Speaking Of The Most Anemic And Weak Democratic Leadership You Can Imagine…

House Republicans are investigating Jan. 6. NPR fact-checked the first hearing

In order to please tRump and stave off the maga thugs republicans in elected office are trying desperately to change reality.  Some are doing it to practice what tRump is able to do which is to make people accept his version of reality even when it is completely false and made up.  No one but tRump can do that and he has been doing it since he was a kid.  He has the ability to convince himself that what he wants to believe is true is true because he wants it.  By the fact he was always wealthy or people thought he was it worked and twice he has had the power of the presidency along with the cult behind him.   Other republicans don’t have that ability and can not command the maga cult.  But that won’t stop them from trying.   Hugs.


Rep. Barry Loudermilk sits with a microphone in front of him.

Rep. Barry Loudermilk, R-Ga., is leading a congressional subcommittee reinvestigating the Jan. 6, 2021, attack on the U.S. Capitol. The Trump administration has promoted a distorted and whitewashed history of that day’s events.

Andrew Harnik/AP

A new Republican-led congressional subcommittee to investigate the Jan. 6, 2021, attack on the U.S. Capitol held its first public hearing this week. GOP lawmakers used the opportunity to criticize the Biden administration and, at times, promote conspiracy theories about the riot. An NPR fact check has identified multiple false and misleading claims from the hearing, which coincides with a broader effort by the Trump administration to rewrite the history of the attack.

The hearing unfolded against the backdrop of Trump’s mass pardons for the Jan. 6 defendants almost one year ago. Stewart Rhodes, the former leader of the Oath Keepers who was convicted of seditious conspiracy for his role in the attack and sentenced to 18 years in prison, appeared at the front of the audience. Rhodes is one of a small group of former defendants who did not receive a full pardon from Trump, and instead received a commutation. As a result, Rhodes was released from prison but his seditious conspiracy conviction remains on his record.

The official topic for Wednesday’s hearing was “Examining the Investigation into the DNC and RNC Pipe Bombs.” On Jan. 6, just as rioters began breaching the outer perimeter of the Capitol, two bombs were discovered outside the headquarters of the Republican and Democratic national committees, diverting law enforcement resources at a critical moment.

During the Biden administration, the investigation into who planted the bombs stalled, and the lack of an arrest fueled conspiracy theories. Dan Bongino, the conservative podcaster who would later become deputy director of the FBI, said on his show in November 2024 that he was certain the bombs were placed by “either a connected anti-Trump insider or this was an inside job.”

A year later, Bongino told a very different story.

WASHINGTON, DC - DECEMBER 4: FBI Deputy Director Dan Bongino (L), accompanied by, Attorney General Pam Bondi (C), and FBI Director Kash Patel (R), speaks during a news conference on an arrest of a suspect in the January 6th pipe bomb case at the Department of Justice on December 4, 2025 in Washington, DC. Federal agents have arrested a suspect they are charging with placing two pipe bombs, which never exploded, the night before the January 6th, 2021 U.S. Capitol attack. (Photo by Andrew Harnik/Getty Images)

Former FBI Deputy Director Dan Bongino confirming the arrest of a suspect in the Jan. 6 pipe bomb case at the Department of Justice in 2025.

Andrew Harnik/Getty Images

While serving as a top FBI official, he appeared at a press conference announcing charges against Brian Cole Jr., a 30-year-old man from Virginia accused of planting the bombs. Cole, who has pleaded not guilty, twice voted for Trump, according to his lawyer. Federal prosecutors allege that Cole confessed and said he believed votes had been “tampered” with in the 2020 election.

Bongino addressed his shifting stance on the pipe bomber case on Fox News in December 2025. “I was paid in the past for my opinions,” Bongino said, “but that’s not what I’m paid for now. I’m paid to be your deputy director.” Bongino left the FBI at the beginning of January 2026 and is set to return to podcasting.

Rep. Barry Loudermilk, R-Ga., who chairs the subcommittee, has made the pipe bomb case a central focus of his inquiry. He repeatedly criticized the FBI for failing to crack the case for nearly five years and said internal documents “paint a dismal picture” of the investigation during the Biden administration.

In one of the few moments of bipartisan agreement, Rep. Jamie Raskin, D-Md., praised the FBI under Director Kash Patel for making an arrest, calling it “a rare bright spot for federal law enforcement over the last year.”

