Nebraska passes anti-trans sports ban misleadingly called “Fairness for Girls initiative”

This horrific event is the result of the democrats withdrawing on supporting / informing the public on the issue and letting the right-wing misinformation and disinformation sway the public.  First the number of trans athletes is small, and second all the medical / scientific evidence shows what they are trying to prevent is not happening.  Plus the safety threats are not happening nor are the sexualizing by showing genitalia in locker rooms happening.  It is a total lie and bigotry supported by religion, a lack of understanding science, and the misconception that because determening sex has always been done based on whether something dangles or not that it is the correct and only way to determine sex or gender.  If democrats had not shrank from the issue and kept supporting the rights all of this could have been prevented.   We have observed that when the issue of same sex attraction rights was being debated and then with same sex marriage once democrats pushed support for it by making sure the truth of the issues was pushed it overwhelmed the misinformation and lies of the bigots.   As soon as the democrats pulled back their support public support for both issues diminished.  But this election proved that the right wing / republican push against LGBTQ+ people, especially trans people were easy for democratic canidates to defuse and by supporting the trans people these democrats still won their elections.  They showed that the scary trans adverts and slogans used by the right really don’t resonate with most people.  I beg our democratic party elected and future candidates to fully support the LGBTQ+ people of all ages with the facts, science, and medical data.  It is time to put the idea that bigotry, hate, and especially religiously driven bigotry works to the trash heap with other failed ideas that were proven wrong.  No matter how hard some people try to cling to tradition it is never a good reason to deny people rights.  Also notice it is always focused on trans girls but never mentioned are trans boys.  That is because it is easier to get less informed people emotionally invested in the idea that girls are at risk than boys being at risk.  It is misogeny.  It is a threat to men that other men would be willing to give up the privilege of being male, but to those same kinds of guys that feel women are lesser than men a woman wanting to be  have the same status as a male they can understand.   They can’t grant it as it undermines their idea of male superiority but it doesn’t hurt their male egos like trans women do.  And of course this is just a gate way into banning transitioning.   First it was bathroom bans but they failed to get much support, but the protect daughters in sports and bathrooms hit the right never to push these bills ever further with the goal of stopping the right to transition entirely which has now happened in many red states due to the republican majority on the SCOTUS being both highly religous and highly republican goal driven.  Hugs.


https://www.lgbtqnation.com/2026/11/nebraska-passes-anti-trans-sports-ban-misleadingly-called-fairness-for-girls-initiative/

Photo of the author

Daniel Villarreal (he/him)November 4, 2026, 2:26 am EST

Nebraska voters have approved of ballot Measure 442, the so-called “Fairness for Girls initiative, The Daily Nebraskan reported, with 67% of voters supporting the initiative as of midnight local time.

The measure will write into the state constitution a 2025 law, sponsored by state Sen. Kathleen Kauth (R), that already requires public K-12 and college athletes to play on teams matching their sex at birth. The measure defines one’s sex at birth as having a reproductive system that “does or at some point will produce, transport, and utilize” either eggs ( for a woman or girl) or sperm (for a man or boy).

The measure applies to all athletic teams or sports sponsored by public schools, postsecondary educational institutions, private schools, or educational institutions that compete against public schools. Opponents of the measure accused its creators of using deliberately misleading language to gain voter support for the measure, though the state Supreme Court disagreed.

Interestingly, the state Supreme Court recently heard arguments challenging the measure’s legality. Opponents say that the ballot measure’s sponsors failed to “adequately inform the public of what they are trying to accomplish” when collecting signatures for the effort.

The measure’s ballot language says, “​​The object of this petition is to amend the Nebraska Constitution to establish constitutional protections for sex-separate athletics to ensure equal access to athletic opportunities for females.”

The plaintiff’s lawsuit said the language failed to properly describe the “legal effect of the filing of the petition and the object sought to be secured by submitting the measure to the voters.” The language “omits major provisions contained in the Initiative’s text and does not accurately reflect the text of the Initiative,” which could lead voters to support it without understanding its consequences, the plaintiff claimed.

More specifically, the plaintiff’s lawsuit noted that the ballot language fails to inform voters that the amendment applies to all public and private schools from childhood to adulthood, and:

  • imposes requirements based on biological sex;
  • prohibits male students from participating in sports and teams designated for female students;
  • applies to recreational intramural sports, as well as interscholastic and intercollegiate sports; and
  • does not actually guarantee equal access to athletic opportunities.

