Separation of Church and State? Or ‘the wrath of a Holy God’

Thanks to Ten Bears for the link among others.   Hugs.   Scottie

Last Week in the Name of God …

Unknown's avatar

Published by Scotties Playtime

I am an older gay guy in a long-term wonderful relationship. My spouse and I are in our 36th year together. I love politics and news. I enjoy civil discussions and have no taboo subjects. My pronouns are he / him / his and my email is Scottiestoybox@gmail.com

10 thoughts on “Separation of Church and State? Or ‘the wrath of a Holy God’”

  1. Can I just dial something back on the Alabama Supreme Court ruling ‘Wrath of God’ for taking a Human Life?
    Does that mean this Supreme Poo-bah is suggesting that every American who took a life in every war irrespective of the situation or circumstances, is condemned unto Hell? That every law officer who was obliged to engage a dangerous and armed criminal and this ended in a fatality is also doomed to Eternal Fires?
    Not thinking it through, just does not begin to cover the folly of these words.
    Where do ‘they’ get ‘these people’ from?

    Liked by 2 people

    Reply

    1. smh. The same OT says Adam came to life when he received the breath from God. That’s why many Jewish and Christian believers feel that a baby is a baby when it’s a baby, which is when it’s outside of its host, breathing on its own or with medical assistance.

      Liked by 2 people

      Reply

      1. Spot on Ali👏.
        This current crop of Whatever-They-Ares have typical extremist views, narrow in vision, contradictory in ‘philosophy’ (I use the term very loosely) and only concerned with making noise to drown out any reasonable debate.
        And also applaudingly ignorant of the subject matter they are confronting.

        Liked by 2 people

        Reply

      2. Hi Ali. What I don’t understand about all of this hard anti-abortion is the total disregard for the woman. In no other circumstances can a living person be required to give any part of their body for anyone else, including babies. A father can not be required to give a kidney to their own child. No one can be compelled to even give blood. Yet these laws make pregnant people nothing more than incubators with fewer rights than the cells growing in them. I don’t understand why a live viable woman has fewer / no rights than a non-viable clump of cells. It is like saying cancer has more rights than the person it is growing in. Hugs. Scottie

        Liked by 1 person

        Reply

        1. IMO, it’s unhappy people’s way of controlling others who are having better lives than the unhappy people. Many times having children at the wrong time causes unhappy people with harder lives. I’m not disparaging kids! Or having kids. I’m only saying that family planning makes sure all the people can be happier with lives that are not as hard, and that makes unhappy people jealous.
          It’s just my opinion, but it formed because of what I’ve seen over my life.

          Liked by 1 person

          Reply

    2. Hello Roger. Yes plus there same judges are extremely pro death penalty refusing to stop the deaths even when it is clear the person was wrongly convicted. They seem to love the state killing people. These same judges never push for food for kids, money for other child aid program, but do everything they can to stop abortion and force births. It makes no sense to me. Hugs. Scottie

      Liked by 2 people

      Reply

      2. It is why I think that, as much as they claim their deeply held religious beliefs, they don’t really believe. If they did believe, they’d be scared witless to do what they do.

        Liked by 1 person

        Reply

Leave a comment

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.