But with the pipe bombing case now moving through the courts — rather than the political arena — lawmakers sometimes veered into claims that did not match the facts.

Trump supporters storm the U.S. Capitol on Jan. 6, 2021.

Trump supporters storm the U.S. Capitol on Jan. 6, 2021.

Samuel Corum/Getty Images

The claim: 

“The Biden FBI did have undercover agents and confidential informants embedded within the rally crowds,” said Rep. Clay Higgins, R-La. “And the Biden FBI did conspire to entrap MAGA Americans prior to J6 and then successfully entrapped several hundred Americans on J6.”

The facts: 

Joe Biden was not president on Jan. 6 — Donald Trump was.

At the time of the attack, the FBI was led by Christopher Wray, a Trump appointee.

Joe Biden took office on Jan. 20, 2021, two weeks after the riot, and Wray remained FBI director for the duration of his presidency.

A Department of Justice inspector general report examined the presence of confidential FBI sources in the crowds on Jan. 6 and found that “none of these FBI [Confidential Human Sources] was authorized by the FBI to enter the Capitol or a restricted area or to otherwise break the law on January 6, nor was any CHS directed by the FBI to encourage others to commit illegal acts on January 6.” The report also found no evidence “showing or suggesting that the FBI had undercover employees in the various protest crowds, or at the Capitol, on January 6.”

Higgins’ office did not respond to a request for comment.

The claim:

Raskin said Trump failed to act decisively to stop the riot and “did nothing to send out the National Guard under his unilateral direct control in the District of Columbia.”

In response, Loudermilk countered that Trump “cannot just send the National Guard unless the National Guard is requested by the legislative branch.”

Referring to former Capitol Police Chief Steven Sund, Loudermilk said, “There were multiple requests made by the former chief of police for National Guard before the request to call them was given. And that was only after shots were fired in the Capitol. That request was made to the Department of Defense in the one o’clock hour on Jan. 6.”

The facts:

The president has direct control of the D.C. National Guard, and the Capitol Police requested assistance from the guard prior to the breach of the building. Still, troops did not arrive until hours later.

Loudermilk appears to have jumbled the timeline of the National Guard’s response, which is laid out in reports from both the Capitol Police and Department of Defense Office of Inspector General.

  • At 1:09 p.m. and again at 1:22 p.m., former Capitol Police Chief Steven Sund asked the House and Senate sergeants at arms to declare an emergency and formally request help from the National Guard. By that point, rioters had breached the outer perimeter of the Capitol grounds and were assaulting police, but had not yet broken into the building. 
  • At 1:49 p.m., Sund called the commanding general of the D.C. National Guard directly to request the assistance of guard troops at the Capitol. 
  • At 2:10 p.m., Sund relayed that he received formal authorization from the Capitol Police Board.
  • At 2:13 p.m., rioters broke a Capitol window and began flooding into the building.
  • At 2:44 p.m., Capitol Police Officer Michael Byrd fired a single shot, striking rioter Ashli Babbitt as she attempted to breach a door to the Speaker’s Lobby, where members of Congress were trying to evacuate. Babbitt subsequently died. National Guard troops did not arrive at the Capitol until 5:55 p.m.

In an email to NPR, Loudermilk’s Deputy Chief of Staff Brandon Cockerham said that the congressman’s reference to a request made “only after shots were fired” was an allusion to a later moment in the timeline, when acting Defense Secretary Christopher Miller authorized the mobilization of the National Guard.

“I believe the Chairman meant to use the word ‘authorization’ instead of ‘request’ as he was alluding to the authorized mobilization of the D.C. National Guard which came at approximately 3:04 PM,” Cockerham wrote.

The claim:

Rep. Troy Nehls, R-Texas, criticized police officers who testified before the previous Jan. 6 select committee, which was led by Rep. Bennie Thompson, D-Miss., and former Rep. Liz Cheney, R-Wyo.

“They set out to have a highly pre-scripted hearing, designated to play on the emotions of Americans,” said Nehls. “For example, the hearing with Capitol Police officers Dunn, Gonell, Fanone, Hodges — four Trump haters who gave highly scripted and pre-planned testimonies.”

