Some The Majority Report clips on ICE and the democrats

The Young GOPer Behind “Alligator Alcatraz” Is the Dark Future of MAGA

https://newrepublic.substack.com/p/the-young-goper-behind-alligator

Responding to DHS propaganda

Stephen Millers hate and ambition to reformat the US to be him and what he desires

Justice Department opens investigation into Minnesota for alleged hiring discrimination

Here is the reason for the post.  The Department of Justice announced Thursday that its Civil Rights Division is investigating the state of Minnesota for possible hiring discrimination.   What the current US government is trying to roll back all gains by minority groups since the 1960s.  They started by making teaching the history of oppression of black people an attack on white people by making CRT a boogie man.  Then came woke as the villain and save the children from the gays or anyone with a different lifestyle from the straight cis majority.  Now it is DEI.  The right has hammered on DEI even though most on the MAGA side couldn’t tell you what it means.  The media on the right has tried to say any black person or any woman hired is not qualified and only got the job because they were a quota DEI hire.  They see a black pilot and think DEI as in not qualified to fly better get off the plane as Charlie Kirk said on his show.   They are trying to make the US a white straight cis ethnostate in the model of Russia with the white males clearly in charge.   We must not let them destroy the melting pot mixture of different people and cultures that have made the US such a grand country.  Plus the AG Bondi claims DEI is illegal but no law was passed by the congress?  tRump seems to think if he says it or if he signs an executive order that makes it law.   He is not a dictator yet.  Hugs

 

https://www.politico.com/news/2025/07/10/trump-doj-investigates-minnesota-00447779

The investigation represents one in a series of clashes between the state and Trump’s DOJ.

Minnesota Attorney General Keith Ellison (left) and Minnesota Governor Tim Walz (right) await the arrival of then-Vice President Kamala Harris at the Minneapolis-St. Paul International Airport on March 14, 2024. | Stephen Maturen/AFP via Getty Images

By Jacob Wendler07/10/2025 05:14 PM EDT

The Department of Justice announced Thursday that its Civil Rights Division is investigating the state of Minnesota for possible hiring discrimination, setting up another clash between the Trump administration and the state’s Democratic leadership.

The investigation hinges on a policy issued earlier this month by the Minnesota Department of Human Services mandating that hiring supervisors provide a “hiring justification when seeking to hire a non-underrepresented candidate,” according to a Thursday letter sent to Minnesota Attorney General Keith Ellison from Assistant U.S. Attorney General Harmeet Dhillon, head of the DOJ’s Civil Rights Division.

Attorney General Pam Bondi’s DOJ has pursued an aggressive crackdown on states and universities that engage in affirmative action policies, opening similar investigations into Rhode Island and the University of California.

“Minnesotans deserve to have their state government employees hired based on merit, not based on illegal DEI,” Bondi said in a statement.

The statute specifies that the justifications are required for “nonaffirmative action hires,” the Minnesota Department of Human Services said in a statement defending its policy.

“The Minnesota Department of Human Services follows all state and federal hiring laws,” it said. “Justification of non-affirmative action hires for some vacancies has been required by state law since 1987.”

The White House has repeatedly clashed with Minnesota Gov. Tim Walz, who has sharply criticized the president since running for vice president on the Democratic ticket in 2024. Ellison has also filed multiple lawsuits against the Trump administration seeking to block several of its policies, and the DOJ sued Minnesota last month to stop the state from providing in-state tuition for some undocumented students.

Trump also refused to call Walz after two Minnesota state lawmakers were shot in May, calling the governor “so whacked out.”

Walz’s office did not immediately respond to a request for comment, and Ellison’s office declined to comment.

YOU HAVE THE LEGAL AUTHORITY, F*****G USE IT

One voice was yelling he was a US citizen.  The conditions are horrible.  They get their drinking water from the toilet.   Maxwell Frost is a progressive treasure.  Hugs

Some clips about how the democratic leadership in the US congress are not getting the message from the people.

