RFK Super PAC Largely Funded By GOP Megadonor

Well we knew that.  The republicans recruited him to run as a chaos agent to suck votes from Biden.  Republicans know their candidates and the ideas they push are unpopular with the people.  So they only way they can stay in power is to cheat, suppress votes of the democrats, and gerrymander to create districts that only republicans can win.  Rather than change the party to appeal to more people they simply demand no one gets to vote unless they vote for them, so they can rule as a minority over the majority.  The problem for the right is RFK is talking more like a republican than a democrat.   What republicans are doing should be illegal.   Hugs


Politico reports:

A super PAC supporting the presidential ambitions of longshot Democratic presidential candidate Robert F. Kennedy Jr. reported receiving more than half its nearly $10 million in funds from a single GOP donor.

Of the $9.8 million reported, $5 million came from Timothy Mellon, a longtime GOP donor who gave $1.5 million to a Trump-aligned group last fall, according to campaign finance records. In a press release earlier Monday, Mellon touted Kennedy’s bipartisan credentials, calling him “the one Democrat who can win in the general election.”

Most of the rest of the super PAC’s fundraising through the end of June came from Gavin De Becker, an author and consultant who reported giving the group $4.5 million.

The Insider reports

Mellon also contributed $53 million to an effort led by Republican Gov. Greg Abbott of Texas to build a wall on the US-Mexico border, effectively funding the entire venture himself.

The grandson of famous banking magnate Andrew Mellon and an heir to the family fortune, Mellon once wrote in a self-published autobiography that welfare programs are “slavery redux” and described Black people as becoming “even more belligerent and unwilling to pitch in to improve their own situations” in the 1980s.

 

 

Yep. He’s the new Tulsi Gabbard. In 18 months he’ll have his own show on Newsmax

 

Killing more Republican viewers with his anti-vax message. That’s one way to insure the quick extinction of the doomed evolutionary offshoot: MAGAman

how shocking.

Thumbnail
 
 

Frankly, I’m surprised it’s just one mega donor funding that loony attention-whore.

 

Also interesting that he appears to want Trump and went this route as opposed to funding DeSantis, who early on was getting lots of big donations.

So two people gave $9.5 million of the $9.8 million he’s got

Our system is so screwed up that a small handful of extremely wealthy individuals can buy lifetime appointments to SCOTUS as well as spoiler candidates for Presidential elections.

That, and controlling cable news propaganda networks that, even when fined enormous amounts of money, just go right back to pumping nonsensical bullshit on the airwaves.

It’s almost as if he were a GOP-funded SPOILER candidate.
Weird, eh?

There doesn’t seem to be much he can actually do though. He might be disruptive if there was an open Democratic race like in 2016 or 2020, but there’s an incumbent. There aren’t going to be debates and campaign rallies.

Fawning appearances on right-wing podcasts and Z-tier cable channels have no impact whatsoever on Democratic primary voters.

I am beginning to think there is some coordination going on through whack job MAGA back channels. There is this small group of MAGAs that have been showing up consistently in downtown Portsmouth NH since before the 2020 election. To this day they show up periodically and hold their trump signs and flags in market square. They have picnics down on the water front. The other day I saw the guy who parks his van with the Fuck Joe Biden sign (a while back he changed it to “truck” Joe biden, probably thinking of the children). He was sitting downtown wearing an RFK 2024 shirt. There’s no way this mental case has given up on trump. It’s a three dimensional chess move to take votes from Biden.

 

DeSantis appointee to Disney board taught seminar using discredited research claiming White people were slaves in America

https://www.cnn.com/2023/08/04/politics/kfile-desantis-appointee-discredited-research-white-slaves/index.html

Yes because anything to defend white people holding black people as property and what the white people did to them.  Don’t mention the bad thing, the rapes, humiliations, the being told what, when, where you were allowed to do anything including pee (sounds like how Amazon treats workers only without them being able to say no or go home) how and when they could eat, basically a white person had complete control over those black people and their bodies.  Let’s obscure and fudge that anyway possible, even making up that white Irish people were also chattel slaves.  That is a complete lie.  But the people that wanted to push it built a whole mythology around the idea.  Just like the anti-trans people have done with every mythical idea they can to try to discredit the idea of a person identifying as the gender not assigned at birth by a visual inspection of the genitals.  What is it with these type people that they cannot simply accept the truth, the history, the science?  Why is it so damn important for the to deny all of the science and history to protect their feelings or their views of the world?  Hugs


