So About Meta

Personally, I don’t think it’s surrender on the part of Meta, nor any of the other media moguls. It’s all of one piece-they’re all in it together with the new 47th president. I’ve read this from others, too, both last night and this morning. We the people are not part of the club. Anyway, here is this.

Meta surrenders to the right on speech

โ€œI really think this a precursor for genocide,โ€ a former employee tells Platformer

Casey Newton

Jan 7, 2025ย โ€”ย 12 min read

Snippet:

I. The past

Donald Trumpโ€™s surprising victory in the 2016 US presidential election sparked a backlash against tech platforms in general and against Meta in particular. The company then known as Facebook was battered by revelations that its network dramatically amplified the reach of false stories about Trump and his opponent, Hillary Clinton, and was used as part of a successful effort by Russia to sow division in US politics and tilt the election in favor of Trump.

Chastened by the criticism, Meta set out to shore up its defenses. It hired 40,000 content moderators around the world, invested heavily in building new technology to analyze content for potential harms and flag it for review, and became the worldโ€™s leading funder of third-party fact-checking organizations. It spent $280 million to create an independent Oversight Board to adjudicate the most difficult questions about online speech. It disrupted dozens of networks of state-sponsored trolls who sought to use Facebook, Instagram, and WhatsApp to spread propaganda and attack dissenters.

CEO Mark Zuckerberg had expected that these moves would generate goodwill for the company, particularly among the Democrats who would retake power after Trump lost in 2020. Instead, he found that disdain for the company remained strongly bipartisan. Republicans scorned him for policies that disproportionately punished the right, who post more misinformation and hate speech than the left does. Democrats blamed him for the countryโ€™s increasingly polarized politics and decaying democracy. And all sides pilloried him for the harms that his apps cause in children โ€” an issue that 42 state attorneys general are now suing him over.

Last summer, the threats against Zuckerberg turned newly personal. In 2020, Zuckerberg and his wife had donated $419.5 million to fund nonpartisan election infrastructure projects. (Another effort that had seemingly generated no goodwill for him or Meta whatsoever.) All that the money had done was to help people vote safely during the pandemic. But Republicans twisted Zuckerbergโ€™s donation into a scandal; Trump โ€” who lost the election handily but insisted it had been stolen from him โ€” accused Zuckerberg of plotting against him. 

โ€œWe are watching him closely,โ€ Trump wrote in a coffee-table book published ahead of the 2024 election, โ€œand if he does anything illegal this time he will spend the rest of his life in prison.โ€

By the end of 2024, Zuckerberg had given up on finding any middle path through the polarized and opposite criticisms leveled against him by Republicans and Democrats. His rival Elon Musk had spent the past year showing how Republican party support can be bought โ€” cheaply. 

In business and in life, Zuckerbergโ€™s motivation has only ever been to win. And a doddering, transactional Trump presented Meta with a rare opportunity for a fresh start.

All they would have to do is whatever Trump wanted them to do.

II. The announcements

On Tuesday, Meta announced the most significant changes to its content moderation policies since the aftermath of the 2016 election. The changes include:

  • Ending its fact-checking program, which funds third-party organizations to check the claims in viral Facebook and Instagram posts and downrank them when they are found to contain falsehoods. It will be replaced with a clone ofย Community Notes, X’s volunteer fact-checking program.
  • Eliminating restrictions on some forms of speech previously considered harmful, including some criticisms of immigrants, women, and transgender people.
  • Re-calibrating automated content moderation systems to prioritize only high-severity violations of content policy, such as those involving drugs and terrorism, and reviewing lower-severity violations only when reported by users. (This sounds boring but might be the most important change of all, as we’ll get to)
  • Re-introducing discussion of current events, which the company calls “civic content,” into Facebook, Instagram, and Threads.
  • Moving content moderation teams from California to Texas to fight the perception that Meta’s moderation reflects a liberal Californian bias. (Never mind that the company has always had content moderation teams based in Texas, or that it was Zuckerberg and not the moderators who set the company’s policies.)

Zuckerberg announced these changes in an Instagram Reel; Joel Kaplan, a Republican operative and longtime Meta executive who last week replaced Nick Clegg as the company’s president of public policy, discussed the changes in an appearance on “Fox and Friends.” (See transcripts of both here.)