The Democratic Party leadership which is made up of all corporate democrats along the manner of Nancy Pelosi.   The idea that a 33 year old Social Democrat like Bernie Sanders and AOC running NY City terrifies them.  Behind the scenes they are trying hard to wing support to Andrew Cuomo who has been accused of being very corrupt instead of a guy who promised to do things that make life better for the working lower incomes.  They are scared that the people will see that they have power and that government CAN work for them.  The democratic leadership totally ignores the fact that Mamdomi raised enough money from small individual donor donations and refused corporate PACs and bribes.    He is the future of the Democratic Party if the democrats ever want to win again.  The videos of the man on the street getting greeted by everyone, he doesn’t put on airs but walks the streets and is like everyone else.   Hugs

In a recent post I posted the news article from Axios about democratic members of congress needing to be more aggressive including being willing to get shot trying to inspect ICE facilities.  It was not about wanting to cause violence nor about wanting to be shot.  The article was about the perception that democratic leadership are too timid and scared to challenge the thuggish ICE and current administration.   The video below goes over the article.   Hugs

Tom Homan rips violent clashes at California pot farm where illegal minors were working, blames Dems’ ‘Nazi’ rhetoric

There is a video at the link below.  I watched this.  ICE went in to terrorize and prove they could.  They had a military style attack helicopter.  This is going to get worse.   They are the tRump admin Gestapo, armed thugs who follow no rules attacking people who have violated no criminal laws.  Even if they were undocumented they had broken no laws as crossing the border illegally is a civil offense like speeding.  Hugs

https://nypost.com/2025/07/11/us-news/tom-homan-rips-violent-clash-at-california-pot-farm-as-proof-ice-protests-will-turn-deadly-blames-dems-nazi-rhetoric/

Indiana church tells LGBTQ+ people to kill themselves or face death penalty under Trump

https://www.thepinknews.com/2025/07/07/indiana-indianapolis-sure-foundation-baptist-church-lgbtq/

Overturning gay marriage ban and adding LGBTQ protections just got harder. Find out why.

https://www.cincinnati.com/story/news/politics/2025/07/09/gop-splits-issue-to-ax-ohio-same-sex-marriage-ban-add-lgbtq-protections/84504795007/

Portrait of Jessie BalmertJessie Balmert

Cincinnati Enquirer
  • Ohio Republicans split the Ohio Equal Rights Amendment into two separate ballot issues.
  • One issue addresses overturning Ohio’s same-sex marriage ban, while the other expands anti-discrimination protections for LGBTQ+ individuals.
  • This move requires proponents to collect double the signatures or sue the Ohio Ballot Board.

Ohio Republicans added another hurdle for proponents of a measure to overturn Ohio’s dormant ban on same-sex marriage and expand anti-discrimination protections for LGBTQ residents.

In a party-line vote, Ohio Ballot Board divided the Ohio Equal Rights Amendment into two issues: one to overturn a 2004 vote that defined marriage as between one man and one woman and another that would prohibit state and local government from discriminating against more than a dozen protected groups, including transgender Ohioans.

To make the ballot, proponents will either have to collect double the number of signatures to get both proposals approved or sue the Ohio Ballot Board to overturn its decision. Backers are eyeing the 2026 ballot at the earliest, said Lis Regula, a member of Ohio Equal Rights’ leadership committee.

During the July 9 meeting, the ballot campaign’s attorney Corey Colombo argued that the proposed constitutional amendment was one issue because it encompassed equal rights for all Ohioans.

People gather for the 52nd Cincinnati Pride Parade, Saturday, June 28, 2025, in Downtown Cincinnati.

People gather for the 52nd Cincinnati Pride Parade, Saturday, June 28, 2025, in Downtown Cincinnati.

But Republicans contended that transgender issues and marriage equality are two different things with two different levels of support from voters.

While Ohioans might support marriage between any two people in the Ohio Constitution, “they may not want to support creating 12 new protected classes under a bunch of different circumstances,” said Ohio Secretary of State Frank LaRose, a Republican who leads the Ohio Ballot Board.

