Rightwing propaganda outlet PragerU’s materials approved for schools in Ron DeSantis’ Florida

https://www.lgbtqnation.com/2023/07/rightwing-propaganda-outlet-pragerus-materials-approved-for-schools-in-ron-desantis-florida/

But Governor DeathSantis claims that he has ended indoctrination in Florida schools.   If you don’t already know, Prager U is a YouTube channel funded to the tune of at least $36 million a year (last I read) by the billionaire Mercer family to spread bigotry and racism.  The Channel has videos against every civil rights gain since the 1950s, while pushing the wholesome goodness of white men.   The channel pushes that white people had a right to do what they have done in history to other groups and that god has established the traditional way life should be.    The fact is what the republicans working with or are religious fundamentalist bigots are fiercely pushing indoctrination of right wing religious views while trying to erase all social and scientific advancements since 1950.   Hugs

PragerU (initialism for Prager University, and short for Prager University Foundation[4]) is an American advocacy group and media organization that creates content promoting conservative viewpoints on various political, economic, and sociological topics. It was co-founded in 2009 by Allen Estrin and talk show host Dennis Prager.

Despite the group’s name being an initialism for Prager University, it is not an academic institution and does not confer degrees. PragerU’s videos contain content widely considered to be misleading or false in promoting climate change denial. Historians and political scientists have also criticized PragerU’s videos for containing misleading or inaccurate claims about topics such as slavery and racism in the United States, immigration, and the history of fascism. PragerU has also been accused of promoting anti-LGBTQ politics.


PragerU purports to liberate children from the “dominant left-wing ideology.”

By Molly Sprayregen Tuesday, July 25, 2023

Gov. Ron DeSantis

Gov. Ron DeSantisPhoto: Shutterstock

A right-wing nonprofit that “offers a free alternative to the dominant left-wing ideology” has announced that Florida has become the first state to approve the organization as an educational vendor.

“This fall in schools across America, students will be watching PragerU videos in their classrooms as states officially make PragerU an approved educational resource,” the group said in a press release, according to the Miami New Times.

RELATED STORIES

Faculty flee Florida college amid DeSantis’s quest to make it a conservative institution

The school is currently dependent on visiting faculty to fill the gaps.

————————————————————————————————————-

PragerU, which is not an accredited academic institution, offers propaganda-filled materials for students in kindergarten through 12th grade through its PragerU Kids program. It describes itself as being in “the mind-changing business.”

“In the past, teachers have been disciplined — even fired — for showing PragerU videos in their classrooms,” the press release states. “Now, PragerU videos are not only being allowed in classrooms but superintendents and education commissioners are actively encouraging teachers to use PragerU’s content to educate their students… PragerU supplemental curriculum offers an easy, cutting-edge way to teach core knowledge in subjects ranging from civics and history to entrepreneurship and financial literacy.”

In addition to a slew of videos for kids, the organization offers resources like a sample anti-critical race theory policy. Its videos claim the gender wage gap does not exist and that white people are unfairly villainized for stealing the land of Native Americans.

petition on its website claims that “PragerU is trying to help America’s students—but the left (which has hijacked and controlled the education system, including teachers unions) is doing everything in its power to label us as ‘far right,’ deplatform us, and keep PragerU out of schools.”

“The left wants you to think that the reason students are failing is because bureaucrats need more money,” it states. “The left wants you to believe that teachers unions are protecting kids and doing right by teachers. The left claims kids don’t need patriotic education. Instead, they are teaching Critical Race Theory, gender fluidity, and that math is racist.”

The Florida Department of Education told the Miami New Times that it “reviewed PragerU Kids and determined the material aligns to Florida’s revised civics and government standards.”

“PragerU Kids is no different than many other resources, which can be used as supplemental materials in Florida schools at district discretion,” said deputy director of communications Cassie Palelis.

Gov. Ron DeSantis‘s (R) office did not respond to a request for comment, but the group’s way of thinking is in line with the governor’s right-wing ideology.

During his time in office, DeSantis has waged war on public education, most notably through his “Don’t Say Gay” law and his vendetta against the teaching of racial and LGBTQ+ issues in schools.