One way to understand these changes is as a marketing exercise, intended to convey a sense of profound change to an audience of one. In this, Meta appears to have succeeded; Trump today called the company’s changes “excellent” and said that the company has “come a long way.” (“Mr. Trump also said Metaโ€™s change was ‘probably’ a result of the threats he had made against the company and Mr. Zuckerberg,” dryly noted the Times’ Mike Isaac and Theodore Schleifer.)

Whether this will be enough to get Trump to end the current antitrust prosecution against Meta, or otherwise advocate for the company in regulatory affairs, remains to be seen. By the cynical calculus of the company’s communications and policy teams, though, one assumes that Trump’s comments inspired a round of high-fives in the company’s Washington, DC offices.

But these changes are likely to substantially increase the amount of harmful speech on Meta’s platforms, according to 10 current and former employees who spoke to Platformer on Tuesday.

Start with the end of Meta’s fact-checking partnerships, which perhaps generated the most headlines of the company’s changes on Tuesday. While the company has been gradually lowering its investment in fact-checking for a couple years now, Meta’s abandonment of the project will have real effects: on the fact-checking organizations for whom Meta was a primary source of revenue, but also in the Facebook and Instagram feeds of which Meta is an increasingly begrudging steward. (snip-MORE. Go read; he left Substack because of the nazis, and made Platformer to get his writing to people. It’s free to read, and you don’t have to subscribe, either.)

Trans Kids Are On The Chopping Block

The thing I like about the video is that she points out how the state claims it must do this to protect kids from the dangerous drugs yet allows their use for straight cis children just not for trans children.ย  The law states it is about making kids accept their birth assigned gender and keeping them from transitioning.ย  ย 

They tried these laws with kids who were gay decades ago and some still fight for it.ย  Force gay kids to accept a heterosexual orientation through conversion methods and then outlaw being homosexual along with erasing anything homosexual from society.ย  It did not work.ย  ย The courts vigorously defended and backed up gay people’s rights to exist as themselves and have full equality of societies benefits as straight people do.ย ย 

Sadly we have much different courts now stacked with bigots and racists by bigots and racist who will push and promote the bigotry.ย  But in the law itself they wrote the bigotry out loud, clear, and easy to see.ย  The republican lawmakers are making it plain this is about erasing trans kids and that will make erasing trans adults much easier.ย  ย I wonder if they will succeed, but I am worried.ย  ย The video is well worth the watch.ย  If you do not wish to watch the video but prefer to read the transcript she provides a link to it in the description box.ย  Many of the podcasters now do.ย  Hugs

The women reliving January 6 while preparing for Trump’s return

Jan 06, 2025 Mariel Padilla Originally published by The 19th

Rep. Becca Balint of Vermont, who was elected to the 118th Congress in 2022, said she was shaped and largely motivated by January 6, 2021 โ€”  the day a mob of President Donald Trumpโ€™s supporters stormed the U.S. Capitol and temporarily halted the certification of the legitimate results of the 2020 election. 

“A lot of the members who ran in the 118th and 119th Congress understood that we were running towards a house on fire and that being honestly democracy itself,” Balint said.

Balint said she vividly remembers January 6, 2021, because it was supposed to be one of the happiest days of her life: She was being sworn in as the first woman to lead the Vermont Senate. When her security team popped into her office to tell her that the U.S. Capitol was under attack, Balint said the footage โ€œshook me to my core.โ€ 

The attack, which the Federal Bureau of Investigation called an act of domestic terrorism, sparked the Department of Justiceโ€™s largest criminal investigation in the countryโ€™s history and led to more than 1,500 people being federally charged. Rioters brought firearms, knives, hatchets, pepper spray, baseball bats, stun guns and explosive devices to fight Capitol Police officers and storm the building where lawmakers were actively voting to certify the 2020 election. Five people died during or soon after the riot, approximately 140 law enforcement officers were injured and $2.9 million worth of damage was done to the Capitol. 

The day after the Capitol riot, Trump referred to the event as a โ€œheinous attackโ€ but has since promised to pardon those who were arrested in connection with the insurrection. Trump himself was indicted on felony charges in 2023 for attempting to overturn the results of the 2020 election โ€”  a criminal case that was dismissed shortly after he won the 2024 presidential election. The president-elect has since started describing January 6 as a โ€œday of love,โ€ as he did on the campaign trail. 

As Congress votes again to certify the results of the 2024 presidential election, the country prepares to welcome back to the Oval Office the same man who denied his loss four years ago and threatened the countryโ€™s tradition of a peaceful transfer of power. 

