What is it with these religious bigots who think their god gives them the right to force everyone to believe / live as they claim to do. They are the first to demand their rights to worship / live as they wish. What gives them the idea the rest of us don’t want the same right. They were the first to attack the Taliban for forcing everyone in the country to worship / live by their version of Islam. Yet now they demand to be the US Christian Taliban. I do not understand their hate. They pick one or a few passages in the OT to clobber others while ignoring all the rest. They don’t stone their rebellious children, they don’t follow the other things in Leviticus and they do not follow anything Jesus said about caring for others. Hate, dominance, and vengeance is all they care about. The Old Testament god gives them that. And pleae notice the bill is titled Increasing Penalties for Child Pornography … it goes against all porn. Just like innocent drag queen story hours were attacked to protect the children from seeing people in costumes reading stories. Hugs
Alongside SB593, Deevers, who is also a pastor at Grace Reformed Baptist Church in Elgin, Oklahoma, introduced legislation to abolish abortion, prohibit drag performances in front of minors, ban divorce on the grounds of incompatibility, and provide tax credits to couples who opt into “covenant marriages” or have multiple children within the bounds of marriage — just to name some highlights.
An Oklahoma state senator has introduced legislation that would ban all pornography, with criminal penalties of up to 10 years in prison for the “production, distribution or possession” of any pornography, according to a press release from the Oklahoma Senate. SB 593, proposed by Senator Dusty Deevers on January 21, is part of a slate of eight bills by the legislator to “restore moral sanity” to the state of Oklahoma.
The bill, entitled “Increasing Penalties for Child Pornography and Prohibiting Pornography in Oklahoma,” goes far beyond the scope suggested in its title. While it does advocate for raising the penalty for the possession, distribution, or production of child pornography from 0-20 years up to 10-30 years, the bill has gone so far as to prohibit pornography entirely.
“Pornography is both degenerate material and a highly addictive drug,” Deevers said in the press release. “It ruins marriages, ruins lives, destroys innocence, warps young people’s perception of the opposite sex, turns women into objects, turns men into objects, degrades human dignity, and corrodes the moral fabric of society. Any decent society will stand against this plague with the full weight of the law.”
Deevers’ description of pornography as a “highly addictive drug” directly echoes the words of the authors of Project 2025,who, in the foreword to the over 900-page blueprint for a very different America, linked pornography to both child abuse and trans identity.
“Pornography, manifested today in the omnipresent propagation of transgender ideology and sexualization of children, for instance, is not a political Gordian knot inextricably binding up disparate claims about free speech, property rights, sexual liberation, and child welfare,” the foreword to the document reads. “It has no claim to First Amendment protection. Its purveyors are child predators and misogynistic exploiters of women. Their product is as addictive as any illicit drug and as psychologically destructive as any crime. Pornography should be outlawed.”
Alongside SB593, Deevers, who is also a pastor at Grace Reformed Baptist Church in Elgin, Oklahoma, introduced legislation to abolish abortion, prohibit drag performances in front of minors, ban divorce on the grounds of incompatibility, and provide tax credits to couples who opt into “covenant marriages” or have multiple children within the bounds of marriage — just to name some highlights.
Mike Stabile, the director of public policy at the Free Speech Coalition, said the proposed bill was really an attempt to encroach on free speech in a statement to USA Today.
“Porn is the canary in the coal mine of free speech, and the trial balloon used by governments to pass laws that can censor speech more broadly,” he told the outlet. “No matter how people feel about adult content, we should all be concerned about the proposed government crackdown on speech.”
Deevers’ attack on pornography comes less than a month after age verification laws effectively made porn inaccessible in 16 U.S. states, mostly in the regional South.
At the time that many of these bans went into effect, Aylo, the parent company to PornHub, told Mashable that it has “publicly supported age verification of users for years” but that the kind required by these bills is “ineffective, haphazard, and dangerous,” as well as a threat to users’ security.
A contributor to Project 2025 was recorded last year stating that age-verification laws are a “back door” to broader porn bans.
Legislators in several states have introduced similarly bizarre bills criminalizing sexual freedom in the short time since Donald Trump’s ascent to the presidency for the second time. Last week, Mississippi state senator Bradford Blackmon introduced the “Contraception Begins at Erection Act,” which would make it illegal for a person to “discharge genetic material without the intent to fertilize an embryo.” The bill suggested a fine of $1,000 for a first offense, $5,000 for a second offense, and $10,000 thereafter. In a statement to local affiliate WLBT, Blackmon said the bill was meant to act as a counterpart to contraception and abortion bills.
“All across the country, especially here in Mississippi, the vast majority of bills relating to contraception and/or abortion focus on the woman’s role when men are fifty percent of the equation,” he told WLBT. “This bill highlights that fact and brings the man’s role into the conversation. People can get up in arms and call it absurd but I can’t say that bothers me.”
