Let’s talk about Biden’s Senate border deal….

How a Palestinian boy was blinded in Israeli prison

Again look at the date.  A year after the last video of a boy abused by Israeli authorities, and they blinded another boy.   If you were his parents, wouldn’t you want justice?  The Israelis kept him in a prison and denied him needed medical care.  Even his doctor couldn’t convince them to help the boy.   They let him go blind, they wanted to hurt him as an example of what happens if you don’t obey your masters.  I am angry!  I have lost online “friends” after saying that Gaza was an open air prison.   So-called critical thinkers couldn’t see that constant mistreatment will drive people to lash out any way possible.  Hugs.  Scottie   



23,973 views Jul 19, 2018

Israeli prison authorities denied Hassan Tamimi his medication, which made him fall into a coma and lose his eyesight.

Palestinian teenager ‘tortured’ in Israeli jail

Notice the date.  6 years ago.   This is why Hamas attacked Israel.   The Israeli military has been mistreating the Palestinians and abusing their children!  Watch the video, see how a slight teenager was blindfolded, handcuffed, manhandled by 20 soldiers, then look at the other children at the end of the video, little kids not even teens yet, crying and being yanked along by soldiers.   Remember that these people have no rights, no due process.  They are treated worse than chattel.  If it was you, your family, your children … would you fight back?  Would you want a government that threw missiles and killed those hurting you?   Hugs.   Scottie



61,021 views Dec 29, 2017

Fawzi al Juneidi, the 16-year-old Palestinian who was recently arrested by Israeli soldiers in the West Bank city of Hebron has been released. A photo of him blindfolded and arrested became a symbol of ongoing Palestinian protests sparked by Trump’s Jerusalem decision. Al Juneidi is out on bail and must appear before the military court again on January 14.

Let’s talk about the Missouri GOP and a new rule….

CNN: Texas seized part of the US-Mexico border and blocked federal Border Patrol agents. Here’s what happened next

Texas seized part of the US-Mexico border and blocked federal Border Patrol agents. Here’s what happened next
Eagle Pass, Texas, has turned into the epicenter of a growing feud between Texas and federal authorities over how to tackle the migrant crisis and who has jurisdiction over that part of the US-Mexico border.

Read in CNN: https://apple.news/AwZ4aAj9xQJSc3oWgVCF4uA

Shared from Apple News

Best Wishes and Hugs,Scottie

Sodomites

I would love to see someone call them that to their face along with the explanation, then watch their heads explode.    Hugs.  Scottie

Lucky Ducky in “Dog Show”

This cartoon really shows how the wealthy think.   Hugs.  Scottie 

NPR: Friendly fire and accidents have killed a lot of Israeli soldiers in Gaza. Here’s why

Friendly fire and accidents have killed a lot of Israeli soldiers in Gaza. Here’s why
Nearly 1 in 5 Israeli casualties since the invasion of Gaza were caused by friendly fire or accidents. Experts say it’s one of the highest such percentages in recent military history.

Read in NPR: https://apple.news/A3eAcCtTqQgOYAMUr9oKoIA

Shared from Apple News

Best Wishes and Hugs,Scottie

Let’s talk about Gen Z and the GOP….

Hi all.  Remember that I said that as they age some people couldn’t accept the changes in society, so long for a prior time when they felt more comfortable with the way things were.   I got some push back on that.   Well Beau explains that phenomena far better than I did.  He says that the republicans base their policies on the core age group of the party’s memories growing up of TV shows from 10 to 15 years before.   He also shows how the attempt to return to a fictitious past won’t work, and that the rights attempt to deny the rights / existence of the LGBTQIA simply is doomed even as they try ever harder.  Please watch the video, I watched it three times.   Got more out of it each time.   Hugs.  Scottie

Iowa Republicans set hearing on bill removing civil rights protections for gender identity

https://www.desmoinesregister.com/story/news/politics/2024/01/25/gop-bill-would-remove-civil-rights-act-protections-for-transgender-iowans-gender-identity/72351459007/

What is it with this time in history that we have such a hard push by one political party to remove rights and remove protections from individuals.  For most of this country’s history, we moved toward expanding rights, to removing barriers and expanding opportunities for oppressed people.  Now the right / republicans are all about denying healthcare rights for women and trans people, denying the right to equal treatment in services, public spaces, housing, and even in expressing publicly support for the oppressed.   For example, taking away reproductive rights from women, and making illegal medically approved gender affirming best practices promoted by all the major medical associations.  Allowing public businesses to refuse services to anyone they think is gay or trans or has a religion the businesses disagree with, such as wedding planners, restaurants, home renters, adoption services, and even restricting movies / books based on dislike for LGBTQIA characters or plots.  Why do the republicans need to promote hate, why not just live and let live?   Hugs.  Scottie

———————————————————————————————————–

Stephen Gruber-Miller
Des Moines Register
 

Iowa Republican lawmakers have again proposed removing protections against discrimination for transgender people from the Iowa Civil Rights Act — and this time a key committee chair says he’s open to the conversation.

