‘It’s Gonna Get Bloody’: Anti-Vax QAnon Conspiracy Theorist Scott McKay Threatens to Put ‘Bullets Inside’ Health Care Providers
Earlier this month, Scott McKay, a prominent QAnon conspiracy theorist known online as Patriot Streetfighter, spoke at a ReAwaken America tour stop in Phoenix, Arizona, where he declared war on health care providers whom he blamed for the recent death of fellow QAnon and anti-vaccine conspiracy theorist Cirsten Weldon.
Stalking the stage while brandishing a tomahawk at the rally, McKay declared that “World War IV” is underway and warned doctors and nurses that if they “have the courage to kill our people, you better have the courage to stand in a direct crosshairs of Patriot Streetfighter because this is now going to happen.”
Following his remarks at the event, McKay sat down for an interview with David Scarlett of the program “His Glory” where McKay explicitly threatened violence.
“I’m going to name names—show pictures where I can—these are the nurses, doctors involved in murdering these people, and I’m going to start pushing these people into the public eye,” McKay said. “Let’s see how they like that battlefield.”
“We can’t allow the enemy or anybody to use our virtues against us,” he continued. “I don’t allow anybody to use the semantics of language or use my virtues against me. This is war. It’s gonna get bloody, and I’m going to get ugly too; no less ugly than any 1776 preacher that dropped his Bible on the lectern, grabbed his muzzle loader or musket, and went out and put balls and bullets inside people and watched blood flow on a battlefield. That’s what they had to do. That’s the name of Christ.”
“It’s an evil enemy,” McKay declared. “Any of the minions, including the doctors and nurses who were part of it—knowingly or unknowingly, that’s not for me to sort out—but they need to know what’s coming next. And that’s the only other battle that I can see in my future now coming up after what happened to Cirsten W.”
Scottie's Playtime 
A VERY sick bunch of people living in this world today.
LikeLiked by 2 people
Hello Nan. A very violent groups of people. That is why I post these things to keep people aware of how willing to use violence to get what they want these people are. Seriously these people are edged on by Republican politicians and supported by dark money from wealthy bigots or wealthy people wanting trouble for political reasons. Think of the parents’ rights being yelled everywhere right now. the only parents that seem to matter are the anti-mask, anti-mask, pro-religion, anti-LGBTQ+ ones, in other words republicans. I see it as out right turning schools into indoctrination centers just like Sunday school in church. There is a reason that a country that once valued science and learning is now trying to keep things as dumbed down as possible using bumper stick slogans. Scottie
LikeLike
There’s a lot to be said for the Cheney Doctrine, the One Percent Doctrine: if someone or something represents a one percent threat one or one family’s safety, one has the right to pre-emptively eliminate the threat.
LikeLiked by 2 people
Yeah, and I just hate that, but yeah.
LikeLiked by 1 person
I don’t like it either, but it is what it is. I’ve gotten a huge post half-drafted ~ have already written about ~ I just can’t …
LikeLiked by 2 people
Hello Ali. I am not so sure. Too many people going off using misinformation and crazy ideas. How many are trying to force hospitals to use Ivermectin on their loved ones when the doctors say it not only won’t help but really will hurt the patient. Look at the Qanon’s in Dallas for months waiting for a dead Democrat to come back and become the Republican president with tRump as king? Nope I do not want the people taking preemptive action unless it is entirely political and non-violent. Scottie
LikeLiked by 1 person
Well, they can go to a nice, safe hospital with padded rooms and those special jackets, rather than anybody dying. I’m non-violent, too, and tend to think along those lines when reading about pre-emptive elimination of threat. I should be more clear these days, about such. I’m sorry!
LikeLiked by 1 person
Hello Ten Bears. For me that is a tough one. I am not a supporter of preemptive action by the people because the people don’t have all the information nor the ability to analyze it. I agree if the government has knowledge of an attack or upcoming violent event then they should step in to stop it or control it. My problem is what Bush used that doctrine for, he attacked a country that had never attacked us using a ginned up incorrect reason when it was really a personal family insult thing, and it destroyed the US history of never attacking first which every prior president used when Nukes and missiles were discussed. Scottie
LikeLiked by 1 person