IL Baptist Pastor Arrested On Child Grooming Charges

I am posting this for the tic Tok video where the person lays it out how it is in the churches where the real grooming takes place, not schools or library book, nor drag queens reading stories.  Hugs

 

The Baptist Press reports:

A pastor from McLeansboro, Ill., was arrested Jan. 5 on two counts of grooming minors for sexual purposes. Garrett Biggerstaff was charged after a four-month investigation that included the seizure of his electronic devices and collection of evidence at his home.

Biggerstaff was taken into custody and booked at the Jefferson County Jail. His bond was set for $150,000.

Biggerstaff, 28, was employed by the Spring Garden School District in Ina, Ill., at the time, but he resigned when the investigation became public in November. He was also the pastor of Pleasant Grove Missionary Baptist Church in Fairfield. The church suspended Biggerstaff immediately.

Read the full article. The TikTok user below has something to say about this one.

https://twitter.com/LanceRYPU/status/1611891375288770561?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw%7Ctwcamp%5Etweetembed%7Ctwterm%5E1611891375288770561%7Ctwgr%5E036164dd16fd102ca2f2a879cf1a8aedce105f85%7Ctwcon%5Es1_c10&ref_url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.joemygod.com%2F2023%2F01%2Fil-baptist-pastor-arrested-on-child-grooming-charges%2F

 

Randy5033 minutes ago

She really nails it! Bravo!

rednekokie23 minutes ago

Okay — how many of these since the first of the year??????

https://twitter.com/JoeMyGod/status/1613268992902176773?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw%7Ctwcamp%5Etweetembed%7Ctwterm%5E1613268992902176773%7Ctwgr%5Ee0c21671694a99ce948202d4d515abe97d26958d%7Ctwcon%5Es1_c10&ref_url=https%3A%2F%2Fdisqus.com%2Fembed%2Fcomments%2F%3Fbase%3Ddefaultf%3Djoemygodt_i%3D39283120https3A2F2Fwww.joemygod.com2F3Fp3D392831t_u%3Dhttps3A2F2Fwww.joemygod.com2F20232F012Fil-baptist-pastor-arrested-on-child-grooming-charges2Ft_e%3DIL20Baptist20Pastor20Arrested20On20Child20Grooming20Chargest_d%3DIL20Baptist20Pastor20Arrested20On20Child20Grooming20Chargest_t%3DIL20Baptist20Pastor20Arrested20On20Child20Grooming20Chargess_o%3Ddefaultversion%3D6333b8c1c426cdcf85e997fce9c86820

Rebecca Gardner3 hours ago

Still no Drag Queens or LGBT folks grooming children. It’s always the fucking ChristoNazis.

Halou3 hours ago

The moral panic against drag and trans people is being used as an excuse to look the other way when members of the clergy get caught.

Longpole Galvestonian2 hours ago

It will take lawsuits and TV commercials about rape by clergyman. Lawyers talking about the cover up of abuse and how to fight back in order reach most people and create awareness.
The news media has failed to get the message out on this danger in the churches.

Darreth Longpole2 hours ago

All of that would have to happen for years to even make a dent. It’s very public how many diocese’ have gone bankrupt due to sexual abuse issues and still parents send their children off to the rectory unsupervised.

Max-1 🔫+cult(R)=☠️ Galvestonian3 hours ago

Because the faith addict never likes to admit their addiction…
And to do so publicly is tantamount to suicide for their faith.

cheakamus Galvestonian3 hours ago

Absolutely. If people in small communities who rarely read the news began putting two and two together are realized that the problem starts in their own churches, we might begin to have some action on this front. It wasn’t until the accusations against the Catholic Church went mainstream that priests and other church employees began to be held accountable. Now do the Evangelicals!

Raging Bee JoeMyGod4 hours ago

If God is all-powerful, all-knowing, and really wants to talk to us, then how would it even be possible to “remove God from a society?”

Nic Peterson4 hours ago

Dear TikTok lady, I love you but you need to understand that they don’t care about children being abused in churches. Why not, because to point that out would hurt the feefees of churchy people and just like some white folk don’t want to be made uncomfortable because of our shared history, many christians would like the same treatment when it comes to the wholesale sexual abuse of children and others at the hands of religious leaders.

Please keep it up though. Many hands make big work small.

bambinoitaliano Nic Peterson3 hours ago

I think her question at the end of the video was meant to be rhetorical.