 


Audio
Live TVLog In

Kfile

DeSantis appointee to Disney board taught seminar using discredited research claiming White people were slaves in America

Andrew Kaczynski
Em Steck

 

By Andrew KaczynskiEm Steck and Steve Contorno, CNN

Published 7:00 AM EDT, Fri August 4, 2023

Ron Peri, a member of the Board of Supervisors for the Reedy Creek Improvement District, listens during a monthly meeting on June 21, 2023 in Reedy Creek, Florida.

Ron Peri, a member of the Board of Supervisors for the Reedy Creek Improvement District, listens during a monthly meeting on June 21, 2023 in Reedy Creek, Florida.

An appointee by Florida Gov. Ron DeSantis to an oversight board of Disney’s special tax district taught a seminar in 2021 falsely claiming “Whites were also slaves in America,” using discredited research to say there was an “Irish slave trade.”

The comments were made by Ron Peri, one of five people DeSantis appointed earlier this year to oversee the Central Florida Tourism Oversight District to replace the old board after the company spoke out against what critics dubbed the “Don’t Say Gay” law in Florida.

Peri, an Orlando-based pastor and CEO of a Christian ministry group called The Gathering, made the comments in an hourlong class for his group posted on YouTube about critical race theory called “Cunningly Devised Fables.”

In other comments Peri spread false claims that Irish slaves were forcibly bred with enslaved Africans. He also said a “significant” number of free Blacks in the antebellum era owned slaves, claims disputed by reputable historians who say the number was minimal. CNN archived Peri’s comments from 2021, which he deleted from YouTube following his appointment to the Disney oversight board.

The oversight board, previously called the Reedy Creek Improvement District, governed Disney’s sprawling 25,000 acre footprint around Orlando. Created in 1967, its duties include providing services like sewage, fire rescue and road maintenance and issuing debt for infrastructure projects supporting Disney’s theme park empire.

“Slavery is a moral wrong wherever it exists or existed and is one of America’s great historical wrongs,” Peri told CNN in a statement Tuesday. “Similarly, racism is likewise wrong. I countenance neither to any degree, so the criticism of the belief that thousands of people being held in slavery was significant and a terrible wrong is severely misplaced. Even one person in slavery is egregious and morally reprehensible, regardless of race.”

The DeSantis administration but did not respond to CNN’s request for comment.

Peri’s 2021 comments came in the context of him pushing back on claims of “systemic racism” in the United States from past White ownership of slaves.

“Look at old newspapers, as old as you can find, and you’ll find that Whites were also slaves in America,” said Peri. “The Irish slave trade began when James II sold 30,000 Irish prisoners as slaves to the new world. His proclamation of 1625, which you can go back and see, required Irish political prisoners be sent overseas and sold to English settlers in the West Indies.”

“By the mid 1600s, the Irish were the main slaves sold to Antigua and Montserrat,” Peri added. “From 1641 to 1652, over 500,000 Irish were killed by the English, and another 300,000 were sold as slaves.”

“The settlers began to breed Irish women and girls with African men to produce slaves with a distinct complexion,” Peri added.

Peri’s claims are based on fabricated material that has circled the Internet over the last two decades and has been the subject of repeated debunkings from news organizations like the New York TimesReuters, the Associated PressSnopes, and frustrated historians – many of whom signed an open letter in 2016 disputing the claims.

Even the article Peri cited as evidence was updated before he used it in the seminar to note it contained a number of factual errors.

Historians who spoke to CNN said that the research Peri cited is ahistorical and based on invented research: Whites were never considered slaves in America, legally or socially; 300,000 Irish were not sent as slaves to the Americas; English King James II – who Peri cited as issuing the proclamation in 1625 – was not born until 1633 and did not take the throne until 1685. Even then, no proclamations by King James II on Irish slaves exist. The Irish did not “breed” with African slaves, as Peri claimed.

Irish immigrants in North America and the Caribbean were never considered slaves but were indentured servants, said Matthew Reilly, a professor of anthropology at City College of New York.