โ€œIt always sends a shiver down my spine when I hear people say โ€˜Americans donโ€™t care about January 6 anymore โ€” move on,โ€™โ€ Balint said. โ€œIโ€™m not moving on. It was a dark day in our history, and Iโ€™m not moving on.โ€ 

The 19th reached out to every woman in Congress โ€” just as it did in 2021 and 2022 โ€” to collect reflections on how January 6 continues to impact them and the country. Seventeen Democratic congresswomen and one senator responded and talked about their remaining trauma, their concern about the normalization of violence and their strong sense of duty to combat any efforts to whitewash that day.


โ€˜Thereโ€™s a record of this.โ€™ 

Hereโ€™s what they said about how the spread of misinformation and disinformation surrounding that day has downplayed the severity of violence and the gravity of what was almost destroyed.

Rep. Suzanne Bonamici of Oregon: I still have seared in my memory the images of Capitol Police officers and other people being beaten. People lost their lives. โ€ฆ Itโ€™s not like somebody made this up. There are videos. There are pictures. There are statements. Thereโ€™s a record of this. And there were people that were convicted by juries of their peers.

Rep. Deborah Ross of North Carolina: I think the most important thing is to be brutally honest about what happened that day. Many of us were there to witness, and weโ€™re here to testify. We cannot allow Donald Trump and his cronies to deny what needs to be preserved for history. The next generation should know how fragile our democracy is and march forward, clear-eyed and ready to fight.

Balint: My grandfather was killed in the Holocaust and so I was raised in a family in which we were taught to be vigilant when people start eroding rights, upending norms, scapegoating people. When up is down and black is white and we canโ€™t agree on basic facts, that is all an indication that we are headed in a very scary direction as a country.

Rep. LaMonica McIver of New Jersey: I think [Trump] is going to do whatever he can to make January 6 be remembered like itโ€™s July 4. In his mind, I think itโ€™s going to be put in the highest regard and glorify the day as much as he can. And heโ€™s going to have four years to try and get the rest of the country to do the same.

Rep. Chellie Pingree of Maine: I think itโ€™s very troubling that this incoming president could convince people that he either wasnโ€™t responsible or that somehow all that didnโ€™t matter. But sometimes it takes us a while to process big, complicated changes like this. Maybe there will be a time when we can reflect back and say that this was a mistake, that we overlooked it, that it took us time to realize how serious that movement was.

Rep. Jill Tokuda of Hawaii: As we approach January 6 once again, we all have a responsibility to stand up against the normalization of political violence and disinformation. We cannot forget what happened that day and as Americans, it is incumbent on us to reject violence in any form from infecting our politics and our democracy.


โ€˜Deeply, deeply disappointed.โ€™ 

Many of the lawmakers said they are still processing what it means about the state of our country that the same man who incited an insurrection could be re-elected four years later. Several emphasized that those involved in planning, executing or inciting the riot still need to be held accountable before the country can heal and move forward.

Sen. Tammy Duckworth speaks on Capitol Hill on in February 2023, in Washington D.C.
Sen. Tammy Duckworth speaks on Capitol Hill on in February 2023, in Washington D.C. (Jabin Botsford/The Washington Post/Getty Images)

Sen. Tammy Duckworth of Illinois: As deeply, deeply disappointed as I am that that same twice-impeached president who led a coup against our government is headed back to the Oval Office, make no mistake: My Democratic colleagues and I, unlike many Republicans after the 2020 election, will uphold the will of the American people, fulfill our constitutional duty and do our part to ensure a peaceful transfer of power.

Rep. Rosa DeLauro of Connecticut: As Donald Trump returns to the presidency, I feel an even greater responsibility to ensure that we do not let an election outcome diminish the gravity of what happened that day. His re-election does not change the reality of the insurrection or absolve those who incited and participated in it. It does not erase the trauma experienced by Capitol staff and Capitol Police officers who defended our democracy at great personal risk. 

Rep. Gwen Moore of Wisconsin: Donald Trump, a convicted felon and aspiring autocrat, is promising to let loose dangerous rioters into our communities and threatening lawmakers and journalists with imprisonment. Trumpโ€™s lawlessness and thirst for political revenge is why I have repeatedly said he is unfit for office. 