What, me worry?4 hours ago

I have yet to see a mug shot of a drag queen who was arrested for molesting or “grooming” children. And you know that we would definitely see it if it ever happened.

sex panic

The second-poorest state in the nation just made monitoring people’s porn viewing habits its top priority

https://www.queerty.com/second-poorest-state-country-just-made-policing-adult-videos-online-top-priority-20230109

What makes these people so afraid of sex?   Why do they think teens / young adults were not just as horny in the 1950s as they are in the 2020s?   How much better to just explain porn to kids starting at about ten years old.   Explain it is not real, explain about consent, and as the kids age explain their feelings, desires, needs, and conception because teens and young people are going to have sex.   They really are, and they have forever.   The body is driven to it and unless you give them an outlet for that need, they will do it the most risky way as that normally is what young people do.   The most risky stuff.   Hugs

adult-video-sexual-content-louisiana-drivers-lisence-id-identification Young man is sitting in bed and watching movie on laptop

Louisiana web users who want to view adult content must now provide a valid driver’s license or state ID to prove they’re above 18 years of age, thanks to a new state law that recently went into effect.

And while that might sound funny, Republicans want to pass a similar law nationwide.

The law, House Bill 142 (HB 142), says that any commercial website containing 33.3 percent or more of sexually explicit material must “perform reasonable age verification methods to verify the age of individuals attempting to access the material.” While all popular adult websites haven’t instituted age checks yet, if they don’t, they can be sued for non-compliance.

The bill was introduced by anti-LGBTQ+ state Rep. Laurie Schlegel, a woman who introduced legislation banning transgender kids from playing on school sports teams matching their gender identities.

Schlegel’s HB 142 says, “[Sexual content] is creating a public health crisis and having a corroding influence on minors.” It also blames adult content for “the hypersexualization of teens and prepubescent children… low self-esteem, body image disorders, an increase in problematic sexual activity at younger ages, and increased desire among adolescents to engage in risky sexual behavior.”

The bill also says sexual content may “impact brain development and functioning, contribute to emotional and medical illnesses, shape deviant sexual arousal, and lead to difficulty in forming or maintaining positive, intimate relationships, as well as promoting problematic or harmful sexual behaviors and addiction.”

Louisiana is the second-poorest state in the country, with 17.4% of its population at or below the poverty line. It also has the second-highest rate of childhood poverty, with 26.8% of its children living at or below the poverty line. And this is what state lawmakers there are currently focused on.

Web viewers will have to enter information from their IDs into a third-party verification system that claims not to store the user data.

Schlegel says the bill is meant to protect children rather than penalize adults. However, if web viewers feel scared about entering their personal information into a verification system, they may turn to lesser-known websites that feature illegal content, one researcher worries.

Olivia Snow — a sex worker, professor, and research fellow at UCLA’s Center for Critical Internet Inquiry — told TechCrunch, “[The law is] really just further marginalizing sex workers, which I think is going to be the primary effect. I imagine this means that there will be an increased black market of premium [sexual] content that’s non-consensually disseminated.”

If Schlegel’s bill sounds ridiculous, don’t laugh. It may actually be a sign of things to come.

In November 2022, Sen. Mike Lee (R-Utah) introduced a bill that would revise the federal definition of “obscenity” to essentially criminalize any web users who view or share “obscene” images online.

“The definition for obscenity [under Lee’s law is] so broad that it would encompass almost all sexual speech now legal,” adult industry advocacy group Free Speech Coalition (FSC) Director of Public Affairs Mike Stabile told The Mary Sue.

“It would also criminalize fans who share content, or couples who sext or share intimate images on dating apps. People don’t think of themselves as ‘[sexual content] distributors,’ but under this bill, even retweeting adult content or DMing a dick pic is a criminal act. The headlines are about [sexual adult content], but this bill criminalizes sex,” Stabile added.

