The women reliving January 6 while preparing for Trump’s return

Jan 06, 2025 Mariel Padilla Originally published by The 19th

Rep. Becca Balint of Vermont, who was elected to the 118th Congress in 2022, said she was shaped and largely motivated by January 6, 2021 โ€”  the day a mob of President Donald Trumpโ€™s supporters stormed the U.S. Capitol and temporarily halted the certification of the legitimate results of the 2020 election. 

“A lot of the members who ran in the 118th and 119th Congress understood that we were running towards a house on fire and that being honestly democracy itself,” Balint said.

Balint said she vividly remembers January 6, 2021, because it was supposed to be one of the happiest days of her life: She was being sworn in as the first woman to lead the Vermont Senate. When her security team popped into her office to tell her that the U.S. Capitol was under attack, Balint said the footage โ€œshook me to my core.โ€ 

The attack, which the Federal Bureau of Investigation called an act of domestic terrorism, sparked the Department of Justiceโ€™s largest criminal investigation in the countryโ€™s history and led to more than 1,500 people being federally charged. Rioters brought firearms, knives, hatchets, pepper spray, baseball bats, stun guns and explosive devices to fight Capitol Police officers and storm the building where lawmakers were actively voting to certify the 2020 election. Five people died during or soon after the riot, approximately 140 law enforcement officers were injured and $2.9 million worth of damage was done to the Capitol. 

The day after the Capitol riot, Trump referred to the event as a โ€œheinous attackโ€ but has since promised to pardon those who were arrested in connection with the insurrection. Trump himself was indicted on felony charges in 2023 for attempting to overturn the results of the 2020 election โ€”  a criminal case that was dismissed shortly after he won the 2024 presidential election. The president-elect has since started describing January 6 as a โ€œday of love,โ€ as he did on the campaign trail. 

As Congress votes again to certify the results of the 2024 presidential election, the country prepares to welcome back to the Oval Office the same man who denied his loss four years ago and threatened the countryโ€™s tradition of a peaceful transfer of power. 

โ€œIt always sends a shiver down my spine when I hear people say โ€˜Americans donโ€™t care about January 6 anymore โ€” move on,โ€™โ€ Balint said. โ€œIโ€™m not moving on. It was a dark day in our history, and Iโ€™m not moving on.โ€ 

The 19th reached out to every woman in Congress โ€” just as it did in 2021 and 2022 โ€” to collect reflections on how January 6 continues to impact them and the country. Seventeen Democratic congresswomen and one senator responded and talked about their remaining trauma, their concern about the normalization of violence and their strong sense of duty to combat any efforts to whitewash that day.


โ€˜Thereโ€™s a record of this.โ€™ 

Hereโ€™s what they said about how the spread of misinformation and disinformation surrounding that day has downplayed the severity of violence and the gravity of what was almost destroyed.

Rep. Suzanne Bonamici of Oregon: I still have seared in my memory the images of Capitol Police officers and other people being beaten. People lost their lives. โ€ฆ Itโ€™s not like somebody made this up. There are videos. There are pictures. There are statements. Thereโ€™s a record of this. And there were people that were convicted by juries of their peers.

Rep. Deborah Ross of North Carolina: I think the most important thing is to be brutally honest about what happened that day. Many of us were there to witness, and weโ€™re here to testify. We cannot allow Donald Trump and his cronies to deny what needs to be preserved for history. The next generation should know how fragile our democracy is and march forward, clear-eyed and ready to fight.

Balint: My grandfather was killed in the Holocaust and so I was raised in a family in which we were taught to be vigilant when people start eroding rights, upending norms, scapegoating people. When up is down and black is white and we canโ€™t agree on basic facts, that is all an indication that we are headed in a very scary direction as a country.

Rep. LaMonica McIver of New Jersey: I think [Trump] is going to do whatever he can to make January 6 be remembered like itโ€™s July 4. In his mind, I think itโ€™s going to be put in the highest regard and glorify the day as much as he can. And heโ€™s going to have four years to try and get the rest of the country to do the same.

Rep. Chellie Pingree of Maine: I think itโ€™s very troubling that this incoming president could convince people that he either wasnโ€™t responsible or that somehow all that didnโ€™t matter. But sometimes it takes us a while to process big, complicated changes like this. Maybe there will be a time when we can reflect back and say that this was a mistake, that we overlooked it, that it took us time to realize how serious that movement was.

Rep. Jill Tokuda of Hawaii: As we approach January 6 once again, we all have a responsibility to stand up against the normalization of political violence and disinformation. We cannot forget what happened that day and as Americans, it is incumbent on us to reject violence in any form from infecting our politics and our democracy.


โ€˜Deeply, deeply disappointed.โ€™ 

Many of the lawmakers said they are still processing what it means about the state of our country that the same man who incited an insurrection could be re-elected four years later. Several emphasized that those involved in planning, executing or inciting the riot still need to be held accountable before the country can heal and move forward.

Sen. Tammy Duckworth speaks on Capitol Hill on in February 2023, in Washington D.C.
Sen. Tammy Duckworth speaks on Capitol Hill on in February 2023, in Washington D.C. (Jabin Botsford/The Washington Post/Getty Images)

Sen. Tammy Duckworth of Illinois: As deeply, deeply disappointed as I am that that same twice-impeached president who led a coup against our government is headed back to the Oval Office, make no mistake: My Democratic colleagues and I, unlike many Republicans after the 2020 election, will uphold the will of the American people, fulfill our constitutional duty and do our part to ensure a peaceful transfer of power.

Rep. Rosa DeLauro of Connecticut: As Donald Trump returns to the presidency, I feel an even greater responsibility to ensure that we do not let an election outcome diminish the gravity of what happened that day. His re-election does not change the reality of the insurrection or absolve those who incited and participated in it. It does not erase the trauma experienced by Capitol staff and Capitol Police officers who defended our democracy at great personal risk. 

Rep. Gwen Moore of Wisconsin: Donald Trump, a convicted felon and aspiring autocrat, is promising to let loose dangerous rioters into our communities and threatening lawmakers and journalists with imprisonment. Trumpโ€™s lawlessness and thirst for political revenge is why I have repeatedly said he is unfit for office. 

Rep. Lois Frankel of Florida: People have short memories. People are more consumed with their own lives [when they go to the polls]. And Iโ€™m not saying thatโ€™s a bad thing; itโ€™s just an observation. What was probably on peopleโ€™s minds? Their bank account, their rent, price of food, right? 

Rep. Joyce Beatty of Ohio: We learned a lot of lessons through this last election. The American people know what they want to hear, whether itโ€™s true or not. 

Rep. Judy Chu of California: No matter what happens during Trumpโ€™s second term, the events of January 6, 2021, will forever be his legacy. He refused to concede or even acknowledge that there was a free and fair election in 2020, and he is still pressuring the Justice Department and intends to continue to pressure the Justice Department.

Rep. Ayanna Pressley of Massachusetts: Trumpโ€™s return to the highest office in the land, despite his central role in the insurrection, is a gut punch to anyone who cares about our democracy. But it does not absolve us of our responsibility to pursue accountability and continue telling the story of what happened that day.

Rep. Pramila Jayapal of Washington: I still put the onus on the Republicans in the Senate who refused to convict him. Thatโ€™s something I think about all the time being on the Judiciary Committee. I think our founding fathers assumed that perhaps there would be a dictator as president โ€” thatโ€™s envisioned in the Constitution. But they also assumed that an entire party would not just enter into a cult and follow that dictator. They assumed that there would be enough people on both sides of the aisle willing to do what it takes to preserve democracy, and that is clearly not the case. 


โ€˜I still tremble at the mere mention of the date.โ€™ 

For many of the women, there is lingering trauma. 

Jayapal: It will always be a day that is very, very tough emotionally. I started a gallery group after, a very close support group to process the trauma โ€” itโ€™s something that none of us will ever forget. 

Rep. Frederica Wilson of Florida: I still tremble at the mere mention of the date January 6, a day that is forever tainted with fear, violence and terror. To have lived it is to never ever forget it. America can never fathom what we experienced. It was like playing a role in a horror movie and hoping that it would soon come to an end. 

Rep. Teresa Leger Fernandez of New Mexico: It makes me sick to my stomach that the people who desecrated our democracy will be pardoned and potentially invited back into the Capitol. It makes me incredibly sad to think that there will be Capitol Police โ€” police who were brutalized and beaten by the mob โ€” who will just have to stand there.

Rep. Sara Jacobs of California: Iโ€™ve been very nervous thinking about and leading up to January 6. I still have lingering trauma from the first one. I don’t like big crowds and loud noises. And I just keep thinking that they have no incentive to be violent this time, right? But it still makes me very nervous because we havenโ€™t actually done the sort of reconciliation and hard work and accountability work that we need to do as a country. โ€ฆ I know that peopleโ€™s trust and faith in institutions is a key part of addressing political violence because political violence only happens when people donโ€™t feel like the nonviolent, institutional way of doing things is actually going to create the effect they want. 


Rep. Ann McLane Kuster talks to Capitol Police officer Sgt. Aquilino Gonell after he testified before the House Select Committee investigating the January 6 attack on the Capitol.
Rep. Ann McLane Kuster talks to Capitol Police officer Sgt. Aquilino Gonell after he testified before the House Select Committee investigating the January 6 attack on the Capitol on July 27, 2021, in Washington, D.C.
(Chip Somodevilla/Getty Images)

Rep. Ann McLane Kuster of New Hampshire said she is still dealing with lasting post-traumatic stress disorder from January 6, one the โ€œmost impactful eventsโ€ in her life. Kuster was also one of the last five lawmakers to be evacuated from the House floor. She could hear the thundering crowds and pounding on the doors and experienced a panic attack as officers snuck them into an elevator and rushed them through an underground tunnel to safety. Kuster later saw security footage of insurrectionists with backpacks, bear mace and zip ties entering the same hallway she had just evacuated 30 seconds earlier.

โ€œIโ€™m haunted by the idea that if the police hadnโ€™t pushed back five seconds here, five seconds there, pushing back on the bicycle racks, pushing back on the people who were crushed in the doors โ€” that the five of us would have been kidnapped, murdered or maimed,โ€ Kuster said. โ€œIt was only a five-vote majority and if we hadnโ€™t been there, America might not have woken up to Joe Biden as the lawfully elected president of the United States.โ€ 

Kuster decided to retire this year before Trump is sworn in as the 47th President of the United States and attributes January 6 as one of the reasons for that decision. In addition to the lingering trauma, Kuster said sheโ€™s received more and more death threats and has noticed a marked increase of violent rhetoric in public discourse. 

โ€œHe tried to kill me once,โ€ Kuster said. โ€œIโ€™m not available for it again.โ€

Conservative Boycott of Small LGBTQ Business Backfires BADLY

A small conservative group in Lancaster, Ohio targeted local businesses and institutions that were LGBTQ+ friendly in response to an annual family-friendly pride event that held an outdoor drag show. When the group failed to get the city to penalize drag performersโ€”and ban drag altogetherโ€”they then circulated a boycott list. Local business owners, however, were not harmed by the boycott. In fact, they saw a major influx in traffic after people drove from out of town to support the businesses after seeing them on the anti-LGBTQ+ boycott list.

Peace & Justice History for 1/6

January 6, 1832
William Lloyd Garrison, along with 15 others, founded the New England Anti-Slavery Society at the African Meeting House in Boston.

William Lloyd Garrison
By 1833, Garrison helped establish the American Anti-Slavery Society with fellow abolitionists Arthur Tappan, Lewis Tappan, and Theodore Dwight Weld. This organization sent lecturers across the North to convince whites of slavery’s brutality.
Garrison went on to be publisher of The Liberator, a newspaper dedicated to education about, and the abolition of, slavery. He published it until passage of the 13th Amendment which made the practice unconstitutional.

Read about the Anti-Slavery Society today
About William Lloyd Garrison
January 6, 1941
President Franklin D. Roosevelt, in his 1941 State of the Union address, introduced the idea of the “Four Freedoms”: freedom of speech and expression; freedom of every person to worship God in his own way; freedom from want; and freedom from fear.

Excerpt from his speech to the Joint Session of Congress
The full textย ย (pdf)

https://www.peacebuttons.info/E-News/peacehistoryjanuary.htm#january6

Ben Shapiro Gets HUMILIATED By His Own Idol In Live Interview | Hasanabi reacts

I like that in this video Ben Shapiro tries his uninformed anti-trans ideas on Neil deGrasse Tyson.ย  He learns the hard way between bullying a student and talking on a profession who understands and knows science.ย  Not only does Tyson turn Shapiro’s anti-trans people in sports completely around on him, he asks Shapiro why the issue even matters to him.ย  Trans people are no threat and are not in large numbers so why is Ben beating that fear drum.ย  It is wonderful.ย  ย Hugs

Timely Toon

Bezo’s Sacrifice by Clay Jones

This one’s for Ann Read on Substack

โ€œDemocracy dies in darknessโ€ is a phrase popularized by Washington Post investigative reporter Bob Woodward who used it in an article about government secrecy. After billionaire and Amazon founder Jeff Bezos purchased The Washington Post and Donald Trump assumed the presidency (sic), it became the newspaperโ€™s first slogan in its 140-year history. Today, democracy is dying.

When Bezos purchased the paper, many felt he was saving the Post and journalism. He stood out of the way and allowed his journalists to defend democracy because there is no democracy without journalism.

After Trump lost the 2020 election by being soundly and squarely defeated by Joe Biden, the Post started to get a little flaky. It laid off and bought out prominent journalists. It started running whimsical New Yorker-like cartoons by Edith Pritchett on its opinion page. It hired right-wing Nixon/Reagan lover Michael Ramirez to draw political cartoons for its opinion page. It refused to make an endorsement in the 2024 election. but it still had Ann.

Herblock Award, Pulitzer Prize, and Rueben Award-winning political cartoonist Ann Telnaes had been freelancing for the Post for years. She was freelancing for the Post when the excellent Tom Toles retired in 2020. The Post promised to hire a full-time cartoonist to replace Toles who had replaced the legendary Herblock. Many felt the Post would hire Ann full-time as she was the most qualified and deserving. But the Post backtracked (lied) and didnโ€™t hire a staffer. Instead, they brought in a freelancer who worked from Canada.

No offense to Michael de Adder, but this is the legendary Washington Post. The person filling Herblockโ€™s spot should be expected to live in Washington, DC, or at the very least, the United States. I believe political cartoons are better if the person drawing them is actually affected by the issues he or she is drawing about. Ann was living in Washington at the time.

For the past few decades, Ann has been one of the best political cartoonists in the world. The Washington Post never fully respected that, and they disrespected her again this week.

During the 2024 presidential campaign, The Post has been flaky. Bezos issued statements before election day about having high expectations from a second Trump administration. Never mind that Donald Trump has attacked the Post, calling it the โ€œAmazonโ€ Washington Post. Never mind that Trump continues to call journalists the โ€œenemy of the American people.โ€ Never mind that Trump calls legitimate news โ€œfake newsโ€ while pushing lies over and over again. Never mind that Trump sues journalism outlets for reporting facts about him. Never mind that Trump threatens and wants to do away with the basic tenets of democracy.

After the election, Bezos and other tech billionaires started dumping money into Trumpโ€™s โ€œinaugurationโ€ fund with many, such as Bezos, making treks to MAGA-Lardo to kiss Trumpโ€™s ass.

As the owner of Amazon, which has government contracts, and with the threat of Elon Musk in a position to make cuts to government spending, itโ€™s in Bezosโ€™ financial interest, or so he believes, to play up to Donald Trump. Jeff Bezos had dinner with Trump, probably sitting in the same spot as all the white nationalists who had dinner with Trump at MAGA-Lardo. Trump was launching a lawsuit against the Des Moines Register for a poll while Bezos was sitting at MAGA-Lardo chomping on his Cobb salad.

This week, Ann drew a cartoon that depicted the billionaires groveling to Trump, and among them was Jeff Bezos. Guess what her editor did with that cartoon? He killed it. Guess what Ann did. She quit.

Thatโ€™s right. Ann Telnaes got up and quit working for the most prominent publication for political cartoonists. In her substack piece, Why Iโ€™m Quitting The Washington Post, Ann, who has been with the Post since 2008, writes, โ€œIn all that time Iโ€™ve never had a cartoon killed because of who or what I chose to aim my pen at. Until now.โ€

Ann called the spiking of the cartoon a โ€œgamechanger,โ€ that was โ€œdangerous for a free press.โ€

Sheโ€™s correct. When newspaper owners are afraid of presidents to the point they start killing critical political cartoons, a free press is in danger. Bezos and Los Angeles Times owner Patrick Soon-Shiong both killed editorials endorsing Vice President Kamala Harris for president over Trump. Why? Because it was bad for business.

Annโ€™s editor, David Shipley, called her a liar for her โ€œinterpretation of events and said in a statement, โ€œNot every editorial judgment is a reflection of a malign force,โ€ Mr. Shipley said in the statement, โ€œMy decision was guided by the fact that we had just published a column on the same topic as the cartoon and had already scheduled another column โ€” this one a satire โ€” for publication. The only bias was against repetition.โ€

As a political cartoonist whoโ€™s worked with editors, I smell bullshit. In my experience, editors LOVE it when cartoons coincide with editorials. Now, these are columns but still, they typically like it when they run together or close together. Shipley says one of those columns had already been published and the second is scheduled for publication. Since one of those hasnโ€™t been published yet, then he should have given deference to Annโ€™s cartoon, that is if heโ€™s not lying. Ann is a Pulitzer Prize winner. Why would he kill her piece for something else?

Shipley said he respects Ann but he clearly doesnโ€™t.

His excuse is nearly as bad as the paperโ€™s when Bezos killed its endorsement of Kamala Harris.

Trump spent his entire campaign promising to weaponize the Justice Department to go after his enemies. Look at his nominees to lead the DOJ. First, it was Matt Gaetz and now itโ€™s Pam Bondi. His pick to lead the FBI is Kash Patel. These are goons.

Ann took a principled stand that will cost her financially. I canโ€™t think of an outlet that would hire her and pay more than the Post. It may have hurt her professionally as I canโ€™t think of an outlet that would hire her and be more prominent than the Post. But sheโ€™s established that sheโ€™s a badass.

The last time something like this happened was when the Pittsburgh Gazette fired Rob Rogers for refusing to stop criticizing Donald Trump. His replacement was goosestepping Steve Kelley (who was later quietly let go). Someone should tell the Post that Steveโ€™s available, whoโ€™s probably already FedExโ€™ed his resume.

I drew a cartoon in 2015 when Ted Cruz attacked Ann which provoked thousands of death threats and threats of other despicable things I wonโ€™t mention here.

I drew a cartoon in 2019 that featured the firing of Rogers. When Rogers was fired, Michael Cavna, who wrote about cartoon issues did a piece about that. Heโ€™s not there anymore to write about Annโ€™s departure.

I drew a cartoon in 2023 about McClatchy laying off three Pulitzer Prize-winning political cartoonists on the same day.

And last June, I hit the Postโ€™s editor.

This profession needs more journalists with backbones like Ann Telnaes and Rob Rogers.

When I stand up and speak out for my colleagues, Iโ€™m not just speaking out for my profession. Iโ€™m also standing up for journalism.

Drawn in 30 seconds: (snip-go watch!)

Kinda.

(Probably been reading too much, but not enough comics, yet. Miss Scarlet’s Mysteries and Sherlock are helping. Enjoy.)

C’est la Vie by Jennifer Babcock for January 04, 2025

C'est la Vie Comic Strip for January 04, 2025

Must Read

Nancy Maceโ€™s Capitol Hill Bathroom Ban Missing from House Rules Package

https://www.yahoo.com/news/nancy-mace-capitol-hill-bathroom-174534337.html

Remember that Mace doesn’t believe in her rhetoric, she just wants the media attention.ย  She wants the adoration she thinks that having people paying attention to her gives to her.ย  She is a child desperately acting out to get the adults to pay attention to her.ย  ย She is the child who never accepted she was at fault or mistaken but wants to blame everyone else including those pretend causes in her head alone.ย  She was for trans rights, a big supporter of LGBTQ+ equality and inclusion when she felt it gained her media attention.ย  ย Then when she saw the attention the Libs of TikTok and other haters on social media get, she waited for the opportunity to create enough spectacle for the spotlight to land on her.ย  She tweeted over 500 times in 2 days on the bird site trying to milk the situation for views and clicks, often forgetting to switch to her burner accounts to praise her own stance.ย  But now the drama has died down and no one is looking so she doesn’t care.ย  She has to find the new outrage to pounce on.ย  Maybe she will again throw a fit, and try to get some of the attention she got the first time, but she knows she has to wait, as it would be overwhelmed by current events.ย  No if she still wants it, she will wait until about a couple of months in then claim she couldn’t use a bathroom because it is full of trans women.ย  ย Hugs

———————————————————————————————————

Josh Fiallo
ย 
Nancy Mace crosses her arms.
Evelyn Hockstein / REUTERS
ย 

Nancy Maceโ€™s hopes of banning transgender women from sharing a bathroom with her on Capitol Hill appear dashed for now.

The South Carolina Republicanโ€™s controversial bathroom ban was not included in the GOPโ€™s House rules package unveiled this weekโ€”a surprise omission less than two months after Speaker Mike Johnsonย reportedly assured Maceย it would be included.

The resolution was all the rage in November, with Mace pulling out different theatrics to drum up support for the ban. That included her using a bullhorn to read Miranda rights to sit-in protesters and using anti-transgender slurs to reference them.

Maceย admittedย her ban was to target the newly-elected Rep. Sarah McBride, a transgender Democrat from Delaware. Maceโ€™s office did not respond to questions texted by the Daily Beast on Friday.

Johnson announced on Nov. 20 that โ€œall single-sex facilities in the Capitol and House Office Buildings […] are reserved for individuals of that biological sex.โ€ This suggested he backed Maceโ€™s proposal even if he was not as fervent in his public comments, but it is unclear why the ban didnโ€™t make into the latest rules package.

โ€œWe welcome all new members with open arms who are duly elected representatives of the people,โ€ Johnson said the day prior. โ€œI believe itโ€™s a command that we treat all persons with dignity and respect.โ€

Mace doesnโ€™t appear to have any bad blood over the omission. She posted Friday morning that Johnson still had her vote to remain House Speaker.

โ€œA vote for @SpeakerJohnson is a vote for President Trumpโ€™s America First agenda,โ€ she wrote. โ€œAfter the last few days of chaos weโ€™ve seen in these tumultuous times, we need steady leadership and continuity. We need to stick together and get to work. We donโ€™t have any time to waste.โ€

Rep. Sarah McBride, a Democrat from Delaware, is the first openly transgender member of Congress. / Bill Clark/Getty Images
Rep. Sarah McBride, a Democrat from Delaware, is the first openly transgender member of Congress. / Bill Clark/Getty Images

While McBride was the resolutionโ€™s target, the ban would have applied to any trans person in the Capitol, including staffers and visitors

McBride, the first openly-trans member of Congress, has not commented on the banโ€™s omission. Back in November, she did not try to go toe-to-toe with Mace on the matterโ€”instead asserting that she would follow whatever the House rules were.

โ€œIโ€™m not here to fight about bathrooms,โ€ she wrote in a statement. โ€œI will follow the rules as outlined by Speaker Johnson, even if I disagree with them.โ€

Gay couple brought to tears as Japanese court rules marriage equality ban unconstitutional

https://www.lgbtqnation.com/2024/12/gay-couple-brought-to-tears-as-japanese-court-rules-marriage-equality-ban-unconstitutional/

As other countries with much smaller fundamentalist Christian influence over the government are working steadily towards equality and full legal rights of the LGBTQ+ communities the US is falling backwards in a regressive retreat of minority rights.ย  Again for some reason driven by fundamentalist Christian religious groups who create problems that never existed and use lies to promote disinformation creating hate towards the minorities they target.ย  You ask why the republicans have partnered with these fundamentalist Christians?ย  Because both groups seen the lost of group power over society they banded together to force society back to a time and culture when they did have majority power.ย  ย It comes down to power over others, and control of society.ย  ย I did not think that Christians believed in that.ย  ย At least I know Rev. Ed Trevors doesn’t.ย  ย But for far too many tradition, what was done by my grandparents, done by my parents, should be done by me also.ย  That is wrong because time, cultures, and the understandings change.ย  ย Hugs.

=============================================================

2017 MAY 08. TOKYO JAPAN. LGBT rainbow flag covered on back of a man
2017 MAY 08. TOKYO JAPAN. LGBT rainbow flag covered on back of a man

The Fukuoka High Court of Japan has become the third of Japanโ€™s eight high courts to rule that the governmentโ€™s policy against same-sex marriage is unconstitutional. However, the court upheld a lower court ruling that dismissed three same-sex couples who had sought 1 million yen ($6,540) each for being denied their constitutional rights to gender and legal equality, individual dignity, and the pursuit of happiness.

The couples, who live in the southwestern cities of Fukuoka and Kumamoto, had their damage claims dismissed by the Fukuoka District Court in 2023 after the court ruled that the government wasnโ€™t obliged to compensate them or legalize marriage equality legislation despite being in โ€œstate of unconstitutionality,โ€ย The Mainichiย reported.

High Court Judge Takeshi Okada ruled that civil laws forbidding same-sex marriages violate the nationโ€™s constitution, saying, โ€œThere is no longer any reason to not legally recognize marriage between same-sex couples.โ€ However, he noted that any change in national marriage laws must be decided by Japanโ€™s legislature, known as the National Diet.

As the judge read his ruling, a 35-year-old plaintiff identified in the media as Kosuke couldnโ€™t stop crying. Despite this, his 37-year-old partner Masahiro said โ€œ[the judge] understood our suffering, and I felt very reassured.โ€

ย 

ย 

ย 

Opponents of marriage equality in Japan have noted that Article 24 of the Japanese constitution specifically states, โ€œMarriage shall be based only on the mutual consent of both sexes and it shall be maintained through mutual cooperation with the equal rights of husband and wife as a basis.โ€

However, marriage equality advocates have also pointed out that the constitutionโ€™s other articles state, โ€œThe people shall not be prevented from enjoying any of the fundamental human rights,โ€ and, โ€œAll of the people are equal under the law and there shall be no discrimination in political, economic or social relations because of race, creed, sex, social status or family origin.โ€

ย 

Regardless, in October the Tokyo High Courtย ruled similarly, echoingย another one made by the Sapporo High Court in March,ย which said that limiting marriage to couples of the opposite sex is โ€œunconstitutionalโ€ and โ€œdiscriminatory.โ€ Despite the rulings, the countryโ€™s judiciary doesnโ€™t have the power to overturn existing civil marriage codes.

Marriage equality has divided the countryโ€™s court system in opposing rulings over several years. Meanwhile, Japanโ€™s conservative government lags behind increasingly supportive public opinion. Seventy percent of the Japaneseย publicย supports marriage equality, but it faces opposition from the ruling Liberal Democratic Party of Prime Minister Fumio Kishida.

The partyย lost its parliamentary majorityย in last Sundayโ€™s election and will likely have to compromise on more liberal policies pushed by the opposition parties, like marriage equality, the aforementioned publication noted.

ย 

Right now, Japan doesnโ€™t offer national LGBTQ+ non-discrimination protections or same-sex marriage. As a result, LGBTQ+ people in Japan often face inequities in employment, housing, education, and health care.

More than 200 Japanese municipalities offer some form of recognition for same-sex couples. Such recognition can help same-sex couples rent apartments together, visit each other in city hospitals, and receive other services that married heterosexual couples enjoy.

Though several jurisdictions offer โ€œpartnership certificates,โ€ theyโ€™re entirely symbolic and donโ€™t offer federal benefits given to married heterosexual couples.

ย 

LGBTQ+ advocacy groups have pushed for a national bill that would enshrine equal civil rights and non-discrimination protections into law. However, the conservative party of Prime Minister Fumio Kishidaย helped defeat the effortย in the lead-up to the 2021 Olympic Summer Games.

Japan remains the only country in the G7, a political and economic forum of seven of the worldโ€™s most advanced economies, that has not legalized marriage equality. Currently,ย the only Asian countries that have legalized same-sex marriage are Taiwan, Nepal, and Thailand.

Subscribe to theย LGBTQ Nation newsletterย and be the first to know about the latest headlines shaping LGBTQ+ communities worldwide.

ย 

Don’t forget to share:

This government just took a major step towards banning anti-LGBTQ+ hate speech

https://www.lgbtqnation.com/2024/12/this-government-just-took-a-major-step-towards-banning-anti-lgbtq-hate-speech/

We in the US need to have the same hope and constant drive as the LGBTQ+ in Poland.ย  See their government is anti-LGBTQ+ and the leader calls them “evil”.ย  But they did not give up and kept working to change the hearts and minds of the people.ย  ย And it is working.ย  We need to do the same.ย  Hugs.

————————————————————————————————————–

June 10, 2018: Warsaw's LGBTQ pride equality march
June 10, 2018: Warsaw’s LGBTQ pride equality march

Poland made a landmark move for LGBTQ+ rights after it banned hate speech against sexual orientation and gender in a new set of regulations.

Currently, the countryโ€™s laws prohibit hate speech on the basis of race, religion, and ethnicity. โ€œThese provisions do not provide sufficient protection for all minority groups who are particularly vulnerable to discrimination, prejudice and violence,โ€ the national justice ministry said.

โ€œThe new regulations aim to more fully implement the constitutional prohibition of discrimination and to meet international recommendations on standards of protection against hate speech and hate crimes,โ€ the ministry added.

The United Nations Human Rights Council has previously criticized the countryโ€™s lack of hate crime protections for LGBTQ+ individuals.

Prime Minister Donald Tusk approved the new legislation. It now moves on to Parliament. If Parliament passes it, President Andrzej Duda will have the option to sign it into law or pass it. He has previously stated that he believes LGBTQ+ individuals are โ€œevil.โ€

However, Dudaโ€™s final presidential term ends next year, and the ruling party hopes they can get someone to replace him in time to sign the legislation into law.

Bart Straszewski, an LGBTQ+ activist in Poland,ย toldย PinkNews, โ€œI felt like a second-category citizen, and we were treated like second-category citizens. The government is telling you that you donโ€™t deserve equal rights, that you are not creating families, and that you are an agent of the West trying to fight family values or tradition.

ย 

โ€œThe atmosphere was hostile. We felt that they didnโ€™t want us here, but we still were here, we still were fighting for our country because we are part of it,โ€ Straszewski added.

Poland previously has not been friendly to LGBTQ+ rights. During the Law and Justice (PiS) partyโ€™s time in power, the country became one of the most viciously anti-LGBTQ+ countries in Europe. Citiesย designated themselves โ€œLGBT-freeโ€ zonesย and government-run media outletsย regularly demonized and spread liesย about the queer community.ย Gay reporters were firedย from publications as part of the national purge.

However, advocates have been working tirelessly to grant protections for LGBTQ+ individuals. A TV anchorย apologized this yearย for his past anti-LGBTQ+ statements and came out in support of the community. Activistsย also rejoicedย when the Polish Supreme Court ruled that same-sex marriage is not illegal, per Polandโ€™s Constitution.

Subscribe to theย LGBTQ Nation newsletterย and be the first to know about the latest headlines shaping LGBTQ+ communities worldwide.

ย 

Don’t forget to share:

Good News is your section for queer joy!ย Subscribe to our newsletterย to get the most positive and fun stories from the site delivered to your inbox every weekend.ย Send us your suggestionsย for uplifiting and inspiring stories.