Indentured servitude consisted of a fixed period of time, usually five to seven years, and was not inheritable. Whereas the race-based chattel form of slavery kept enslaved people as property for life and children would inherit their mother’s status.

“The conditions may have been like that of slavery, but socio-legally, it was a very different form of unfreedom,” said Reilly.

In another comment, Peri used data attributed to the 1830 census to say the numbers showed a “significant” and “large number” of free Blacks owned slaves. However, the 1830 census data cited by scholars show that out of 2,009,043 slaves in the United States, 3,776 free Blacks owned 12,907 slaves – 0.006%.

“The justification that they have for it is they claim that systemic racism emanates from White ownership of slaves,” Peri said. “Therefore, all White wealth is based on the hard work and abuse of Black slaves and women. That’s their justification. Well, the reality is all races owned slaves.”

“A significant number of these free Blacks were the owners of slaves,” Peri added.

Historians, like esteemed Harvard professor Henry Louis Gates, Jr., have noted that a large number of those Black slave owners “owned” their own family members to protect them – oftentimes by purchasing a family member. And that pointing to other races owning slaves is a way to minimize the brutal realities of slavery.

“The vast majority, the overwhelming majority – to the tune of millions of people who were brought from West and West Central Africa to the Americas – they were enslaved. Not people who were perpetrating slavery themselves,” Jenny Shaw, a professor of history at the University of Alabama, told CNN. “There’s a small number who did because they rose up in society and did what society was doing, which was enslaving people.” And that some people of African descent enslaved people because they were family members bringing them into their households with the intent of freeing them.

Peri’s unearthed comments come amidst the controversy over the Florida Board of Education’s new standards for teaching Black history.

Disney and DeSantis

Peri’s appointment to the Disney oversight board followed a clash between the company and DeSantis over a state law that would restrict certain classroom instruction about sexual orientation and gender identity. While Disney first declined to weigh in publicly on the legislative fight over what critics called the “Don’t Say Gay” bill, then CEO Bob Chapek, under immense pressure from the company’s employees, later changed directions, and shared his concerns with the legislation. Later, after it became law, the company in a statement said it would work to get it repealed.

However, Peri has also accused Disney in the past of adopting teachings of critical race theory in its company training. The comments touched on another top concern of DeSantis, who sought to ban employers from training workers about privilege and systemic racism when he signed the Stop Woke Act, parts of which were blocked by a federal judge from going into effect.

“We’re seeing companies embracing CRT,” Peri said in his Zoom. “I’m gonna just share two – Walt Disney you’re quite familiar with. You know, down here in Orlando.”

DeSantis has faced backlash in recent days over Florida’s board of education approving controversial new standards for teaching Black history in the state, which includes teaching “how slaves developed skills which, in some instances, could be applied for their personal benefit.” DeSantis has defended the state’s curriculum.

Peri previously faced scrutiny after CNN’s KFile uncovered that the Orlando pastor had suggested tap water turned people gay. Peri disputed that he made the remark during a May 1 Central Florida Tourism Oversight District board meeting, saying from the dais, “I never said that. I don’t believe it, certainly.”

The latest revelations about Peri’s beliefs come as DeSantis’ conflict with Disney is embroiled in dueling legal challenges. Peri is named as a defendant in a lawsuit filed by Disney, which alleges that the Florida governor has punished the company for exercising its First Amendment rights while describing his hand-picked board as a pawn in his “retribution campaign” against the entertainment giant.

In its complaint, filed in the United States Circuit Court for the Northern District of Florida, Disney alleged DeSantis picked board members who would “censor Disney’s speech and discipline the Company” and that DeSantis’ action against the company “threatens Disney’s business operations, jeopardizes its economic future in the region, and violates its constitutional rights.”

Peri, meanwhile, voted with the rest of the Central Florida Tourism Oversight District board to sue Disney in state court. In the past week, a Central Florida judge rejected Disney’s request to dismiss the state lawsuit. In the federal case, lawyers for DeSantis have asked the court to delay a trial until after the presidential election while Disney attorneys suggested a timeline that would put the case before jurors next July.

The board installed by DeSantis has said much of its power was stripped by Disney in an agreement reached before the governor’s appointees took over in February.