In May, he signed a law forbidding colleges and universities from spending state or federal funding on programs that promote political or social activism or “diversity, equity, and inclusivity” (DEI). DeSantis said such DEI programs often actually stand for “discrimination, exclusion, and indoctrination.”

In 2022, DeSantis signed the so-called “Stop WOKE Act,” which forbids schools and businesses from offering educational programs on racism and gender-based discrimination. The law is currently on hold as a court considers its impact on constitutionally protected rights to free speech.

Italy begins stripping lesbian mothers of their parental rights

https://www.lgbtqnation.com/2023/07/italy-begins-stripping-lesbian-mothers-of-their-parental-rights/

Right wing governments working with Christian churches to deny rights to LGBTQ+ people.  To stop equality, to stop same sex marriage.  To deny family status at the same time as right governments and churches claim family units are best for children.  We already know that children raised in same sex households do as well as or better than children in traditional opposite sex households.  This is an attempt to make anything but the traditional male / female relationship status meaningless.  Sure you can have civil partnerships but you get no rights with it, same with same sex marriage in the US if the republican fundamentalist religious right has its way.  Because it is not good enough for those people to be able to do their things, do their beliefs, follow their own doctrines, their goal is to force everyone else to live by their church rules also.   Hugs

 
Two lesbian mother and baby on bed having fun
Photo: Shutterstock

In conjunction with its crackdown on the rights of same-sex parents, the Italian government has begun retroactively stripping same-sex parents of their legal connection to their children.

Michela Leidi told the Daily Mail that she “cried for ten days” after receiving a letter informing her she would be removed from her daughter’s birth certificate. “It was as if I did not exist.”


RELATED STORIES

The couple doesn’t know why they were targeted as one of the first to have their legal status changed retroactively, as in most cities the policy has been focused on new babies born. They said their community, friends, and family have always supported them.

“I suspect the government is afraid that a family that looks different, like ours, can be as happy – maybe even happier sometimes – as a traditional family,” Liedi said. “On paper, they say Giulia has one mother but we know she has two. We will do everything possible to prove we are a good family.”

Her wife added, “No one from the government or the prosecutors came to see that we are a happy family with a happy baby.”

While same-sex civil unions have been legal in the country since 2016, same-sex couples do not have the right to adopt, thanks in part to opposition from the Catholic Church. Surrogacy remains illegal in Italy and there are restrictions that prevent the adoption of “stepchildren” by one parent. Medically assisted reproduction, like in vitro fertilization (IVF), is only available to heterosexual couples.

Viola became pregnant through artificial insemination, and the couple had to travel to Spain to receive the treatment.

Until March, there were several Italian cities where same-sex couples could be listed as “parents”—as opposed to “mother” and “father”—on birth registrations. But the Interior Ministry began sending letters ordering an end to the practice. 

Italy’s Prime Minister Giorgia Meloni, leader of the far-right Brothers of Italy party, made anti-LGBTQ+ rhetoric a cornerstone of her campaign for office. She opposes allowing same-sex couples to adopt as well as marriage quality, calling civil union “good enough” for LGBTQ+ couples.

“Yes to the natural family, no to LGBT lobbies,” she declared last summer.

Under current Italian law, the member of a same-sex couple who is not legally recognized as a child’s parent could lose custody if the legally recognized parent dies or the relationship ends.

This is particularly horrific for another couple, Vanessa Finesso and Cristina Zambon. Finesso is the one who gave birth to their daughter after undergoing IVF in Spain. Even though she used Zambon’s egg, Zambon has been threatened with the loss of parental rights by the government. Finesso has cancer and is worried that if she dies, her wife will lose custody of their daughter.

The order also leaves the children of same-sex couples in jeopardy in other ways. “Children end up having limited access to key services and benefits, such as healthcare, inheritance, and child support,” Angelo Schillaci, a law professor at Sapienza University in Rome, told BBC when the policy was first announced. “At present, only one parent is recognized by law, the other one is a ghost. In real life, parents and children play together, cook together, play sports, and go on holiday together. But on paper, they are apart, the state does not see them. It’s a paradoxical situation.”