Report: 188 Catholic clergy members in Kansas are alleged predators

https://onlysky.media/hemant-mehta/report-188-catholic-clergy-members-in-kansas-are-alleged-predators/

Damn, Damn, Damn!   Joe My God had two of these today.   All religious leaders but not a single one a drag queen or a trans person.   This one left me raw, maybe because it is late and I had a rough day but more likely if I admit the truth because of what the victims said.  I admit that I had to stop reading after that and go get an alcohol filled drink.  Even Odie who is sacked out on my desk lifted his head to look at me when I let out my gasp of anguish at this.   I won’t be graphic but those who have not been taken against their will / wishes really don’t understand the feelings those things bring up in those of us who have.  Even typing this I have had to wipe the tears from my eyes and blow my nose.   And this is not in anyway graphic!  It is just I can fill in the gaps, I know … Damn I know and at nearly 60 years old I still cannot forget.  Anyway it is a worthwhile read.   Hugs

The Kansas Bureau of Investigation also cited 400 alleged victims of Catholic sexual abuse since 1950
 
Report: 188 Catholic clergy members in Kansas are alleged predators | Catholic priest with hands on his head
Catholic priest with hands on his head (image via Shutterstock)
Reading Time: 3 MINUTES

 

Afour-year investigation into Kansas’ Catholic churches has found 188 alleged predators suspected of committing “aggravated criminal sodomy, rape, aggravated indecent liberties with a child and aggravated sexual battery.”

The report also says there were 400 victims of sexual abuse in the Kansas archdioceses since 1950, but in most of those cases, either the clergy member has died or the statute of limitations has long expired.

The [Kansas Bureau of Investigation] originally focused on reports of clergy sexual abuse in the state’s four Roman Catholic dioceses — Wichita, Salina, Dodge City and Kansas City, Kansas. It later expanded to include the Society of St. Pius X, a breakaway Catholic group known for its traditional Latin Mass with a large branch in St. Marys in northeast Kansas.

Some of the victims withheld vital information from investigators because they said they had signed non-disclosure agreements. In many cases, the report said, Church leaders failed to report allegations of abuse to law enforcement, failed to keep records of those allegations, and failed to conduct thorough internal investigations.

And, just as you’d suspect, there were instances where accused priests were merely shuffled to another parish while remaining on the Church’s payroll.

It’s a predictable yet troubling account of what we’ve seen in state after state ever since attorneys general began taking these matters seriously. After a Pennsylvania grand jury report came out in 2018, the floodgates opened. In some states, laws were enacted to put power back into the hands of victims by reopening a window for filing sexual abuse lawsuits that had previously been closed due to statutes of limitations. It’s not clear how Kansas politicians will act moving forward.

Whatever they do, if they do anything, it’ll be too late for some:

A few of the victims the task force dealt with were in prison and attributed that in part to the sexual abuse they’d endured as children, the report said.

“Our agents witnessed men, now in their 60s and 70s, break down in tears as they reported their sexual abuse to our team,” it said. “In many cases they have never previously disclosed the sexual abuse to anyone.

“Many times the victims thought they were the only victim of the offending priest. Following appropriate investigative interviews and actions, some victims learned for the first time they were not the only one the priest had abused.”

Some of the alleged victims had also died by suicide.

There are a couple of silver linings, that is if there can really be any in a situation like this.

One is that this investigation was requested by a Republican attorney general (Derek Schmidt), in response to a request from Kansas City Archdiocese Archbishop Joseph Naumann, which came after lawyers identified 15 clergy members who “warranted further investigation.” The people who may seem least likely to take these matters seriously did the right thing, though it’s possible public pressure had a lot to do with that.

The other is that the Church appears to be taking these matters more seriously. Too little, too late, no doubt, but it’s something. The allegations are more likely to have occurred decades ago than recently. That said, only a few dozen priests accused of abuse have been identified by name by the four dioceses in Kansas. The report suggests there are many more where those came from.

I would also highlight the report’s list of how the Catholic Church, despite cooperating with the KBI, hindered the investigation. The KBI cites non-disclosure agreements, Church officials using language that “minimized the seriousness or severity” of abuse, a failure to report abuse allegations to law enforcement, a lack of “transparent communication” with parishioners about the allegations, horrible recordkeeping policies, inadequate internal investigations, and an inability to hold people accountable for their roles in the abuse.

We knew a lot of those things already, but that means the Church’s willingness to assist with the investigation was hampered by the Church’s own actions in the past. The people who (sometimes unintentionally) destroyed evidence shouldn’t get much credit for supposedly opening their doors wide open to investigators.

As of now, no criminal charges have been filed in the 30 cases where the task force submitted affidavits. That’s likely because there are some hurdles (including death) that prosecutors can’t overcome. Justice will not be served in those cases.