Rep. Lois Frankel of Florida: People have short memories. People are more consumed with their own lives [when they go to the polls]. And Iโ€™m not saying thatโ€™s a bad thing; itโ€™s just an observation. What was probably on peopleโ€™s minds? Their bank account, their rent, price of food, right? 

Rep. Joyce Beatty of Ohio: We learned a lot of lessons through this last election. The American people know what they want to hear, whether itโ€™s true or not. 

Rep. Judy Chu of California: No matter what happens during Trumpโ€™s second term, the events of January 6, 2021, will forever be his legacy. He refused to concede or even acknowledge that there was a free and fair election in 2020, and he is still pressuring the Justice Department and intends to continue to pressure the Justice Department.

Rep. Ayanna Pressley of Massachusetts: Trumpโ€™s return to the highest office in the land, despite his central role in the insurrection, is a gut punch to anyone who cares about our democracy. But it does not absolve us of our responsibility to pursue accountability and continue telling the story of what happened that day.

Rep. Pramila Jayapal of Washington: I still put the onus on the Republicans in the Senate who refused to convict him. Thatโ€™s something I think about all the time being on the Judiciary Committee. I think our founding fathers assumed that perhaps there would be a dictator as president โ€” thatโ€™s envisioned in the Constitution. But they also assumed that an entire party would not just enter into a cult and follow that dictator. They assumed that there would be enough people on both sides of the aisle willing to do what it takes to preserve democracy, and that is clearly not the case. 


โ€˜I still tremble at the mere mention of the date.โ€™ 

For many of the women, there is lingering trauma. 

Jayapal: It will always be a day that is very, very tough emotionally. I started a gallery group after, a very close support group to process the trauma โ€” itโ€™s something that none of us will ever forget. 

Rep. Frederica Wilson of Florida: I still tremble at the mere mention of the date January 6, a day that is forever tainted with fear, violence and terror. To have lived it is to never ever forget it. America can never fathom what we experienced. It was like playing a role in a horror movie and hoping that it would soon come to an end. 

Rep. Teresa Leger Fernandez of New Mexico: It makes me sick to my stomach that the people who desecrated our democracy will be pardoned and potentially invited back into the Capitol. It makes me incredibly sad to think that there will be Capitol Police โ€” police who were brutalized and beaten by the mob โ€” who will just have to stand there.

Rep. Sara Jacobs of California: Iโ€™ve been very nervous thinking about and leading up to January 6. I still have lingering trauma from the first one. I don’t like big crowds and loud noises. And I just keep thinking that they have no incentive to be violent this time, right? But it still makes me very nervous because we havenโ€™t actually done the sort of reconciliation and hard work and accountability work that we need to do as a country. โ€ฆ I know that peopleโ€™s trust and faith in institutions is a key part of addressing political violence because political violence only happens when people donโ€™t feel like the nonviolent, institutional way of doing things is actually going to create the effect they want. 


Rep. Ann McLane Kuster talks to Capitol Police officer Sgt. Aquilino Gonell after he testified before the House Select Committee investigating the January 6 attack on the Capitol.
Rep. Ann McLane Kuster talks to Capitol Police officer Sgt. Aquilino Gonell after he testified before the House Select Committee investigating the January 6 attack on the Capitol on July 27, 2021, in Washington, D.C.
(Chip Somodevilla/Getty Images)

Rep. Ann McLane Kuster of New Hampshire said she is still dealing with lasting post-traumatic stress disorder from January 6, one the โ€œmost impactful eventsโ€ in her life. Kuster was also one of the last five lawmakers to be evacuated from the House floor. She could hear the thundering crowds and pounding on the doors and experienced a panic attack as officers snuck them into an elevator and rushed them through an underground tunnel to safety. Kuster later saw security footage of insurrectionists with backpacks, bear mace and zip ties entering the same hallway she had just evacuated 30 seconds earlier.

โ€œIโ€™m haunted by the idea that if the police hadnโ€™t pushed back five seconds here, five seconds there, pushing back on the bicycle racks, pushing back on the people who were crushed in the doors โ€” that the five of us would have been kidnapped, murdered or maimed,โ€ Kuster said. โ€œIt was only a five-vote majority and if we hadnโ€™t been there, America might not have woken up to Joe Biden as the lawfully elected president of the United States.โ€ 

Kuster decided to retire this year before Trump is sworn in as the 47th President of the United States and attributes January 6 as one of the reasons for that decision. In addition to the lingering trauma, Kuster said sheโ€™s received more and more death threats and has noticed a marked increase of violent rhetoric in public discourse. 

