Alabama medical marijuana bill requiring negative pregnancy test ‘clearly unconstitutional,’ opponents say

Sen. Larry Stutts, R-Tuscumbia

Sen. Larry Stutts, R-Tuscumbia

Sen. Larry Stutts, R-Tuscumbia

An Alabama bill that would require all women between the ages of 13 and 50 to show a negative pregnancy test before being able to buy medical marijuana is “unprecedented” and “clearly unconstitutional,” advocates say.


The bill, introduced by practicing OB/GYN and state Sen. Larry Stutts, R-Tuscumbia, would require “all women of childbearing age” to either test negative on a doctor-administered pregnancy test or show documentation from a “certified medical lab” that they are not pregnant.


The legislation, which passed the Senate Children, Youth and Human Services Committee on Thursday, would also ban breastfeeding women from obtaining medical marijuana.


The bill would allow breastfeeding women to obtain medical marijuana for someone else if they are doing so as a registered caregiver.


Stutts could not be reached for comment, but he claimed earlier this month that the bill is necessary to protect the health of babies in the womb as Alabama prepares to make medical marijuana available for purchase.


“I’m still not in favor of the marijuana bill, but it is in place. I think it can be improved and one of the ways it can be improved is to limit pregnant people, limit their availability to it,” he said on the Jeff Poor Show.


“There’s a lot of data about marijuana and pregnancy … and recommending not to do it. I counsel patients all the time that are pregnant about not taking drugs and not smoking marijuana during their pregnancy, not smoking cigarettes during their pregnancy.”


While the state legislature passed medical marijuana and Gov. Kay Ivey signed the bill into law last year, licenses have yet to be issued and there are no active marijuana dispensaries in Alabama.


Emma Roth, a staff attorney with the National Advocates for Pregnant Women, said no state has a law mandating women show a negative pregnancy test before obtaining medical marijuana.


“This is completely unprecedented because it is so clearly unconstitutional,” she said.


Roth said Oklahoma considered a similar provision in 2018 through executive order but backed off amid the high possibility of a legal challenge.


“We have serious concerns, just from a constitutional perspective and a public health perspective” about Stutts’ bill, Roth said.


“We are very concerned that this is an invasion of the privacy of Alabama women and their right to equal protection under the law.”


Roth noted that a home pregnancy test would not be sufficient under the bill’s language.


Legal issues aside, the legislation is also “not grounded in science,” she said, pointing to a 2020 study that found evidence does not suggest that prenatal cannabis use leads to cognitive impairments.


There are several conditions where medical marijuana is helpful for pregnant women, such as epilepsy and hyperemesis gravidarum — a severe form of morning sickness that can lead to weight loss, studies show.


Katie Darovitz, an Alabama woman with epilepsy, was told by her doctor to stop her anti-epileptic medication when she became pregnant because of their links to birth defects. She turned to marijuana to prevent her seizures.


She was arrested on chemical endangerment of a child charges a couple weeks after the December 2014 birth of her son because they both tested positive for marijuana, even though her baby was healthy.


Alabama was one of a handful of states where mothers can be prosecuted for exposing an unborn child to illicit drugs under the state’s chemical endangerment of a child law at the time.


In part because of Darovitz’ case and an and ProPublica investigation into the drug arrests of pregnant women with legal prescriptions, the Alabama Legislature amended the chemical endangerment law to exclude such women from the chemical endangerment


Darovitz’ charges were ultimately dropped, but Roth said her case showed that the decision on whether to obtain medical marijuana should be up to a woman and her doctor, not the Alabama Legislature.


“This legislation would prevent pregnant women from getting medical marijuana even when she and doctor agree it’s in the best interest of her health and the health of her baby,” she said.

3 thoughts on “Alabama medical marijuana bill requiring negative pregnancy test ‘clearly unconstitutional,’ opponents say

  1. Hi Scottie;
    This reminds me of a conversation I had with my parent’s friends when I visited Mom and Dad. We were at a bar, discussing the coming legalization of weed in Michigan. We were at a BAR. In one of the poorest counties in Michigan, where open fields and woods abounded. Sipping angrily at her third mixed drink a nice lady declared that ‘marijuana was a gateway drug’ and it was horrible that we would open the drug to the local youth. I laughed.
    Have you ever noticed how there doesn’t seem to be a bill requiring someone to pass a pregnancy test before buying alcohol? I would argue that many women wouldn’t be pregnant were it not FOR the alcohol! But, drug of choice issues aside, weed is far healthier for a person than alcohol, tobacco, two of Alabama’s staples. I won’t speak on the guns, meth, Percocet, oxycontin, etc. Alabama is also known for…. and what the f’ ever spawned MGT.
    So, I’ll put away the “what about” argument. What would be fantastic is if people would recognize that there are no perfect solutions, people are going to do things that aren’t always perfect. Hell, my mother was water skiing two weeks before due date! Bad stuff happens, good stuff happens; quit trying to handcuff the world!


    Liked by 2 people

    1. Hello Randy. Yes there is no medical evidence that cannabis effects a growing fetus, yet we know alcohol does. The reason there are no studies on cannabis is that the federal government wont allow it. Just as a law was passed to prevent the cc from studying the effects of gun violence. The war on drug or the was on cannabis was really a way to prevent the black and liberal hippies from voting. The conservatives passed laws hammering the drug and the racist police enforced them mostly against black people. It is a winning issue for which ever party promises to make it legal but the Democrats were fighting it because of their age. The remember the stupid shit pushed about weed during their prime 40 years ago and it is still in their heads. I hate that the people leading the country are decades out of date on the culture.


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.