TRUMP’S WORST NIGHTMARE! | Christopher Titus | Armageddon Update

Ohio elections board refuses to allow trans woman to run for office because of old law

https://www.lgbtqnation.com/2024/01/ohio-elections-board-refuses-to-allow-trans-woman-to-run-for-office-because-of-old-law/

It is one thing for a person who commits a crime to be off the ballot, like starting an insurrection against the US.  But this is the real weaponizing of the laws to harm political opponents.   What are these republicans scared of?  They can not fight idea to idea.  They can not promote their own ideas because they unpopular, the people don’t want what the republicans are pushing.   So republicans resort to dirty tricks. Even the governor said, let her on the ballot.   Hugs.  Scottie


 
Vanessa Joy
Vanessa JoyPhoto: Screenshot / News 5 Cleveland

The county elections board that disqualified a transgender candidate for Ohio state office because she did not include her deadname on petitions circulated to potential voters is refusing to reverse its decision, even after pressure from the state’s governor and other trans candidates being to run for office without disclosing their deadnames in Ohio.

Despite collecting enough signatures to run as a Democrat for Ohio’s firmly Republican House District 50, real estate photographer Vanessa Joy learned earlier this month that she had been disqualified from the race by the Stark County Board of Elections due to an obscure state law requiring candidates to disclose any name changes that have taken place within the last five years.

Notably, the 1995 law was not mentioned in the Ohio secretary of state’s 2024 candidate guide and has not been included in previous candidate guides in recent years. Nor did the candidacy petition form Joy filled out include any mention of the law or space to list any name changes.

Joy requested a reconsideration of the decision, according to a January 19 statement from the Stark County Board of Elections. The board denied her request, citing an Ohio Supreme Court case that found that the law is “unambiguous,” that the “intent behind the candidate’s use of a different name is not relevant,” and that it could not “add an exception that does not appear in the statutory language.”

“The Stark County Board of Elections is sympathetic to Vanessa Joy’s argument that the campaign election guide put out by the Ohio Secretary of State was not specific enough,” the statement read.

The board added that its “decision must be based on the law and cannot be arbitrarily applied.” However, Joy was one of four transgender candidates running for Ohio office this year. Two others, Bobbie Arnold and Arienne Childrey, had their candidacies for Ohio state House seats challenged under the law. Both have since been cleared to have their names appear on the November ballot. Still, according to the Associated Press, both Arnold and Childrey could technically be removed from office if Joy does not succeed in challenging the law.

A fourth trans candidate, Ari Faber, has not had his candidacy for Ohio’s state Senate challenged. Faber has not legally changed his name and is running with his birth name on the ballot, NBC News reports.

While Joy told the AP that, for now, her campaign is over, she is working with an attorney to get the law changed. “I’m out of the race, but I’m not out of the fight,” she said.

Last week, Ohio Gov. Mike DeWine (R) said that trans candidates should not be disqualified for not listing their deadnames and argued for changes to ensure that future candidates will be aware of the little-known law.

According to the AP, Ohio’s Republican Secretary of State Frank LaRose said that his team will include the law in future candidate guides but opposed changing the law itself.

Republicans Determined To Make Anti-Abortion Laws So Much Worse

Let’s talk about the Biden impeachment inquiry….

Let’s talk about Gen Z and the GOP….

Hi all.  Remember that I said that as they age some people couldn’t accept the changes in society, so long for a prior time when they felt more comfortable with the way things were.   I got some push back on that.   Well Beau explains that phenomena far better than I did.  He says that the republicans base their policies on the core age group of the party’s memories growing up of TV shows from 10 to 15 years before.   He also shows how the attempt to return to a fictitious past won’t work, and that the rights attempt to deny the rights / existence of the LGBTQIA simply is doomed even as they try ever harder.  Please watch the video, I watched it three times.   Got more out of it each time.   Hugs.  Scottie

Iowa Republicans set hearing on bill removing civil rights protections for gender identity

https://www.desmoinesregister.com/story/news/politics/2024/01/25/gop-bill-would-remove-civil-rights-act-protections-for-transgender-iowans-gender-identity/72351459007/

What is it with this time in history that we have such a hard push by one political party to remove rights and remove protections from individuals.  For most of this country’s history, we moved toward expanding rights, to removing barriers and expanding opportunities for oppressed people.  Now the right / republicans are all about denying healthcare rights for women and trans people, denying the right to equal treatment in services, public spaces, housing, and even in expressing publicly support for the oppressed.   For example, taking away reproductive rights from women, and making illegal medically approved gender affirming best practices promoted by all the major medical associations.  Allowing public businesses to refuse services to anyone they think is gay or trans or has a religion the businesses disagree with, such as wedding planners, restaurants, home renters, adoption services, and even restricting movies / books based on dislike for LGBTQIA characters or plots.  Why do the republicans need to promote hate, why not just live and let live?   Hugs.  Scottie

———————————————————————————————————–

Stephen Gruber-Miller
Des Moines Register
 

Iowa Republican lawmakers have again proposed removing protections against discrimination for transgender people from the Iowa Civil Rights Act — and this time a key committee chair says he’s open to the conversation.

GOP lawmakers, who hold majorities in the Iowa House and Senate, have filed several bills over the past few years seeking to remove gender identity as one of the protected classes in the state’s civil rights law. But those bills have not received hearings.

