As Zuckerberg Goes Around Whining About Biden, He Made Sure To First Get His New Approach Approved By Trump

from the you-realize-how-that’s-worse,-right? dept

Remember how Zuckerberg was “done with politics”? Remember how he promised that he was going to stop doing what politicians demanded he do?

Now it turns out that he not only did his big set of moderation changes to please Trump, but did so only after he was told by the incoming administration to act. Even worse, he reportedly made sure to share his plans with top Trump aides to get their approval first.

That’s a key takeaway from a new New York Times piece that is ostensibly a profile of the relentlessly awful Stephen Miller. However, it also has a few revealing details about the whole Zuckerberg saga buried within. First, Miller reportedly demanded that Zuckerberg make changes at Facebook “on Trump’s terms.”

Mr. Miller told Mr. Zuckerberg that he had an opportunity to help reform America, but it would be on President-elect Donald J. Trump’s terms. He made clear that Mr. Trump would crack down on immigration and go to war against the diversity, equity and inclusion, or D.E.I., culture that had been embraced by Meta and much of corporate America in recent years.

Mr. Zuckerberg was amenable. He signaled to Mr. Miller and his colleagues, including other senior Trump advisers, that he would do nothing to obstruct the Trump agenda, according to three people with knowledge of the meeting, who asked for anonymity to discuss a private conversation. Mr. Zuckerberg said he would instead focus solely on building tech products.

Even if you argue that this was more about DEI programs at Meta rather than about content moderation, it’s still the incoming administration reportedly making actual demands of Zuckerberg, and Zuckerberg not just saying “fine” but actually previewing the details to Miller to make sure they got Trump’s blessing.

Earlier this month, Mr. Zuckerberg’s political lieutenants previewed the changes to Mr. Miller in a private briefing. And on Jan. 10, Mr. Zuckerberg made them official….

This is especially galling given that it was just days ago when Zuckerberg was whining about how unfair it was that Biden officials were demanding stuff from him (even though he had no trouble saying no to them) and it was big news! The headlines made a huge deal of how unfair Biden was to Zuckerberg. Here’s just a sampling.

Image

Notably absent from this breathless coverage was any mention that Trump was the one who actually threatened to imprison Zuckerberg for life. Or that his incoming FCC chair threatened to remove Section 230 if Meta didn’t stop fact-checking.

Also conveniently omitted was the fact that the Supreme Court found no evidence of the Biden administration going over the line in its conversations with Meta. Indeed, a Supreme Court Justice noted that conversations like those that the Biden admin had with Meta happened “thousands of times a day,” and weren’t problematic because there was no inherent threat or direct coordination.

Yet, here, we have reports of both threats and now evidence of direct coordination, including Zuckerberg asking for and getting direct approval from a top Trump official before rolling out the policy.

And where is this bombshell revelation? It’s buried in a random profile piece puffing up Stephen Miller.

It’s almost as if everyone now takes it for granted that any made-up story about Biden will be treated as fact, and everyone just takes it as expected when Trump actually does the thing that Biden gets falsely accused of.

With this new story, don’t hold your breath waiting for the same outlets to give this anywhere near the same level of coverage and outrage they directed at the Biden administration.

It’s almost as if there’s a massive double standard here: everything is okay if Trump does it, but we can blame the Biden admin for things we only pretend they did.

I’m used to hypocrisy in the political world, but this is beyond ridiculous. It’s now being made clear that the Trump admin is actually doing the exact thing that people were (falsely, misleadingly) blaming Biden for.

And it’s just a random aside in a story, and no one seems to be calling it out. Other than us here at Techdirt.

5 thoughts on “As Zuckerberg Goes Around Whining About Biden, He Made Sure To First Get His New Approach Approved By Trump

    1. Hi Ali. It does seem so. But why is it they never cave or give into democrats but instantly cave … like all the media companies are doing right now to threats by tRump to sue them even though they are in the right … to tRump or other republicans. Because the cult of tRump republicans are fine with breaking the laws and norms to use government against anyone who says a bad thing about them but democrats won’t. I learned years ago that the reason why Sunday news hosts would attack democrats viciously interpreting them all the time and arguing with them, while at the same time never doing the same thing to republicans. It was because the Republican Party had a rule. Any news show host that corrected or argued / interrupted with a republican would be blackballed so that no republican at any level could be booked on their shows, any of that companies shows. The democrats did not do that. So that is how the news got skewed and a right wing bias 20 or 30 years ago. Hugs

      Liked by 1 person

    1. Exactly. They’re going to keep doing what they’ve been doing, whatever and however that is. They put the policy in place to seem people-friendly so they’d make money, now they’re disclaiming the policy to seem maga-y, so they’ll make money. It’s all the same to them. They’ll hire who they want as they always have.

      Liked by 3 people

    2. Hi Suze. They worship the myth of the 1950s which they believe in with great joy. What a glorious time in the US according to them. Not so great for the minorities including non-whites, women, and the LGBTQ+. But it was the greatest time for white males and the Christian church, the very groups coming into charge of the nation with the goal of bring back the days they were the unquestioned ones in charge. We must not let them beat us into giving up the rights gained since the 1960s for all people. The US went from the melting pot of the land of freedom to the place with the drive to be as regressive a theocracy as possible. Hugs

      Liked by 2 people

Leave a reply to suze hartline Cancel reply

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.