In the city of Padua, where Finesso and Zambon live, 27 families (33 children) have gotten warning letters that one parent may lose parental rights and be stripped of their place on their kids’ birth certificates. Some plan to leave the country for good.

But the mayor of Padua, Sergio Giordani, is defying the government’s orders and continuing to issue birth certificates recognizing two-mom families.

“My phone is full of pictures of happy families with shining eyes,” he said. “I’m really proud of what I’ve done.”

Some morning Beau as I work on my morning postings

Queer Folks in the UK are Being Denied Sexual Healthcare Due to Budget Cuts

https://www.intomore.com/culture/you/queer-folks-in-the-uk-are-being-denied-sexual-healthcare-due-to-budget-cuts/

A new study has exposed the startling lack of access to sexual healthcare in the UK. After testing the healthcare resources across Great Britain, the researchers nearly half of all requests for doctor’s appointments concerning sexual health were denied. 

The study was conducted by Terrence Higgins Trust, a nonprofit focused on HIV and sexual health services, with support from British Association of Sexual Health and HIV. In the UK, the National Health Service is funded by the government, and the researchers wanted to examine “the state of sexual health services after a decade of austerity.”

Under the persona of a ‘mystery shopper’ called ‘Gabriela,’ the researchers contacted 57 clinics in England, Scotland, and Wales to try to book a sexual health appointment. ‘Gabriela’ was described as being in her mid-20s, having recently had unprotected sex with both men and women, and as experiencing no symptoms. The researchers chose this persona in order to test whether clinics prioritized symptomatic patients, given that asymptomatic patients are common in STIs like chlamydia.

What they found was that 49% of appointment requests in all three countries were denied. The remaining 51% did offer face-to-face appointments, but with wait times averaging 13 days (19 in rural areas).

While these appointments were successfully made by telephone, online booking proved challenging. In England, only 10% of clinics offered online booking, none in Wales, 44% in Scotland.

Only 11% of clinics offered walk-in appointments without exceptions. Postal STI testing, meanwhile, varied wildly. All clinics in Wales offered mail-in testing, but only 56% in Scotland did.

In consequence, the researchers are calling on all three countries to provide free year-round postal testing, easy access to online appointment booking, and to reduce wait times to no more than 48 hours.

“The sexual health of the nation has consistently been ignored by Central Government,” said Richard Angell, Chief Executive of Terrence Higgins Trust. “A wake-up call is needed. If more than 1,000 new STIs being diagnosed each and every day does not incentivize policy change and renewed investment, it is hard to see what will.

“Ultimately, you get what you pay for – the lowest real terms spending on sexual health is matched by the highest rates of sexually transmitted infections.

“The Government should guarantee long-term funding settlements for sexual health services at a rate of inflation plus 1 percent so as to address years of consistent under-funding.”

The bad samaritans: How a lack of empathy among Republicans is a threat to us all

https://www.lgbtqnation.com/2023/07/the-bad-samaritans-how-a-lack-of-empathy-among-republicans-is-a-threat-to-us-all/

NATIONAL HARBOR, MD - MARCH 6, 2014: Senator Mitch McConnell (R-KY) speaks at the Conservative Political Action Conference (CPAC).
NATIONAL HARBOR, MD – MARCH 6, 2014: Senator Mitch McConnell (R-KY) speaks at the Conservative Political Action Conference (CPAC).Photo: Shutterstock

“Under the Hitler regime…the most important thing that I learned…was that bigotry and hatred are not the most urgent problems. The most urgent, the most disgraceful, the most shameful, and the most tragic problem is silence.” -Joachim Prinz, Rabbi of Berlin, exiled in 1937 to the United States, from his speech August 28, 1963 in Washington, DC

“Those who can make you believe absurdities can make you commit atrocities.” –Voltaire


 

After engaging in the games for a while, one of the friends, Jeremy Strohmeyer, walked toward the restrooms. Seeing that he entered the women’s room, the other young man, David Cash, walked in to see what Jeremy was doing. He noticed that Jeremy was playfully throwing wadded paper towels at a young black girl, who seemed at first to have enjoyed the attention.

