Please note what these bigots say.Ā The issue under rational-basis review is not whether Texas should be concerned about opposite-sex sodomy, but whether it is reasonable to believe that same-sex sodomy is a distinct public health problem. They claim it is OK for straight cis couples to do anal sex, but not for two guys.Ā Why, because they hate gay people, they hate the idea of having sex between people with both having dicks.Ā This is just an attempt to have a straight cis society enforced by a Christian Taliban.Ā It is based in a desire for a society that only includes people like them, with the same feelings and ideas that they have.Ā The rest of us can just fuck off and get out.Ā It is simply bigotry and anti-LGBTQ+ hate.Ā Ā This is the idea that if they do something it is OK but if others they don’t like do it then they are wrong and evil.Ā Also notice they do their best to push these bigotry ideas on other countries which are poorer and need the money these groups bring.Ā All this bill does is say treat others including trans people with respect and dignity.Ā Don’t try to keep looking into their pants to see what is between their legs.Ā Ā Hugs.Ā Scottie
ĀUSA TodayĀ reports:
A divided Supreme Court on Friday left in place lower court orders blocking changes to sex discrimination rules for schools in many states while new protections for transgender students under Title IX are being challenged.
The Biden administration, in an emergency request, had argued the court orders were too sweeping and some of the updates should be allowed to take effect as scheduled on Aug. 1. But the GOP-led states and conservative groups challenging the new rules said the components canāt be easily separated.
āSchools would have to work out how the Rule functions without its key provisions, amend their policies, and train their staff accordinglyāall by next weekāand then do it all again after judicial review,ā lawyers for Alliance Defending Freedom, which represents a Louisiana school board, told the court last month.
Read theĀ full article.
As Iāve mentioned here many times, Alliance Defending Freedom once petitioned the US Supreme Court to keep homosexuality criminalized. Since then, they have provided free legal support to overseas groups seeking to maintain or institute such laws in their own countries.
Hereās what ADF Global executive director Benjamin BullĀ said in 2013Ā when India re-criminalized homosexuality:
āWhen given the same choice the Supreme Court of the United States had inĀ Lawrence vs. Texas, the Indian Court did the right thing. India chose to protect society at large rather than give in to a vocal minority of homosexual advocates. America needs to take note that a country of 1.2 billion people has rejected the road towards same-sex marriage, and understood that these kinds of bad decisions in the long run will harm society.ā
More fromĀ Media Matters:
In 2003, ADF president Alan Sears co-wrote a book titledĀ The Homosexual Agenda: Exposing The Principal Threat to Religious Freedom Today, which warned that eliminating anti-sodomy laws would lead to the overturning of ālaws against pedophilia, sex between close relatives, polygamy, bestiality and all other distortions and violations of Godās plan.ā
And from the ADFās 30-pageĀ LawrenceĀ amicus brief:
Same-sex sodomy is far more effective in spreading STDs than opposite-sex sodomy. Multiple studies have estimated that 40 percent or more of men who practice anal sex acquire STDs. In fact, same-sex sodomy has resulted in the transformation of diseases previously transmitted only through fecally contaminated food and water into sexually causes diseases ā primarily among those who practice same-sex sodomy. The issue under rational-basis review is not whether Texas should be concerned about opposite-sex sodomy, but whether it is reasonable to believe that same-sex sodomy is a distinct public health problem. It clearly is.
Alliance Defending Freedom was jointly founded in 1994 by the leaders of Coral Ridge Ministries, Focus On The Family, and the American Family Association.