Rep. Terrence Upchurch, D-Cleveland, said Republicans divided the measure because of politics. “It’s one issue. It’s cut and dry.”

“There’s definitely political will for using trans people to divide Ohioans,” Regula said. “The hopeful side of me appreciates that they are recognizing the support for same-sex marriage. That’s great. We’ve made progress. We still have progress to make.”

What is the Ohio Equal Rights Amendment?

If approved by voters, the Ohio Equal Rights Amendment would prohibit state and local government from discriminating based on: “race, color, creed or religion, sex, sexual orientation, gender identity or expression regardless of sex assigned at birth, pregnancy status, genetic information, disease status, age, disability, recovery status, familial status, ancestry, national origin or military and veteran status.”

The sweeping measure would expand the list of protected individuals far beyond the national Equal Rights Amendment, which aims to prohibit discrimination based on sex. Ohio ratified that amendment in 1974, but it has not been recognized as part of the U.S. Constitution because of missed deadlines and other disputes.

The proposal would also overturn a 2004 vote that defined marriage as between one man and one woman.

This language has been dormant since a 2015 U.S. Supreme Court decision led by Ohioan Jim Obergefell legalized gay marriage in America. As of 2023, Ohio had 22,400 same-sex married couples, according to the most recent federal census data.

“Marriage equality has been going strong now for 10 years, and the sky hasn’t fallen. Society hasn’t collapsed,” said Senate Minority Leader Nickie Antonio, D-Lakewood. “What happened is you have families who have standing, whose children can feel good and talk about their families just like every other kid at school, no matter what the configuration of their family is.”

But proponents of marriage equality worry that the Obergefell decision could be overturned by an unfriendly U.S. Supreme Court. “I think it is reasonable to believe that it is under threat,” said Regula, citing the language used in the decision overturning Roe v. Wade.

What are the arguments for and against this measure?

Supporters of the proposed constitutional amendment want to overturn Ohio laws that penalize people with HIV for donating blood or having sex without disclosing their HIV status. More recently, Republican lawmakers banned transgender students from using school bathrooms that match their gender identity and banned gender-affirming care for transgender minors. 

“Those discriminatory laws make Ohio less of a welcoming place and make it a place where fewer people are interested in coming,” Regula said.

Opponents say these are losing issues at the ballot box.

“To bring such an unpopular constitutional amendment like this forward is one, shockingly appalling, but also really dumb after Sherrod Brown just lost his Senate seat over these issues,” said Aaron Baer, president of the Center for Christian Virtues.

Republicans crafted attack ads against Brown for voting against amendments that would have stripped funding from schools and colleges that allowed transgender girls to play in women’s sports.

“I have a hard time seeing them get a lot of traction with this,” Baer said. CCV was a driving force behind the 2004 constitutional amendment to ban same sex marriage in Ohio.

What happens next?

The group looking to put the Ohio ERA before voters faces a tall task. If they want voters to approve both measures, they must collect an additional 1,000 valid signatures for each proposal, go before Ohio Attorney General Dave Yost for initial approval and return to the ballot board.

Then, proponents would have to collect at least 413,487 valid signatures, or 10% of votes cast in the most recent governor’s race, for each measure or 826,974 in total. Those signatures must meet a minimum threshold in half of Ohio’s 88 counties.

“While I applaud the spirit of the work that they are trying to do, I just think it’s a real uphill battle that they’re going to be faced with,” said Antonio, the state’s first and currently only openly gay lawmaker.

For more than a decade, Antonio has repeatedly introduced the Ohio Fairness Act to prohibit discrimination based on sexual orientation or gender identity. The GOP-controlled Legislature has not moved forward on the fairness act.

Antonio said a legislative fix is still the right path for protections against LGBTQ discrimination.

“I struggle with asking the majority of people, the majority of the population, to grant equality by a vote to a marginalized group,” Antonio said. “I will continue to fight for the Ohio Fairness Act, because I think it’s the right thing to do.”

Reporter Laura A. Bischoff contributed to this article.

State government reporter Jessie Balmert can be reached at jbalmert@gannett.com or @jbalmert on X.