SCOTUS Rules To Protect Cops From Miranda Violations

CNN reports:

The Supreme Court limited the ability to enforce Miranda rights in a ruling Thursday that said that suspects who are not warned about their right to remain silent cannot sue a police officer for damages under federal civil rights law even if the evidence was ultimately used against them in their criminal trial.

The court’s ruling will cut back on an individual’s protections against self-incrimination by barring the potential to obtain damages.

It also means that the failure to administer the warning will not expose a law enforcement officer to potential damages in a civil lawsuit. It will not impact, however, the exclusion of such evidence at a criminal trial.

Read the full article.

https://twitter.com/keithboykin/status/1539978970313146368?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw%7Ctwcamp%5Etweetembed%7Ctwterm%5E1539978970313146368%7Ctwgr%5E%7Ctwcon%5Es1_c10&ref_url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.joemygod.com%2F2022%2F06%2Fscotus-rules-to-protect-cops-from-miranda-violations%2F

 

TexasBoy • 20 hours ago

The GOP appointees, taking us closer and closer to a Christian police state.

teeveedub TexasBoy • 20 hours ago

You beat me to it. I was just about to post virtually the same thing. This is no longer the democracy that I grew up in.

2patricius2 TexasBoy • 18 hours ago

I wonder. Does this mean if Thomas is hauled away in handcuffs he can’t use the argument that no one read him his rights?

Rex • 20 hours ago

The Supreme Court is no longer protecting the Citizens of the United States, they’re protecting a political party.

S_E_P Rex • 20 hours ago

AND enabling an authoritarian state

(((GC))) – End the filibuster! Rex • 20 hours ago

It’s no accident that even before Gorsuch & co., Roy Zimmermann sang about “the Supreme Court Republicans Of The United States: SCROTUS”!

margaretpoa • 20 hours ago

SCOTUS is hyperpartisan and lacks all independence and legitimacy. Congratulations, Justice Roberts. You’ve presided over the demise of the supreme court and the independent judiciary.

(((GC))) – End the filibuster! margaretpoa • 20 hours ago

Five of nine justices were appointed by presidents who lost the popular vote (GWB and Girth, Wind, and Liar [h/t Colbert]). They took office only because the Electoral College — that obsolete “compromise” to keep Southern states in the Union and (with the 3/5 rule) have enslaved people artificially amplify their oppressors’ voting power — distorted our votes.

So yes, the current Supreme Court is illegitimate.

(((GC))) – End the filibuster! • 20 hours ago • edited

And it’s the right wing who complain about “activist judges” and “unelected black-robed tyrants”…

Friendly reminder: a majority of current justices were nominated by second-place, popular-vote-losing presidents (GWB & TFG). As such, the Supreme Court does not reflect the will of the people, but rather minority rule.

As Mehdi Hasan [edit] and many others say, it’s time to enlarge, rebalance, and UNpack the Court!

NY Gov Blasts “Shocking” SCOTUS Ruling On Guns

The right to have a gun without being in a militia or military was a new right created by gun lover Anton Scalia and even he said there were some limits.     That is the meaning of activist judges, he loved guns and played with guns and wanted guns freely taken everywhere.   But now  the SCOTUS are removing any restrictions based on a mythical romanticized verson of what the US was and founded to be.  The fact is for all of US history guns were very tightly controlled, they were not just carried by everyone everywhere.   It was not that way.   Those myths of the wild west of gun touting people shooting everywhere and people like the rifle man solving all the problem is not real and is a stupid fantasy.  The SCOTUS is an ideology driven group that is going to cause the entire country to crash and burn.   All to push a religious ideology.   Scary.   Hugs

Spectrum News has the transcript:

Does everyone understand what a concealed weapon means? That you have no forewarning. That someone can hide a weapon on them and go into our subways, go into our grocery stores, like stores up in Buffalo, New York, where I’m from. Go into a school in Parkland or Uvalde, This could place millions of New Yorkers in harm’s way.

As governor of the state of New York, my number one priority is to keep New Yorkers safe, but today the Supreme Court is sending us backwards in our efforts to protect families and prevent gun violence.

And it’s particularly painful that this came down at this moment, when we are still dealing with families in pain from mass shootings that have occurred, the loss of life, their beloved children and grandchildren.

