Red States like Tennessee are moving more and more money out of public education funding, opting to give the funding to private charter schools through vouchers and other means of fund diversion. The privatization of education has long been underway as the right-wing has been chipping away at teacher unions, panicking over CRT, and more recently, the accusations that LGBT teachers are ‘grooming’ children to be gay in public schools. Ana Kasparian discusses on The Young Turks.
Beau breaks down how much Gov. Abbott’s right wing grandstanding cost the people of Texas, hurt the US economy, helped shrink the US GNP like Putin wished he could do, all for nothing. They found no extra drugs, they found no illegals, but they did cause at least 7 deaths.
An Intel-developed software solution aims to apply the power of artificial intelligence to the faces and body language of digital students. According to Protocol, the solution is being distributed as part of the “Class” software product and aims to aid in teachers’ education techniques by allowing them to see the AI-inferred mental states (such as boredom, distraction, or confusion) of each student. Intel aims to expand the program into broader markets eventually. However, the technology has been met with pushbacks that bring debates on AI, science, ethics and privacy to the forefront.
The AI-based feature, which was developed in partnership with Classroom Technologies, is integrated with Zoom via the former’s “Class” software product. It can be used to classify students’ body language and facial expressions whenever digital classes are held through the videoconferencing application. Citing teachers’ own experiences following remote lessons taken during the COVID-19 pandemic, Michael Chasen, co-founder and CEO of Classroom Technologies, hopes its software gives teachers additional insights, ultimately bettering remote learning experiences.
The software makes use of students’ video streams, which it feeds into the AI engine alongside contextual, real-time information that allows it to classify students’ understanding of the subject matter. Sinem Aslan, a research scientist at Intel who helped develop the technology, says that the main objective is to improve one-on-one teaching sessions by allowing the teacher to react in real-time to each student’s state of mind (nudging them in whatever direction is deemed necessary).
But while Intel and Classroom Technologies’ aim may be well-intentioned, the basic scientific premise behind the AI solution – that body language and other external signals can be accurately used to infer a person’s mental state – is far from being a closed debate.
For one, research has shown the dangers of labeling: the act of fitting information – sometimes even shoehorning it – into easy to perceive (but ultimately and frequently too simplistic) categories.
We don’t yet fully understand the external dimensions through which people express their internal states. For example, the average human being expresses themselves through dozens (some say even hundreds) of micro expressions (dilating pupils, for instance), macro expressions (smiling or frowning), bodily gestures, or physiological signals (such as perspiration, increased heart rate, and so on).
It’s interesting to ponder the AI technology’s model – and its accuracy – when the scientific community itself hasn’t been able to reach a definite conclusion on translating external action toward internal states. Building houses on quicksand rarely works out.
Another noteworthy and potential caveat for the AI engine is that expressing emotions also vary between cultures. While most cultures would equate smiling with an expression of internal happiness, Russian culture, for instance, reserves smiles for close friends and family – being overly smiley in the wrong context is construed as a lack of intelligence or honesty. Expand this towards the myriad of cultures, ethnicities, and individual variations, and you can imagine the implications of these personal and cultural “quirks” on the AI model’s accuracy.
According to Nese Alyuz Civitci, a machine-learning researcher at Intel, the company’s model was built with the insight and expertise of a team of psychologists, who analyzed the ground truth data captured in real-life classes using laptops with 3D cameras. The team of psychologists then proceeded to examine the videos, labeling the emotions they detected throughout the feeds. For the data to be valid and integrated into the model, at least two out of three psychologists had to agree on how to label it.
Intel’s Civitci himself found it exceedingly hard to identify the subtle physical differences between possible labels. Interestingly, Aslan says Intel’s emotion-analysis AI wasn’t assessed on whether it accurately reflected students’ actual emotions, but rather on its results being instrumental or trustable by teachers.
There are endless questions that can be posed regarding AI systems, their training data (which has severe consequences, for instance, on facial recognition tech used by law enforcement) and whether its results can be trusted. Systems such as these can either prove beneficial, leading teachers to ask the right question, at the right time, to a currently troubled student. But it can also be detrimental to student performance, well-being, and even their academic success, depending on its accuracy and how teachers use it to inform their opinions on students.
