I am tired of the gaslighting and lies. Blatantly claiming to be following the court’s orders when they clearly are not and giving the middle finger to the courts. Are we a nation of laws or are we now a nation ruled by corrupt gang thugs who as one person in the DOJ said “tell the court to fuck itself”. Where has the Republican Party of law and order gone? When the Democrats are in charge the Republicans sue all the time to block things. Look how many times Biden was blocked by the courts in lawsuits filed by Republicans. How would they have reacted if Biden’s administration just ignored the courts like tRump’s admin is doing? Are we at a crisis point yet? Hugs
Sheer scale of the lawsuits threatens to clog the judicial system
About 700 Justice Department attorneys deployed to represent the government in immigration cases
Hundreds of judges around the country have ruled more than 4,400 times since October that President Donald Trump’s administration is detaining immigrants unlawfully, a Reuters review of court records found.
The decisions amount to a sweeping legal rebuke of Trump’s immigration crackdown. Yet the administration has continued jailing people indefinitely even after courts ruled the policy was illegal.
“It is appalling that the Government insists that this Court should redefine or completely disregard the current law as it is clearly written,” U.S. District Judge Thomas Johnston of West Virginia, an appointee of President George W. Bush, wrote last week, ordering the release of a Venezuelan detainee in the state.
Most of the rulings center on the Trump administration’s departure from a nearly three-decade-old interpretation of federal law that immigrants already living in the United States could be released on bond while they pursue their cases in immigration court.
White House spokeswoman Abigail Jackson said the administration is “working to lawfully deliver on President Trump’s mandate to enforce federal immigration law.”
SOARING NUMBER OF IMMIGRANT DETAINEES
Under Trump, the number of people in ICE detention reached about 68,000 this month, up about 75% from when Trump took office last year.
A conservative appeals court in New Orleans last week gave the Trump administration a victory in its drive to lock up more immigrants. Just because prior administrations did not fully utilize the law to detain people “does not mean they lacked the authority to do more,” U.S. Circuit Judge Edith Jones wrote in a decision reversing rulings that led to the release of two Mexican men. Both remain free, their lawyer said.
Other appeals courts are set to take up the issue in the coming weeks.
Tricia McLaughlin, a Department of Homeland Security spokesperson, said the increase in lawsuits came as “no surprise” – “especially after many activist judges have attempted to thwart President Trump from fulfilling the American people’s mandate for mass deportations.”
The department did not respond to more specific questions about the cases and data findings in this story.
With few other legal paths to freedom, immigrant detainees have filed more than 20,200 federal lawsuits demanding their release since Trump took office, a Reuters review of court dockets found, underscoring the sweeping impact of Trump’s policy change.
In at least 4,421 cases, more than 400 federal judges ruled since the beginning of October that U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement is holding people illegally as it carries out its mass-deportation campaign, Reuters found.
A chart showing the number of habeas challenges to immigration detention by month
Other cases are pending, have been dismissed because the detainee was released, or were transferred to another judicial district, which would force immigrants to file a new case. Reuters was unable to determine how many cases were moved or re-filed.
Joseph Thomas, an 18-year-old high school student from Venezuela, was arrested during a traffic stop in Wisconsin in late December, while riding with his father, Elias Thomas, on his Walmart delivery route.
The men are asylum seekers who entered the United States in August 2023. Both are authorized to work, their lawyer, Carrie Peltier, said. Peltier said they were stopped for “driving while brown.”
Within a month, judges ordered the release of father and son.
Chief U.S. District Judge Patrick Schiltz – also a Bush appointee – ruled that Joseph had been detained illegally and ordered his immediate release. In his ruling, he said Joseph was not subject to mandatory detention, and called out a “lack of any evidence that ICE had a warrant when it detained Joseph while he was a passenger in his father’s car.”
U.S. District Judge Eric Tostrud, a Trump appointee, ruled that Joseph’s father Elias was eligible for a bond hearing.
“This raises an issue of statutory interpretation that courts in this District have repeatedly considered and rejected, and it will be rejected here as well,” Tostrud wrote in his order.
Joseph is now taking classes online, afraid to return to school.
LANDSLIDE OF LAWSUITS
Habeas corpus – Latin for “you shall have the body” – emerged in the English courts in the 1300s and is enshrined in the U.S. Constitution. It provides a legal recourse for people the government has detained unlawfully.
Reuters counted habeas lawsuits by gathering the dockets of every publicly filed federal court case over more than two decades from Westlaw, a legal research tool that is a division of Thomson Reuters.