I’m prepared to call the Legislature back into session to deal with this. We’ve been in contact with leadership — we’re just looking at dates — but I will say, we are not powerless in this situation.

We’re not going to cede our rights that easily, despite the best efforts of the politicized Supreme Court of the United States of America.

This decision isn’t just reckless, it’s reprehensible. It’s not what New Yorkers want, and we should have the right of determination of what we want to do in terms of our gun laws in our state.

 

KaneHau TexasBoy • 3 hours ago

That way they can force women to get pregnant and have the baby at gun point.

La’Kietha TexasBoy • 2 hours ago

and they announced this decision right after they asked for and got beefed up security for Supreme Court justices

Is It Last Call for Lauren Boebert’s Gun Restaurant?

https://www.thedailybeast.com/is-it-last-call-for-lauren-boeberts-gun-restaurant?ref=home

The Colorado GOP congresswoman ascended into the political spotlight partially because of her gun-themed restaurant. It may now be closing its doors soon.

EXCLUSIVE

Photo Illustration by Luis G. Rendon/The Daily Beast/Getty/Google/Facebook

 

 

The institution at the center of Rep. Lauren Boebert’s origin story now appears to face an uncertain future.

Shooters Grill, the gun-themed Hooters parody restaurant that put Rifle, Colorado, on the map and elevated Boebert to local celebrity status, has run into some trouble with its new landlord—a marijuana retailer.

But her landlord isn’t all that new. And the story, which has gone through several iterations over the last week, isn’t exactly adding up.

 

As it stands, the landlord has told Boebert he will revoke the restaurant’s lease at the end of August, and send Shooters packing. The rest is up in the air.

Boebert told The Daily Beast that she and her husband, Jayson Boebert, had been surprised to receive the notice last week announcing that their lease would not be renewed. The building’s ownership changed hands last month, she said, and now Shooters would either have to find new digs or shut down for good.

But the day after that notice arrived, an anti-Boebert political group somehow got word that the timeline was even tighter than that—two weeks, the group said, putting the possible ouster just days before Republicans hit the polls for primary day.

Her employees hadn’t heard that yet, so Boebert scrambled to quash that rumor, which she characterized to The Daily Beast as rank misinformation. Still, the truth stood: The restaurant she and her husband founded eight years ago was on the brink of closing.

She didn’t explain exactly why her business was being kicked out. A person familiar with the arrangement said the property manager felt he had a “moral” imperative to close the business, and had planned to lease the space to another restaurant.

Boebert told The Daily Beast at one point that she and her husband were “at peace” with ending their run, and did not plan to fight the order. But as the plot thickened politically, she bought some time.

Now she says she’s entertaining two contradictory options: The original shutdown plan, or buying the building outright from the new owners. She won’t say which she and her husband are choosing until after the primary.

Shooters was central to Boebert’s rocketship ascent to federal office, but it hasn’t been a financial success. The restaurant turned in a streak of six-figure annual losses leading up to Boebert’s 2020 election, and struggled to stay above water even after she shot to fame as a MAGA darling. She said it had been a lot of work balancing the stress and drama of running a restaurant against her legislative duties 1,800 miles away, and she often found herself turning to her mom to pick up the slack. That struggle is partially why she at first saw the closure as a blessing.

Jayson Boebert also appears to have had his hands full. Between 2019 and 2020, as Shooters was losing money, he pulled in nearly $1 million as a contracted shift worker for oil and gas outfit Terra Energy—though Lauren Boebert appears to have reported the wrong source of that income on her federal financial disclosures.

Today, however, the Shooters website is down. The last time it appears active in an archive search was December 2021.

A buyout would appear unusual—and not only because the Boeberts had apparently decided less than a week ago that they would wind down the business—but also because the new owners bought the building less than a month ago. If they chose to sell, it would be a near-instant flip—morally and financially.

But they’re not exactly new owners. In fact, it’s the same family.

The company that took over the Shooters building, Milkin Enterprises, was formed days before the purchase, according to Colorado business records. And the two men on the Milkin Enterprises incorporation documents—Mike Miller and Dan Meskin—run a cannabis dispensary, Rifle Remedies, which until 2019 shared a street address with Shooters, according to state filings.

Boebert told The Daily Beast that Shooters had cut its previous rent checks to Dan Meskin’s father—Mike Meskin, who owned the building through Meskin Enterprises. She didn’t remark on Dan, who was named in a local Post Independent story from 2016 as the building’s property manager.