Which means the only real consequence the Catholic Church in Kansas will ever face is the exodus of worshipers who call themselves Catholic. If you’re a Kansan who still attends or supports the Catholic Church with your time or money, you’re complicit in their actions. It’s not too late to break ties. Tradition is no excuse to prop up a criminal institution. If that leads to more of these dioceses going bankrupt, no one who cares about the victims is going to shed a tear. The Church has enough property and stashed artwork to sell to cover the costs of the trauma they’ve inflicted upon victims.

It’s long past time for the Catholic Church in Kansas (and everywhere else for that matter) to suffer for what it’s done to members. 

Avatar photo

HEMANT MEHTA

Hemant Mehta is the founder of FriendlyAtheist.com, a YouTube creator, podcast co-host, and author of multiple books about atheism. He can be reached at @HemantMehta. 

Is the Right to Contraception About To End in America?

My dogs that love gravy please make no mistake in thinking what these people are driving hard for.  It is not the 1950s as most of us assume, but for these die hard Christian white male power nationalists the goal is the 1850s.    Hugs

As of last week, Republican efforts to ban birth control in America have officially started, and teenagers in Texas are its first victims

 

 
 
Image by Thomas Breher from Pixabay

To paraphrase Pastor Niemöller, first they came for our abortion rights. Now they’re coming for our birth control.

Psychologist Dr. Marty Klein notes at Psychology Today that there are typically only a few reasons why people oppose birth control. They are:

— Fundamentalist religions fear sexual pleasure, which birth control facilitates
— Contraception effectively limits family size, empowering women
— Contraception promotes personal autonomy [making women more likely to challenge male authority]
— Birth control may make abortion more acceptable to society

As of last week, Republican efforts to ban birth control in America have officially started, and teenagers in Texas are its first victims.

When Clarence Thomas wrote in his Dobbs concurring opinion that the Supreme Court should next overturn the right to birth control in the United States, a lawyer and a judge in Texas were apparently listening.

Most Americans have no idea this high-stakes drama — heading toward the Supreme Court but already now law in Texas — is even going on.

Lost in the Christmas holiday chatter, a Trump-appointed federal district judge in Texas just a week ago put a stop to teenagers getting confidential access to federally-funded birth control pills and devices in that state.

He did it based on a lawsuit filed by attorney Jonathan Mitchell, the same man who co-authored the Texas “abortion vigilante” law. Everybody ridiculed that effort at first, you’ll recall, but the Supreme Court upheld it and today it’s Texas law and spreading across Red states like a fungus.

Mitchell is also known as the guy who supported the Mississippi abortion ban before the Supreme Court that led to the Dobbs decision overturning Roe v Wade.

Perhaps anticipating Clarence Thomas’ later call to overturn Supreme Court decisions legalizing birth control,  homosexual behavior, and gay marriage (Griswold v Connecticut, Lawrence v Texas, Obergefell v Hodges), Mitchell even wrote in his amicus brief for the Dobbs case an originalist reference similar to the argument the Texas judge would later make against birth control:

“The right to marry an opposite-sex spouse is ‘deeply rooted in this Nation’s history and tradition’; the right to marry a same-sex spouse obviously is not.”

In the Texas federal lawsuit Mitchell brought, Deanda v. Becerra, Trump-appointed Judge Matthew Kacsmaryk ruled that teens between 15 and 18 shouldn’t be able to make birth control decisions independent of their parents because, he ruled, that had always been the law in the early years of America:

“For centuries, the common law held minors were incapable of giving consent to make important life decisions.”

Somehow, he managed to overlook the fact that the age of sexual consent “for centuries” was, in every American state from the founding of this nation in 1789, 10 to 12 years old. It wasn’t raised to 14, 15, or 16 in any US state until the 1930s.

But don’t try to argue facts with people running on religious or male-power arguments.

Although the fight for women’s bodily autonomy is as old as time, this part of the story begins in 1970.

Richard Nixon had a reputation as an awkward, bumbling prude when it came to sex, but even he knew that teenagers should be able to get birth control without their parents’ consent.

A teenage pregnancy could destroy a young woman’s life, and, at that time, over one-in-ten girls became pregnant between 15 and 19 years old. Fully 92 percent of those teenage pregnancies, according to research published in the following decade, were unintended and could have been prevented with access to birth control.

So, in 1970, President Nixon signed into law Title X, a federal grant program that included funds for confidential access to birth control for people across the nation regardless of their age.

Nonprofit agencies were formed in each state to receive the federal money and provide birth control (among other services): in Texas “Every Body Texas” is the group that administers Title X statewide through 32 agencies and 156 clinics.