Questions surrounding long-term analysis of students’ emotional states also arise – could a report from systems such as these be used by a company hiring students straight out of university, with labels such as “depressed” or “attentive” being thrown around? To what measure of this data should the affected individuals have access? And what about students’ emotional privacy – their capacity to keep their emotional states internalized? Are we comfortable with our emotions being labeled and accessible to anyone – especially if there’s someone in a position of power on the other side of the AI?
The line between surveillance and AI-driven, assistive technologies seems to be thinning, and the classroom is but one of the environments at stake. That brings an entirely new interpretation for wearing our hearts on our sleeves.
What bothers me is there are legal safeguards over what can be done with recording and using cameras on children, but no such safeguards on adults. We are getting used to every aspect of public life being under the watch of cameras and those that can tap into them. Plus many people have cameras in their homes, on their electronic devices, in their autos that all record or report on them. Over the years since 9/11 we have given up any real idea of privacy, our lives are a fishbowl. Even our TV’s report back what we watch, when we stop or pause. Our homes have cameras that the police want access to (ring system) that neighbors can join to share their cameras with. Now these face things on your computer. Ask this question, will they have to ask you to use your camera, or will the bad actors simply use them anyway. I run security programs to prevent access to my computer cameras and on my desktops when I am not using them I unplug them. But what about new independent digital cameras and phone cameras? Will you get notified when a company accesses them? The microphones? Do the terms of service you just ignore to get the app you want give them the right to spy on you? I wish I could say the government will protect us but the government is one of the biggest abusers of the system. After 9/11 the Patriot Act gave away most privacy rights of US citizens in favor of the feeling of being safe. Do you feel safer now? In some areas the public has to install cameras in their homes in case the police break in to protect the occupant that lives there. WTF has happened to the independent freedom loving Americans? Oh yes they are attacking school boards over mask policies and trying to stop people from reading books that have the true racist history or god forbid be about LGBTQ+.
A city leader said Fine later tried to block the release of the text messages through a public records request and wanted a city attorney who was overseeing the request to be fired.
Fine denied he threatened to get the funding pulled or that he ever spoke about firing the city attorney.
In the text messages between Fine and West Melbourne City Councilman John Dittmore, obtained late Friday through a public records request, Fine told Dittmore that funding requests for the charity and the city in a state budget recently submitted for approval to Gov. Ron DeSantis would be on the governor’s chopping block.
The reason: city police officials had invited Jenkins to participate in a Special Olympics fundraising event by the West Melbourne Police Department, but had neglected to invite Fine.
“Jenkins just put your project and special Olympics funding on the veto list,” Fine wrote.
As Dittmore tried to intervene, the text messages show, Fine again said the Special Olympics funding was “at risk,” calling the move to invite Jenkins a “huge (expletive) by the bureaucrats.”
“Smart move is to cancel with apology for wading into politics,” he wrote.
Fine rejected Dittmore’s subsequent invitation to attend the event, which took place Friday at a Chick-Fil-A restaurant on Palm Bay Road, calling Jenkins a “whore.”
“I’m not going to jack (expletive) where that whore is at,” he wrote. “You guys will have to raise a lot of money given that’s who you want to honor, not the person who got you money in the budget.”
The $112.1 billion state budget, passed by the Florida Legislature and sent to the governor’s desk last month, included $1 million in various appropriations for the Special Olympics and a $460,000 flood risk reduction project affecting about 500 homes in West Melbourne’s Westbrooke neighborhood.
Dittmore told FLORIDA TODAY that, in a follow-up phone conversation with Fine, the State House representative objected when he found out the texts would be released by West Melbourne city attorney Morris Richardson as part of a public records request filed by Jenkins, and suggested Richardson should be fired.
“He was very displeased and frustrated with the fact that our city attorney made the decision that some of this stuff was going to be public,” Dittmore said. “He made references to the fact that we should consider terminating his employment.”
Fine denied Saturday that conversation ever took place and said he never threatened to ask DeSantis to veto the items. He said the “veto list” comment was a remark about the “negative attention” brought to the event by Jenkins, who attempted to “politicize” it when she posted about the event on social media.
“When you have someone like Jennifer Jenkins come and politicize charity events, it creates problems,” Fine told FLORIDA TODAY. “If you want to be in a charity event, fine. But when you go on Facebook and you politicize it, you put it at risk.”
Fine did not answer further questions pressing him on the nature of the “risk” he referenced.