It’s not clear what morality the new owners are acting on. County records indicate the father-son deed transfer went through on May 26, two days after the Robb Elementary School massacre in Uvalde, Texas. That same day, Boebert remarked that after the 9/11 terrorist attacks, “We didn’t ban planes.”

Just days after Boebert first grabbed the national political spotlight for confronting Beto O’Rourke on gun control in Aurora, Colorado—site of a movie theater massacre—the Rifle Remedies storefront changed its address from the Shooters building, according to state business records.

Neither Dan nor Mike Meskin appear to have made any political contributions. While Dan Meskin’s wife is not a big donor—about $225 total lifetime contributions—she made a few small-dollar gifts to Democrats trying to defeat Boebert in 2020 and last year. The two other Meskins don’t appear to have made any political donations.

It’s unclear why Boebert would appear unfamiliar with the “new” owners, as she suggested in phone calls. It’s also unclear why those owners wouldn’t have been familiar with Boebert, who claimed to have “first option to buy” the building—an option that Mike Meskin, and possibly his son Dan, would have given her personally.

Boebert, who repeatedly dismissed the possibility of a political motive behind the ouster, did not say whether she was offered that option to buy. But she told The Daily Beast that Milkin Enterprises now appeared open to a sale.

“He said, ‘If you’re still interested in purchasing, I’m interested in selling,’” she told The Daily Beast.

But Shooters—whose gun-packing waitresses attracted international attention as a roadside novelty long before Boebert stepped into the political arena—has never lived high off the hog.

The restaurant lost more than $600,000 in total between 2018 and 2020, according to Boebert’s financial disclosures, and it appears to have struggled with annual tax obligations, incurring a number of liens totaling nearly $20,000, the Denver Post reported.

A series of articles in 2014 boosted the novelty restaurant’s profile, turning it into something of a “tourist trap,” as one former employee described it to The Daily Beast. Shooters has marketed itself as a Second Amendment-positive business, where waitresses open-carry loaded firearms on their hips and serve up menu items like a “Swiss and Wesson” sandwich.

“The customers love that they can come here and express their rights,” Boebert said in a 2014 CBC interview. “We called it ‘Shooters’ and started throwing guns and Jesus all over the place.”

Some of those waitresses, however, were too young to carry—and a rare few chose not to, one former worker told The Daily Beast. One of them appears to have been on probation for a year in which she worked at the restaurant, and would have been prohibited from carrying a firearm.

This former employee said that, unlike some other servers, she wouldn’t pack a loaded gun at work, and soon stopped carrying altogether.

“I was tired of getting maple syrup on my Glock, running my gun into the corner of the bartop,” she explained.

The Boeberts never seemed able to keep a steady grip, the employee said, though they certainly would put in the work, with Lauren Boebert sometimes even pulling shifts as a cook.

And it was the Shooters cooking—though not Boebert’s—which caught bad press in 2017, when the restaurant’s pork sliders caused mass diarrhea at the Rifle Rodeo.

“I did not eat that day, because I saw who was cooking and I knew better,” a former employee told The Daily Beast.

“There were Mexicans back in the kitchen, and if they were cooking, I would eat. But not this cook,” she said, adding that the cook responsible for the food poisoning would often “scratch his balls” on the job and routinely “drop food on the floor.”

(The Daily Beast could not independently substantiate these claims.)

Boebert’s elevation to household name, along with her aggressive publicity operation, appear to have helped buoy the business over the last two years. While not exactly swimming in cash, Shooters is now at least above water.

Asked about those finances, the first-term congresswoman told The Daily Beast that the grill is “not in the red,” and made its June rent.

“Does a restaurant ever turn a profit?” Boebert joked. “No, we’re doing fine. We’re not in the red, we’re—we’re in the black, so it’s a lot better than last year.”

Perhaps conveniently, though, the Boeberts have tabled the family decision until after the primary.

“I had a conversation with my husband and we decided that after the election, we would get together and talk about maybe purchasing the building,” she said.

“That’s in six days,” she added.