โ€œHe tried to kill me once,โ€ Kuster said. โ€œIโ€™m not available for it again.โ€

McDonaldโ€™s is the latest company to roll back diversity goals

https://apnews.com/article/mcdonalds-diversity-dei-goals-845d94cd46511341a43e98e057b0fa8e

Please notice the part of the story that talks about Robby Starbuck, if you don’t know of him clicking on his blue highlighted name leads to another story of how he coerced John Deere.ย  McDonald’s claims they are doing this because of the SCOTUS actions on school admissions, but sorry they are not colleges or universities.ย  ย They are a private business and have the right to set their own no discrimination goals and policies.ย  ย By blaming the court ruling they are trying to divert attention from the real reason.ย  ย 

Back to Robby Starbuck, This sub human pond scum is winning because he uses threats of hurting the profit of these companies.ย  ย Now maybe the shareholders are predetermined to be racist bigots.ย  But if we want this coercion to stop, we must be as loud, willing to band together, and use our money even when it hurts.ย  So far only one company has stood against him and Stephen Miller’s white power legal company.ย  ย We must rise up as we once did, make the haters ashamed again like we did over 1970s to 1990s.ย  We can retire meekly to our self-imposed prisons of our homes and acting straight or cis, but that will only encourage them.ย  This is how it went down in Russia and the Russian controlled influenced nations.ย  ย  The maga cultist and fundamentalist Christian bigots are following the Putin playbook in lockstep.ย  We have to show them the playbook won’t work here.ย  ย And trust me it is easier to do now than in a future where they have removed all sign of the LGBTQ+ people from society.ย  ย Hugs

=============================================================

Image

A McDonaldโ€™s restaurant stands in Albany, Ore., April 29, 2024. (AP Photo/Jenny Kane, File)

I Don’t Know About Happy, But Whatever…

Happy Insurrection Day by Clay Jones

Is Trump confused or just lying again? Read on Substack

Tomorrow is the fourth anniversary of Donald Trumpโ€™s white nationalist insurrection, when he called MAGA terrorists to come to Washington, DC on January 6, 2021, to stop the certification of Joe Bidenโ€™s election victory over him.

Trump lost the 2020 election fair and square.

Trump is the first president to refuse a peaceful transfer of power. He refused to cooperate with Bidenโ€™s transition team, a courtesy President Barack Obama extended in 2016 and after Trumpโ€™s victory last November (gag), President Biden extended to him as well. Both Democratic presidents hosted President-Elect (sic) Trump in the White House.

Trump ordered his MAGAts to attempt the insurrection after failing to overturn the election through court challenges, installing fake electors, calling election officials to intimidate them into giving him extra votes that didnโ€™t exist, and even having his goons harass and intimidate election workers.

Trumpโ€™s white nationalist terrorists assaulted at least 174 Capitol Police officers on January 6, 2021, with 15 hospitalized. There was one death from a stroke and four suicides afterward. They also caused over $30 million in damages which Trump should pay for.

Two of the terrorists died from natural causes, one died from a drug overdose, and another, Ashley Babbit, died from a gunshot wound.

Over 1,500 were arrested, including Donald Trump. This nation has forgotten about the insurrection and has returned Trump to the presidency (sic). After January 20, Donald Trump plans to pardon all of the white nationalist terrorists who attacked our nation.

These people were looking to murder Speaker Nancy Pelosi and Vice President Mike Pence. Now, they will be rewarded.

I had a Lyft driver on New Yearโ€™s Eve ask me why I donโ€™t support Donald Trump and I answered, โ€œBecause I love my country.โ€ The elderly white driver (surprise) replied, โ€œDonald Trump does too.โ€ I have a serious inability to tolerate bullshit and I probably got a one-star rating from him after I replied to his response, โ€œDonald Trump does too.โ€ Thankfully, he made his dumbass ignorant comment near the end of the ride, where a guy ambushed me with Jesus pamphlets. I went straight from Trump freak to Jesus freak. I was glad I was getting out of town.

Thatโ€™s our country for you today. Half this nation believes Donald Trump was right to send white nationalist terrorists to attack the Capitol to make him an unelected dictator or they donโ€™t care.

Marjorie Taylor Greene doesnโ€™t just want to ignore January 6, but she wants to make it a national holiday. Hey, weโ€™ll all get a day off. MTG is also concerned that a snowstorm tomorrow will โ€œdisruptโ€ Trumpโ€™s certification. Thatโ€™s rich.