A review of Jenkins’s Facebook account in the lead-up to the event shows several posts in which Jenkins touted the fundraiser with pictures of her in a mock jail uniform, holding a placard reading “#BailJenkins,” a riff on Fine’s “#JailJenkins” slogan he has often used in his own Facebook posts.
The fundraiser event was billed as participants “bailing out” various community leaders, who were “jailed” on the roof of Chick-Fil-A, according to ads posted by the West Melbourne Police Department.
While Fine said he did have the ability to ask DeSantis to veto line items in the state budget, he denied asking DeSantis to do so.
“If I (had the intention to do that), I would have. I haven’t. Never planned to. Didn’t do it,” he said.
Messages seeking comment to DeSantis’s press office were not immediately returned Saturday. FLORIDA TODAY has reached out to Special Olympics Florida.
Richardson said the city never intended to be caught in the crossfire of the fight between Jenkins and Fine. The invitation to attend the fundraiser was sent to the entire school board and to Brevard Superintendent Mark Mullins, he said. Only Jenkins responded that she would attend.
“In organizing this fundraiser for the Special Olympics, the City of West Melbourne certainly did not intend to become involved in an unrelated political dispute,” Richardson said in an email. “I trust that better angels will prevail, and that our leaders will not allow this to impact worthy projects and causes.”
Dittmore said a since-deleted Facebook post he made late last week attempting to apologize to Fine for Jenkins’ involvement in the event was an attempt to “smooth over” the situation before it “got out of hand.” He said he deleted the post when supporters of Fine and Jenkins began to argue in the comment section.
Dittmore said he was just looking out for city residents, who badly need the flood risk protection funding.
“My whole goal was not to let this politicization affect the City of West Melbourne,” he said.
Why is Fine feuding with Brevard School Board member Jennifer Jenkins?
“I’m not surprised by it,” Jenkins said of the incident Saturday, adding that she felt Fine had tried pulling similar attacks against her in the past.
“It’s typical for someone to attack a woman with sexual innuendos when they are threatened by their strength,” she said of Fine’s “whore” comment. “I’m no stranger to these attacks from him. He has constantly gotten a pass for his defamation and libel, and he’s just been emboldened by those who are supposed to be holding him accountable.”
Fine and Jenkins have been embroiled in a public and increasingly rancorous feud in recent months, stemming from Fine’s anger with Jenkins over her support last year of a mask mandate for Brevard Public Schools. The mandate, which was later revoked, bucked a state order from DeSantis banning such mandates.
The case was tossed after the court agreed with Fine’s attorneys that the Facebook posts — in which Fine called Jenkins “mentally ill” and a “child abuser” for her support of the mask mandate, and repeatedly suggested she had cheated on her husband — was protected political speech.
Criminal complaints made last year containing a host of allegations against Fine by Jenkins and Robert Burns, a Brevard County political consultant with whom Fine has also had a long-standing feud, were dismissed by the State Attorney’s Office.
An investigation by the Florida Department of Law Enforcement found the complaints — which included allegations of corruption of a public servant by threat, cyberintimidation and stalking — arising from Fine’s frequent Facebook posts about Jenkins and Burns either did not rise to the level of a crime or were permitted under Florida law.
Fine made national headlines this week with a bill he filed in the recent special legislative session that stripped the Walt Disney Co. of special self-governing rights it was granted over a 25,000-acre parcel in Central Florida that serves as home to its Florida theme parks.
The bill was approved by both the Florida House and Senate and signed Friday by DeSantis.
Ethics expert: This is what you would see in a dictatorship
The legality of Fine’s threats was not clear Saturday. An expert in political ethics who spoke to FLORIDA TODAY said she wasn’t sure if Fine had broken any laws.
However, Beth Rosenson, an associate professor in political science at the University of Florida, said it was certainly unethical.
“To threaten the city, that if they don’t disinvite her and apologize that he’s going to work to get the project vetoed, that’s an ethical violation of what he’s supposed to be doing in his job,” said Rosenson, author of “The Shadowlands of Conduct: Ethics and State Politics.”
“It sounds like a pretty egregious, sort of petty way to behave,” she said. “That’s not why people elect somebody.”
Fine’s efforts reminded her of the “personalized politics” often displayed by dictators, she said, where those seeking political favors are required to “bow down” and show fealty to leaders’ demands.