In the state Supreme Court’s recent ruling, the justices wrote that the state ballot language law “does not require an initiative’s object statement to set forth every consequence that would result from the initiative measure should it be adopted by voters.”


Daniel Villarreal is a longtime, award-winning journalist and editor who has written for NBC News, Newsweek, Vox, Slate, Vice News, The Seattle Stranger, The Dallas Voice and numerous other LGBTQ+ publications. He has spoken at SXSW, Creating Change, Netroots Nation, GaymerX, and is a graduate of GLAAD’s Voices of Color program and of the Poynter Institute’s 2024 Power of Diverse Voices seminar. He is also the founder of QueerBomb Dallas, an annual non-corporate Pride event; CinéWilde, the nation’s longest running monthly LGBTQ film series. He is available for interviews and educational talks.

A Right-Wing Legal Group’s Lawsuit Over a High School Wrestling Match Falls Apart on Video

This is another Riley Gaines  person trying to say she lost only because her opponent was trans.  They claim that the wrestler Kallie Keeler was sexually assaulted.  The issue is that all the wrestlers asked and the experts say the moves were standard wrestling moves.   Even the coach says that fingers often end up in places they don’t belong in normal activities in public.  I was not a wrestler, but I know someone who did wrestle in high school.  I had joked with him I couldn’t have done wrestling with all the hands on the crotch of the wrestlers touching each other’s cocks and balls or fingers in the butt.  He told me it was very common and if you watched many boys got up from the floor during or after a match with hard ons or wet spots on their uniforms where their dicks are.   The law suit is an over the top attempt to get wrestler Kallie Keeler a bunch of rewards that she did not earn and to punish all trans athletes.  It also is so she can repeat Riley Gaines track of using her anti-trans hate to be on TV and make a lot of money she wouldn’t make if she was not pushing bigotry and hate.  Plus if the opponent was a cis girl and accidentally did the same thing she wouldn’t have won either.  This is a Christian family who feels entitled to award seh did not earn.  Athe the end of the video he reads responses and comments from anti-trans people who said it was a commonly used move and sexual touching happens.   Hugs

 

The right-wing legal group Alliance Defending Freedom has filed a sweeping federal lawsuit on behalf of Washington high school wrestler Kallie Keeler, claiming she was sexually assaulted during a match against a transgender opponent.

The problem? There’s video of the match, and according to multiple wrestlers, coaches, and wrestling experts I spoke with, it shows nothing controversial. Just legal, routine wrestling techniques.

The lawsuit goes far beyond the match itself, targeting the Washington Interscholastic Activities Association (WIAA), school officials, coaches, and state authorities while demanding that Keeler’s losses to transgender athletes be erased from the record books and that trans athletes be barred from competing against her in the future.

Despite the dramatic allegations, Pierce County prosecutors declined to pursue criminal charges, and even some conservatives who oppose transgender participation in sports have criticized ADF’s characterization of the match.

tRump’s new Sec of Defense 11 15 2024

I talk about tRump’s new Sec Of Defense being a Christian nationalist fundamentalist fanatic, a white supremacist, and a hater of the LGBTQ+. I talk about how he wants to purge the ones he doesn’t like from the military and how tRump hopes to use him to purge the military of anyone not cis straight white Christian and totally loyalist to tRump, the Dear Leader.

Trump pledged to roll back protections for transgender students. They’re flooding crisis hotlines

Image

1 of 3 |  

Republican presidential nominee former President Donald Trump walks from the podium after speaking at a campaign rally at Lee’s Family Forum, Thursday, Oct. 31, 2024, in Henderson, Nev. (AP Photo/Julia Demaree Nikhinson)

Image

2 of 3 |  

FILE – Protesters advocating for transgender rights and healthcare stand outside of the Ohio Statehouse, Jan. 24, 2024, in Columbus, Ohio. (AP Photo/Patrick Orsagost, File)

Image

3 of 3 |  

FILE – Jude Armstrong and fellow Benjamin Franklin High playwriting class students perform their play, “The Capitol Project,” on the steps of the Louisiana Capitol in Baton Rouge, La., March 27, 2024. (AP Photo/Gerald Herbert, File)