Speaker-hanging-by-a-thread Mike Johnson doesnโ€™t want to investigate January 6 but investigate the investigators. The new Department of Justice under Donald Trump and Pam Bondi will be looking to prosecute people like Rep. Bennie Thompson, who chaired the J6 Committee, and former GOP Rep. Liz Cheney, who co-chaired the committee. The DOJ may also be weaponized against people like Special Counsel Jack Smith, Attorney General Merrick Garland, and even President Joe Biden.

Other Republicans encouraged J6, attempted to dox Speaker Pelosiโ€™s location, gave them pre-insurrection tours, and later called the attackers โ€œprotestersโ€ and โ€œtourists.โ€ Goons gotta goon.

On January 6, some will celebrate. I will encourage you to remember that our incoming president (sic) is a terrorist and a national security threat.

Two days that will make me sick to my stomach this month is tomorrow, January 6, and January 20.

Iโ€™m gonna get drunk.

Creative note: Both of my proofers had disgusted reactions to this cartoon which is exactly what I was going for. Also, I hate layers in Procreate. This cartoon has nearly 40 of them. I would usually just write โ€œpardonโ€ over and over again, but I thought the placement would work better with the layers, but thatโ€™s just as much of a PITA to me as lettering. My layer-loving friend and colleague Phil Hands should be happy.

Drawn in 30 seconds: (go watch!)

Mike Johnson Recited Fake Christian Nationalist Prayer

What a Christian Lie?ย  A stanch hardcore Christian who pushes his religion on everyone else wouldn’t ever make stuff up … would they?ย  ย Hugs.ย ย 

==============================================================

ย 

The Baptist-led siteย Word & Wayย reports:

Mike Johnson of Louisiana was reelected today (Jan. 3) to lead the U.S. House of Representatives. During his acceptance remarks a bit later, he read what he called a prayer from Thomas Jefferson. But Monticello and the Thomas Jefferson Foundation call it a โ€œspurious quotation,โ€ adding itโ€™s unlikely Jefferson actually wrote or delivered it. Johnson has a history of using fake quotes to advance his belief that the U.S. should be a โ€œChristian nation.โ€

โ€œI offered one that is quite familiar to historians and probably many of us,โ€ he said about the prayer, which he noted the program described as one Jefferson recited every day during his presidency and each day afterward until he died.

โ€œI wanted to share it with you here at the end of my remarks not as a prayer per se right now but as really a reminder of what our third president and the primary author of the Declaration of Independence thought was so important that it should be a daily recitation,โ€ Johnson added.

From the official historicalย Monticello site:

We have no evidence that this prayer was written or delivered by Thomas Jefferson. It appears in the 1928 United States Book of Common Prayer, and was first suggested for inclusion in a report published in 1919.

Interestingly, although we can find no evidence that this prayer has a presidential source, it was used by a subsequent president in a public speech. Several months after his 1930 Thanksgiving Day Address as Governor of New York, it was pointed out that Franklin Delano Rooseveltโ€™s speech bore a striking resemblance to the very same prayer discussed above.

Ultimately, it seems unlikely that Jefferson would have composed or delivered a public prayer of this sort. He considered religion a private matter, and when asked to recommend a national day of fasting and prayer, replied, โ€œI consider the government of the US. as interdicted by the constitution from intermedling with religious institutions, their doctrines, discipline, or exercises.โ€

As usual, fake historian David Barton is behind this.

Right Wing Watchย has relentlessly exposed Bartonโ€™s countless lies about about the Founding Fathers, perhaps most notably his claim that the Bill of Rights and Declaration of Independence are taken virtually verbatim from scripture.

Sheeeeesh. Thomas Jefferson, whose “Jefferson Bible” removed all the supernatural happenings and “miracles,” from the text, made it clear that he did not believe in the divinity of Christ. He titled his work “The Life and Morals of Jesus of Nazareth” and made a copy for himself, although he never published it. Mike Johnson, David Barton, and other Christians who try to impose Christian piety on Thomas Jefferson are very much mistaken, or simply lying. Jefferson was a Deist, not a Christian.