The records, combined with other court filings, offer the most comprehensive view to date of the scale of lawsuits moving through the U.S. justice system and of the defeats for the administration.
Within the span of a few days in January, lawyers filed habeas petitions for Liam Conejo, a five-year-old Ecuadorean boy detained in the driveway of his Minnesota home; a Ukrainian man with a valid temporary humanitarian status who was detained on his way to work as a cable technician; a Salvadoran man married to a U.S. citizen and father of a 3-year-old autistic child who is also a U.S. citizen; an Eritrean hospital worker with refugee status who was arrested after letting agents into his apartment complex and a Venezuelan man who was arrested after dropping off his daughter at school.
None had criminal records.
DIVERTED LAWYERS, VIOLATED ORDERS
The rush of lawsuits is forcing the U.S. Justice Department offices to divert attorneys who would normally prosecute criminal cases to respond to habeas cases.
Using court dockets, Reuters found more than 700 Justice Department attorneys representing the government in immigration cases. Five of the attorneys each appeared on the dockets of more than 1,000 habeas cases.
Partly as a result of that legal logjam, judges have found that the government has left people locked up even after judges ordered their release.
In a court order, issued last month in Minnesota, Schiltz said the government had violated 96 orders in 76 cases. The U.S. Attorney there, Daniel Rosen, said in a filing, two days later that the cases had created an “enormous burden” for government attorneys.
Similarly, U.S. District Judge Nusrat Choudhury, an appointee of Democratic President Joe Biden in New York, wrote this month that ICE violated two “clear and unambiguous orders” by flying a man to New Mexico for detention while falsely claiming he was in New Jersey and could be brought to a court hearing.
A Justice Department spokesperson, Natalie Baldassarre, said the administration “is complying with court orders and fully enforcing federal immigration law.”
“If rogue judges followed the law in adjudicating cases and respected the government’s obligation to properly prepare cases, there wouldn’t be an ‘overwhelming’ habeas caseload or concern over DHS following orders,” she said.
LEGAL HURDLES
In New York, advocates have waited outside immigration court to connect detained immigrants with lawyers who can file same-day habeas claims – blocking their rapid transfer to a detention center in another state.
On January 16, U.S. District Judge J. Paul Oetken issued an emergency ruling for an Ecuadorean man who was detained at his court hearing, barring the government from moving him out of New York. On January 30, U.S. District Judge Andrew Carter, who like Oetken was appointed by Democratic President Barack Obama, ordered his immediate release.
Still, many immigrants aren’t able to seek that relief. Some aren’t aware that they can file a habeas case. Others can’t find affordable lawyers.
Judy Rall, the U.S. citizen wife of a Venezuelan detainee who has spent almost a year at the Bluebonnet detention center in Texas, said she was quoted upwards of $5,000 to file a habeas petition, which she could not afford. She and her husband have a pending immigration case based on their marriage, but the government has declined to release him while the case is being adjudicated. He has no criminal record, but the government has alleged, without providing evidence, that he has links to the Venezuelan gang Tren de Aragua.
This month, her lawyer offered to take on the habeas case for free.
“Our home burnt down, and I had told them I needed him to come help,” she said. “I assume that is the reason.”
Reporting by Nate Raymond in Boston, Kristina Cooke in San Francisco and Brad Heath in Washington, D.C.; additional reporting by Brad Brooks in Minneapolis; Editing by Craig Timberg and Suzanne Goldenberg
The video played shows how ICE gang thugs narrated a scenario they hoped the courts would believe, but the videos show they rammed the woman, shot her in 2 seconds with no warnings or words, just rammed her car and then shot her five times. The video shows they lied about being boxed in as no one was in front of them. The wanted a legal kill because they were pissed at the people honking their horns at them, with the driver saying it is time to get aggressive. ICE are gang thugs with anger issues who think they have the right to do to people what ever they want. So another couple cases taken to court where they claimed domestic terrorists attacked ICE only to have them dismissed because of the ICE thugs and their bosses lies. But the victims are still stuck with hospital bills, lawyers bills, and car repairs that ICE thugs don’t have to pay for but the victims do. Hugs
The video from the scene showed that the ICE gang thugs lied and made false claims about the shooting of the woman. However the woman still had hospital bills and a damaged car she had to pay. These gang thugs wanted to kill a Hispanic person, wanted to remove a brown person from society. They faked a story, clearly they narrated a story that was not happening at the time so they would have an excuse to attack a person. Hugs
The conditions are on purpose to make people so miserable they give up their rights to asylum or any cases they have going. The ICE people / US government are already violating the rights of the people they kidnap off the streets. These are as bad as any concentration camp and the US government denies it all. When Democrats take power / authority back we need to investigate and punish all involved. The government flat out lies and gaslights the public as if they think nothing will ever be found out. Hugs
Investigations by the Miami Herald found that the whereabouts of two-thirds of over 1,800 men detained at “Alligator Alcatraz” during July 2025 were unknown, contradicting claims that 1,200 detainees were missing from the facility.