We knew he was going to go to this, but remember the only one talking about trans people was the republicans.  Harris never mentioned them.  This is totally a manufactured outrage.  No one cared before a few religious republicans got talking constantly about it.  I think you all need to ask yourself how trans people affect your lives?  There are what 1,400 trans people in the country?  There are 5 trans kids in sports?  There has never been a trans woman sweep the awards at any event yet that was the constant talking point.  Trans women who they mistakenly call men / boys are going to steal your daughter’s trophy.   But it never happened and they couldn’t show it.  How was this something people voted to switch the election on? Think on it right wing voters on how you were played.  So silly and stupid.  Plus the religious people now in charge of the military intend to remove trans people and gay people.   That will not only harm readiness because the military keeps saying it doesn’t affect the readiness at all.  I know from experience that if you remove the LGBTQ+ from the military, it will gut the military entirely and that will harm readiness.   Hugs

Anti-LGBTQ+ attacks nationwide have increased 112% over the last two years

https://www.lgbtqnation.com/2024/11/anti-lgbtq-attacks-nationwide-have-increased-112-over-the-last-two-years/

Bathrooms with a view: Cutting windows into student restrooms is a new level of weird

https://www.yorkdispatch.com/story/opinion/editorials/2024/10/02/bathrooms-with-a-view-cutting-windows-into-student-restrooms-is-a-new-level-of-weird/75479753007/

I bet the next election will be well attended and these people will lose their seats and new progressive inclusive people will win.  That is what has happened all over when the right bigots and haters snuck into school board seats, they go too far trying to erase the LGBTQ+ kids / people from existence, then they get kicked out.   Sadly by then the damage is done.  What they hell do they want people perving on kids in the bathrooms for?  To make the kids scared to use them and to make sure the weird kids are not doing weird gay stuff in them, right?    Hugs.  Scottie.

By the way.  We have a hurricane headed right at us.  It will be here Wednesday at around noon, but we have three days of wind and rain beforehand.  It will hit at a class three.  It is projected to hit just above us but could hit us directly.  We will be spending the next few days getting as much done as possible, stocking in cat food Ron forgot and getting more gas and propane for the generator.  It is unlikely that pole of ours will survive another storm as it is already leaning hard.  Repair crews are already stretched thin in other areas so won’t be able to come rescue us in our time of need.  Going to be a very long few months.  Hugs.  Scottie

YORK DISPATCH EDITORIAL BOARD
York Dispatch
 
 

At the risk of stating the obvious, South Western’s elected school board is making some strange decisions.

For the last two years, they’ve fixated on which bathrooms LGBTQ+ kids use. In 2023, officials in this Hanover-area district played musical chairs with school bathrooms in a misguided attempt to appease the loudest bigots among them — ending up with five different types of bathrooms.

After a low-turnout school board election in which several far-right members joined their ranks, they hired a Christian law firm, decided to begin banning books and reopened the bathroom issue. Board President Matthew Gelazela, who was elevated to his post after previously serving as the board’s most vocal bomb-thrower, pointed to Red Lion’s discriminatory policies as something to aspire to.

UPDATE:Amid parent complaints and national scrutiny, South Western School District boards up bathroom windows

Now, upon the advice of that law firm — the Harrisburg-based Independence Law Center — the board approved spending $8,700 to cut windows so passersby can look into the so-called “gender-identity” student bathrooms.

Yes, you read that correctly.

These adults want to make it easier for other people to watch your children while they’re in the bathroom. It’s absolutely mind-boggling.

For more than a year, South Western School Board officials have grappled with how LGBTQ+ students use the bathroom. Most recently, school officials cut windows into Emory H. Markle Middle School's gender neutral restrooms, allowing anyone passing by to peer inside.

For more than a year, South Western School Board officials have grappled with how LGBTQ+ students use the bathroom. Most recently, school officials cut windows into Emory H. Markle Middle School's gender neutral restrooms, allowing anyone passing by to peer inside.
 

Gelazela, who’s steadfastly refused to explain the logic here, said in a public meeting that the windows help “[add] privacy in the toilet facility” and that they “increase oversight of the wash area.”

There’s a reason public restrooms tend not to have windows — or, if they do, they have frosted glass.

No one wants to be spied on when they’re relieving themselves.

Gelazela, in pursuing his book ban, repeatedly said he’s trying to protect the children.

But this latest decision does just the opposite.