 

Donald Trump SECRET RECORDING with Georgia Secretary of State EXPOSED in FULL

This is astounding.  Incredible.   I know people hard of hearing will struggle with this, and when tRump talks he is very loud compared to the other people and I had to keep adjusting the volume, but my dogs that love gravy this is a must listen to by everyone!   tRump starts out very cordial listing all the ways he won, how the system was against him but how he won every state, how he had all these reports that were true (even when told they were not true he claimed they were verified true) he pulled repeated numbers out of his ass and kept just claiming everyone knew he won and everyone was angry these states had not given him the win.   Then when after a while the State of Georgia people try to politely push back telling tRump his numbers are not true, he gets ugly and threatening.   Plus he goes on a total rant about Ruby Freeman and her daughter claiming this old lady was a well-known political activist who repeatedly sabotaged Republicans and that Secretary of State Brad Raffensperger knew this and let her get away with it, and he maybe even helped her.    The call was entirely tRump being tRump.  Totally delusional, totally unable to accept anything he did not say as even been said, he is the complete authority and if you don’t agree you are wrong.   This is worth listening to even if you have trouble hearing.   This is the cult leader of the Republican party and the right wing.  This was almost the king of the US.   This is the guy that all the armed militias came to the capital to put in office against the votes of the people.   This is the guy who has inspired an army of Trumpism politicians and most scary inspired ones like DeathSantis who will be way worse and way smarter and will not leave office if he gets elected president.   Hugs

Just re-released by the January 6th committee, hear the full, unedited recording between former President Donald Trump and Georgia Secretary of State Brad Raffensperger. There are more than 11,780 reasons to listen to this. 

BREAKING: Texas Paul REACTS to New DOJ Subpoenas Targeting Trump Fake Electors Scheme

Texas Paul REACTS to GOP BANNING Gay Republican Group from Republican Events

Homophobic Preacher Calls For Execution Of Gay People!

Mounds of plastic waste appear off Guatemala’s shores

Top Republican goes full PANIC when asked devastating question

The science says let transgender women play women’s sport

https://cosmosmagazine.com/people/transgender-women-in-sport/

This article was sent to me by Ali.   Thanks for the link.   Hugs

This article on transgender women in sport first appeared in Cosmos Weekly on 6 May 2022. For more stories like this, subscribe to Cosmos Weekly.

Trans women’s bodies have been thrown into the spotlight recently. With a private member’s bill which “seeks to exclude trans girls and trans women from participating in sports” in the Senate being supported by some in government, and fervently denied by others, it’s worth diving into the science behind the issue causing all this furore.

While research in this field is still in its infancy, it’s clearer than some think. Not only do trans women not have advantages over cis women in sport in most cases, but cis women playing sports are overwhelmingly not worried about trans women competing alongside them.

First, let’s start with the science. When a trans woman decides to transition, usually one of the first medical steps they’ll undertake is to go on hormones. These are testosterone blockers (also known as anti-androgen medications) and estrogen, both of which are common medications that can also be prescribed to cis women to treat various ailments.

These hormones have a number of effects on a trans woman’s body – they add and change the way fat is distributed, they lower the levels of red blood cells, and significantly decrease strength, muscle and lean body mass.

“In sports cheating via ‘blood doping’, red blood cells are raised,” wrote Ada Cheung, an endocrinologist from the University of Melbourne, in a Sydney Morning Heraldopinion article. “The opposite occurs in trans women: oxygen-carrying red blood cells drop to female levels. Trans women gain fat mass and lose bone density.

Not only do trans women not have advantages over cis women in sport in most cases, but cis women playing sports are overwhelmingly not worried about trans women competing alongside them.

“Further research is coming. My research group at the University of Melbourne, in collaboration with the Institute for Health and Sport at Victoria University, have started the GAME research study examining how feminizing hormones impact fitness, endurance, physique and gene changes in muscle over time in comparison groups.”

Although hormones will change many facets of a trans woman’s body if they transition as an adult, it won’t change someone’s height; and one study, published in the British Journal of Sports Medicine, suggested that despite strength and muscle decreasing, they may still have a small advantage over the average cis women.

This is where the controversy comes from. Is it “fair” for someone who went through male puberty to be able to play at the elite level with women? Despite the recent coverage, this is not a particularly new issue. In elite sports, many sporting bodies already have codes in place that allow trans women to play if their testosterone level is below 5–10 nanomoles per litre for a number of months.

But in almost all sports, height or a slight strength advantage are not what gives you the leg-up over competitors. The AFL has called the ideas that trans women will “dominate” on the field, or cause a safety concern to their cis teammates, as “myths”.