But then the scene turned violent. Strohmeyer grabbed 7-year-old Sherrice Iverson, placed his hand over her mouth, and spirited her into a toilet stall as Cash watched by the sinks. He entered an adjacent stall and mounted the toilet edge allowing him to peer down as he saw Jeremy continuing to muffle the girl’s screams and warning Sherrice to keep quiet or he would kill her.

Not wanting to get involved, Cash returned to playing video games. He did not attempt to stop his friend from attacking the young girl. He did not seek help or call law enforcement officials. He calmly played games and waited the 20 minutes it took for Jeremy to return. David asked Jeremy what had happened.

“I killed her,” Jeremy asserted with a certain serenity in his tone on that summer evening in 1997. Soon thereafter, the two friends coolly entered nearby casinos where they enjoyed mechanical rides and continued to play video games until it was time for them to return home.

With the assistance of the video security system implanted at the casino, Strohmeyer was eventually caught, tried, and convicted to life imprisonment for rape and murder. Cash, on the other hand, was never indicted because inaction was not a crime in Nevada at the time.

In reaction to the case and the lack of charges against Cash, Richard Perkins, Speaker of the Nevada Assembly, sponsored the Sherrice Iverson bill requiring Nevadans to notify law enforcement if they witness violent acts committed against a child. The law took effect in 1999, and a similar measure passed in California one year later.

Asked on a 1999 CBS 60 Minutes segment, The Bad Samaritan, whether if given a chance, he would do things differently, Cash said, “I don’t feel there is much I could have done differently.” Asked a similar question during an interview on a Los Angeles radio station, Cash gave a similar reply and added: “How much am I supposed to sit down and cry about this?” he asked. “The simple fact remains that I did not know this little girl. I do not know starving children in Panama. I do not know people dying of disease in Egypt.”

The Long Beach Press-Telegram quoted Cash as saying that he wanted to sell his story to the media. One movie company offered him $21,000. He added. “I’m no idiot,” he declared. “I’ll (expletive) get my money out of this.”

In not taking action to intervene on behalf of Sherrice Iverson, David Cash colluded in her death. “Enabler” is the term given to those who fail to act to help abusers. “Passive bystander” or “bad Samaritan” is the name for people who are conscious of bad actions developing around them but fail to intervene.

Though I have studied the Holocaust and other genocides, until I discovered this case, I always had the gnawing and seemingly unanswerable question pulling at me, “How could these incidents have taken place throughout the ages”?

David Cash taught me that mass murders happen on the macro level when people on the individual and collective levels let them happen, when witnesses– so-called “bystanders” – do little or nothing to intervene. When people either allow their fear or reluctance to “get involved” and supersede their empathy.

David Cash refused to see, hear, and stand up to do the right thing in the face of evil around him.

For the past eight years, the not see Republican Party has continually refused to see, hear, and stand up to the would-be authoritarian dictator, Donald J. Trump. By burying their heads in the political sand, they have permitted Trump to grab, assault, and ravage our governmental institutions physically and figuratively.

I now fully understand the process in the rise and takeover of the Nazi Party in Germany in the 1920s and 1930s.

Staying silent

Empathy, that special and majestic human quality, has always been a vital life force of our humanity. As we understand in psychology, unless there is developmental delay, infants demonstrate the rudimentary beginnings of empathy whenever they recognize that another is upset and then show signs of being upset themselves. Very early in their lives, infants develop the capacity to crawl in the diapers of others even though their own diapers don’t need changing.

Though empathy is a part of the human condition, through the process of socialization, others often teach us to inhibit our empathetic natures with messages like “Don’t cry,” “You’re too sensitive,” “Mind your own business,” “It’s not your concern.” We learn the stereotypes of the individuals and groups our society has “minoritized” and “othered.” We learn who to scapegoat for the problems within our neighborhoods, states, nations, and world.