Mathew Rodriguez is the former senior news editor at Them. In the past, he has been a senior culture editor at The Atlantic, as well as a staff writer at Out Magazine, INTO, and Mic. His writing has been featured in Slate, Teen Vogue, The Village Voice, MEL Magazine, and more. He … Read more
I am an older gay guy in a long-term wonderful relationship. My spouse and I are in our 36th year together. I love politics and news. I enjoy civil discussions and have no taboo subjects. My pronouns are he / him / his and my email is Scottiestoybox@gmail.com
View all posts by Scotties Playtime
6 thoughts on “An Oklahoma Senator Introduces Legislation to Ban All Porn and Imprison Content Creators”
whats porn to some is the Bible to others…..let’s just ban the Bible for incest, bestiality, rape, etc…see how far we get.
Wasn’t that tried in OK already, in regard to the school library book bans? I thought I remembered they got it banned, then it was decided that of course the Bible could never be harmful in a classroom. I could be mistaken, or it could have been somewhere else. It was in brighter times, of course.
OK has a mandate that a Bible (trumps of course) will be available in EVERY classroom from kindergarten to the 8th grades, and that “classes will be taught from” the same book. Of course we also have an ACLU lawsuit going against the state for their stupid mandate.
Hi Ali. I remember what you are talking about. It was when they were banning books from libraries due to sex, so someone filed a challenge to the bible for what Suze wrote. They pulled the bibles from the shelves, then the state legislatures modified the book banning bill to exempt the bible. They really had to write that the bible couldn’t be challenged or removed. So much for the reasons they wanted to ban the books. Hugs
Hi Suze. I agree. I like porn and feel I am a let people be themselves, but there are things in the Bible that are repulsive to me. Suze as a gay man who once was a gay teen and a gay unmarried young adult, now a 62 year old … birthday tomorrow … gay man with a wonderful husband who enjoys cuddling and sex with me … Can anyone tell me the problem issue with porn? Straight people watch it, straight cis people watch it together, and same with gay people we watch it often with spouses. Or if a spouse can’t do sex for any reason it is an outlet for the other partner.
As you know I was abused as a child. On the Male Survivor site I often read of men turning to porn to scratch the itch put in them from their abuse so they don’t do it in person which they feel will hurt their spouse.
I know I am male and a hypersexual one due to my childhood but I really don’t see the problem with porn or why the right / republicans / fundamentalist Christians are sure it is such a threat to them? It is sex. Only sex. Every animal on the planet does it … .well I think there are some fish or amebas that don’t but still, it is a normal thing to do. Any boy can tell you, even preteen we find out touching ourselves down there feels great and we don’t need a porn video to find that out. Look at any bunch of 13 / 14 year old boys, and they are rubbing up against counters or other things. So why this drive against something that doesn’t solve a problem, yet they don’t concentrate on the real problems? Hugs
whats porn to some is the Bible to others…..let’s just ban the Bible for incest, bestiality, rape, etc…see how far we get.
LikeLiked by 3 people
Wasn’t that tried in OK already, in regard to the school library book bans? I thought I remembered they got it banned, then it was decided that of course the Bible could never be harmful in a classroom. I could be mistaken, or it could have been somewhere else. It was in brighter times, of course.
LikeLiked by 2 people
OK has a mandate that a Bible (trumps of course) will be available in EVERY classroom from kindergarten to the 8th grades, and that “classes will be taught from” the same book. Of course we also have an ACLU lawsuit going against the state for their stupid mandate.
LikeLiked by 2 people
Hi Ali. I remember what you are talking about. It was when they were banning books from libraries due to sex, so someone filed a challenge to the bible for what Suze wrote. They pulled the bibles from the shelves, then the state legislatures modified the book banning bill to exempt the bible. They really had to write that the bible couldn’t be challenged or removed. So much for the reasons they wanted to ban the books. Hugs
LikeLiked by 1 person
Hi Suze. I agree. I like porn and feel I am a let people be themselves, but there are things in the Bible that are repulsive to me. Suze as a gay man who once was a gay teen and a gay unmarried young adult, now a 62 year old … birthday tomorrow … gay man with a wonderful husband who enjoys cuddling and sex with me … Can anyone tell me the problem issue with porn? Straight people watch it, straight cis people watch it together, and same with gay people we watch it often with spouses. Or if a spouse can’t do sex for any reason it is an outlet for the other partner.
As you know I was abused as a child. On the Male Survivor site I often read of men turning to porn to scratch the itch put in them from their abuse so they don’t do it in person which they feel will hurt their spouse.
I know I am male and a hypersexual one due to my childhood but I really don’t see the problem with porn or why the right / republicans / fundamentalist Christians are sure it is such a threat to them? It is sex. Only sex. Every animal on the planet does it … .well I think there are some fish or amebas that don’t but still, it is a normal thing to do. Any boy can tell you, even preteen we find out touching ourselves down there feels great and we don’t need a porn video to find that out. Look at any bunch of 13 / 14 year old boys, and they are rubbing up against counters or other things. So why this drive against something that doesn’t solve a problem, yet they don’t concentrate on the real problems? Hugs
LikeLiked by 1 person
the whole point is to distract and deflect until they can make changes behind our backs.
LikeLiked by 1 person