Sigh. I Think We Saw This Coming, But Here It Is:

Transgender women athletes banned from female Olympic events by new IOC policy

By  GRAHAM DUNBARUpdated 2:25 PM CDT, March 26, 2026

GENEVA (AP) — Transgender women athletes are now excluded from women’s events at the Olympics after the IOC agreed to a new eligibility policy on Thursday which aligns with U.S. President Donald Trump’s executive order on sports ahead of the 2028 Los Angeles Games.

“Eligibility for any female category event at the Olympic Games or any other IOC event, including individual and team sports, is now limited to biological females,” the International Olympic Committee said, to be determined by a mandatory gene test once in an athlete’s career.

It is unclear how many, if any, transgender women are competing at an Olympic level. No woman who transitioned from being born male competed at the 2024 Paris Summer Games, though weightlifter Laurel Hubbard did at the Tokyo Olympics in 2021 without winning a medal.

The eligibility policy that will apply from the L.A. Olympics in July 2028 “protects fairness, safety and integrity in the female category,” the IOC said.

“It is not retroactive and does not apply to any grassroots or recreational sports programs,” said the IOC, whose Olympic Charter states that access to play sport is a human right.

After an executive board meeting, the IOC published a 10-page policy document that also restricts female athletes such as two-time Olympic champion runner Caster Semenya with medical conditions known as differences in sex development, or DSD.

“We know that this topic is sensitive,” IOC President Kirsty Coventry said in an online news conference to explain the policy.

Coventry and the IOC have wanted a clear policy instead of continuing to advise sports’ governing bodies who previously have drafted their own rules.

“At the Olympic Games, even the smallest margins can be the difference between victory and defeat,” Coventry, a two-time Olympic gold medalist in swimming, said in a statement. “So, it is absolutely clear that it would not be fair for biological males to compete in the female category.”

She set up a review of “protecting the female category” as one of her first big decisions last June as the first woman to lead the Olympic body in its 132-year history.

Female eligibility was a strong theme in a seven-candidate IOC election last year — held after a furor around women’s boxing in Paris — when Coventry’s main rivals pledged a stronger policy to leading on the issue.

“This was a priority for me way before President Trump came into his second term,” Coventry said. “There’s not been any pressure (on) us to deliver anything from anybody outside of the Olympic Movement.”

Before the 2024 Paris Olympics, three top-tier sports — track and field, swimming and cycling — excluded transgender women who had been through male puberty. Semenya, who was assigned female at birth in South Africa and has testosterone levels higher than the typical female range, won a European Court of Human Rights judgment in her years-long legal challenge to track and field’s rules which did not overturn them. (snip-there is more, sort of pleading for understanding, but go see the rest of it if you like)

The expert group agreed the current gene test is “the most accurate and least intrusive method currently available.” The saliva, cheek swab or blood sample screens for “the SRY gene, a segment of DNA typically found on the Y chromosome that initiates male sex development in utero and indicates the presence of testes/testicles.”

Still, the mandatory gender screening — already conducted by the governing bodies of track and field, skiing and boxing — is likely to be criticized by human rights experts and activist groups.

Athlete appeal to CAS?

The IOC policy can — and likely will — be challenged at the Court of Arbitration for Sport in the Olympic body’s Swiss home city Lausanne, perhaps by an athlete acting alone.

Track athletes Dutee Chand of India and Semenya challenged previous versions of their sport’s eligibility rules at the court.

Any potential appeal would examine science underpinning IOC research which was not published Thursday. A case could occupy much of the near-28 months until the L.A. Olympics open.

“As we know in today’s world,” Coventry said, “any and all rules and regulations at any point in time could always be challenged.” (snip)

The White House welcomed the IOC’s decision, describing it as the result of the executive order.

“The IOC aligning their policy with President Trump’s executive order ahead of the 2028 LA Games is common sense and long overdue,” White House spokesman Davis Ingle said in a statement.