Through it all, that precious life-affirming flame of empathy can wither and flicker. For some, it dies entirely. And as the blaze recedes, the bullies, the demagogues, and the tyrants take over by filling the void where our humanity once prevailed. And then we have lost something very precious.

David Cash represents the termination of empathy on the individual micro level, resulting not only in the possibly preventable rape and murder of a young girl, but the death of his own soul. And when the demise of empathy comes to people who are around powerful leaders and their willing subjects, the consequences, on the macro level, become exponentially deeper, more toxic, and more tragic.

Jeremy Strohmeyer and Donald Trump were cast from the same mold with their narcissistic, sociopathic personalities. Cash comes from the same mold as many current members of the Republican Party in that they lack sufficient empathy, which overrides their actions.

For example, Trump knew early of the deadly potential of the Coronavirus, but he decided to lie to the public while failing to mobilize any discernible national policies and actions due to concerns for stock markets over the health and safety of the people. Many Republican leaders failed to speak up.

Trump has referred to our military personnel as “suckers” and “losers” for joining the military, for being captured, for dying, and for receiving meager financial compensation. Many Republican leaders failed to speak up.

Earlier, he carelessly blamed the mayor of London for being incompetent after a terrorist attack on his city. Many Republican leaders failed to speak up.

He accused the mayor of San Juan, Puerto Rico of playing politics and being ungrateful, and the Puerto Rican people of being lazy and expecting everything to be done for them on their “bankrupt” island after a “500-year” storm virtually shut them down and people clung desperately to life. Many Republican leaders failed to speak up.

He referred to white nationalist neo-Nazi terrorists in Charlottesville, Virginia, who showed up for a so-called “Unite the Right” rally, as well as the counter-demonstrators, as “Good people, on both sides.” Regarding his reference to the white nationalists, many Republican leaders failed to speak up.

He mocked a disabled reporter, took away the rights of trans students to use bathrooms most closely aligning with their gender identities, demonized Latinx people, Muslims, and women, ridiculed Gold Star parents who sacrificed so much while Donald Trump sat on his gold-plated toilet and attempted to take away affordable health insurance from an estimated 20 million low-income people. Many Republican leaders failed to speak up.

And he behaved as if the series of package bombs sent through the mail to leading Democratic politicians and activists was nothing more than an inconvenience during the closing days of the midterm election season. Many Republican leaders failed to speak up.

Trump separated young children from their refugee parents and placed them in cages as if they were feral animals. Many Republican leaders failed to speak up.

And he risked the very lives of members of Congress and his own Vice President on January 6, 2021, after he lost over 60 court cases in his attempts to circumvent the results of a fair election. While some Republican leaders harshly criticized Trump at the time, they ultimately reversed themselves and got on their knees to kiss his ring.

Empathy can save the world

Quite frankly, I find few differences between the attitudes and actions of Jeremy Strohmeyer on the micro level and Donald J. Trump on the macro level.  

I find few differences between the attitudes and inactions of David Cash and the majority of the current Republican Party in their refusal to stand up and act in the best interests of a young girl, in Cash’s case, and in service to the fragile democratic experiment we know as the United States of America in the case of the Republican Party.

Though the Cashes and Republicans are more numerous than we can even imagine, empathy has always been an antidote to the poison of inaction, prejudice, discrimination, stereotyping, and scapegoating, and to bullies and demagogues who take power and control.

Empathy is the life force of our humanness, and ultimately it is the key to our recovery during the current crisis in our country.

I often wonder how Trump’s Republican bad Samaritan enablers can sleep at night and get back up in the morning still willing to degrade and prostrate themselves by attacking our democratic institutions and seriously dismantling our country’s standing in the world.

A recent poll taken by The Hill found that 80% of registered Republicans believe that if elected as the next President of the United States in 2024, Trump should be able to serve even if he is convicted of multiple felony charges, including in the case of willingly and unconstitutionally holding onto classified documents. Even in the case of the documents, many Republican leaders either failed to speak up or they are speaking up in his defense.

Each time anyone enables an abusive action or actor, they keep perpetrators and themselves further from the truth and from help, and they diminish themselves and their integrity more than just a bit.