Since then, DeSantis and the board have focused on clawing back authority while threatening to develop the land around Disney – including by building a prison or a competing theme park next to Disney World.

Let’s talk about Hunter, Archer, and an old video….

Male anti-abortion religious leaders mull murder charges for pregnant people at national event

These white men won’t quit until the US is a Christian theocracy policed by Christian Taliban moral police thugs.  Some important quotes that show their mindset.  Regardless of the legislative strategy, the panelists agreed changing the culture of America to take on a Christian biblical worldview, which will require all pastors to take the same position on abortion as their own.  Also week-long series of events hosted by Operation Save America, an anti-abortion, anti-LGBTQ and anti-Muslim religious group that wants all Americans to follow “God’s law” and their interpretation of the Christian gospel.  The panel was part of a week-long series of events hosted by Operation Save America, an anti-abortion, anti-LGBTQ and anti-Muslim religious group that wants all Americans to follow “God’s law” and their interpretation of the Christian gospel. The moderator of the panel, Derin Stidd, opened by asking, “Why do you all hate women?” to which the men laughed.  Hugs




🚨 BREAKING: SHAPIRO DICK PIC

Thumbnail

Raging Bee6 days ago

Um, no, if you’re STILL A SLAVE, then you really can’t do ANYTHING for your “personal benefit.”

Floriduh’s “history” books are being written by people who don’t even want to know about their history.

Fire & Smoke Crown Raging Bee6 days ago

^ That captures it in a nutshell. The education of slaves was to benefit the people holding them in bondage as property.

Some of his fans are disappointed they don’t get to see him in action.

Thumbnail
Texas A&M University said on Friday that its president would retire “immediately” after fallout surrounding political pushback of a new director of its journalism program because of her work promoting diversity, equity and inclusion.

DoctorDJ7 days ago

Anyone see a problem with hiring Dr. McElroy? Anyone?

Thumbnail

ohbear1957 DoctorDJ7 days ago edited

It sounds so familiar.

Germany’s 1933 civil service law applied to university professors as well as elementary and secondary-school teachers. … Scholars who were Jewish or supported left-leaning parties struggled to find research and teaching positions in public, government-supported German universities and often worked in private ones instead. With the passage of the new law, the Nazis attempted to root out any dissent to their policies and ideology that remained in German higher education.

https://www.facinghistory.o…

amandagirl15701 kaydenpat7 days ago

They call it other things, like “Protecting Children” or “Academic Freedom”. None of which is their actual goal, but it’s just bigotry and racism repackaged to make it more palatable.

Honestly, who would be against diversity? Racists… that’s who.

Serene Pumpkin7 days ago

Their idea of “diversity” is a mix of white Protestant men and white Catholic men.

Genitals… Genitals, Everywhere…

Thumbnail

Project 2025 …

Ten Bears post is really good and seriously important.   This is something that everyone needs to understand.  The big money and fossil fuel industry desperately wants to rake every last dollar they can, no matter the cost to the world, before their deep investments in a vanishing substance is worthless.   It is another example of the way the wealthy have been forcing the US government using greedy politicians to fuck over the public, the people, the environment, other public needs, basically the entire country to gain more wealth.  Please go to Ten Bears post and read it.  

Not to distract from that but again WordPress decided to fuck up something that worked really well.  When reblogging someone’s content you got a comment box to add your thoughts.  That would post your comment to the person’s blog and sent the comment plus a snippet of the other post with their title to your blog, so your readers would know what it was about and click on it to read the person’s post on their site.  It worked so well!  It was so simple.  It did so many functions automatically.  

So of course WordPress screwed with it, changed it, and made it harder.  They made it the same as their “press this” button.  Now you get a new window with a snippet in the body box, you need to add a title, add your comment, and more stuff.  Then add your comment to the original post!   Just how in the many layers of hell that WordPress inhabits makes this an improvement?   It is just making the reblog button the same as the press this button, which people were not using.  Hugs

Bowling for Columbine (2002) – A Brief History of the United States Scene (8/11) | Movieclips

The South is So Gay

When you think about LGBTQ representation, you probably don’t immediately picture the southern states of America. In this episode, @TraeCrowderLiberalRedneck examines the contradictions and challenges of being gay in the South. Original Air Date: 6/1/2020

The American South is a complicated place, and we know a lot less about it than we think we do. And many things about the South that seem to make no sense are less confounding in context. The reality is the history of many Southern things has been manipulated, hidden, or just plain ignored. Trae Crowder guides us through the pride points, failures, and contradictions in “Southin’ Off.”