The Herald used two detainee rosters obtained in July and August to determine that 800 detainees had no record in ICE’s online database, while over 450 had no location listed, raising concerns about the accuracy of detainee tracking at the Florida migrant detention center.
Despite claims of missing detainees, the U.S. Department of Homeland Security denied that anyone was unaccounted for at “Alligator Alcatraz” in ICE’s online detention locator system, highlighting discrepancies between public reports and official statements regarding the facility.
In January 2026, a claim resurfaced online that approximately 1,200 detainees were “missing” from the so-called Alligator Alcatraz, the Florida migrant detention center touted by Trump as the “new standard” for immigration facilities.
“BREAKING NEWS 1200 detainees at alligator alcatraz are missing and their records have been wiped,” read one Instagram post (archived) on Jan. 28.
While it is true that according to a seriesofinvestigations by the Miami Herald, the whereabouts of two-thirds of more than 1,800 men detained at “Alligator Alcatraz” during July 2025 were unknown, January 2026 posts claiming these findings were “breaking news” were misleading. The Herald published its findings in a series of investigations in summer 2025.
We first broke down the Herald’s investigations on Sept. 25, 2025, when a number of socialmediaposts (archived, archived, archived) circulated the claim. The Jan. 28 Instagram post above was a repost of a video (archived) originally shared by TikTok account @rark.muffalo on Sept. 23, 2025:
The Herald did not claim to independently verify whether family members could not locate the 1,200 detainees, as the posts above claimed, but rather used two detainee rosters the outlet obtained to inform its reporting. It was unclear whether any significant developments took place since we first published our assessment of the investigations, but we reached out to the Herald reporters who reported the stories seeking any relevant information, and will update this story if we receive a response.
The list — made public for the first time here — was shared with the Department of Homeland Security and the Florida Division of Emergency Management, which oversees the site. Neither disputed its accuracy.
On Aug. 19, the Herald published another story based on a second list the outlet obtained of 1,400 detainees’ names. The reporters did not list each name on the roster as they did with the July 14 story. In the second story, reporters compared the two datasets and searched names on the detainee locator system for Immigration and Customs Enforcement and found that two out of five immigrants on the list of detainees from the outlet’s July 14 story were moved elsewhere. The Aug. 19 story read:
More than 40% of the 750 detainees in the initial list were sent not out of the country but to other ICE facilities, the Herald found. Another 40% were still at the detention center.
Alligator Alcatraz detainees often did not appear in ICE’s locator system, the Herald found, and the fate of the rest — around 150 detainees — is unclear. Some of them were likely still at Alligator Alcatraz but others may have been deported.
The numbers in both data sets are snapshots in time, and fluctuate as detainees enter and leave the facility.
By Sept. 16, reporters Ben Wieder and Shirsho Dasgupta used the two detainee lists the Herald obtained in July and August to determine that, “As of the end of August, the whereabouts of two-thirds of more than 1,800 men detained at ‘Alligator Alcatraz’ during the month of July could not be determined by the Miami Herald.”
They then broke the numbers down. According to their findings, 800 detainees showed no record in the online database for ICE, while more than 450 listed no location and only instructed the user to “Call ICE for details.”
We wrote to the U.S. Department of Homeland Security — which oversees ICE — as well as the Florida Division of Emergency Management — which oversees operations at “Alligator Alcatraz” — seeking information on detainees reportedly not accounted for. DHS responded: “FALSE. No one is unaccounted — including at Alligator Alcatraz — in ICE’s online detention locator system. This is yet another hoax about the facility.”
While the Herald did not reveal where it had obtained the two lists of detainees, the news site did use public records to reportedly verify the accuracy of the lists. In an email to Snopes, Wieder wrote:
To inform our reporting in this story and our prior stories, we compared information on the lists we’ve obtained with information from ICE’s online detainee locator system. We’ve also verified information from the lists with the EOIR immigration courts database and with other public records. Our comparison of the data we’ve obtained with these other external records and numerous interviews has confirmed the accuracy of the data.