The facts:

Nehls was referring to testimony by Harry Dunn and Aquilino Gonell, who served with the Capitol Police, and Michael Fanone and Daniel Hodges, who served with D.C.’s Metropolitan Police Department.

All four officers have publicly criticized Trump, in large part because of the injuries and trauma they suffered defending the Capitol on Jan. 6.

But their politics are not as simple as Nehls suggested.

Fanone, who was dragged into the crowd and repeatedly beaten and shocked in the neck by a rioter with a Taser-style device, voted for Trump in 2016.

“I was looking for a candidate that supported law enforcement,” Fanone told NPR in an interview last year. “I regret the decision. It was clearly the wrong decision in hindsight.”

Fanone suffered a traumatic brain injury and a minor heart attack due to the assaults on Jan. 6.

Nehls’ office did not respond to NPR’s request for comment.

Political cartoons / memes / and news I want to share. 1-11-2026

Image from Assigned Male

Image from Assigned Male

Image from Assigned Male

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

political cartoon

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

image

The soul of MAGA/ICE writ large.

 

 

 

 

Jimmy Margulies for 1/9/2026

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Mike Smith for 1/9/2026

 

 

 

Lee Judge for 1/9/2026

 

 

 

 

 

Joey Weatherford for 1/9/2026

Joey Weatherford for 1/8/2026

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

JD Vance defends Minnesota shooting as self-defence amid immigration crackdown

The report / written article has several sections with different versions.  But it seems clear that Gestapo leader Stephen Miller is pushing everyone to send the message to ICE thugs and all right wing news media that the government would shield ICE gang thugs as long as they kept the harassment and terrorizing the brown people.  The goal of ICE is to make brown people too scared for their lives to stay in the country or come here.  The goal of the government is to force the public into instant obedience and to never protest anything the tRump people do or demand no matter how illegal, abusive, or scamming.   Hugs

A third officer, positioned in front of her car on the left, drew his gun and fired three times while jumping back, with the last shots aimed through the driver’s window after the car’s bumper appeared to have cleared his body.

The video did not appear to show contact and the officer stayed on his feet, though Ms Noem said he was taken to a hospital and released.


https://www.abc.net.au/news/2026-01-09/minneapolis-shooting-fbi-bca-blocked/106212576

Has Video Duration: 1 minute 4 seconds.

Viewer advice.

ICE agent fatally shoots woman in Minneapolis.

In short:

US Vice-President JD Vance says an ICE officer was clearly justified in shooting a woman during an immigration enforcement surge.

Minnesota authorities have accused the FBI of seeking to block their access to an investigation into the death of Renee Nicole Good, 37. 

What’s next?

Protesters have taken to the streets and some local schools have cancelled classes for the day.

US Vice-President JD Vance has defended the immigration agent who shot and killed a 37-year-old Minneapolis woman amid tensions between state and federal officials.

Renee Nicole Good was shot in the head in front of a family member on Wednesday, local time, during an immigration enforcement surge.

Mr Vance said the shooting was justified and that Ms Good was a “victim of left-wing ideology”.

“I can believe that her death is a tragedy while also recognising that it is a tragedy of her own making,” he said.

Mr Vance said the officer was clearly acting in self-defence.

A piece of paper stapled to a powerline saying "RIP Renee" with a photo of her.

There has been an outpouring of grief and anger in the community following the shooting. (AP: Mike Householder)

FBI ‘reversed course’ over joint probe

Minnesota’s Bureau of Criminal Apprehension (BCA) said it had been blocked by the FBI from taking part in a joint investigation into the shooting.

Following the shooting, the BCA initially said it had agreed to jointly investigate the shooting with the FBI.

But on Thursday, a day after the shooting, BCA Superintendent Drew Evans said the federal agency had “reversed course” and taken sole control over the probe.

He said that step meant the state bureau would no longer have access to the scene evidence, case materials or interviews.

“As a result, the BCA has reluctantly withdrawn from the investigation,” Superintendent Evans said.

The FBI and the office of US Attorney Daniel Rosen, the chief federal prosecutor in Minneapolis, did not immediately respond to questions about the BCA statement.

Keith Ellison, the state’s Democratic attorney general, told CNN the FBI’s decision was “deeply disturbing” and said state authorities could investigate with or without the cooperation of the federal government.

