Meet Charles Hamilton: the 18th century “female husband” who scandalized British society

Charles Hamilton, Female Husband
Image from a copy in Bristol Library of the pamphlet “The Female Husband” (1813 edition) by Henry Fielding. Cartoon is attributed to George Cruikshank. Text on the image says: “The Prisoner being convicted of this base and scandalous crime was sentenced to be publically and severely whipped four several times in 4 Market Towns, and to be imprisoned for 6 Months.”Photo: British Newspaper Archive

Charles Hamilton, a traveling doctor in 18th-century Somerset, UK, was a dapper, charming suitor who could have his pick of the ladies – and according to some accounts, often did.

But it was love at first sight when the doctor laid eyes upon his landlady’s niece, the beautiful but naive Mary Price.

On July 16, 1746, at St. Cuthbert’s Church in Wells, Somerset, Charles (or, as the parish register has it, James) Hamilton and Mary Price were married by the Reverend Mr. Kingstone.

For two months, the couple traveled through Somerset as husband and wife selling quack remedies – unproven cure-alls that often had little medical value. Still, on September 13, in a nearby town called Glastonbury, Mary denounced her husband to the town authorities.

It turned out that Charles was missing a vital piece of equipment for Mary’s long-term happiness – a penis.

Charles’ story scandalized and titillated society, courtesy of Henry Fielding’s hurriedly-written – and mostly fictionalized book – The Female Husband.

But who was Charles Hamilton?

The person first known to the world as Mary Hamilton was born in Somerset, a rural farming county in southwest England, in about 1725, the daughter of William and Mary Hamilton.

When still a child, her family moved to Angus in Scotland until, at about 14, Mary put on her brother’s clothes and set out on the road back to England alone. From this moment, Mary lived as a man, going by the names of James, George, and Charles Hamilton in the years that followed.

In Northumberland, as Charles Hamilton, he entered the service of Dr. Edward Green, a ‘mountebank’, or seller of quack medicines. He then worked for Dr. Finly Green before setting up independently as an unqualified doctor.

In May 1746, he arrived at Wells in Somerset and lodged in the house of Mary Creed, meeting her niece and falling helplessly in love. This fateful act led to the marriage that would cast him into infamy.

A deposition from Mary Price says that she and Hamilton traveled selling medicines after marriage.

During their time together, Hamilton “entered her body several times” and “so well did the imposter assume the character of man, that she still believed she had married a fellow-creature of the right and proper sex.”

But after gossiping with her neighbors, Mary soon began to suspect her husband was harboring a secret. She confronted her husband when they were in Glastonbury – a town just a few miles away from their home in Wells. Hamilton admitted the truth to Price, who, in turn, instantly ratted him out.

The story was unusual enough at the time to attract the attention of the local newspaper, the Bath Journal.

According to those reports, after news of the arrest, many people visited the prison to gawp at Hamilton, described as being “bold and impudent”.

It added that “it is publickly talk’d that she has deceived several of the Fair Sex by marrying them.”

Another report says that at the trial, the prosecuting attorney, Henry Gould – misspelled as Gold in the newspapers – claimed that Hamilton had been married fourteen times.

The scandalized magistrates struggled to agree what the crime was – or even if one had been committed.

Newspaper article about Charles Hamilton and Mary Price
British Newspaper Archive

Records show that it was not so much that Hamilton dressed and worked as a man that was a problem as much as the fact that he deceitfully contrived penetrative sex.

After much debate Charles Hamilton was labeled an ‘uncommon notorious cheat’ and was charged under the vagrancy act of 1744; an act meant to prosecute lack of employment or deceitful attitudes.

During the trial, members of Hamilton’s community wrote a letter to the clerk asking for severe punishment. They demanded public humiliation to ensure that Hamilton would never be able to live as a man again.

The severity of Hamilton’s sentence, and the terms in which the court delivered it, reflected the outrage and perplexity the case had aroused: ‘and we, the Court,’ they said, ‘do sentence her, or him, whichever he or she may be, to be imprisoned six months, and during that time to be whipped in the towns of Taunton, Glastonbury, Wells and Shepton Mallet.’

The newspaper recorded that the ‘bold and impudent’ Hamilton remained at that time ‘very gay, with periwig, ruffles, and breeches’, still defying the world as the world closed in.

He continued to sell his remedies surrounded by fascinated crowds who flocked to see him.

Newspaper article about Charles Hamilton and Mary Price
British Newspaper Archive

At three-week intervals, until Christmas 1746, Hamilton was whipped publicly in four different towns. That might have been the end of the saga for Hamilton if it weren’t for the novelist Henry Fielding.

Now considered the founder of the English novel, Fielding hurriedly cashed in on the salacious scandal, claiming he had his information “from the mouth” of Hamilton himself.

However, he likely never met the person he satirized in his work and it was instead cobbled together from court reports and his own (filthy) imagination.

