Category: Police / Law Enforcement / ICE
https://youtu.be/k2WOsURMbUY
Texas Paul EXPOSES GOP Links to Extremist Groups
Pro-Trump Pastor calls for LGBTQ Americans to be Executed in most Shocking Statements Yet
Jamie Raskin issues BAD NEWS to Republicans over Trump pardons
Anti-LGBTQ lawyer explains how abortion restrictions paved the way for banning trans health care
Matt Sharp of ADFPhoto: ScreenshotA rightwing lawyer explained how the fights for reproductive rights and for transgender people’s access to gender-affirming medical care are connected when it comes to the law.
Ohio’s House Families, Aging, and Human Services Committee Meeting held a hearing today about H.B. 454, which would ban doctors from providing gender-affirming care to transgender youth and requires teachers to out trans kids to their parents. All of the witnesses at the hearing supported the bill, and most were from religiously affiliated organizations.
Related: Christian legal hate group says conversion therapy bans are unconstitutional
Citing an abortion rights case, Matt Sharp of the anti-LGBTQ hate group Alliance Defending Freedom (ADF) testified to explain that courts actually might uphold the law even though it’s telling doctors to practice medicine in a sub-optimal way.
“Opponents challenged the law on several grounds, including that the law’s requirements conflicted with best medical practice,” Sharp said. “But the Sixth Circuit upheld the law and the authority of the legislature to pass it.”
“The court found that states can enact laws that limit medical procedures even when opponents claim that the laws were, quote, ‘directly contrary to medical profession custom’ and that certain medical groups did not consider them to be necessary.”
Sharp was referring to the 2019 appeals court decision in EMW Women’s Surgical Center v. Beshear, where a reproductive health care provider challenged Kentucky’s 2017 Ultrasound Informed Consent Act. The bill required people who wanted an abortion to have an ultrasound over 24 hours before the procedure and required doctors to allow the pregnant person to hear the fetal heartbeat and explain the images the ultrasound produced. They argued that it violated doctors’ freedom of speech.
A Trump-appointed judge, John K. Bush, wrote the majority opinion and said that the bill was fine because it “provides relevant information” that “gives a patient greater knowledge of the unborn life inside her.”
Effectively, Sharp argued that a court already said that doctors’ opinions on what’s best for patients can be overridden by legislatures and that courts will allow the same to be done to transgender people.
Spanish Politicians Try to Outlaw Consensual Sex Work, Including Porn
MADRID — Spanish sex workers and adult industry figures are sounding the alarm about a proposed new law, supported by politicians from both the ruling and opposition parties, aiming to outlaw all forms of paid sex work — including commercial pornography.
Last week, the ruling Spanish Socialist Workers’ Party, known as PSOE, introduced a proposal for an “abolitionist law against sexual exploitation,” something that had been included in the party’s platform.
But the draft includes a new section, 187, which explicitly outlaws audiovisual productions, magazines or internet content deemed “pornographic,” the El Español newspaper reported yesterday.
Prominent politicians within PSOE, which took power in 2019 after several years of conservative rule under the Partido Popular, have taken up the abolition of sex work as their personal cause. These include the party’s General Vice-Secretary Adriana Lastra, who last month took to the press to promote a change in the Spanish penal code to mandate up to three years of jail time for anyone paying for sex.
Lastra framed the effort as an attempt to reach out to the right, saying she hoped both the conservative PP and the left-wing minority alliance, Unidas Podemos, would vote for it.
The proposed legislation would revive the crimes of “proxenetism,” meaning pimping or pandering, and “tercería locativa” or brothel keeping. Both were removed from the penal code in 1995 by a previous Socialist administration.
The language used by the PSOE exclusively uses the Spanish feminine “prostituta,” which is both stigmatizing and criminalizing, and also essentializes sex work as a female occupation.
The law also conflates legal minors with the much vaguer “persons in situation of vulnerability,” which could be deployed by authorities to apply to whomever they wish.
A Left-Right Alliance to Re-Criminalize Consensual Sex Work
Prime Minister Pedro Sánchez has actively campaigned for “the abolition of prostitution,” including during the most recent PSOE convention, in Valencia last October.
Last month, PSOE attempted to sneak the new criminalization provision into a popular “Sólo Sí Es Sí” (“Only Yes Means Yes”) sexual consent law. A last-minute amendment outlawing sex work was requested by the conservative PP and Sánchez negotiated to slap it onto that much less controversial law, behind the backs of the minority parties that are part of his legislative alliance.
However, those parties — Unidas Podemos, ERC and Bildu — threatened to “vote against the entire ‘Sólo Sí Es Sí’ law if it included the PP-driven anti-sex-work amendment,” government sources leaked to the press.
PSOE decided to remove the amendment and reintroduce the abolitionist reform on its own. The ruling party also has shown a strange desire to rush the process “as soon as possible,” government sources confirmed to El Español.
Lastra told the press that Spain “must be a dignified country” and cannot continue “turning a blind eye to this grave violation of human rights.”
According to the PSOE, anyone who opposes to the party’s extreme Nordic Model reform is on the side of the “exploitation of women” and against “human rights.”
Noted Industry Voices Erika Lust, Paulita Pappel Speak Out Against the Law
Noted Swedish-Spanish adult filmmaker, producer and studio owner Erika Lust took to Twitter today to sound the alarm about the impending government attempt to ban all sex work, including adult performance.
“This International Sex Workers Day, I want to take the opportunity to express my unconditional support to all sex performers currently based in Spain, where the government is once again threatening their safety with prohibitionist bills that claim to ‘protect their rights,’” Lust tweeted.
Noting that the PSOE’s proposed reform “calls for the abolition of all forms of making a profit from the prostitution of others, including porn production,” Lust warned that “it would not matter whether the practice is carried out under exploitation — banned under current law — or if it is independent labor, with consent from all parties involved, following ethical production standards.
“What is presented as an effort to stop exploitation and violence in defense of human rights, in particular women’s rights, ends up being the main source of violence, precariousness and lack of protection for all sex workers — who are already vulnerable as it is,” the Barcelona-based feminist filmmaker continued.
Lust added that “if the government really cares about women’s rights, they should ask how women are treated in the porn industry. Are these women entirely in charge of their own careers? How can we guarantee the basic labor rights of sex workers?”
She quoted fellow pornographer and FSC Europe activist, Spanish-born Paulita Pappel, in noting that “sex work is only safe when it is decriminalized, and pornography is artistic expression and thus a right under freedom of speech.”
By condemning the porn industry “without taking all of these aspects into account, this bill only reinforces the stigma on sex workers and confuses sex work with sex trafficking,” Lust concluded.
Pappel herself issued an impassioned video through her social media explaining the background of the government’s attack on consensual sex work and urging support for the voices of actual sex workers and adult industry stakeholders.
Main Image: Spain’s self-described ‘prostitution abolitionist’ Prime Minister Pedro Sánchez
Turkish police violently arrest and ‘torture’ Istanbul Pride organizers during peaceful protest
I want to point out that Turkey used to be a secular democracy and is still a member of NATO. They have transformed into a hardline strongman government with few democratic elements, and the government is promoting a Muslim theocracy. As for NATO Turkey has become one of the biggest obstacles for NATO growth and development. Recep Tayyip Erdoğan is close with Putin and so threatens the secrets of US systems used my NATO. It is a bad situation made worse by religion taking over the government. And again near the end I have highlighted the same slurs and attacks by government on the LGBTQ+. President Tayyip Erdoğan’s government has shamelessly sought to paint LGBTQ+ as “perverts” or claim they don’t even exist as they tear away at what little rights LGBTQ+ people have in Turkey.
Turkish police descended on a peaceful Istanbul Prude protest. (Screen capture via Twitter)
Turkish police brutally beat and allegedly “tortured” nearly a dozen LGBTQ+ activists in Istanbul who were simply celebrating the start of Pride Month.
On 5 June, members of İstanbul LGBTİ+ Onur Haftası, which organises Istanbul Pride, gathered in the Yeldeğirmeni neighbourhood of the Kadıköy district to read a statement welcoming the start of Pride.
But as activists came together to celebrate 30 years of Istanbul Pride at around 6.30pm, a wave of police swept over the street. Hundreds of officers wielding riot shields proceeded to arrest 11 LGBTQ+ campaigners, according to video footage shared by İstanbul LGBTİ+ Onur Haftası.
Officers from Turkey’s national police force, the General Directorate of Security, were joined by the Çevik Kuvvet riot squad to squash the peaceful protest.
Activists and onlookers alike booed as people were escorted into police vans. Cordons of police lined the street and raised their shields up high in an attempt to prevent bystanders from seeing officers handcuffing and shoving activists.
Remaining defiant, Pride organisers and other campaign groups continued to raise intersex-inclusive Progress flags and heckle even as police detained them.
“Istanbul LGBTI+ Pride week is 30th [sic] years old. Police attacked and arrested LGBTI+ people who met in Yeldegirmeni streets in Istanbul- Kadikoy to celebrate Pride Month,” İstanbul LGBTİ+ Onur Haftası tweeted.
“Queer pride will defeat police torture! Istanbul Pride March countdown just begun! This year to we will resist!”
Members of İstanbul LGBTİ+ Onur Haftası, as well as two members of Trans+ Korteji, were arrested by police that evening. Trans+ Korteji claimed that, while in custody at the Vatan Police Station, officers “tortured” activists and shared alarming photographs of their heavily bruised wrists and legs.
Those arrested were all released later that evening.
With the theme of “resistance” 2022’s Istanbul Pride parade is scheduled for 26 June. But how police crushed a small gathering was a troubling forewarning of what the coming weeks will be like for LGBTQ+ people.
Istanbul Pride’s parades attracted hundreds of thousands of attendees for 13 years before the governate of Istanbul banned LGBTQ+ Pride events in 2015. Each year since city officials have invented reasons to prohibit the parade, such as “safety concerns” or COVID-19 restrictions, all but going in the face of Turks’ constitutional right to hold a peaceful protest without prior permission.
Yet activists refuse to back down and march anyway – and they have their reasons to. President Tayyip Erdoğan’s government has shamelessly sought to paint LGBTQ+ as “perverts” or claim they don’t even exist as they tear away at what little rights LGBTQ+ people have in Turkey.
In one of the most violent crackdowns yet, 2021 Istanbul Pride saw a shower of rubber bullets and tear gas strike LGBTQ+ Pride-goers. Around 20 were detained.
İstanbul LGBTİ+ Onur Haftası knows that this year won’t be any different. In the statement the group intended to read out on 5 June, organisers hoped to say that Pride is not only a celebration but is and always will be a protest.
“We LGBTIQA+ people are on the streets again. Our voices, laughter, and slogans echo in these streets. We are here with our identities, orientations, queerness, and all our existences,” the statement said according to the Turkish press agency Bianet.
“We are strong together, we continue to exist,” İstanbul LGBTİ+ Onur Haftası added. “Happy Pride.”
Brexit ‘largely to blame’ for £31bn loss to UK economy, study finds
Brexit is “largely to blame” for billions being lost in trade and tax revenues in recent years, according to a new study by top economists.
The Centre for European Reform (CEF) said that by the end of last year, Britain’s economy was 5.2 per cent – or £31bn – smaller than it would have been without Brexit and the Covid pandemic.
“We can’t blame Brexit for all of the 5.2 per cent GDP shortfall … but it’s apparent that Brexit is largely to blame,” said John Springford, author of the CEF study.
The CER modelled the performance of a “doppelganger” UK – if the nation had remained inside the EU’s single market – using data from other advanced economies similar to the UK.
Mr Springford said “disentangling” the economic effects of Brexit and Covid in recent years was “difficult” – but said it was clear that the bigger negative impact had come from Brexit.
The economist argues that a huge gap between the current UK and his “doppelganger” economy had opened up before the pandemic struck in the spring of 2020.
Mr Springford said the sluggish economic performance after the end of lockdowns in 2021 also showed that the “sizeable” shortfall was “mostly Brexit and not Covid”.
“The UK ended Covid restrictions sooner than many of its peers, thanks in part to starting its vaccination campaign early in 2021,” he said. “That should have made its recovery from Covid faster than other countries, not slower.”
The report added: “British politicians may find it difficult to ignore the central role of Brexit in the UK’s economic problems for much longer.”
It comes as British firms point to the post-Brexit red tape which is continuing to create costly hold-ups in trade with the EU.
One seafood firm in Northumberland spoke out about the “ridiculous” paperwork which almost caused a £50,000 delivery to be destroyed, since a form signed 43 times did not include a printed name.