Conservatives are more likely to complain in everyday service contexts due to their higher sense of entitlement

Conservative consumers are more likely than their liberal counterparts to complain across various service contexts, according to new research published in the Journal of Consumer Psychology. The findings provide evidence for the role of entitlement in explaining ideological differences in complaining behavior.

Previous research suggested that conservatives complain less than liberals due to their higher level of system justification motivation (SJM), which involves defending institutions and perceiving policies as fair. However, this account may not apply to service contexts where self-interested motivations are prioritized over system justification. Therefore, the researchers aimed to investigate whether conservatives would complain more than liberals due to their higher sense of entitlement.

“I have always been interested in political ideology as an area of research,” said study author Steven Shepherd, an associate professor and William S. Spears Chair in Marketing and International Business at Oklahoma State University.

“Some recent research in marketing finds that liberal consumers are more inclined to complain that conservatives, and although their theorizing makes sense, a lot of political ideology theory and research suggests that conservatives might in fact complain more than liberals. So we wanted to explore that side of things and provide a more complete account of how political ideology relates to consumer complaining.”

The researchers conducted a series of three studies to explore the relationship between political ideology and complaining behavior.

In Study 1, the researchers recruited 301 American participants from Amazon Mechanical Turk (MTurk). The participants rated their likelihood of complaining across six scenarios (e.g., “Imagine you are getting a takeout order from a restaurant and it is taking much longer than usual for it to be ready. How likely are you to give a smaller tip because of this?”). They also completed measures of political ideology, consumer entitlement, and SJM.

Political ideology was measured using a single item, where participants indicated their position on a spectrum ranging from “very liberal” to “very conservative.” This allowed the researchers to categorize participants as either liberal or conservative based on their responses.

To measure consumer entitlement, participants responded to an 11-item scale developed by Butori (2010). The scale assessed participants’ beliefs about their deservingness of special treatment or benefits as consumers. Participants indicated their level of agreement or disagreement with statements such as “I deserve better treatment than the average customer.”

 

Finally, participants completed an eight-item scale to measure their level of system justification motivation. The SJM scale captured participants’ tendencies to defend and view overarching institutions, organizations, and norms as fair and just. Participants rated their agreement or disagreement with statements such as “Most of the time, the system works well and is fair.”

The results showed that political ideology, consumer entitlement, SJM, and complaining intentions were positively correlated. The researchers found that conservatives had higher consumer entitlement, which predicted increased complaining intentions. This relationship held even when controlling for demographic variables.

To further explore the findings, Study 2 focused on the influence of social comparison and the perception of deservingness. The researchers recruited 791 American participants from MTurk. They presented participants with a scenario in which they overheard another customer receiving a special discount due to their status as a student or a police officer.

The researchers predicted that conservatives would feel less entitled and show lower complaining intentions when a police officer received a discount, as conservatives tend to view the police as a fair authority. The results supported this hypothesis, revealing that conservatives showed higher entitlement in the student condition and lower entitlement in the police officer condition. Moreover, conservatives exhibited higher complaining intentions in the student condition but not in the police officer condition.

In Study 3, the researchers extended their investigation to service recoveries. They recruited 594 American participants from MTurk and presented them with a scenario where they experienced a delay in a restaurant delivery. Participants were assigned to either a control condition, where they received an apology and a standard discount, or a special treatment condition, where they were told their situation was unique and received a special discount. In line with the previous studies, conservatives showed higher complaining intentions in the control condition but not in the special treatment condition.

“We consistently found that conservative consumers expressed an increased willingness to complain about various service experiences. This was due to conservatives on average being higher in consumer entitlement; that is, feeling that they are not just ‘any other customer’ and are more deserving of special treatment and consideration than other customers.”

These results contribute to a better understanding of ideological differences in complaining behavior and highlight the role of consumer entitlement as a novel mechanism and predictor in consumer political ideology research. However, the researchers note that future research utilizing behavioral data from different sources and exploring potential moderating factors can provide further insights into the relationship between ideology and complaining behavior.