“It’s not how democracy is supposed to operate,” she said. “So I think there’s some pretty deep, profound implications of what he’s doing.”
Florida Republican Rep. @VoteRandyFine threatened to block state funding for the Special Olympics because he wasn’t invited to an event and a school-board member he doesn’t like was. Fine is the same guy who suggested protestors should be run over.https://t.co/oE6QDEcWuQ
Rep. Randy Fine just went down a long list of companies and universities who “messed with” him and the legislature and how he made them pay. Wow this was a crazy ass meeting
Florida state Representative Randy Fine was a cosponsor of the state’s new anti-cyberbullying law. Now, the Florida Department of Law Enforcement is investigating him for violating the very law he helped pass. https://t.co/Qc4whVaW3p
NEW: Jewish GOP FL State Rep suggests that all Palestinians are terrorist animals, and beneath "pigs, rats, and snakes," which are considered vermin in the Hebrew faith#TheUndercurrentpic.twitter.com/T74vh7MEhv
This is what happens when the Republicans in Florida are in power. They bully and throw tantrums like @VoteRandyFine He wants them to lock me up bc of my peaceful sit-in. Well he threatens to get funding vetoed when his feelings are hurt. #FLPol#disneyhttps://t.co/RkNXKswlpo
"Randy Fine has taken over $20K from Disney in political contributions. This woke money he has not returned," says @annaforflorida. "If you want to talk about free markets, I'm your girl…Florida Republicans want Disney to get back in line, continue donating to their coffers." pic.twitter.com/1tQtATDpdX
“Based upon this review, we do not feel that this content is appropriate for young children even though it does not rise to the level of a crime.” The group complaining about the books also wanted to ban a book about the civil rights movement.
The Florida chapter of Moms 4 Liberty (M4L), a far-right “parents’ rights group”, has filed a criminal complaint against the Indian River County School District for having library books with LGBTQ themes. Even more concerning was the local sheriff’s response to the group’s complaint.
This story began in November 2021 when M4L told the district school board to remove 51 “pornographic or sexually explicit” books from school libraries. M4L’s list reportedly included LGBTQ-inclusive titles such as “All Boys Aren’t Blue” and “The Perks of Being a Wallflower.”
M4L then submitted a criminal complaint to the Indian River County Sheriff’s Office. After the supervisor of the office’s child sex crime unit conducted “a thorough review”, Sheriff Eric Flowers wrote that the reviewed books’ content “do not allow us to make an arrest in this case.”
“However,” Flowers wrote, “based upon this review, we do not feel that this content is appropriate for young children even though it does not rise to the level of a crime.”
“Some of the content in these books is highly questionable and I certainly would not want my child to have access to it,” he concluded. “I would recommend that the district continue to review their policy to allow for stricter oversight prior to books such as these being made available to children.”
Flowers’ response is concerning because it helps add legitimacy to M4L’s true aim: banning books without full transparency or oversight. The district could start quietly removing titles from school libraries just to avoid public controversy, and one study suggests that many schools do exactly that.
Groups like M4L regularly pressure school boards to ban books without going through the official district policies and public transparency protocols meant to ensure that schools don’t violate First Amendment prohibitions against government officials banning free expression, a recent study by the free-speech organization PEN America found.
Many of the books removed from schools libraries don’t even meet the legal definitions for “obscenity” and “pornography”, PEN reported, despite M4L’s claims to the contrary.
For example, M4L has sought to ban a book about police brutality against 1960s civil rights demonstrators because it had a “negative view of firemen and police.” The group wanted to ban a book about the church’s persecution of 17th-century astronomer Galileo Galilei, writing, “Where is the HERO of the church?” The group also opposed a picture book about seahorses because it contained a “discussion of the male carrying the eggs.”
According to her own parents, she’s not a particularly gifted athlete, but the middle schooler is now banned from playing on the field hockey team she helped create.
“Kentucky’s a national embarrassment today, and it’s shameful that lawmakers would prioritize attacking one trans seventh grader, rather than the real issues facing Kentuckians,” he said. “It’s a sad day in our Commonwealth.”
Wells, who testified against the bill in February, agreed.
“It’s disgusting that this bill is even suggested,” she told legislators. Because of the passage of SB 83, Wells will be barred from playing on the team she helped to create.