I have been stuck time and time again on the post-factual campaign, transition, presidency, and now post-presidency of Donald J. Trump. I get stuck on the lies, the verifiable lies, big and small that he spreads and on his direct attacks on our democratic institutions, like the entire judicial system, the House of Representatives, the Senate, the State Department, state legislatures and secretaries of state who would not overturn President Joe Biden’s victory.

Even more troubling, however, are Trump’s enablers who spin the facts by turning themselves into virtual pretzels in defense of Trump’s attempts – to paraphrase Voltaire – to make us believe his absurdities he uses to give himself permission to commit possible atrocities.

His sustained and vicious attacks on what he refers to as the “dishonest and corrupt” media imperil our very freedom of the press as guaranteed by the First Amendment of the U.S. Constitution. Fortunately, many of the outlets within the Fourth Estate, while making some mistakes, fact-check themselves and our politicians, including Trump, and by so doing, exposes his lies for what they are.

Rep. LAUGHED AT For Not Knowing The Law

Conservatives are more likely to complain in everyday service contexts due to their higher sense of entitlement

Conservative consumers are more likely than their liberal counterparts to complain across various service contexts, according to new research published in the Journal of Consumer Psychology. The findings provide evidence for the role of entitlement in explaining ideological differences in complaining behavior.

Previous research suggested that conservatives complain less than liberals due to their higher level of system justification motivation (SJM), which involves defending institutions and perceiving policies as fair. However, this account may not apply to service contexts where self-interested motivations are prioritized over system justification. Therefore, the researchers aimed to investigate whether conservatives would complain more than liberals due to their higher sense of entitlement.

“I have always been interested in political ideology as an area of research,” said study author Steven Shepherd, an associate professor and William S. Spears Chair in Marketing and International Business at Oklahoma State University.

“Some recent research in marketing finds that liberal consumers are more inclined to complain that conservatives, and although their theorizing makes sense, a lot of political ideology theory and research suggests that conservatives might in fact complain more than liberals. So we wanted to explore that side of things and provide a more complete account of how political ideology relates to consumer complaining.”

The researchers conducted a series of three studies to explore the relationship between political ideology and complaining behavior.

In Study 1, the researchers recruited 301 American participants from Amazon Mechanical Turk (MTurk). The participants rated their likelihood of complaining across six scenarios (e.g., “Imagine you are getting a takeout order from a restaurant and it is taking much longer than usual for it to be ready. How likely are you to give a smaller tip because of this?”). They also completed measures of political ideology, consumer entitlement, and SJM.

Political ideology was measured using a single item, where participants indicated their position on a spectrum ranging from “very liberal” to “very conservative.” This allowed the researchers to categorize participants as either liberal or conservative based on their responses.

To measure consumer entitlement, participants responded to an 11-item scale developed by Butori (2010). The scale assessed participants’ beliefs about their deservingness of special treatment or benefits as consumers. Participants indicated their level of agreement or disagreement with statements such as “I deserve better treatment than the average customer.”

 

Finally, participants completed an eight-item scale to measure their level of system justification motivation. The SJM scale captured participants’ tendencies to defend and view overarching institutions, organizations, and norms as fair and just. Participants rated their agreement or disagreement with statements such as “Most of the time, the system works well and is fair.”

The results showed that political ideology, consumer entitlement, SJM, and complaining intentions were positively correlated. The researchers found that conservatives had higher consumer entitlement, which predicted increased complaining intentions. This relationship held even when controlling for demographic variables.

To further explore the findings, Study 2 focused on the influence of social comparison and the perception of deservingness. The researchers recruited 791 American participants from MTurk. They presented participants with a scenario in which they overheard another customer receiving a special discount due to their status as a student or a police officer.

The researchers predicted that conservatives would feel less entitled and show lower complaining intentions when a police officer received a discount, as conservatives tend to view the police as a fair authority. The results supported this hypothesis, revealing that conservatives showed higher entitlement in the student condition and lower entitlement in the police officer condition. Moreover, conservatives exhibited higher complaining intentions in the student condition but not in the police officer condition.

