Trump’s DHS pushes for new ‘emergency’ demolitions of D.C. historic buildings
I still do not see the emergency need here as none is really stated. What is the security issue? I think the thing is tRump’s admin wants to erase anything that as any other administration’s branding on it. The object is to make DC tRump’s city bearing only his branding and everything named after him. He sees other tyrant authoritarian dictator has a city named after them, he wants DC to be his, the White House to be a palace like other royalty has so he must have, and his rule to be unquestioned. Hugs.
The Trump administration is extending its wrecking ball to yet more historic buildings in Washington as the president’s pet projects — including his golden ballroom and triumphal arch — press forward.
Homeland Security Secretary Kristi Noem appears before the House Committee on Homeland Security on Capitol Hill on Dec. 11, 2025.Mark Schiefelbein / AP Photo
The Trump administration is looking to tear down more historic buildings in Washington as the president, nearly a year into his final term, looks for ways to leave his mark on the District of Columbia.
This includes the destruction of the East Wing of the White House to make way for the president’s grand ballroom, which he now says will cost some $400 million, as well as a massive so-called arc de Trump.
But a memo uncovered by The Washington Post on Tuesday shows the administration using a new justification (that is, other than Trump’s vanity) to explain its latest effort to raze a part of D.C.’s history: a so-called emergency.
The Post reports Department of Homeland Security Secretary Kristi Noem, whose agency has engaged in some rather lavish spending on her behalf this year, issued a memo earlier this month “seeking to fast-track the demolition of more than a dozen historic buildings at St. Elizabeths in Southeast Washington,” which officials have been converting into a sprawling headquarters for DHS over more than a decade in accordance with historic preservation of treasured landmarks.
Per The Post:
‘Demolition is the only permanent measure that resolves the emergency conditions,’ Noem wrote in the memo. A risk assessment report undertaken by her agency ‘supports immediate corrective action,’ she wrote. The assessment report, which Noem included with her memo, concludes the vacant buildings ‘may be accessed by unauthorized individuals seeking to cause harm to personnel.’ The structures ‘provide a tactical advantage for carrying out small arms or active shooter scenarios,’ the report states.
MS NOW has not independently confirmed the memo. A spokesperson for the General Services Administration, which is overseeing development of the St. Elizabeths campus, confirmed to The Post that the agency had been alerted by the DHS about “a present security risk to life and property” at the campus “that may require us to demolish buildings.”
The report notes the push is being opposed by multiple preservationist groups, including the National Trust for Historic Preservation, which has also sought to thwart Trump’s ballroom project.
It’s yet to be seen whether there’s any true risk in need of being resolved by Trump’s demolition of yet more historic buildings. But if past is prologue, there’s certainly reason to doubt the administration’s “emergency” claims here: namely, the president’s obvious desire to remake the nation’s capital and his administration’s tendency to use claims of “emergencies” to impose a slew of radical policies.
I am an older gay guy in a long-term wonderful relationship. My spouse and I are in our 36th year together. I love politics and news. I enjoy civil discussions and have no taboo subjects. My pronouns are he / him / his and my email is Scottiestoybox@gmail.com
View all posts by Scotties Playtime
4 thoughts on “Trump’s DHS pushes for new ‘emergency’ demolitions of D.C. historic buildings”
Seems as if they’re looking at the wrong official as to cost overruns on building maintenance and upkeep.
Hi Ali. I can’t see how this is a national security matter? Do you? I think it is that tRump wants his own city, with his stamp and brand, that has the people / look he likes. He saw how other wealthy dictators / tyrants live in fancy places and have their names on everything and he wants that also. Plus I think that Stephen Miller and Russell Vought are keeping tRump distracted with busy work while keeping him in a bubble so he has not a clue what they are doing to the people and country. I just listened to him give a speech that is total fiction on the economy and how popular he is. Someone is feeding him those numbers and as he only watches Fox anger channel he sees only what his handlers want him to see. Hugs
Hell, I had a whole comment made about this, answering Scottie’s question, and redirecting to my comment. I pushed “Comment,” and WP came back with “could not be published.” sigh. It wasn’t too many words, and it wasn’t anything that oughtn’t be said.