More:Parents question school that cut windows into student bathrooms amid anti-LGBTQ+ push

More:‘Our politics can be done with a sense of joy,’ Tim Walz tells York crowd

The parents who spoke to The York Dispatch about the latest bathroom renovations said their children no longer feel comfortable using these bathrooms. One of the parents went to the principal and asked for an exemption to allow her son to use a different bathroom further away from class.

Her 13-year-old doesn’t want to be spied on while he’s in the bathroom.

And we don’t blame him.

It’s creepy and weird.

And let’s not ignore the bigger picture: This is happening at a time when this and other York County school boards are pushing policies that would restrict what books students read, what sports teams they compete on and even which pronouns they use.

All of this is part of an attempt to erase LGBTQ+ people.

Cutting a window into these bathrooms is an intimidation tactic designed to make sure students who use the so-called “gender-identity” facilities — and, let’s be honest, any student who doesn’t fit neatly into the worldview of the school board’s far-right majority — know they’re being watched, controlled and judged.

In their quest to punish LGBTQ+ kids, however, the misguided “adults” on this South Western School Board are doing the things they accuse others of doing.

This is an invasion of privacy and a waste of taxpayer dollars.

It needs to stop.

A Second Trump Term Scares Me…

This man understands, this person gets it!  Those of us not center, those of us not maga, those of us paying attention to what is happening and see what red states are doing to the LGBTQ+ and how hard they are trying to keep anyone not fully supporting them from voting … Yes we are scared.  We feel all the movement to the future acceptance of people who are different from the main stream, all the rights for black people, all the rights for minorities, all the rights for the disabled, all the rights for the poor, and all the rights that have been gained for the LGBTQ+ are being wiped away with the goal being removing us from public society so that we have no voice in the very country we live.  Welcome to the 1950s white cis straight men in charge society.  Hugs.  Scottie

An Algerian Boxer vs Elon Musk, JK Rowling, and A Ton Of Hate

A reality check on the ‘Tampon Tim’ meme

https://www.startribune.com/a-reality-check-on-the-tampon-tim-meme/600965646

Here is why the right / republicans are panicking.   It is an attack on trans boys.  This who line of they are putting them in the boy’s bathroom is really a way to say Walz supports trans kids.  The truth is the bill doesn’t require the products be in any bathroom, just they be available to menstruating students and that includes trans boys.  Ron and I off the top of our head thought of dozens of places in a school that they could be put instead of the bathrooms.  Just a few, nurses stations, main offices, teachers could keep them in their rooms, a storage closet open to students, dispensers on doors or in hallways, student activity rooms, the rooms used for the gay straight clubs, so on.  But even if they were in the boy’s bathrooms, what is the problem with that, other than the made up issue the right has with trans boys?  That boys will see tampons and pads.  Do these boys not have mothers or sisters?  Have they never been in a store?  Do they help unpack grocery bags?   If boys do not know what these items are for, then they should be taught. It need not be a deep mystery and a shame for girls and women.   It won’t turn them gay or trans, it won’t cause their spines to break. Below I post the important quote then the article.  Hugs.  Scottie

But the law’s actual language provides considerable flexibility for school districts to implement it, according to Deb Henton, the executive director of the Minnesota Association of School Administrators.

That might mean making these products available for free in various locations for all who need them, such as unisex bathrooms, girls’ bathrooms, the school nurse or the front office, but not necessarily in boys’ bathrooms. Henton, in an interview, lauded the “local control” the law provides for implementation, and said she’s fielded no concerns about its rollout.

At Anoka-Hennepin, the state’s largest school district, the free products are not found in traditional male-only bathrooms, a spokesman said. But they are provided for free to all in “nongendered bathrooms,” girls’ bathrooms or from health staffers.

A smart, compassionate new state law is spurring misinformed attacks on Minnesota’s latest vice presidential contender: Gov. Tim Walz.

By Editorial Board

Star Tribune

AUGUST 8, 2024 AT 8:14PM
Kristy Wesson and Margie Solomon of the National Council of Jewish Women Minnesota and student Elif Ozturk delivered menstrual products to Hopkins High School in 2022. Ozturk and community advocates were pushing for a bill, subsequently made law, to require public schools to provide such products.
 

Opinion editor’s note: Editorials represent the opinions of the Star Tribune Editorial Board, which operates independently from the newsroom.

•••

On Tuesday, Democratic presidential nominee Kamala Harris tapped Minnesota Gov. Tim Walz as her running mate. By Wednesday, the opposition had mobilized with lightning speed for its one of its first political attacks, dubbing Walz “Tampon Tim” in reference to a new state law providing free menstrual products to school students.