Kentucky’s Republican-controlled House and Senate overrode a veto by Gov. Andy Beshear (D) to enact a law barring transgender girls from playing on middle and high school girls’ sports teams. The governor had vetoed Senate Bill 83 the prior week, saying that it likely violates Constitution’s equal rights protections.
Proponents of the bill insist it is necessary to ensure that cisgender girls don’t lose opportunities to competitors who are transgender. But there is no evidence of risk to cisgender athletes, and the state’s only known trans female athlete is actually responsible for increasing athletic opportunities for girls in Kentucky.
“Transgender children deserve public officials’ efforts to demonstrate that they are valued members of our communities through compassion, kindness, and empathy, even if not understanding,” Beshear wrote in a statement.
Despite the rhetoric of trans athletes dominating women’s sports, state efforts to ban transgender youth from participating in athletics are often legislating against an exceptionally small number of students. Kentucky’s actions echo those in Utah, where legislators likewise overturned a veto by the state’s governor to push through a ban on trans athletes that applies to very few students. According to Gov. Spencer Cox (R), only four transgender youth are currently competing in athletics in the state.
“Four kids and only one of them playing girls sports,” Cox said. “That’s what this is all about. Four kids who aren’t dominating or winning trophies or taking scholarships. Four kids who are just trying to find some friends and feel like they are a part of something. Four kids trying to get through each day. Rarely has so much fear and anger been directed at so few. I don’t understand what they are going through or why they feel the way they do. But I want them to live.”
One troll’s story of secretly “crushing [hormone] pills” into her daughter’s cereal in the morning to force them into being transgender went viral among gullible conservatives.
An internet forum where people pretending to be parents forcing their children to be transgender has gotten shut down after it was found to be full of fake stories.
As the U.S. plunges even deeper into a moral panic over children who are supposedly being forced to transition, some anti-transgender people are reacting to the fact that that never happens by making up stories about it and trying to pass them off as real.
“Anyone else have trouble convincing your teen kids to continue transitioning?” user “Funkyduffy” wrote on the subreddit r/TransParentTransKid. “My 15-year-old daughter (AMAB) has started refusing her estradiol so I’ve been crushing the pills and putting it in her cereal in the morning.”
Reddit is a largely anonymous internet platform where most users create unidentifiable handles and connections between users aren’t the focus, a contrast to social media platforms like Facebook, Instagram, and Twitter. This makes it easier and more accepted for people to create temporary profiles to say whatever they want on various forums called subreddits.
One such subreddit, r/TransParentTransKid, was started last August when some users decided to post fake stories to it to promote the negative stereotype that parents and schools are forcing kids to be transgender. In reality it is common for schools and parents to be obstacles to trans kids expressing their identities while it’s unheard of for schools and parents to impede cisgender kids the same way.
The user who called for the subreddit’s creation said that it would be “filled with stories about how our real/adoptive children magically learned they were also trans after finding out about their parents,” according to Reuters.
According to another subreddit, r/AgainstHateSubreddits, r/TransParentTransKid was shut down for violating Reddit’s rules because they were “engaged in promoting hatred of transgender people, as well as targeted harassment.”
But the stories still spread outside of Reddit to rightwingers who were all too willing to believe them.
“This is fucking child abuse and I’ll die on this Hill,” wrote libertarian author Justin O’Donnell on Twitter, posting a picture of Funkyduffy’s fake story. He got almost 46,000 likes for it.
Ian Miles Cheong – who has a history of posting misinformation about trans people online and even riling Rep. Marjorie Taylor Greene (R-GA) up – shared the story with the words “Good parenting.”
The story comes as conservative politicians and activists are claiming that there is a massive effort by schools and parents to turn children transgender.
For example, Rep. Greene said in February that there are “these mothers that think [having a trans child] is like having a handbag. They need to have a boy, a girl, and a trans child like as if they’re some kind of accessory.”
Funkyduffy’s story may have been one that pushed her to believe that such parents exist.
“I have never – not once – heard of a child being forced to transition,” said the ACLU’s Gillian Branstetter. “The exception is intersex children who are frequently forced into surgeries, yet every effort to ban gender-affirming care exempts those surgeries.”
Photo: Shutterstock
12-year-old Fischer Wells is the only known transgender youth athlete in Kentucky.Photo: Fairness Campaign
Photo: Shutterstock
Scottie's Playtime 