Broadly speaking, the detention center — which is technically run by the state of Florida — has reportedly made it difficult for attorneys to reach their detained clients, therefore allegedly violating detainees’ First and Fifth amendment rights, according to a lawsuit brought by the American Civil Liberties Union.
The Sept. 16 story, while dependent on these two detainee rosters for evidence, also presented testimony from family members of two detainees who had reportedly gone missing.
One man, a 53-year-old Guatemalan detained at “Alligator Alcatraz” whose family asked that his name not be included for fear of retribution, didn’t show up for a hearing, according to his attorney. A government attorney told the man’s attorney that he’d accidentally been sent to Guatemala instead of being transferred to a different detention center ahead of the hearing, as planned.
Communication from another man, Cuban national Michael Borrego Fernandez, went silent after ICE transferred him to another facility in California. His family described the situation as “psychological torture,” as they were worried about his health, given a recent surgery. They then found him in Mexico, where ICE had deported him without notice.
In sum, while Snopes had not independently verified that each name on the purported lists the Miami Herald used to determine that two-thirds of the detainees at “Alligator Alcatraz” during July 2025 were missing from ICE’s locator system, evidence exists from real cases that detainees apparently have gone missing for stretches of time, or are not where ICE said they were. Therefore, the possibility exists that other detainees reportedly missing from the ICE system were also deported or sent to other unknown facilities without their family’s or attorney’s knowledge.
Feb. 3, 2026: This story was updated to clarify that an Instagram video from Jan. 28, 2026, was a repost of a video originally posted on Sept. 23, 2025.
I strongly disagree with the jury finding here. She was shoved and jostled by ICE personnel in an attempt to have a reason to throw the congress woman out. Please notice the congress woman is black. Why go after her and not the other members of congress who were there? Why jostle and bump her and not the others? Clearly it is bigotry. There is a video at the link below that won’t embed here. Hugs
Democracy Now! speaks with Congressmember LaMonica McIver of New Jersey, who is facing up to 17 years in prison stemming from an incident last May when she and two other Democratic congressmembers sought to inspect Delaney Hall, a private prison run by the GEO Group under contract with ICE. The federal government claims McIver assaulted an immigration officer. “I’m not going to let them bully me out of doing my job. I’m just not,” says McIver, who describes conditions at the prison as dismal. “There was an entire riot at the same detention center because detainees were not getting food.”
TRANSCRIPT
This is a rush transcript. Copy may not be in its final form.
AMY GOODMAN: This is Democracy Now!, democracynow.org. I’m Amy Goodman.
We go now from New Jersey’s most famous musician to New Jersey Democratic Congresswoman LaMonica McIver. She’s facing up to 17 years in prison, stemming from an incident last May when she and two other Democratic congressmembers went to inspect Delaney Hall, the private immigration prison run by GEO Corporation under contract with ICE. The federal government claims McIver assaulted an immigration officer as federal agents were arresting Newark Mayor Ras Baraka, who had accompanied the congressional delegation to Delaney Hall. Congressmember McIver has vehemently denied the charges. This is a brief clip of the scene outside the ICE jail that day.
AMY GOODMAN:Ten days later, then-acting U.S. Attorney for New Jersey Alina Habba dropped the charges against Newark Mayor Ras Baraka, but at the same time, she announced three felony charges against Congressmember McIver, including assaulting, resisting, impeding and interfering with federal officers. Not since 1799 have such charges been brought against a House member. Alina Habba is the former personal attorney for Donald Trump. In December, she resigned after a panel of federal judges ruled she’s serving in her position unlawfully.
Members of Congress have the oversight authority to visit DHS facilities without prior notice, but the Trump administration has repeatedly attempted to restrict or thwart that access.
We go now to Newark, where we’re joined by the Democratic Congresswoman LaMonica McIver.
Welcome to Democracy Now!It’s great to have you with us. We have spoken with Mayor Ras Baraka several times. This is our first time talking to you. Explain the state of the case against you. I mean, the judges already ruled that the U.S. attorney, Alina Habba, the former private attorney of President Trump, was serving illegally. But you still have these charges against you that she brought?
REP. LAMONICA McIVER: Yes. Well, first of all, thank you so much for having me, Amy. It’s great to be on with you.