A maroon car with yellow police tape around it

Renee Nicole Good was shot inside her car on Wednesday, local time. (Reuters: Tim Evans)

Ms Good’s death has left Minneapolis on edge, with protesters taking to the streets in anger and schools cancelling classes as a precaution on Thursday.

Minnesota and Trump administration officials have offered starkly different accounts of the shooting, with US President Donald Trump describing the slain woman as a “professional agitator”.

Democratic politicians and protesters have contested that claim, with the Minneapolis City Council saying she was “out caring for her neighbours” and died “at the hands of the federal government”.

Vance says officer deserves gratitude

Homeland Security Secretary Kristi Noem said on Wednesday, local time, that the officer who shot Ms Good had been “dragged” by a vehicle during a previous incident in June.

According to court documents, the officer was part of a team trying to apprehend a man in the country illegally.

A man wearing a navy suit, holding up his hands

JD Vance defended the shooting as self-defence during a press conference on Thursday. (Reuters: Kevin Lamarque)

He broke a window and reached into the vehicle, attempting to open the door when the driver sped off, dragging the officer the length of a football field in 12 seconds.

The officer’s right arm was bleeding, and an FBI agent applied a tourniquet.

He was transported to a hospital, where he received more than 50 stitches.

Prosecutors said he had “suffered multiple large cuts and abrasions to his knee, elbow, and face”.

Mr Vance said the ICE officer “deserves a debt of gratitude”.

“This is a guy who’s actually done a very, very important job for the United States of America,” he said.

“He’s been assaulted. He’s been attacked. He’s been injured because of it.”

City and state officials blame immigration surge for shooting

A heavily armoured police officer spraying a chemical agent at a crowd.

Federal authorities in Minneapolis used chemical agents on protesters during democrations on Thursday, a day after the shooting. (AP: Tom Baker)

The agent was among 2,000 federal officers that the Trump administration had announced it was deploying to the Minneapolis area in what the Department of Homeland Security described as the “largest DHS operation ever”.

But Wednesday’s shooting drew immediate condemnation from city and state officials who blamed Mr Trump’s immigration enforcement surge for sowing chaos in the city’s streets.

DHS officials, including Ms Noem, defended the shooting as self-defence and accused the woman of trying to ram agents in an act of “domestic terrorism”.

Minneapolis Mayor Jacob Frey, a Democrat, called that assertion “bulls**t” and “garbage” based on bystander videos taken of the incident that appeared to contradict the government’s account.

Videos showed two masked officers approaching Ms Good’s car, which was stopped at a perpendicular angle on a Minneapolis street.

As one officer ordered Ms Good out of the car and grabbed at her door handle, the car briefly reversed and then began driving forward, turning to the right in an apparent attempt to leave the scene.

A third officer, positioned in front of her car on the left, drew his gun and fired three times while jumping back, with the last shots aimed through the driver’s window after the car’s bumper appeared to have cleared his body.

The video did not appear to show contact and the officer stayed on his feet, though Ms Noem said he was taken to a hospital and released.

Reuters/AP

 

Trump’s Dangerous Jan6 History Rewrite

The whoppers of 2025

https://rollcall.com/2025/12/25/the-whoppers-of-2025/

Claims about economy, war in Ukraine, measles were among the top falsehoods of past year

President Donald Trump listens during a ceremony for the presentation of the Mexican Border Defense Medal in the White House on Dec. 15, 2025.

President Donald Trump listens during a ceremony for the presentation of the Mexican Border Defense Medal in the White House on Dec. 15, 2025. (Anna Moneymaker/Getty Images)

Let’s talk about Trump semiconductor tariffs and the reshoring fantasy….

The White House’s new media ‘bias’ tracker is a desperate gimmick Margaret Sullivan

https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2025/dec/02/white-house-media-bias-tracker-gimmick

The White House’s new media ‘bias’ tracker is a desperate gimmick

Margaret Sullivan

The site isn’t exposing misleading reporting – it’s revealing the bubble Trump increasingly inhabits

trump in press briefing room, behind pam bondi‘Given that bubble, harsh reality via the media is a rude intrusion.’ Photograph: Jonathan Ernst/Reuters

Donald Trump has used the mainstream press as a punching bag for many years, but in recent weeks his jabs have become even more frequent – and more ill-tempered.