The obscure – and pornographic – pamphlet was published anonymously. Like a Georgian-era 50 Shades of Grey, it was badly written, salacious and sold out almost immediately. Unlike 50 Shades of Grey, only four copies are known to exist today.

In his story, Fielding claims Mary Hamilton was born in 1721 on the Isle of Man, the daughter of a former army sergeant who had married a woman of property on the island.

In his version, she had been brought up in the strictest principles of virtue and religion but was seduced into “vile amours” by her friend Anne Johnson, an enthusiastic Methodist, and “transactions not fit to be mention’d passed between them”.

When Anne leaves him for a man, Hamilton seeks another female lover. He meets Mrs. Rushford, a wealthy 68-year-old widow who takes her to be a lad of about 18. He pretends to be a Methodist preacher and promptly marries the widow.

According to Fielding, he deceived his bride by means “which decency forbids me even to mention.” The bride eventually discovers Hamilton’s birth sex, and Hamilton is forced to flee. Hamilton uses various other aliases to marry other women but is repeatedly forced to run when the ruse is discovered.

Finally, posing as a doctor, he marries Mary Price.

Gendering Hamilton as a woman, Fielding also claims that “on the very evening she had suffered the first whipping, she offered the gaoler money, to procure her a young girl to satisfy her most monstrous and unnatural desires.”

The Female Husband by Henry Fielding
British Newspaper Archive

Historian Louis Crompton describes Fielding’s account as “one part fact to ten parts fiction” – so what did happen to Charles Hamilton once the storm had passed?

In July 1752, an unsigned letter appeared in the Pennsylvania Gazette, sent from Chester, just outside Philadelphia. It recounted the story of Charles Hamilton, an itinerant doctor living as a man, who was discovered to be biologically female.

According to the letter, Hamilton said he had been brought up in the business of a doctor and surgeon in the UK.

He said he had set sail for Philadelphia in Autumn 1751, cast away from North Carolina and made his way towards the city, selling medicine and treating people along the way.

Hamilton confessed he had used the “disguise” for many years.

So perhaps, Hamilton headed off to the New World and continued to live his life as he always had – true to himself and unashamed.

Laura Linham is a freelance journalist based in Somerset, UK. You can find her on Twitter, @midsomlaura


7 thoughts on “Meet Charles Hamilton: the 18th century “female husband” who scandalized British society

  1. Every time I read about a woman “of yore” transitioning in any direction during times when that was “unheard of,” I really feel proud of women’s ingenuity.

    Liked by 1 person

    1. Hello Ali. I agree with you. But in many countries and back then women had no rights so anyone with feeling they are not quite what the times felt a women should be, why wouldn’t they adopt the other gender? Think of this, in Iran transgender people can freely transition with Government help. The only thing is there is not an equal applying of the law. As I understand it males transitioning to females are no hampered in any way, but females transitioning to male face a lot more resistance and questioning. So a male wanting to give up privilege is accepted but a woman wanting to gain privileges is suspected and delayed. But again this shows that there were trans / people who had a different gender identity from birth sex a long time ago. This should stop the lie that kids today are changing their gender due to hearing about it in school. Hugs

      Liked by 1 person

      1. I didn’t know that- it’s interesting how there is resistance, in Iran, to trans-men transitioning, but not to trans-women transitioning. Hmm. I bet the arguments against trans-men transitioning are similarly sexist to those used by US resistance to trans-women. That’s an interesting dynamic.

        Liked by 1 person

        1. Hello Ali. The reason the government pays for and assist with sexual transitioning is because they don’t believe in gay people existing. So if you are a man that likes men, the government forces you to be a woman so you are straight. As for why they are more hassles for female to male transition could be what you say or it could be that the people in charge don’t have the hostility to same sex female sexual activity that they do to same sex males doing it. It is that way in the bible, and a lot of preachers against the gays only scream about the guys and they would love to watch lesbian porn or be invited to join a couple girls. It is their fantasy I have read. Again what pleases them is good, what they don’t like is against gods commands. Hugs

          Liked by 1 person

          1. 💡 I see now. I never would have thought of that on my own, that they would use transition to erase gay people. Now I’m sorta putting that together with a biblical example of God’s love and salvation (sorry about the terminology) I read in Sojo that is our logic for total acceptance of all humans. I don’t want to take the space and your time to relate that here, but it’ll come up again, I’m certain.
            Also, agreed as to straight-laced men loving lesbian porn. sigh

            Liked by 1 person

          2. I don’t mean to be graphic, but as related to sex between females being more “acceptable,” I tend to think it’s because there’s no appendage involved. I won’t go into any more detail than that.

            Liked by 1 person

            1. Hello Nan. Could be, the appendage does seem to get the hate preachers in the NIFB cult well worked up. But I also think it is more the idea that for these men acceptable sex is with women, and for them the more women the more acceptable. Very selfish way to think about it, but these are not really the kind of guys that care much about the feelings of others. Hugs


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

%d bloggers like this: