Clay Jones

Stolen Women by Clay Jones

Trump thinks women are property…his property Read on Substack

If you are aware of a pedophile, and you enable that pedophile, then you’re as bad as a pedophile. So, what did Trump know? What did Trump do?

There is a video of Trump seeing a young girl going up an escalator in 1992, maybe she was a preteen, and he comments that he’ll be “dating” her someday. It’s creepy. It’s creepy like when he said he’d be dating his own daughter if they weren’t related. On another occasion, he said what he and Ivanka have in common is their love for sex. I just shivered.

I know relationships are different, but what father wants to talk to his daughter about his or her sex life? Ew. The most I ever talked to my mother about sex was shortly after my separation from my wife, and she said she hoped I wouldn’t fall in love with the first woman I slept with. I told my mother, “I haven’t fallen in love with either of them.” And she said, “TWO? TWO? I’m so ashamed and proud of you.” Unfortunately, my father wouldn’t shut up about his past exploits.

Trump is a creeper. When he endorsed Roy Moore for the Senate, he already knew about allegations of pedophilia against Moore. Trump’s defense was, “He said he didn’t do it.” That’s the same defense he used for Putin’s election meddling.

Whenever it’s a he-said-she-said situation, Trump will always go with he-said. (snip-MORE)

Some News Of The Day

Senate Democrats Estimate DOGE Caused Billions of Dollars In Government Waste by TPM
Read on Substack

A lot of things happened. Here are some of the things. This is TPM’s Morning Memo. Sign up for the email version.

What DOGE Cost Us

Democrats on the Senate Permanent Subcommittee on Investigations yesterday released a jaw-dropping report attempting to document the scope and scale of financial waste, personnel upheaval, and human suffering caused by the so-called Department of Government Efficiency and Elon Musk’s giddily uninformed strike force of Peter Thiel acolytes. In all, the Democrats, led by Richard Blumenthal (CT), estimated DOGE cost the government $21.7 billion.

“DOGE-generated waste could also have easily funded monthly food assistance for the 5.3 million families losing an average of $146 in monthly food security assistance ($9.3 billion per year) under the new budget; or it could have been used more broadly to support the 40 percent of taxpayers that will see a net increase to their taxes as a direct result of the Trump tax plan,” the report contends.

Major news coverage focused on the cost of the government paying over 150,000 federal workers who accepted the Trump administration’s deferred resignation incentives, under which they had to stop working but are continuing to be paid through September or even December. The minority’s report, which estimated that 200,000 workers took these buyouts, calculated that paying workers for not working cost the government $14.8 billion.

Neither the buyouts nor paying workers while on administrative leave (costing an additional $6.1 billion) increased government efficiency, as was always obvious and predictable. The report details many other costs, from the petty and pointless (millions of hours of wasted employee time writing the Musk-required email listing their weekly accomplishments) to the catastrophic (the elimination of the United States Agency for International Development, “projected to cause millions of additional deaths globally while simultaneously endangering domestic public health by reducing essential medical staff and programs.”)

As it rampaged through the government, DOGE destroyed valuable assets, wasting money already set aside to be spent, or depriving the government of income-generating programs. Product spoilage of USAID supplies of food and medicines cost the government nearly $10 million. DOGE’s elimination of the Internal Revenue Service’s Direct File program, the report estimates, wasted a more than $33 million investment in it, not to mention that taxpayers no longer have a free electronic filing option. DOGE caused the loss of more than $263 million of interest and fee income by shutting down Department of Energy loans from a program to modernize the electricity grid. The actual cost of the mass cancellations of medical research grants at the National Institutes of Health has yet to be fully calculated.

This summary represents a fraction of the entire report, and much is still not even known about the scope of the DOGE destruction. Yesterday, Blumenthal wrote to the inspectors general at 27 agencies, requesting they “initiate a comprehensive review of DOGE’s activities within your agency in order to determine the full scope of costs that DOGE’s careless actions have imposed,” particularly “the financial impact of the reorganization of federal agencies through mass layoffs, the canceling of grants, contracts, and other projects for partisan reasons, and the stifling of income-generating activities.”