“The predicted effect was quite robust across a range of different everyday service situations. Throughout the research we didn’t find evidence to the contrary; that is, that liberals complain more than conservatives. In the paper we propose a number of contextual factors, either individually or in combination, that might play a role, and future research might be able to more precisely pin down exactly when and why conservatives vs. liberals complain more vs. less.”

The study, “On the political right, the customer is always right: Political ideology, entitlement, and complaining“, was authored by Steven Shepherd, Hesam Teymouri Athar, and Sahel Zaboli.

A short round up as I start a new post to catch the Friday to Sunday bunch.

Thumbnail

the Republican infrastructure plan !!

Thumbnail
WTF. These people are not coming to hurt anyone, they are not coming to destroy the US, but to share the dream of a wonderful country. Abbott is proving to be the destroyer and despicable person, as is anyone who would follow these orders. Hey think how we look at the guards at concentration camps, Texas will be thought of in the same way. Scottie
Drag performances in Ohio could be banned from public parks, parades and other places children might be if a bill introduced by House Republicans becomes law.
House Bill 245 expands the definition of adult cabaret performers from strippers and topless dancers to include “entertainers who exhibit a gender identity that is different from the performer’s or entertainer’s gender assigned at birth.”
Diversity or diversity and inclusion programs are just words for let others than white males have a seat at the table. Seriously, this is what the republicans and MG are fighting. Why would they want to block others than whites / at one time only white males, from having a chance to be included? Racism and misogyny.

Biden got a Target Letter, too!

Thumbnail
The pro-life party! Right! Tell me another one.

Judge refuses to limit drag show ruling to just Hamburger Mary’s

Sign outside Hamburger Mary’s Bar & Grille in downtown Orlando, on Tuesday, June 13, 2023. (Ricardo Ramirez Buxeda/ Orlando Sentinel)
PUBLISHED:  | UPDATED: 
 

A federal judge won’t limit his previous ruling that temporarily blocked a Florida law he has determined violated the constitutional rights of drag performers.

U.S. District Judge Gregory Presnell on Wednesday denied a motion asking that his injunction blocking the law apply only to the plaintiff in the case, the Hamburger Mary’s restaurant in downtown Orlando.

“This injunction protects Plaintiff’s interests, but because the statute is facially unconstitutional, the injunction necessarily must extend to protect all Floridians,” Presnell wrote in his order.

At issue is a new Florida law that contains penalties for any venue allowing children into a sexually explicit “adult live performance.” The law includes potential first-degree misdemeanor charges for violators.

Hamburger Mary’s filed a lawsuit in May against Gov. Ron DeSantis, the state, and Melanie Griffin, secretary of Florida’s Department of Business and Professional Regulation. DeSantis, who signed the measure into law, and the state have since been dropped as defendants, with Griffin remaining.

The downtown Orlando restaurant, which opened in 2008, has held drag performances that include bingo, trivia and comedy.

Presnell in June issued an order preventing Griffin’s agency from enforcing the law pending the outcome of a trial. He also denied the state’s motion to dismiss the lawsuit.

In that ruling, Presnell, an appointee of President Bill Clinton, questioned what the line in the law about “prosthetic or imitation genitals or breasts” would mean for cancer survivors.

“It is this vague language — dangerously susceptible to standardless, overbroad enforcement which could sweep up substantial protected speech — which distinguishes [the new Florida law] and renders Plaintiff’s claim likely to succeed on the merits,” Presnell wrote.

State attorneys representing Griffin then requested a stay to Presnell’s order for parties other than Hamburger Mary’s. The state also has filed an appeal to Presnell’s ruling.

“The Court’s injunction also sweeps beyond Plaintiff to nonparties who may wish to expose children to live obscene performances in violation of the statute,” lawyers for the state agency argued in requesting the stay. “The portion of the injunction that applies to nonparties threatens Florida, and the children Florida enacted the law to protect, with irreparable harm, and is beyond the Court’s remedial authority.”

But Presnell on Wednesday denied that request, writing:  “By her motion, Defendant seeks to neuter the Court’s injunction, restricting her enforcement only as to Plaintiff and leaving every other Floridian exposed to the chilling effect of this facially unconstitutional statute.”