Yes, you’re absolutely correct. These charges are still pushing forward. I’m still fighting it. I’m in the second stretch of that fight, as we filed an appeal to the 3rd Circuit Court to basically have these charges dismissed based off legislative immunity. As you so clearly laid out, you know, I was there to do my job, to conduct oversight, along with two of my other colleagues, when ICE and DHS created that whole fiasco that happened out there. And so, we’re looking forward to taking the case, you know, to getting these charges thrown out, and looking forward to being in front of a judge at the 3rd Circuit in a couple of months. And so, we’re just waiting on that process right now.
AMY GOODMAN: So, but explain what you were doing. It relates certainly today, as some judges have ruled that the Trump administration can delay congressmembers or legislators from inspecting these facilities. In May, talk exactly about what happened, about why you were at Delaney Hall, what it is, for a global audience, you and two other congressmembers, and then what happened to Ras Baraka and what happened to you.
REP. LAMONICA McIVER: So, of course. So, we went there for an oversight visit, which is something that Congress, you know, statutorily have the right to do. We can show up to any ICE facility and have an inspection, unannounced, announced. That’s, you know, in statute for us to do that. And so, me, two of my colleagues from New Jersey — which we have done in the past before. We’ve showed up to ICE, a ICE facility in New Jersey, other than Delaney Hall, and conducted an oversight visit. And just that day, we were going to Delaney Hall. We had gotten a lot of calls about Delaney Hall. We had no idea that this facility had opened up. The mayor of the city had said that this place was not cooperating with city guidelines. And so, we’re like, “Hey, we need to go here and check this place out.”
Mayor Baraka did not accompany us to the facility for the oversight visit. It was literally just members of Congress. Mayor Baraka showed up later, because he was coming there for the press conference that we were having after our tour. But he was not there to come with us on the visit. I mean, he had been showing up there at this facility every day prior to us coming, because, once again, this facility has, basically, you know, just refused to adhere to city guidelines as it relates to inspections and fire code inspections. They claim they are a federal facility, but they’re not. It’s a private prison that has a contract with the federal government. They’re not a federal facility.
And so, we showed up there to have our oversight visit, and we were met with an army of ICE agents, of folks from DHS. I mean, we had — I had never experienced anything like that, nor had we when we went to another facility to inspect that facility. And so, they created a whole fiasco, you know, unlawfully arrested the mayor for trespassing, after they let him into the gate. I mean, it was just a whole complete nightmare there that day, with them basically trying to restrict us from having oversight of this facility. Just days later, I mean, they put out this whole new protocol from DHS that said congressmembers had to give seven days’ notice for them to show up to have oversight, just constantly trying to stop Congress from having oversight and holding the administration accountable. And we continue to see this from last May and now continuing on each and every day with the different scenarios from this administration.
And so, I continue to show up to do oversight, continue to hold this agency, but also these facilities, accountable. I’ve been back to Delaney Hall since then. I had a detainee who died there. A 42-year-old Haitian immigrant who was completely healthy before going to this facility died within 24 hours of being at this facility. And so, I went back there to have an inspection. A couple of weeks after we went last May, there was an entire riot at this same detention center, because detainees were not getting food. They were starving. And detainees were upset about that, and they had a whole riot. And they had about four detainees who escaped through a makeshift wall there.
So, that just goes to show you why oversight is so important and why we have to continue to apply pressure and do our jobs as members of Congress and, you know, go to these facilities. You know, the government has said, hey, I went there, we were there to protest, we were there to do all of these things. But we didn’t go there for anything. I didn’t go there for a protest. We went there for one reason, and that one reason was to go there to protect the people who were there, to find out what was going on, to make sure that things were going — running OK inside this facility, which we have the right to, and that is our job to do so. And so, you know, we’re going — I’m not going to stop doing what I’m supposed to be doing and what the people of the 10th Congressional District here in New Jersey have elected me to do. And that is to protect them and hold this administration accountable.
AMY GOODMAN:You were there with New Jersey Congressmembers Rob Menendez and Bonnie Watson Coleman. Now what is your legal situation? So often in these cases of political persecution, the process is the punishment. The New Yorkernotes, in December —
REP. LAMONICA McIVER: Correct.
AMY GOODMAN: — you had already racked up close to a million dollars in legal fees. What do you think this message sends to congressmembers, legislators all over the country: If they stand up for their constituents, as they say — as you say you were doing, you’ll be personally bankrupted?