The week of Christmas, because of Kacsmaryk’s Deanda v. Becerraruling, Texas agencies affiliated with Every Body Texas learned they had to start turning away teenagers, virtually all of them girls and women, who were seeking confidential birth control.

This is now the law in Texas.

Picking up the beat, Republican legislators in Missouri, Idaho, and Louisiana have introduced or are proposing birth control bans in those states, according to the Pew Trust. Expect Republicans in your state to soon try the same.

Lest you think that hyperbolic, consider how Republicans in the US House and Senate voted when Democrats introduced the Right to Contraception Actimmediatelyafter Clarence Thomas suggested the Court should overturn that right.

Fully 195 Republicans voted against the legislation in the House; only 8 supported it. And when it reached the Senate, it was killed by a Republican filibuster.

The Deanda v. Becerradecision in Texas banning confidential dispensing of contraception to teenagers will be appealed to the Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals, known across the nation as the place most likely to uphold crackpot rightwing rulings. From there it goes to the six crackpot rightwingers on the Supreme Court.

Republicans appear quite fixated on banning both abortion and birth control nationwide.

Authoritarian societies have a long history of trying to regulate women’s bodies.

The first books the Nazis burned in May of 1933 were birth control guides by Planned Parenthood founder Margaret Sanger, shortly before Hitler banned birth control in that nation (soldiers were allowed to possess condoms “to maintain their good health”).

Birth control was similarly banned in Romania by Nicolae Ceaușescu, bringing that nation Europe’s highest infant mortality rate and lowest life expectancy (particularly for women), a legacy which continues to this day even though Ceaușescu was overthrown and killed in 1989.

And now the GOP wants to ban birth control in the United States, starting with the youngest and most vulnerable among us. Authoritarians, after all, always first attack those least able to defend themselves before they climb the ladder of the society they intend to conquer.

This opening shot — coming out of Texas, just like the first ban on abortion (and from the same lawyer) — should make all Americans sit up and take notice.

Visible Cis Confusion

Funny and informative without being overly science heavy.  I doubt I will post more today, I had planned to do comments but spent most of the day in bed where my back feels the best.  That new bed is really good on my back.  I don’t intend to post much news until I can get to the old comments but right now videos are the most I can really deal with.   I will soon go back to bed and finish watching “The Fifth Element”.   Randy has suggested a bed setup for me to work from but the best position for me to slow down the pain is lying flat on one of my sides.   I will get the epidural after the MRI and if that doesn’t fix the pain issues then I will switch to fentanyl.    Hugs

Malehood I Short Film

Trans Porn Rose 75% In Popularity This Year on Pornhub

https://www.them.us/story/trans-porns-pornhub-popularity

Trans-related porn is exploding at the same time trans rights are under fierce attack. 
Trans Porn Rose 75 In Popularity This Year on Pornhub
Getty Images

It’s the most wonderful time of the year, when that company with an unfathomable amount of access to everyone’s personal data yassifies the numbers into a cute end-of-year roundup complete with charts and graphics. No, not Spotify Wrapped — we’re talking about the Pornhub Year in Review. And this year, it’s been reported that trans porn exploded in popularity, even as trans sex workers are increasingly losing access to the tools they need to survive and transphobia as a whole is increasing nationwide. 

In 2022, porn under the “transgender” category increased in popularity by 75% to become the 7th most popular category worldwide and the 3rd most popular in the U.S., according to the tube site’s report. In addition, “FTM” searches were eight times more popular than “MTF” searches. And men viewed videos tagged as “trans” 22% more than women. However, women on “straight” Pornhub viewed the “trans male” sub-category 115% more than men, lest we think that being a chaser is only limited to one gender or sexuality. Pornhub even noted that the most searched-for gender identities were “non binary,” “gender x” (whatever that means) and “androgynous.”

Interestingly, Pornhub appears to aggregate its data for PornhubGay totally separately, and not by gender. Over on PornhubGay, searches for “FTM” grew 202%, becoming the 20th of the top 20 gay searches, whereas it didn’t rank last year.

 

Trans porn’s popularity appears to be in keeping with the general trends of the past few years. Last year, searches for “trans” grew 141%, with views of the trans category growing by 23%. In 2017, Pornhub also published a report specifically on the popularity of trans porn; for the most part, and for better or worse, it found that the popularity of trans porn has been steadily increasing since the mid-2010s. 