“Sporting ability is more than just hormones,” they write in their Gender Diversity Policy. “Like other players, gender diverse players are all individuals and may have a range of physical abilities, fitness, skill levels and different strengths and weaknesses in the multi-skilled game of Australian football.

“For example, a cisgender or transgender woman may be taller and/or stronger than other women competitors but may also be slower and/or less agile.”

The results at the Olympics and other major sporting events back this up. For the very few trans women who have competed in sport at the elite level, there’s been no domination over cis women. Trans women may occasionally win, but they have never broken a world record, or won an Olympic event. If anything, trans women seem very much on an even playing field with their cis counterparts.

It’s also worth pointing out that the cohort of trans girls who transitioned before going through male puberty is only going to increase as more transgender people are able to transition earlier. For example, in 2017 in Australia, a law was overturned in the courts that had required all under 18 trans youth to go to court to be able to access puberty blockers or hormones from their doctor. Although there’s still a long way to go, increased access to gender affirming care for kids means that the issue itself is very likely to get smaller over time.

This idea that trans women are naturally better at sport than cis women comes back to the impression that men have an innate advantage over women in every sport, which is not true either. Although we’ve mentioned that men are on average taller and stronger than women, at very long distances in ultra-running, research has shown that women start to outcompete men. This seems to be because women are metabolically better suited for endurance. Then there’s sports like figure skating, which became segregated in 1905 after British woman Madge Syers entered what had previously been an all-male World Championships and won silver.

Transgender trans women sport
Madge Syers, British figure skater. Olympic Games, London 1908. Credit: ullstein bild Dtl / Getty

But in the debate on the inclusion of transgender women in sports, we are not just talking about elite sport – this also includes community and children’s sports, both which involve a different range of issues. 

The vast majority of sports are played by those who are kids and teenagers, and the highest percentage of people who identify as transgender are people under the age of 18. It’s important to acknowledge that trans women in sport includes trans girls who have never gone through male puberty – and who could benefit from the health and mental wellbeing benefits of sport the most. Unfortunately, the data shows that LGBTQ+ people are under-represented playing sports.

“Sport is a very valuable tool to be used to help boost LGBT kids’ self-esteem and self-worth,” says Erik Denison, the lead researcher at the Sport Inclusion Project at Monash University.

“Everything we know from the Centres for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), in the US, is that if kids play sport, they’re about half as likely to have attempted suicide in the last year.”

Many community women’s clubs do not have testosterone guidelines and welcome anyone who identifies as a woman. On top of that, research surveys done by Denison have also shown that the majority of women sporting players do not see playing against a trans competitor as an issue.

In his research across six sports and 12 community clubs at Monash University, less than a quarter (24%) of women believed “trans women have an unfair advantage when they play on a female sport team”. Interestingly, when men were asked the same question, that percentage almost doubled (46%). This is similar to other research findings around the world.

Denison understands this. When he first began work in this field, he also assumed that trans women would have an unfair advantage. The research has changed his understanding, but it’s worth noting exactly why this difference exists.

“For [men] playing sport, the number one reason is about competition and winning,” he says. “I’ve never done research where the first thing a guy says is that they like their sport because it’s inclusive or welcoming or friendly,” he says.

“Whereas just about the first thing every woman that I’ve ever interviewed says when you ask them, ‘Why do you like your sport?’ is, ‘Oh, it’s great to meet friends, it’s inclusive, it’s a very friendly club’.”

Transgender trans women sport
Transgender, non-binary athlete Quinn with team Canada after winning Olympic gold during the Women’s Football match between Canada and Sweden, Tokyo 2021. Credit: Naomi Baker / Getty

This echoes my own experience playing in a women’s AFL team with trans women playing alongside us. And this inclusive, welcoming aspect goes back all the way to when women’s sports were just beginning to rise in popularity in Australia.

“There are lots of examples where women created their own associations, leagues and competitions because if they didn’t, they simply would not have had the opportunity to play,” explains Kirby Fenwick, co-founder of Siren: A Women in Sport Collective and an expert in the history of women’s sport.

“Men have long dominated sport in Australia and too often resisted creating space or opportunity for women. “Embedded in the fabric of women’s sport is a foundation of community and inclusivity – a desire to bring people in, not look for ways to keep them out.”