) were horrifying, equally as horrifying as the movie “The Exorcist” for many of the same reasons. My experiences in the denom. in which I was raised were not at all horrifying; it was full of the grace of Jesus. I am aware that some of that has changed in that denom.; it changed enough I left it in my young adulthood. The denom. I joined a little later was fine, but then a popular minister was let go due to calling out people who wanted a “position” on gay rights. I stopped attending then, and I haven’t found a local church that will denounce and help work against war and the death penalty, Gospel regardless, so I still don’t attend. I know this is no skin off anyone’s nose here; I’m just explaining myself a little. I still believe, and believe God knows I’m doing the best I can to not harm anyone, and to help all I can without proselytizing but by showing love. Some people would then believe I’m not really Christian, and that’s fine, they can believe that.
That’s a verbose definition of malleable, though. One definition.
LikeLiked by 2 people
I’m curious … why is so important to be considered “Christian”?
LikeLiked by 2 people
Nan, I have no idea why that’s important. We’re told to not be that way, as I know you recall from your studies. The only reason I’ve “come out of my closet” about it here is because it’s germane to the discussion, and I believe I’m among friends who really don’t care what I believe anyway, as long as it’s not harmful to others. We’ve both been reading here at Scottie’s long enough to know I don’t push that part of me forward very often or very far; today is the farthest I’ve ever gone about this aspect of myself.
And now that I wrote all that, I guess your question may go to my statement that some may believe that I am not Christian and that is fine… that is the truth as to me. I read atheists also, though, and one in particular, of whom I’m a fan, will tell a person to their face that if they don’t take all the dogma about whatever the IFB or whoever is pushing, they aren’t really Christian even if they think they are. That atheist went to Bible college, got a degree, and preached for many years before finding for himself that he doesn’t and cannot believe. I may be a bit sensitive due to that (and other atheists who believe the same,) he’s never called me out because I don’t comment there and would never try to push religion there anyway, as he’s warned against doing so. If he was as good a preacher as he is an ass-ripper about religion on his blog, well! He’s “saved some souls!” (Kidding.)
LikeLiked by 1 person
I was actually asking Scottie, but thanks for your comment. 😉
LikeLiked by 2 people
OMG, I’m so sorry for interrupting, Nan; my mistake.
I just read a funny line in my current book; Gays and Christians are always arguing about rainbows when really they belong to the leprechauns.
I hope that makes up for my screed!
LikeLiked by 1 person
Not a problem! I appreciated your input.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Hello Nan. First I disagree the bible is not malleable and open to interpretation. It is so contradictory that everyone can find a passage to prove or disprove everything/ anything. The Old Testament god acts like an angry warlord tyrant full of fury and vengeance. Demanding and unreasonable. The New Testament god is sweet and nice, forgiving and accepting. The current translations don’t match the few parts we have of the originals or their meanings. People seem to pick which god they like best and use the stuff they find that backs that up. But like all things supernatural, that too seems open to interpretation.
As to your question, why is so important to be considered “Christian”? I don’t think I said it was. I looked over the conversation and I was talking about him belonging to a scam group started and controlled by a rather nutty religious woman who claims sex with demons causes some sickness / disease. I said, “I am sure Dr. Ladapo doesn’t have a clue what is in the bible. He is all about grift and scam.” I personally don’t care if a person is a Christian or other religion or not. But I think many are like DeathSantis, who now claims to be a super fundamentalist Christian, doing things because god told him to return the country to a godly time. Yet when he was to be sworn in they had to rush to buy a bible because the DeathSantis family did not have one. How is that a true believer? That is what offends me. Hugs. Scottie
LikeLike
Hello Ali. I believe in people living as their authentic true self as long as they are not harming others. For you, that is being a nice person, what you believe a Christian should be. I don’t feel it is my right to decide who is what. I don’t get to say who is trans or not, that is up to the person to say. I can not assign a gender to a person, again it is for them to decide. I feel the same for who is or is not a Christian. If a person says they are a Christian, I accept it, same as if they tell me that they are a Muslim, Buddhist, or any other religious denomination. I think there are different kinds of Christians and how they use their religion towards others. Some like you and Roger are what I would call loving Christians, helpful, uplifting, you find joy in your faith, other people, and in life. The other kind I call Hate Christians, such as the NIFB. They worship a hateful god who is full of anger, they use his words not to uplift like you and Roger do, but to tear down and destroy. They attack to drive away people that they don’t agree with, rather than welcome people into the fold to show them love.
Ali, you are a wonderful person and I enjoy your time here on my Play Time. Please don’t feel you need to hide the fact of your religious faith. I am not religious, I am an atheist. I believe in science and so far there is no evidence to support the supernatural and as for the bible so much of it is incorrect, simply unable to have happened, and changeable / malleable that I discount that it was written by a deity or supreme being. But that is my belief, and I don’t insist others have it. Ron my wonderful spouse believes in the supernatural. He gets comfort and joy from that so why would I take it from him, he harms no one with his beliefs. I feel the same with other things people do, if they don’t harm others then I don’t care what they do or like or believe in. Hugs. Scottie
LikeLiked by 1 person