Is MAGA Turning on Trump over Israel?

I spotted two stories this week in the inside-the-Beltway press, one in Politico and the other in Axios, suggesting MAGA is turning on Trump because of his continued support of the Netanyahu regime and its assault on Gaza that even Israeli human rights organizations have called a genocide. The Axios piece even suggests a “GOP realignment” on the issue may be underway. The Politico piece is more measured on that possibility, but neither piece mentions the critical role of Christian Zionists — that is, evangelicals who vigorously support Israel’s far right, like Ambassador to Israel Mike Huckabee — in the Trump coalition.

It is hard to know now this possible coalitional split will play out. In the meantime, can we talk about how the MAGA figures turning against Israel are saying things that have gotten foreign students detained and universities’ funding cut off?

(snip-MORE, + other subjects)

And In Not What It Initially Appears To Be,

Charlotte Clymer with another interesting story about rightwingers.

Why Sydney Sweeney Needs to Be Canceled by Charlotte Clymer

Her career needs to end. Read on Substack


Actually, this has nothing to do with Sydney Sweeney.

I’ve seen some of her movies and shows. She’s a good actor. She seems nice. I have no real opinion of her beyond that.

The rightwing media ecosystem is currently obsessed with Ms. Sweeney, and per their usual outrage machine schtick, they’ve made her their latest vehicle for claiming Democrats are out-of-touch with America.

This week, Fox News and various other conservative outlets have spent considerable time claiming that Democrats are furious over a jeans advertisement featuring Ms. Sweeney—the details of their supposed outrage are too absurd to get into here, and I’d rather not insult your intelligence by pretending you should care.

But I figure tens of millions of Trump supporters are feverishly googling “Democrats” and “Sydney Sweeney” for that sweet, sweet hit of outrage to feed their addiction, and it occurred to me that a provocative headline could be a great opportunity to get them here and offer a read-out on what Democrats and progressives are currently, actually, passionately discussing.

I’m in approximately ~5,000 group chats with fellow Democrats (heavy sigh), give or take a few, and Sydney Sweeney has not come up once in any of them. Not a single one.

Here’s what we’ve really been talking about this week:

We’re pretty horrified by the ongoing horror in Gaza. Children there are starving-to-death, and the Israeli military has brutally slaughtered more than 1,000 innocent civilians attempting to get food assistance, almost all of which is being blocked by Netanyahu’s government.

All of our allies—including the United Kingdom—have been urgently pleading with Netanyahu to end the blockade and feed starving people in Gaza and please, oh please, stop shooting at them.

We’re wondering why Republican Christians in Congress would disregard Christ’s clear teachings on this matter. Pope Leo XIV condemned “the very grave humanitarian situation in Gaza, where the civilian population is crushed by hunger and remains exposed to violence and death.”

But hey, what the hell does he know?

We’re disgusted by the cover-up over the Epstein files, and it’s fairly obvious to everyone that Donald Trump is desperately attempting to conceal and distract from his involvement in a massive sex trafficking operation that targeted children.

Remember when the Republican Party pretended to care about pedophiles and sex trafficking and the so-called “Deep State” and Trump pandered to them for votes by claiming he would released the Epstein files and then he didn’t?

We’ve been talking all month about the fall-out of Trump’s One Big, Beautiful Bill and the fact that upwards of 17 million Americans will lose their health care coverage and millions will lose food assistance and a ton of rural hospitals are about to close down.

We have no idea how we’re going to help all these people when that legislation is fully implemented, and in discussing how to get medical treatment for the sick and food for the hungry, we don’t really care who these vulnerable folks voted for last year.

We’re considerably worried about the country’s total unpreparedness for natural disasters like hurricanes and tsunamis and flooding and earthquakes because Donald Trump and the Republican Party have gutted the NOAA and the National Weather Service and FEMA.

We imagine a lot of people are going to needlessly die in flood waters and devastating cyclones because of Republican incompetence and cruelty, and again: we have no idea how we’re going to help these folks when that happens.

We’ve been talking a lot about the accelerating erosion of constitutional protections and the Trump administration openly forcing colleges and corporations to pay him a bribe in order to avoid being targeted by his dictatorial madness.

We’ve been talking about Trump’s efforts to silence Stephen Colbert and his other most prominent critics in pop culture, except, of course, when he’s too chickenshit to take on the creators of South Park.

We wonder how the Constitution will survive this era. We wonder how the courts can resist threats of violence. We wonder how democracy can endure when even the most concerned Republicans, like Sen. Lisa Murkowski, have largely given up on their oaths.

Sydney Sweeney and which endorsements she’s landed and what ads she’s appearing in and what products she’s hawking to the public — none of that matters to us.

If anything, in regards to Ms. Sweeney, we’re embarrassed for the shamelessness of Republicans who are attempting to exploit her as a distraction from the death and destruction they’re causing and enabling.

Maybe if we got a hungry or sick child in a rural part of the country to record a video talking shit about Ms. Sweeney, that would be enough for Trump and Republicans to pay attention to their suffering. (snip)

A Positive Way To Take Back Identity:

Black Indigenous Chefs Are Reclaiming Identity Through Food — One Dish at a Time by Michael Harriot

Black Native food workers are passing down culinary traditions, restoring lost connections and feeding body and soul. Read on Substack

Crystal Wahpepah (Photo courtesy of Crystal Wahpepah)

The Indigenous food movement has seen a renaissance in North America, with restaurant openings, cookbook releases and community initiatives that announce the presence, expertise and heritage of Indigenous food workers. Amidst this moment, Black Native food workers have seen both the beauty and the harshness of living at the intersection of Blackness and Indigeneity, as the dominant settler colonial culture of the United States often tries to erase or flatten all parts of their identities.

But those attempts at erasure have also provided moments of reflection and insight, and a realization that the mission of Black Indigenous food workers is profoundly spiritual and political healing work. For Stephan Oak, a Black and Lakota forager and woodworker who lives in Detroit, the threads of connection that Black Indigenous people hold in their family stories that are “steeped in violence, but also steeped in love and resistance” are also guides that allow them to connect in the past, present, and future — a shared cosmology.

Crystal Wahpepah, who is Black and Kickapoo and the executive chef and owner of Wahpepah’s Kitchen in Oakland, Calif., says that often, through representation and education, Black Native people in the food industry come to a deeper peace about their identity and heritage. At Wahpepah’s Kitchen, over cornbread dishes from the Ute and Kickapoo people, wild rice from the Great Lakes tribes and bison from the Great Plains, people often find themselves.

“I meet so many people who are Black and Native but never felt connected to their Indigenous side, and when they meet me, they start talking about it, about culture, about those things that have been lost,” she says. Wahpepah is also opening a new restaurant, A Feather and a Fork, which is also the title of her upcoming cookbook.

That loss is something felt in both Black and Indigenous communities and can often feel pronounced because of family separation through residential schools, land expulsions, the trans-Atlantic slave trade and the domestic slave trade that broke up Black families across the country. “Because of colonial violence, there’s a fractured relationship to home or your connection to your ancestors,” says Oak. “The intent of the colonizer is to stop you from looking … to accept the identity of the conditions they’ve placed on you.”

Food is one of the ways Oak and others are reclaiming autonomy over their identities, especially as governments use food as a weapon by depriving communities of affordable, culturally relevant food. Oak points out that even amidst food deserts on reservations and urban Black communities, people find ways to be more self-sufficient and connect back to the land, which helps them reconnect with the essence of who they are. (snip-MORE; lots more but not too long)

Crystal Wahpepah’s wild rice salad with strawberries and pecans (Courtesy of Crystal Wahpepah)

Last Day Of July In Peace & Justice History

July 31, 1896
The National Association of Colored Women (NACW) was established in Washington, D.C. Its two leading members were Josephine Ruffin and Mary Church Terrell. Founders also included some of the most renowned African-American women educators, community leaders, and civil-rights activists in America, including Harriet Tubman, Frances E.W. Harper, Margaret Murray Washington, and Ida B. Wells-Barnett.

Mary Church Terrell
The original intention of the organization was “to furnish evidence of the moral, mental and material progress made by people of colour through the efforts of our women.” 
However, over the next ten years the NACW became involved in campaigns favoring women’s suffrage and opposing lynching and Jim Crow laws. By the time the United States entered the First World War, membership had reached 300,000.
The NACW and its founders  
July 31, 1986
25,000 people rallied in Namibia for freedom from South African colonial rule. In June, 1971 the International Court of Justice had ruled the South African presence in Namibia to be illegal. Eventually, open elections for a 72-member Constituent Assembly were held under U.N. supervision in November, 1989. Three months later Namibia gained its independence, and maintains it today.
More on Namibia’s independence 


Namibian flag
July 31, 1991
The United States and the Soviet Union, represented by President George H.W. Bush and General Secretary Mikhail Gorbachev, signed the Strategic Arms Reduction Treaty, known as START I. It was the first agreement to actually reduce (by 25-35%) and verify both countries’ stockpiles of nuclear weapons at equal aggregate levels in strategic offensive arms.
The Soviet Union dissolved several months later, but Russia and the U.S. met their goals by December, 2001. Three other former republics of the U.S.S.R., Kazakhstan, Belarus and Ukraine, have eliminated these weapons from their territory altogether.

Comprehensive info from the Federation of American Scientists:

https://www.peacebuttons.info/E-News/peacehistoryjuly.htm#july31

A real bad night. What started out being a good one. Trigger warning

I went to bed about normal 7 pm for me.  Surprisingly when I told Ron he said he wanted to go also.  That was about 2 hours or earlier than he normally goes to bed.  His normal time to go to bed is 9 or a bit later.  But we went to bed together.  Along with Tupac.

We cuddled several hours with me holding him and then us reversing and him cuddling me.  We go back and forth during the night.  We often fall asleep in each other’s arms, and I often get my most restful sleep while we cuddle.  Which is going to seem strange with what I am going to write next.  

After four hours of holding each other, I noticed Ron’s legs were fidgeting and fussing.  I asked him if he legs were bothering him and he replied yes.  I was a bit miffed he did not tell me before I noticed but I told him we needed to take some time off on our own sides and he asked if we could cuddle later to which I agreed.  

At some point I started to have a bad memory nightmare.  I know in the nightmare I was begging for help, I was screaming for help.  Then I could hear Ron’s voice calling me begging me to wake up, but my fear / pain was too much and I still yelled for anyone to help me.  

Then With Ron yelling next to me, as he knew better than to touch me when I am in that state, I started to hear him and even as I was still crying out for help I heard him beg me to follow his voice.  When I came to he told me I was the loudest I had been in a long time, begging for help at one point I screamed out several times “help me, someone please help me”.  

After he woke me I got out of bed and went to the bathroom.  When I got back he asked if I wanted to talk.  I said no.  He told me Scottie that was bad, you were really upset and loud.  I just got back into bed and faced away from him.  He understood I was not ready to deal with it.   

For the next couple of hours I lay there trying not to think of the memories I had just experienced in my nightmare.  In the morning I got up early, when Ron got up he twice asked me to talk about what I went through.  I told him I was not ready yet.  I could see him wanting more but knowing pushing me would only cause me pain.  

The memory / nightmare was a really bad hours long rapes by multiple people when I was a really young kid.   I was young enough to think that screaming and yelling would get me help.  As I got older I understood doing such things only brought more punishment.  In the dream I was experiencing it as I did then, with all the pain, panic, desperation and then submission.  