The Coquet Island Shellfish Company told the BBC the issue cost the firm up to £15,000 to sort out after several delays. “There have been no discernible benefits of Brexit. Everything takes longer and costs more,” said sales director Jane Pedersen.
An influential committee of MPs recently warned that it was uncertain whether the post-Brexit free trade agreements negotiated by Boris Johnson’s government will provide any “actual economic benefits”.
No 10 confirmed on Friday that controversial new Brexit legislation – designed to take unilateral action to stop checks agreed with the EU as part of the withdrawal deal – will be published in the Commons on Monday.
Conservative party grandee Ken Clarke said the “vast majority” of peers will back attempts to block the bill and “hold it up for a considerable time”.
Meanwhile, Tory peer David Frost, the former Brexit negotiator, has said he is “thinking” about standing as an MP. “We’ll see if the opportunity arises and it might and it might not, we’ll see,” he told LBC. “I am thinking about it.”
New study shows welfare prevents crime, quite dramatically
https://www.eurekalert.org/news-releases/954451
This has been well known for a century, maybe longer. People who have nothing, who are hungry, cold, hopeless will do whatever they can to get what they need, even crime. Let’s give them another way, we can easily afford it in this country if we stop robbing the public to funnel the money to the wealthy. Hugs
A new paper in the Quarterly Journal of Economics, published by Oxford University Press, indicates that removing cash welfare from children when they reach age 18 greatly increases the chances that they will face criminal justice charges in subsequent years.
Supplemental Security Income is a United States program that provides payments to people with disabilities who have low incomes. Children qualify for the program based on their disability status and their parents’ low income and assets. Until 1996 children automatically continued to qualify for the adult program when they reached 18 years old unless their incomes increased.
As part of changes made to US social welfare programs in 1996 the US Social Security Administration began to reevaluate children receiving SSI when they turned 18 using different, adult, medical eligibility criteria. The Social Security Administration began removing about 40% of children receiving benefits when they turned 18. This process disproportionately removes children with mental and behavioral conditions such as attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder.
Using data from the Social Security Administration and the Criminal Justice Administrative Records System researchers estimated the effect of losing Supplemental Security Income benefits at age 18 on criminal justice and employment outcomes over the next two decades. By comparing records of children with an 18th birthday after the date of welfare reform enactment on August 22, 1996, and those born earlier (who were allowed onto the adult program without review) the researchers were able to estimate the effect of losing benefits on the lives of the affected youth.
They found that terminating the cash welfare benefits of these young adults increased the number of criminal charges by 20% over the next two decades. The increase was concentrated in what the authors call “income-generating crimes,” like theft, burglary, fraud/forgery, and prostitution. As a result of the increase in criminal charges, the annual likelihood of incarceration increased by 60%. The effect of this income removal on criminal justice involvement persisted more than two decades later.
The researchers found that the impact of the change was heterogeneous. While some people removed from the income support program at age 18 responded by working more in the formal labor market, a much larger fraction responded by engaging in crime to replace the lost income. In response to losing benefits, youth were twice as likely to be charged with an illicit income-generating offense than they were to maintain steady employment.
While each person removed from the program in 1996 saved the government some spending on SSI and Medicaid over the next two decades, each removal also created additional police, court, and incarceration costs. Based on the authors’ calculations, the administrative costs of crime alone almost eliminated the cost savings of removing young adults from the program.
“Traditionally, economists talk about the income effects of welfare programs in the context of the formal labor market—that welfare discourages work,” said the paper’s authors, Manasi Deshpande and Michael Mueller-Smith. “What we find is that the income effect of welfare benefits can also manifest as reductions in criminal activity. In fact, in the SSI context, cash welfare has a much larger discouragement effect on criminal activity than it does on formal work.”
The paper “Does Welfare prevent crime? The criminal justice outcomes of youth removed from SSI” is available (at midnight on June 7th) at: https://academic.oup.com/qje/advance-article/doi/10.1093/qje/qjac017/6581195.
Direct correspondence to:
Manasi Deshpande
University of Chicago Department of Economics
Saieh Hall for Economics 347
1126 East 59th Street
Chicago, IL 60637 mdeshpande@uchicago.eduTo request a copy of the study, please contact:
Daniel Luzer
daniel.luzer@oup.com