REP. LAMONICA McIVER:Yeah, I mean, you’re absolutely right. The process is the punishment. This is what they’re doing. They’re doing this with your taxpayer dollars, prosecuting a member of Congress for doing their job. It doesn’t cost them anything, because they’re using taxpayer dollars to do so. But I think what it does is it inserts fear in other leaders to step up and hold the administration accountable. It’s intimidation. It’s bullying. And they’re just using me as a tool and a prop to do so. And that’s why I continue to stress how urgent, like, my case is, not because it’s about me, but it’s about the broader picture of how they are trying to stop congressmembers from doing their job, I mean, and it’s awful. But at the same time, that’s why I continue to push forward, continue to work for the people of the 10th Congressional District and protect them from this administration, specifically ICE, because I’m not going to let them bully me out of doing my job. I’m just not. They’re not going to bully me from stopping my work, and they’re not going to take away my joy while I do it.
AMY GOODMAN: Congressmember McIver, as we are broadcasting, the White House so-called border czar, Tom Homan, just finished speaking. He held a news conference around 7 a.m. Minnesota time. He said ICE and CBP are working to, quote, “draw down” the number of federal agents in Minneapolis. This is some of what he said.
TOM HOMAN: State and local law enforcement — again, I appreciate they all acknowledged that we do have federal immigration laws in this country that have been passed by Congress, and that ICE is in fact a legitimate law enforcement agency charged with enforcing those laws. We’re not making this up, folks. ICE is enforcing laws enacted by Congress. They’re in federal statute.
That said, I’m not here because the federal government has carried its mission out perfectly. First thing I said to senior staff when I walked in here is what I told you earlier. I didn’t come here looking for photo ops or headlines. I come here looking for solutions. I do not want to hear that everything that’s been done here has been perfect. Nothing’s ever perfect. Anything can be improved on. And what we’ve been working on is making this operation safer, more efficient, by the book. The mission is going to improve because of the changes we’re making.
AMY GOODMAN: So, that is the so-called border czar, who seems to have been sent to Minneapolis to replace Greg Bovino, the head of CBP. I’m used to saying CPB, the Corporation for Public Broadcasting, but President Trump ended that. So it’s all about CBP now, Customs and Border Patrol. And he’s been sent off to California. But there is Tom Homan, the man who was being investigated by the FBI, until a few weeks ago, for taking a Cava bag filled with $50,000 of cash from two undercover FBI agents. That investigation has been squelched, though some of your fellow congressmembers are calling for the video of him accepting that cash, people like Congressmember Raskin. But I’d like to ask — end by asking you about whether you think the government is going to be partially shut down this weekend, and to respond to — you were really the precursor to Minneapolis, but to respond to what the Senate is threatening to do, as they say they want to separate DHS funding from the rest of the budget, and if the Republicans don’t agree to, they won’t vote for the bill.
REP. LAMONICA McIVER: Yeah, well, I truly believe we’re heading to a shutdown, because at the end of the day, look, who can — who can even approve or give this agency, this rogue agency, that we’ve seen murder two people in broad daylight in the last couple of weeks — how can we give them more money? Like, why would the Senate give them more money to operate? Obviously, there are some big issues within this department, that is not operating, you know, effectively, and so they should not be given more money to cause more problems and more hurt and to terrorize American citizens. And so, I do truly believe we’re going to go to a shutdown. It’s shameful that Republicans in charge in the Senate won’t separate out the DHS funding and deal with the rest of the funding, but they want to continue to, you know, be scared of Donald Trump, and they’re, you know, keeping this package deal together, instead of separating it out, knowing that they have issues. So, I truly believe we’re definitely going to be heading to a shutdown.
AMY GOODMAN: Democratic Congressmember LaMonica McIver, speaking to us from Newark, New Jersey. Thank you so much for joining us.
Coming up, we look at how ICE is using facial recognition technology to track immigrants and protesters — or, as the government calls them, agitators — in Minnesota and across the country. But first, more Bruce Springsteen.
[break]
AMY GOODMAN: “Streets of Minneapolis,” just released by Bruce Springsteen, who definitely doesn’t need facial recognition technology to recognize him or his voice.
Amy Goodman is the host and executive producer of Democracy Now!, a national, daily, independent, award-winning news program airing on more than 1,100 public television and radio stations worldwide. Time Magazine named Democracy Now! its “Pick of the Podcasts,” along with NBC’s “Meet the Press.”
Scottie's Playtime 