6 thoughts on “Sigh. I Think We Saw This Coming, But Here It Is:

  1. I confess to having sort of mixed feelings about this, mostly though being tapping on 75 years of age, and trying to catch up with all the changes in gender identities which were bound to come about in the post WWII era (it shook up more that just ‘collateral’ damage). And the flurry of arguments in which only misogynist males are benefitting from the division.
    Compromise I ask?
    It would seem that a leaf could be taken out of Paralympics Book ,where degrees of disabilities are taken into account in the various events.
    Thus ‘Degrees of Gender?’ .

    Just a thought.

    Roger

    Like

  2. I confess to having sort of mixed feelings about this, mostly though being tapping on 75 years of age, and trying to catch up with all the changes in gender identities which were bound to come about in the post WWII era (it shook up more that just ‘collateral’ damage). And the flurry of arguments in which only misogynist males are benefitting from the division.
    Compromise I ask?
    It would seem that a leaf could be taken out of Paralympics Book ,where degrees of disabilities are taken into account in the various events.
    Thus ‘Degrees of Gender?’ .

    Just a thought.

    Roger

    Liked by 1 person

    1. Oh, I can’t begin to keep up with terminology to avoid being exclusive. I use a lot of “they” if I haven’t been told; similar to how, when I was young, all adults were “Miss, Mrs.,” or “Mr.” (later “Ms.,) until I was invited by the person to call them their first names, or advise me they are “Dr.” or something. I do my best. Sometimes something stupid comes out, of course.

      As to a solution, I don’t know. IOC’s statement covers the entire world, so everyone should input ways to work with including everyone. I think, (other than making peace with the DNA testing of only women, which still strikes me as misongynist,) your Degree of Gender idea is good, like height or weight categories in some sports, or the Paralympics Book, as you said. Thanks!

      Liked by 1 person

      1. Hi Ali.
        Like any issue which draws a great deal of attention and strong feelings; things get complicated and folk who shouldn’t be end up in conflict with each other.
        I’m going to go back to a basic which is the one that troubles me.
        Those who espouse Male Dominance will be the only ones who truly benefit from this dispute between basically Feminism and basically LGBT+. They are more than content to be seen to taking the side of a section of Feminism and build it into their structures; just so long as any influence the women recruited have is minimal.
        The more astute of this male grouping will be playing on the inherent concern of Women who see any change in their boundaries as a danger. This, as troubling as it seem would be based on fear of subjugation, which is a common trigger through Human societies and groupings and one which is always open to being used by those with other agenda.
        Hence the conflict saddens me.

        Raising another issue to do with Women’s sports.
        Why do women athletes feel the need to wear two piece uniforms?
        Put that into a Internet search and you get quite divergent answers.

        Take care Ali.
        And keep up the good work.

        Roger

        Liked by 1 person

        1. Thank you, Roger! Doing what I can., taking care and helping Scottie here.

          I cannot answer about the uniforms. I don’t know how it is in the rest of the world, but even 20-30 years ago, women’s styles in the office and professionally diverged far from how people my age expected people to dress at work. I understood part of it to be that women are entitled to feel safe and be judged on their abilities and not their appearance and attire, and I admired their confidence. But, sheesh, sometimes, In a courtroom, for instance, where the men are constrained to wear ties and suits (and I and women my age+ also wore suits with blouses to the neckline,) closed-toe shoes, and leg covering (socks,) there were young women dressed for a summer outing. They were still treated respectfully, and judged on their abilities, but it seemed not fair (sometimes the AC in the courtroom pooped out, as one example.) And I worried it could damage progress, so I was an old woman at 38-40!
          I’m curious now, so might search that if I get some time today. I’m doing some at home No Kings observances today, and Ollie must be paid attention! 🙂

          Liked by 1 person

          1. Hi Ali.
            Firstly… How did the No Kings events go in your ‘neck of the woods’?🙂

            On the sports event dress? I’ve read arguments on the sides of ‘improving performance’ which seem to make sense. There again back in 2021 the Women’s Norwegian Beachball team wore shorts instead of bikini bottoms (and got fined- the disappointment of the male expectation knows no limits of ridiculousness?).
            https://www.bbc.co.uk/sport/handball/57890430

            Best wishes
            Roger 🙏

            Like

Leave a reply to ali redford Cancel reply