In Study 3, the researchers extended their investigation to service recoveries. They recruited 594 American participants from MTurk and presented them with a scenario where they experienced a delay in a restaurant delivery. Participants were assigned to either a control condition, where they received an apology and a standard discount, or a special treatment condition, where they were told their situation was unique and received a special discount. In line with the previous studies, conservatives showed higher complaining intentions in the control condition but not in the special treatment condition.

“We consistently found that conservative consumers expressed an increased willingness to complain about various service experiences. This was due to conservatives on average being higher in consumer entitlement; that is, feeling that they are not just ‘any other customer’ and are more deserving of special treatment and consideration than other customers.”

These results contribute to a better understanding of ideological differences in complaining behavior and highlight the role of consumer entitlement as a novel mechanism and predictor in consumer political ideology research. However, the researchers note that future research utilizing behavioral data from different sources and exploring potential moderating factors can provide further insights into the relationship between ideology and complaining behavior.

“The predicted effect was quite robust across a range of different everyday service situations. Throughout the research we didn’t find evidence to the contrary; that is, that liberals complain more than conservatives. In the paper we propose a number of contextual factors, either individually or in combination, that might play a role, and future research might be able to more precisely pin down exactly when and why conservatives vs. liberals complain more vs. less.”

The study, “On the political right, the customer is always right: Political ideology, entitlement, and complaining“, was authored by Steven Shepherd, Hesam Teymouri Athar, and Sahel Zaboli.

ABC NEWS: Russian fighter jet damages US Reaper drone with flare over Syria: Officials

Russian fighter jet damages US Reaper drone with flare over Syria: Officials
It’s the latest in a string of “unprofessional” incidents, the military said.

Read in ABC News: https://apple.news/AJiQ5GiG0TQmqDQEL2v4FzA

Shared from Apple News

Best Wishes and Hugs,Scottie

USA TODAY: Charles Barkley is (expletive) right, and courageous, in defending transgender community

Charles Barkley is (expletive) right, and courageous, in defending transgender community
Charles Barkley is a star and recently used that power to defend the trans community in a profane tirade. It’s one of Barkley’s finest moments.

Read in USA TODAY: https://apple.news/ATjAkf3wiTAmKBvgwjfTcTA

Shared from Apple News

Best Wishes and Hugs,Scottie

Mary’s “Land Of Opportunity”

Thank you Jill. While we have many of the same viewers, for anyone that has not checked out Jill’s website I really recommend you check her postings out.

The stories of how the people of lower incomes struggle to survive should be presented more to the public, so people can understand just how drastic the movement of money to the upper levels of wealth has become. It is a drastic robbing of the poor to give even more excess to the wealthy. It is the true obscenity of the US financial system and unrestrained capitalism. The salt in the wound is that it doesn’t have to be this way, all we have to do is look what other countries manage to provide for their public with less GDP than the US. That is why the republican politicians insist on touting US exceptionalism, the constant cheering that the US is #1, and the non-stop forever trying to make anything slightly helpful the government could do for the people derided as socialism. It is all designed to keep the public, the people of the country looking inward with pride and looking outward with scorn, even as we wither and die under robber barons who cherish the gilded age of history. Hugs

Gilded Age, period of gross materialism and blatant political corruption in U.S. history during the 1870s

jilldennison's avatarFilosofa's Word

Mary is a single mother of three young children ranging in age from 6 to 14.  She works a full-time, minimum wage job, they live in a tiny two-bedroom apartment, and barely make ends meet.  Mary does not own a car but takes the bus to and from work.  If one of the children is sick and needs to go to the doctor, she relies on neighbors to help her out.  When Mary shops for groceries, she buys only generic brands or things that are on sale – they eat a lot of beans and rice.  Mary does receive some food stamp and rental assistance, but even that combined with her paycheck which amounts to just under $1,000 per month, Mary struggles to put food on the table, pay the rent and utility bills on time, and buy the essentials like medicine (one of Mary’s children is asthmatic, and Mary…

View original post 740 more words