Published by Scotties Playtime
I am an older gay guy in a long-term wonderful relationship. My spouse and I are in our 36th year together. I love politics and news. I enjoy civil discussions and have no taboo subjects. My pronouns are he / him / his and my email is Scottiestoybox@gmail.com
View all posts by Scotties Playtime
Scottie's Playtime 
Of course the SC’s decision as related to the funding of religious schools is TOTALLY biased. But this is what we are dealing with (and will continue to do so) now that we have a majority of CHRISTIAN judges. Unfortunately, there will be NO neutrality when it comes to religious cases.
However, having said that, I do wonder how they would rule if the case was about money going to a school that was teaching Buddhism or Hinduism or Bahai or Shinto or …
LikeLiked by 1 person
Hello Nan. Not sure how far up the court ladder it has progressed but right after the PA Christian adoption agency won the right to discriminate against gay people and still take taxpayer money the same damn Christian agency refused to place a child with a Jewish couple citing religion. That was the case where Gorsuch said the worst kind of discrimination was discrimination against religion. On the SC ruling today, Nancy had a fund-raising letter ready to go! Ya !!! Oh that solves the problem for sure. The Democratic party leader Speaker of the House had a fund raising letter ready to go and sent out right away. No legislation, no call to action of her members and yes she fought for an anti-choice corporate Democrat in Texas over the progressive pro-choice candidate. Oh what a champion for choice she is. Hugs
LikeLiked by 1 person