“Bogus Disclaimer” Added To FL Abortion Measure

Again republicans know that their possition on abortion is not popular and the public wants access to it.   But republicans don’t care what the people want, they only want to force everyone to obey the rules they create.  So they have to lie and mislead to get their way.  Don’t fall for it.   Hugs.  Scottie


 

The Washington Post reports:

A Florida panel has approved language that will appear beneath an abortion ballot proposal in November that states the referendum will “negatively impact the state budget,” a move that reproductive rights proponents call “a dirty trick.”

The financial impact language says public funds may be required to pay for abortions, and that possible lawsuits could be costly. The statement concludes that “costs cannot be estimated with precision,” but asserts that if the amendment passes, it could be bad for growth in the state.

Last fall, the panel approved language that said the impact of Amendment 4 was “indeterminate.” Since then, Florida Gov. Ron DeSantis (R) and Florida House Speaker Paul Renner (R) appointed new members to the panel who voted to change the financial statement that will be on the ballot.

Here’s the new wording:

 


The proposed amendment would result in significantly more abortions and fewer live births per year in Florida. The increase in abortions could be even greater if the amendment invalidates laws requiring parental consent before minors undergo abortions and those ensuring only licensed physicians perform abortions.

There is also uncertainty about whether the amendment will require the state to subsidize abortions with public funds. Litigation to resolve those and other uncertainties will result in additional costs to the state government and state courts that will negatively impact the state budget.

An increase in abortions may negatively affect the growth of state and local revenues over time. Because the fiscal impact of increased abortions on state and local revenues and costs cannot be estimated with precision, the total impact of the proposed amendment is indeterminate.

 

If you actually had the majority of voters on your side lying about it wouldn’t be necessary.

This
The republicans wouldn’t constantly make ballot initiatives confusing and biased if they had the numbers to win outright.

 

…the referendum will “negatively impact the state budget,”

An unplanned and unwanted pregnancy bigly impacts a woman’s budget, too, but you don’t give a fuck about that.

One would think that having a bunch of abandoned, unwanted infants in state care would affect the budget, but then it IS Florida. They don’t really give a crap about kids so I guess they won’t be helping to support them.

And on hospital and state budgets if they don’t have decent health insurance through their (or a partner’s) work…

NOW he’s worried about litigation costs?

He could give up his private army if he needs State funds.

Eh. People understand the question and what is really at risk: women’s rights, not the budget.

Rethugs hone in on whatever “vulnerability” they perceive in the electorate. Mention “money” and lots of people will freak out.

Or so the Rethug monsters think.

That’s how the right got some many “right to work” ballot measures passed. Ignorant people gladly voted against their own self interests.

 

Today’s Republicans are evil but they’re savvy.

Case-in-point: They hope to win on the abortion issue nationwide by framing it as “killing babies.”

Not as “restricting a woman’s right to do with her body as she pleases,” but as “killing babies.”

Evil, but savvy.

 

This is not merely savvy. It’s framing the message to influence the millions with short attention spans and low intellectual skills, and to get it in few enough words to make a bumper sticker. The wording probably derives from lots of expensive political consulting work and focus groups.

Or the free State of Florida could see a massive windfall in income from all those nasty whores travelling to Florida to have weekly abortions on demand in conjunction with their vacations to Disney. As they so freely point out, the economic impact is indeterminate.

Sending state troopers to escort the governor when he went to far distant states undoubtedly had a negative impact on the budget as well.

California allows abortions and has the fifth largest economy in the world.

The financial impact of an abortion ban needs to be included as well

 

Leave a comment

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.