GOP lawmakers, who hold majorities in the Iowa House and Senate, have filed several bills over the past few years seeking to remove gender identity as one of the protected classes in the state’s civil rights law. But those bills have not received hearings.

This year, Rep. Steven Holt, R-Denison, has scheduled a subcommittee hearing on House File 2082, which would remove gender identity protections from the civil rights law and add gender dysphoria “or any condition related to a gender identity disorder” to the definition of a disability that would be protected under the law.

“I just want to hear a conversation about it,” Holt said. “I want to have a subcommittee and hear a conversation about it.”

In 2020, Holt used his position as Judiciary Committee chair to kill a similar bill that would have removed gender identity protections from the civil rights law.

The hearing, where the public can speak to lawmakers about the bill, will be held Wednesday at noon in room 102 of the Iowa State Capitol.

Keenan Crow, the policy and advocacy director for One Iowa, a group that advocates for LGBTQ rights, called Holt’s position “alarming.”

“Whenever you have somebody who’s willing to have a conversation about removing the civil rights of an entire class of people, that’s not a good conversation to be having,” Crow said. “Those rights should not be up for debate. Transgender people should be able to rent houses, get credit cards, get loans, go buy a sandwich, rent a hotel room, just like anybody else should be able to.”

More:Gender-affirming care ban for kids, trans bathroom bill are now Iowa law. What they do:

The Iowa Civil Rights Act prohibits discrimination based on race, creed, color, sex, sexual orientation, national origin, religion, ancestry, disability and gender identity. Lawmakers added the protections for gender identity in 2007 when Democrats held the Iowa Legislature and governor’s office.

People who fall under one of the protected classes in the civil rights law are protected from discrimination in employment, wages, public accommodations, housing, education and credit practices.

Holt said he believes transgender people would still have protections under Iowa and federal law even if lawmakers stripped gender identity out of the civil rights act.

“I think there’s plenty of other places in federal and in state law that would prevent discrimination,” he said. “Because I think we should all be opposed to discrimination based upon someone’s skin color or gender identity or whatever the case may be.”

Holt called it “an interesting concept” to look at specifying that gender dysphoria could qualify as a disability that merits protection. He pointed to a U.S. Supreme Court decision last summer that found people with gender dysphoria are protected under the Americans With Disabilities Act.

Crow said because that court decision is already on the books, adding gender dysphoria as a disability wouldn’t provide any additional protections. But it could harm low-income transgender Iowans who can’t afford to go to the doctor to receive a diagnosis, they said.

More:Iowa’s gender-affirming care ban is chasing transgender kids out of state for medical care

“Now they don’t have any housing protections and a landlord can literally just say, ‘no, I don’t want you in my space, you’re transgender,'” they said. “And there’s nothing that that person can do about it. So this is an extremely dangerous, extremely harmful bill.”

Holt didn’t guarantee that the bill would advance beyond the subcommittee hearing, but said he believes it’s time to have a conversation.

“I still have concerns about this, but I at least want to have the conversation and see where it goes,” Holt said.

Iowa Republicans in recent years have passed a flurry of laws impacting transgender Iowans, including banning transgender youth under 18 from receiving gender-affirming medical care, restricting transgender students from using school bathrooms that align with their gender identity and banning transgender women and girls from competing in female sports.

Stephen Gruber-Miller covers the Iowa Statehouse and politics for the Register. He can be reached by email at sgrubermil@registermedia.com or by phone at 515-284-8169. Follow him on Twitter at @sgrubermiller.

  

 

The hate.

It never ends…

There are some really awful people in this country, aren’t there?

More than I ever knew.

 

Same here. Ever since a black man became president I’ve seen nothing but an escalation in hate in this country. It’s like a huge swath of this country decided that anyone who is not white, straight, male and Christian is subhuman and need to have their rights taken away. I am disgusted with my country.

It’s getting worse

Theofascist monsters (the core of today’s Republican Party) are as we speak working furiously to devise their challenge to Obergefell.

Their war against the trans community is a warm-up act for them.

Merely practice.

Thumbnail
 
Thumbnail
 

They came for the blacks. I said nothing i wasn’t black Then they came for the jews, I said nothing I wasn’t jewish. Then the came for……..

““I just want to hear a conversation about it,” Holt said.”

People’s basic rights aren’t (or shouldn’t be) up for conversation.

We never have had a discussion about his Rights, have we?
Maybe the People of Iowa need to gather in the public square and begin that discussion…

It’s another distraction from poor governance…

Thumbnail
 

Won’t they be surprised to find out that this, (Yes this SCOTUS!) has already ruled that gender identity is covered under sex discrimination.

Only under the Civil Rights Act of 64, which doesn’t include discrimination in the realm of public accommodations.

But that’s only because the Title II of Civil Rights Act of 64 which covers public accommodations doesn’t include sex.