The nickname was trending nationally this week on Twitter, an indicator of its political currency. Chaya Raichik, whose scurrilous “Libs of TikTok” account on X (formerly Twitter) has more than 3 million followers, was one of the first to amplify it. Former Fox News host Megyn Kelly added to the momentum, endorsing the nickname via tweet. Former First Lady Hillary Clinton weighed in from a different angle, with a tweet supporting the Minnesota measure.

Social-media users swiftly took sides as well, and as usual, facts and context were missing, especially from those who see the new law as evidence of a radical Minnesota under Walz’s leadership. But a closer, more informed look at the issue should yield a different conclusion. This is good and necessary policy. Providing free menstrual products is a practical, compassionate remedy to address an under-the-radar reason for student absenteeism. Some families can’t afford menstrual products, and when that happens students stay home instead of going to class, falling behind as they do.

There’s a lot of talk about closing educational achievement gaps in Minnesota and elsewhere, particularly for low-income students. The new state law, which has a price tag of about $2 million a year, is an actual solution to help address this, one that’s relatively low-cost. And there’s real-world data to back it up. New York City schools reported a 2.4% increase in attendance after a state law went into effect requiring free period products for students, according to the advocacy group Alliance for Period Supplies.

Minnesota is far from alone in providing this type of assistance. More than half of the nation’s 50 states have taken steps to help students who struggle to afford tampons and pads. Ohio, led by Republican Gov. Mike DeWine, now requires period products in schools and has provided $5 million in funding for this, the Alliance for Period Supplies reports. Alabama and Georgia provide grants for schools to make free products available.

Other states, such as Washington, Nevada, Illinois and Utah, require schools to provide these products, though they didn’t fund them. To Minnesota’s legislators’ credit, the new law provides dollars to schools and is not an unfunded mandate.

 

Other background information is also useful as the dubious online debate continues.

The new law went into effect in January and applies to students in grades four through 12. The legislation itself was passed during the 2023 session as part of a broader educational bill, which Walz then signed. Rep. Sandra Feist, DFL-New Brighton, was the bill’s chief author in the Minnesota House. Sen. Steve Cwodzinski, a retired teacher and DFLer from Eden Prairie, championed the measure in Minnesota Senate.

But the most powerful advocates for it came from outside the State Capitol. Young Minnesotans reached out to Feist about this issue. After Feist introduced it, these students testified on its behalf as the legislation made its way through various committees. Among them was Elif Ozturk of Golden Valley, who is now 18 and will attend Columbia University this fall.

 

In an interview, Ozturk told an editorial writer she got involved after seeing other students struggle to afford these products in junior high. She spoke to counselors and was told that some students had to leave class or couldn’t attend because they lacked pads or tampons. Ozturk dug into the issue and discovered that other states had taken steps to help students’ access these products. She thought Minnesota should do the same.

“If we don’t talk about it, it’ll never be fixed. These people who are in power, predominantly old men, have no clue what young girls go through every single day,“ Ozturk said.

Other advocates for the law’s passage: school nurses, who testified movingly about how students struggle to afford these products and the educational and emotional consequences when they can’t.

 
 

A specific but ill-informed attack on the new Minnesota law is in dire need of a reality check. Critics contend, wrongly, that it mandates menstrual products in boys’ bathrooms. This has unfortunately been used to stoke ongoing culture wars over transgender individuals.

But the law’s actual language provides considerable flexibility for school districts to implement it, according to Deb Henton, the executive director of the Minnesota Association of School Administrators.

That might mean making these products available for free in various locations for all who need them, such as unisex bathrooms, girls’ bathrooms, the school nurse or the front office, but not necessarily in boys’ bathrooms. Henton, in an interview, lauded the “local control” the law provides for implementation, and said she’s fielded no concerns about its rollout.

At Anoka-Hennepin, the state’s largest school district, the free products are not found in traditional male-only bathrooms, a spokesman said. But they are provided for free to all in “nongendered bathrooms,” girls’ bathrooms or from health staffers.

There’s nothing radical about Minnesota’s new law. Instead it’s a smart, low-cost measure to address educational achievement gaps, one that many states are embracing. Weaponizing this measure is laughably out of touch and likely to backfire not only with women, but all who care about them.