ย 

ย 

Nancy Maceโ€™s Capitol Hill Bathroom Ban Missing from House Rules Package

https://www.yahoo.com/news/nancy-mace-capitol-hill-bathroom-174534337.html

Remember that Mace doesn’t believe in her rhetoric, she just wants the media attention.ย  She wants the adoration she thinks that having people paying attention to her gives to her.ย  She is a child desperately acting out to get the adults to pay attention to her.ย  ย She is the child who never accepted she was at fault or mistaken but wants to blame everyone else including those pretend causes in her head alone.ย  She was for trans rights, a big supporter of LGBTQ+ equality and inclusion when she felt it gained her media attention.ย  ย Then when she saw the attention the Libs of TikTok and other haters on social media get, she waited for the opportunity to create enough spectacle for the spotlight to land on her.ย  She tweeted over 500 times in 2 days on the bird site trying to milk the situation for views and clicks, often forgetting to switch to her burner accounts to praise her own stance.ย  But now the drama has died down and no one is looking so she doesn’t care.ย  She has to find the new outrage to pounce on.ย  Maybe she will again throw a fit, and try to get some of the attention she got the first time, but she knows she has to wait, as it would be overwhelmed by current events.ย  No if she still wants it, she will wait until about a couple of months in then claim she couldn’t use a bathroom because it is full of trans women.ย  ย Hugs

———————————————————————————————————

Josh Fiallo
ย 
Nancy Mace crosses her arms.
Evelyn Hockstein / REUTERS
ย 

Nancy Maceโ€™s hopes of banning transgender women from sharing a bathroom with her on Capitol Hill appear dashed for now.

The South Carolina Republicanโ€™s controversial bathroom ban was not included in the GOPโ€™s House rules package unveiled this weekโ€”a surprise omission less than two months after Speaker Mike Johnsonย reportedly assured Maceย it would be included.

The resolution was all the rage in November, with Mace pulling out different theatrics to drum up support for the ban. That included her using a bullhorn to read Miranda rights to sit-in protesters and using anti-transgender slurs to reference them.

Maceย admittedย her ban was to target the newly-elected Rep. Sarah McBride, a transgender Democrat from Delaware. Maceโ€™s office did not respond to questions texted by the Daily Beast on Friday.

Johnson announced on Nov. 20 that โ€œall single-sex facilities in the Capitol and House Office Buildings […] are reserved for individuals of that biological sex.โ€ This suggested he backed Maceโ€™s proposal even if he was not as fervent in his public comments, but it is unclear why the ban didnโ€™t make into the latest rules package.

โ€œWe welcome all new members with open arms who are duly elected representatives of the people,โ€ Johnson said the day prior. โ€œI believe itโ€™s a command that we treat all persons with dignity and respect.โ€

Mace doesnโ€™t appear to have any bad blood over the omission. She posted Friday morning that Johnson still had her vote to remain House Speaker.

โ€œA vote for @SpeakerJohnson is a vote for President Trumpโ€™s America First agenda,โ€ she wrote. โ€œAfter the last few days of chaos weโ€™ve seen in these tumultuous times, we need steady leadership and continuity. We need to stick together and get to work. We donโ€™t have any time to waste.โ€

Rep. Sarah McBride, a Democrat from Delaware, is the first openly transgender member of Congress. / Bill Clark/Getty Images
Rep. Sarah McBride, a Democrat from Delaware, is the first openly transgender member of Congress. / Bill Clark/Getty Images

While McBride was the resolutionโ€™s target, the ban would have applied to any trans person in the Capitol, including staffers and visitors

McBride, the first openly-trans member of Congress, has not commented on the banโ€™s omission. Back in November, she did not try to go toe-to-toe with Mace on the matterโ€”instead asserting that she would follow whatever the House rules were.

โ€œIโ€™m not here to fight about bathrooms,โ€ she wrote in a statement. โ€œI will follow the rules as outlined by Speaker Johnson, even if I disagree with them.โ€

Let’s talk about Trump, Musk, and a well-known historian….

Let’s talk about Trump vs Republican AGs over TikTok….

Some Joe My God headlines of republican right wing feces

The eight tech titans alone gained more than $600 billion this year, 43% of the $1.5 trillion increase among the 500 richest people tracked by the Bloomberg Billionaires Index.

Greenlandโ€™s natural resources are worth many trillions; future drillers and diggers wonโ€™t care that itโ€™s cold and distant. As Alaska proves, where thereโ€™s value, thereโ€™ll be value-extractors

plus, perhaps, a casino or two. Yes, the right kind of development could MGGAโ€”Make Greenland Great Again.