This year, Rep. Steven Holt, R-Denison, has scheduled a subcommittee hearing on House File 2082, which would remove gender identity protections from the civil rights law and add gender dysphoria “or any condition related to a gender identity disorder” to the definition of a disability that would be protected under the law.

“I just want to hear a conversation about it,” Holt said. “I want to have a subcommittee and hear a conversation about it.”

In 2020, Holt used his position as Judiciary Committee chair to kill a similar bill that would have removed gender identity protections from the civil rights law.

The hearing, where the public can speak to lawmakers about the bill, will be held Wednesday at noon in room 102 of the Iowa State Capitol.

Keenan Crow, the policy and advocacy director for One Iowa, a group that advocates for LGBTQ rights, called Holt’s position “alarming.”

“Whenever you have somebody who’s willing to have a conversation about removing the civil rights of an entire class of people, that’s not a good conversation to be having,” Crow said. “Those rights should not be up for debate. Transgender people should be able to rent houses, get credit cards, get loans, go buy a sandwich, rent a hotel room, just like anybody else should be able to.”

More:Gender-affirming care ban for kids, trans bathroom bill are now Iowa law. What they do:

The Iowa Civil Rights Act prohibits discrimination based on race, creed, color, sex, sexual orientation, national origin, religion, ancestry, disability and gender identity. Lawmakers added the protections for gender identity in 2007 when Democrats held the Iowa Legislature and governor’s office.

People who fall under one of the protected classes in the civil rights law are protected from discrimination in employment, wages, public accommodations, housing, education and credit practices.

Holt said he believes transgender people would still have protections under Iowa and federal law even if lawmakers stripped gender identity out of the civil rights act.

“I think there’s plenty of other places in federal and in state law that would prevent discrimination,” he said. “Because I think we should all be opposed to discrimination based upon someone’s skin color or gender identity or whatever the case may be.”

Holt called it “an interesting concept” to look at specifying that gender dysphoria could qualify as a disability that merits protection. He pointed to a U.S. Supreme Court decision last summer that found people with gender dysphoria are protected under the Americans With Disabilities Act.

Crow said because that court decision is already on the books, adding gender dysphoria as a disability wouldn’t provide any additional protections. But it could harm low-income transgender Iowans who can’t afford to go to the doctor to receive a diagnosis, they said.

More:Iowa’s gender-affirming care ban is chasing transgender kids out of state for medical care

“Now they don’t have any housing protections and a landlord can literally just say, ‘no, I don’t want you in my space, you’re transgender,'” they said. “And there’s nothing that that person can do about it. So this is an extremely dangerous, extremely harmful bill.”

Holt didn’t guarantee that the bill would advance beyond the subcommittee hearing, but said he believes it’s time to have a conversation.

“I still have concerns about this, but I at least want to have the conversation and see where it goes,” Holt said.

Iowa Republicans in recent years have passed a flurry of laws impacting transgender Iowans, including banning transgender youth under 18 from receiving gender-affirming medical care, restricting transgender students from using school bathrooms that align with their gender identity and banning transgender women and girls from competing in female sports.

Stephen Gruber-Miller covers the Iowa Statehouse and politics for the Register. He can be reached by email at sgrubermil@registermedia.com or by phone at 515-284-8169. Follow him on Twitter at @sgrubermiller.

  

 

The hate.

It never ends…

There are some really awful people in this country, aren’t there?

More than I ever knew.

 

Same here. Ever since a black man became president I’ve seen nothing but an escalation in hate in this country. It’s like a huge swath of this country decided that anyone who is not white, straight, male and Christian is subhuman and need to have their rights taken away. I am disgusted with my country.

It’s getting worse

Theofascist monsters (the core of today’s Republican Party) are as we speak working furiously to devise their challenge to Obergefell.

Their war against the trans community is a warm-up act for them.

Merely practice.

Thumbnail
 
Thumbnail
 

They came for the blacks. I said nothing i wasn’t black Then they came for the jews, I said nothing I wasn’t jewish. Then the came for……..

““I just want to hear a conversation about it,” Holt said.”

People’s basic rights aren’t (or shouldn’t be) up for conversation.

We never have had a discussion about his Rights, have we?
Maybe the People of Iowa need to gather in the public square and begin that discussion…

It’s another distraction from poor governance…

Thumbnail
 

Won’t they be surprised to find out that this, (Yes this SCOTUS!) has already ruled that gender identity is covered under sex discrimination.

Only under the Civil Rights Act of 64, which doesn’t include discrimination in the realm of public accommodations.

But that’s only because the Title II of Civil Rights Act of 64 which covers public accommodations doesn’t include sex.

 

Let’s talk about McConnell, Trump, and deals….

JESUS 2.0 | Christopher Titus | Armageddon Update

Let’s talk about the New Hampshire results….

Let’s talk about Biden, banking, and overdrafts….

I hate hearing someone say both parties are the same.   Tell me a republican that would try to stop wealthy banks from raking in billions in profits from the poor people?   Those people don’t think both parties are the same, they simply don’t have a good reason to support theirs, so they have to claim the other side is the same thing.   It also is why the republicans are so desperate to impeach Joe Biden.  Can’t let tRump a republican be the only one, we have to falsely claim democrats are just as bad.   Not that tRump was good or correct, but that Biden is as bad!   Hugs.  Scottie