I have come to realize burdening Ron with these memories only causes him to feel pain thinking of what I went through with no way to stop it.  Trust me my wonderful Ron would have killed to stop a child being abused.  Yes he tries to be a grand husband to comfort me, but it is wrong of me to ask that of him I think.  Is it transferring my pain on to him in the name of “sharing”, the same question could be asked of my sharing of it on the blog.  But he can only take the pain and memories I share as I could only take the abuse.  He is then stuck with them in his mind as I am with them in mine.  Do I have that right?  Is that not abusing my own husband the man I adore to do that, to ask that.  Is that the same for when I share with everyone here on my blog.  I am giving you my memories and pain with no way to stop it.  Have I become a villain, an abuser?  

Until I figure out if I am doing more damage than good I will have to keep telling him I just don’t want to talk.  Better to suffer in silence than cause him a pain he can not rid himself of.   Hugs

Four important clips from The Majority Report. Each video clip is a different subject

10 Women Disarm an F-16, & Torquemada’s Work in Spain, in Peace & Justice History for 7/30

July 30, 1492
The same month Christopher Columbus set sail from Spain for his “expedition of discovery to the Indies” [actually the Western Hemisphere], was the deadline for all “Jews and Jewesses of our kingdoms to depart and never to return . . .” lest they be executed. Under the influence of Fr. Tomas de Torquemada, the leader of the Spanish Inquisition, King Ferdinand and Queen Isabella had ordered the expulsion of the entire Jewish community of 200,000 from Spain within four months. Spain’s Muslims, or Moors, were forced out as well within ten years.

The edict of expulsion from Spain signed by King Ferdinand and Queen Isabella
All were forced to sell off their houses, businesses and possessions, were pressured to convert to Christianity, and to find a new country to live in. Those who left were known as Sephardim (Hebrew for Spain), settling in North Africa, Italy, and elsewhere in Europe and the Arab world.
Most went to Portugal, were allowed to stay just six months, and then were enslaved under orders of King John. Those who made it to Turkey were welcomed by Sultan Bajazet who asked,
 “How can you call Ferdinand of Aragon a wise king, the same Ferdinand who impoverished his own land and enriched ours?”
July 30, 1996
Four Ploughshares activists in Liverpool, England, were acquitted of all charges (illegal entry and criminal damage) on the basis of their having prevented a greater crime, after having extensively damaged an F-16 Hawk fighter jet to be sold to the Indonesian government for use in its genocidal occupation of East Timor.

Seeds of Hope-East Timor Ploughshares: the action and the aftermath

https://www.peacebuttons.info/E-News/peacehistoryjuly.htm#july30

Health Dis/Misinfo That’s Dangerous For Young People

Opinion: Contraception Gives Young Women Control of Their Bodies—So Why Are So Many Girls Afraid to Use it?

Jul 28, 2025, 9:00am Shoshana Kaplan

One-third of young women who don’t take birth control say they fear its side effects. Misinformation plays a role, a health expert says.

This story is part of our monthly series, Campus Dispatch. Read the rest of the stories in the series here.

As long as contraception has been widely available, misconceptions about its safety—from weight gain fears to claims you need a birth control “cleanse” every few years—have scared some young women away from using it. Today, this kind of misinformation is no longer solely circulated in locker rooms or sleepovers. In the modern digital world, active misinformation and disinformation campaigns that deter people from using contraception circulate on social media—reaching millions.

The origin of this issue varies. Sometimes, rumors about birth control are intentionally created and promoted for political purposes; this is disinformation. Sometimes, false claims are unintentionally spread by people who believe their statements are true. Other times, one person misrepresents their real, lived experience as a universal truth.

The results are astonishing: A 2022 KFF study found that roughly one-third of reproductive-age women who are not on birth control cite fears of side effects as a reason for avoiding contraception.

Since the fall of Roe v. Wade in 2022, contraception and comprehensive sex education have become more than just public health priorities: They are now the front lines of defense in protecting reproductive rights and empowering people—young women especially—to make choices about their bodies.