The national security issue is their concern with the inability to change aspects of certain historical buildings in order to assure that one or a few more gunmen can’t go in and start spraying. They shouldn’t use our historical buildings if they need to be that secure. Destroying historical architecture is what, most recently, the Taliban did in Afghanistan after the Northern Alliance was conquered. The purpose, as it has been through history, is to destroy the morale of conquered populace.
As to the overruns I commented on, I’d like to see the new ballroom and these demos/renovations run up the flagpole alongside of the Reserve building’s costs, and see how Republicans are spending our money.
It’s not as short and sweet as my previous, but it covers everything.
Hi Ali. Thank you for both this and the other comment you were referring to. I agree with the idea of looking out for firearms angles … but what about the fact that Israeli Mossad went all around DC putting up cell phone capture devices when it became open knowledge that tRump refused to give up his personal phone for a government secured one! How many other countries did that we will never know but the fact is our “Allie” Israel was doing this …???
As you write about the destruction of the US buildings I do remember the Buddhist statues that the Taliban destroyed that couldn’t be replaces. All for a misguided religious reason. Also it hides the rest you said about republicans misspending.
Ali not matter how long or short your comments I love them all. I might understand or misunderstand, but we talk it out and I learn stuff. I hope you are well. I started making supper and Ron came in and said I need to go sit down and rest he would make supper. OK that was new but I like it. I am exhausted again at 6:20 pm! I need to take my pain medication but if I do, I will soon go right out. Hugs
Seems as if they’re looking at the wrong official as to cost overruns on building maintenance and upkeep.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Hi Ali. I can’t see how this is a national security matter? Do you? I think it is that tRump wants his own city, with his stamp and brand, that has the people / look he likes. He saw how other wealthy dictators / tyrants live in fancy places and have their names on everything and he wants that also. Plus I think that Stephen Miller and Russell Vought are keeping tRump distracted with busy work while keeping him in a bubble so he has not a clue what they are doing to the people and country. I just listened to him give a speech that is total fiction on the economy and how popular he is. Someone is feeding him those numbers and as he only watches Fox anger channel he sees only what his handlers want him to see. Hugs
LikeLike
Hell, I had a whole comment made about this, answering Scottie’s question, and redirecting to my comment. I pushed “Comment,” and WP came back with “could not be published.” sigh. It wasn’t too many words, and it wasn’t anything that oughtn’t be said.
The national security issue is their concern with the inability to change aspects of certain historical buildings in order to assure that one or a few more gunmen can’t go in and start spraying. They shouldn’t use our historical buildings if they need to be that secure. Destroying historical architecture is what, most recently, the Taliban did in Afghanistan after the Northern Alliance was conquered. The purpose, as it has been through history, is to destroy the morale of conquered populace.
As to the overruns I commented on, I’d like to see the new ballroom and these demos/renovations run up the flagpole alongside of the Reserve building’s costs, and see how Republicans are spending our money.
It’s not as short and sweet as my previous, but it covers everything.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Hi Ali. Thank you for both this and the other comment you were referring to. I agree with the idea of looking out for firearms angles … but what about the fact that Israeli Mossad went all around DC putting up cell phone capture devices when it became open knowledge that tRump refused to give up his personal phone for a government secured one! How many other countries did that we will never know but the fact is our “Allie” Israel was doing this …???
As you write about the destruction of the US buildings I do remember the Buddhist statues that the Taliban destroyed that couldn’t be replaces. All for a misguided religious reason. Also it hides the rest you said about republicans misspending.
Ali not matter how long or short your comments I love them all. I might understand or misunderstand, but we talk it out and I learn stuff. I hope you are well. I started making supper and Ron came in and said I need to go sit down and rest he would make supper. OK that was new but I like it. I am exhausted again at 6:20 pm! I need to take my pain medication but if I do, I will soon go right out. Hugs
LikeLiked by 1 person