He threatened to sue the BBC for $1bn last month over the editing of a documentary that aired more than a year ago. He called one White House reporter “piggy”, and told another – the well-regarded Mary Bruce of ABC News – that she was a “terrible person and a terrible reporter”. He called a New York Times reporter “ugly, both inside and out”.

And last Friday, his White House unveiled the latest wrinkle: a new website that supposedly tracks media bias. It offers a “Hall of Shame” and “media offenders of the week” to focus on reporting that the president dislikes. It names individuals and news organizations, and it points to the Boston Globe and CBS News, among others, for doing supposedly misleading and biased work. It uses terms like “left wing lunacy” to describe some of its complaints.

The site’s first iteration is particularly focused on media reporting about Trump’s call for six Democratic members of Congress to be arrested, tried and punished for their supposedly “seditious” video reminding military and intelligence personnel that they are not obliged to follow illegal orders. Trump even boosted a social media post that shouted: “HANG THEM GEORGE WASHINGTON WOULD” (He later told Fox News he wasn’t “threatening death, but I think they’re in serious trouble”).

All this for a video in which the members of Congress sought to remind people that military members make an oath to the constitution, not to the president.

“Our laws are clear. You can refuse illegal orders,” Senator Mark Kelly of Arizona, a former astronaut and a US navy veteran, says on the video. Trump has been especially furious about Kelly, who seems like just the wrong person to go after, giving his background of service and high credibility.

The White House site crows that those journalists and outlets who reported on all this are now “exposed”.

There really is something being exposed here, but it’s not the reporting.

It’s Trump’s own increasing desperation and his decreasing ability to countenance anything other than flattery and sycophancy. That’s not what the mainstream press is – or should be – in the business of providing.

But as Jonathan Lemire reported this week in the Atlantic, this president has become more and more isolated lately. His social media appears mostly restricted to his own (poorly named) Truth Social site; his travel is generally not to meet with (or even see) ordinary Americans; instead he tends to hang out with the billionaires who want something from his administration and are willing to cozy up shamelessly to get it.

“President Trump has never before been in such an echo chamber,” according to Lemire. “His domestic travel has basically stopped. He sees rich donors and Maga media, not actual voters.”

Given that bubble, harsh reality via the media is a rude intrusion, and the new White House site is an evident effort to dispel the discomfort by disparaging it.

Who, I wonder, does Trump think he’s reaching with this effort?

The Maga faithful, of course, don’t need to be persuaded. They already are fully on board with anything their dear leader does. And most other Americans – even some of the millions who voted for him – already have his number.

Trump’s overall approval rating of 38% is the lowest since his return to the presidency, according to a recent Reuters/Ipsos poll. It has fallen dramatically since the start of that second term and is down two percentage points just since the beginning of November. Even his iron grip on the Republican party has weakened. All of that is a deep worry with the approach of the midterm elections – less than a year away.

Who can he blame?

Why, the press, of course. And that’s precisely what this new site is all about.

Will it work? Granted, trust in the mainstream press is low, so reporters and news organizations are a convenient target of criticism. And granted, media bias exists, though the most blatant is on the far right, the busy pro-Trump propagandists.

But I agree with Seth Stern, director of advocacy for the Freedom of the Press Foundation, who told the Washington Post that most people – whatever their politics – aren’t going to buy what this new “bias tracker” is selling.

“People understand the obvious conflict inherent in a presidential administration appointing itself the arbiter of media bias,” Stern said.

That’s especially true for media criticism from those doing the bidding of Trump, who has made his antipathy toward the press so central to his persona.

Calling out inaccurate and biased reporting is a fair pursuit. Journalists are far from flawless; they make mistakes, and the best of them correct those quickly and fully.

But that’s not what this new site is about. And trashing the media is not going to help Trump get out of the trouble – or the bubble – that he’s in.

  • Margaret Sullivan is a Guardian US columnist writing on media, politics and culture

Trump’s Plan For Homeless Concentration Camps | Jesse Rabinowitz | TMR

1,300 bed concentration camp with no way out just for not being able to pay the rent.  If you watch the video you see these anti-homeless lock them up solutions to make homeless disappear are coming from right wing billionaire funded think tanks.  Again this is a war on the poor.  And seriously with costs going up how long until being poor is anyone the wealthy don’t like.   So many dystopian movies have this same start.  Hugs

Mike Johnson Goes Full Pathetic Worm