Share this:
- Click to share on X (Opens in new window) X
- Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window) Facebook
- More
- Click to print (Opens in new window) Print
- Click to share on Reddit (Opens in new window) Reddit
- Click to share on Tumblr (Opens in new window) Tumblr
- Click to share on Pinterest (Opens in new window) Pinterest
- Click to share on Pocket (Opens in new window) Pocket
- Click to share on Telegram (Opens in new window) Telegram
- Click to share on WhatsApp (Opens in new window) WhatsApp
It will not work out well.
Only when both sides agree that they’ve ‘had enough of this crap’ and start laying down the guns do peace talks have any hope of coming out with an agreement that is the least worst option for both (after blood has been spilt it is always The Least Worse Option)
Roger
LikeLiked by 2 people
Hi Roger. You are correct. You often use the troubles as an example. The UK tried to impose peace but couldn’t. It needed the two parties involved to be invested in it and both gain from a peace deal. Right now it is the same as Gaza, those who started the aggression and are profiting by with the idea future gains are trying to force their “peace” plan on a weaker opponent who gets nothing from the deal or losses even more in it. It treats only the aggressors gain, while the ones trespassed against completely give up all agency and surrender. Hugs
LikeLiked by 1 person
And those think they have won by imposition will find there will always be a resistance or opposition to their rule.
In addition they were also find that their homeland will be riven by its own measure of descent.
https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/articles/cly580gkd9ro
Take care
Roger & Sheila 🌼❤️🌻
LikeLike