This particular bump in the popularity of trans porn, in addition to last year’s growth, is of course happening at the same time that lawmakers have introduced the highest number of anti-trans and general anti-LGBTQ+ bills in history. That these two occurrences are simultaneous is probably no coincidence. Last year, an Alabama republican lawmaker who voted to criminalize doctors who provide minors with transition-related healthcare was caught liking trans porn on Twitter. And a study from Lawsuit.org additionally found that Google users in Republican states are overwhelmingly responsible for the popularity of certain trans-related porn search terms, like “shemale” and “tranny.” 

But this data also likely comes as a slap in the face to trans sex workers, who are facing an increasingly precarious future. In August, Visa and Mastercard announced that it would be suspending payment processing for the ad-buying arm of Mindgeek, the parent company that owns Pornhub, making it much harder for Mindgeek sites to generate revenue and in turn cutting off a revenue stream for the sexworkers who use it. That followed Mastercard’s 2021 rule changes, which stated that the payment processing company could suspend users at any time for selling content that violates its vague rules. That rule change led to OnlyFans’ controversial decision to ban adult content, although that decision was later reversed. 

These legal charges against Pornhub have largely been led by the Traffickinghub campaign, which was founded in partnership with the Evangelical Christian group Exodus Cry. And although the goal of protecting children from trafficking and grooming seems to be an admirable one, the vast majority of child exploitation actually happens on Facebook, with a Daily Beast sreport finding that the site recorded 20.3 million reported incidents related to child pornography or trafficking in 2020. By comparison, MindGeek reported 13,229. As the rhetoric of the current anti-trans movement shows, “protecting children” is usually just a smokescreen for something far more unsavory. 

Since trans people are far more likely than cis people to rely on sex work for income, these issues disproportionately affect trans workers. And while you could make some pithy jokes about America’s Freudian obsession with trans people, the reality is that trans sex workers remain some of the most vulnerable in our community. 

Texas Paul Issues URGENT Warning Heading into Holiday Season

A lot of the reason this happens in the US is because we teach our kids to fear anyone seeing their bodies.   Kids in other advanced developed countries are as willing to show themselves to a stranger online hoping it will be a girl / boy they like willing to also show themselves.   In other countries when the person really behind the scam comes out the kids are upset but they don’t freak out and give the person money or even worse more explicit videos.   They do not kill themselves.    Because they know they can go to the parents and tell them, they know that if their friends do get the videos / pictures because they shared their contacts unknowingly that no one will disown them or freak out.  Yes they will get teased but it is not the end of the world.  Hell in the US adults are still trying to ban porn like it is the 1950s.   In the US until the middle to late 1960s it was common for schools that had pools to have the boys swim nude and the girls wear suits often in the pool /pool area at the same time.    I have seen the pictures and read the stories.  No one cared as it was the custom / tradition before the US got hyper modest and back to being prudish.    Here in the US I have read of a rash of kids killing themselves after giving the perpetrator everything they had, hundreds of dollars and including more pictures / videos but they are too scared to tell the parents or let the pictures videos out to their contacts especially if they were gay based.  Kids too afraid of their parents seeing their genitalia that they would give a stranger all the money they had and then kill themselves.   Teens too afraid of their own friends seeing their junk that they are willing to do anything including kill themselves.   In the US we have taken prudishness and weird anti-sex / anti-genitals to the point it is killing our kids.   Yet the republicans only focus on stopping any self-enjoyment to force young adults to marry and have more babies just to experience sex.   As long as it is the correct kind of sex of course.    Hugs 

Libs Of TikTok Owner: LGBTQs Are In An “Evil Cult”

“There’s something so unique about — the LGBTQ community has become this cult and it’s so captivating and it pulls people in so strongly unlike anything we’ve ever seen and they brainwash people to join.

“And they convince them of all these things and it’s really, really hard to get out of it. It’s really difficult.

“I think they’re evil. And sometimes we try to break it down a lot and we discuss why this is happening, what’s happening, whatever, and I think sometimes the simplest answer is they’re just evil.

“They’re bad people. They’re evil people. And they want to groom kids. They’re recruiting.” – Chaya Raichik, owner of LibsOfTikTok, the Twitter account that has spawned violent and armed protests at LGBTQ events.

 

Raising_Rlyeh5 hours ago

She’s fucking Jewish and has no problem spreading what is essentially blood libel against lgbtq people

Republicans’ BIZARRE Obsession EXPOSED by Texas Paul