I am a public health master’s candidate focused on reproductive health and communications. This summer, I am interning at the sexual health and equity non-profit Advocates for Youth, which champions bodily autonomy for young people. In my work here to develop sex education materials and resources for young people and educators, as well as in my academic research, I’ve come to believe that combatting digital misinformation about birth control will require a collective response.

Taking health advice from TikTok

It’s easy to see how young people can fall victim to digital misinformation: Imagine you’re a 15-year-old girl dealing with severe period pain, or perhaps your acne has gotten out of control. Or maybe, you’re just excited to start having sex for the first time and want to do so safely. After talking with your mom and doctor, you decide to try hormonal birth control. You feel relieved. After months of keeping this big life choice to yourself, you finally shared your needs—and you were heard. You have a plan.

That night, some two hours into your usual TikTok scroll, you’re shown a video featuring a beautiful young woman you recognize from your “For You” page. She says birth control not only wrecked her hormonal balance, but will also cause cancer. You’ve seen this creator’s lifestyle content before and always trusted her. In the most-liked comments, hundreds of people echo her experience, sharing stories of hair loss or feeling “crazy” on the pill. Some comment they’re grateful to have never started birth control at all. Nowhere in the comments do you see a doctor or other medical expert pushing back, insisting that birth control is safe and effective.

What do you do?

Perhaps you search TikTok for other perspectives. You find a couple videos from OB-GYNs disputing the claims. But the other creator’s post had more than 200,000 views and hundreds of comments, while that one OB-GYN’s explainer only has 5,000 views and 20 comments. On social media, attention often passes for credibility.

You text your best friend, who asks her older sister. The sister agrees with the original creator’s claims.

Now you’re really nervous (your sister’s friend has had two boyfriends, after all!). You go back to your mom to say you’re not sure about the plan anymore. You’re scared of what birth control will do to your body. She tries to reassure you that it’s safe, but you can’t stop thinking about the women on TikTok who said it wasn’t.

‘A fertile breeding ground for misinformation’

Even though birth control rumors have circulated for decades, today’s rising mistrust of medical providers and the over-politicization of health, combined with poor digital literacy, have come together to create a fertile breeding ground for misinformation. False claims about infertility and severe mood disorder flourish.

“Data clearly show the deluge of misinformation about reproductive health care, including birth control, on social media,” reads a June 2024 statement from the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists, the nation’s top association of OB-GYNs. “This misinformation can cause real harm for patients by encouraging unsafe methods of contraception; by sharing ineffective methods that expose people to unintended pregnancy; or by scaring people away from safe, effective, evidence-based methods of contraception.”

The American Medical Association is likewise sounding the alarm that the rapid spread of misinformation puts lives at risk.

To a certain extent, historic distrust in doctors drives this phenomenon. Physicians have long faced accusations of minimizing women’s medical concerns—by not using anesthesia when inserting intrauterine devices (IUDs), for example, or dismissing reports of pain during pregnancy. This past, which fuels genuine mistrust, is especially prominent in Black and brown communities, where the medical establishment in the 19th and 20th centuries routinely ignored, lied to and exploited patients under the guise of scientific discovery and public health. Any serious efforts to address reproductive health care must acknowledge this legacy, not deny it.

Instead, politicians capitalize on this weakening trust in medicine by amplifying misleading claims. Right-wing commentators like Ben Shapiro and Candace Owens routinely use their platforms to denounce birth control and spread lies about its effectiveness and adverse effects, while claiming they are concerned for women’s health. Some academic researchers and political analysts suggest these are deliberate efforts to dampen opposition should Republicans begin repealing access to birth control using the Comstock Act, an anti-obscenity law from the late 1800s that could stop doctors from mailing contraception or abortion pills. The fewer people believing in the efficacy of birth control, the more compelling their case.

Combatting disinformation together

Too often, efforts to combat misinformation are limited to one-on-one doctor’s office conversations, high school health class (if a school district even offers evidence-based sex education; many don’t), or sporadic debunking posts from reproductive health organizations.

Those of us who believe, as I do, that birth control should be a right for every person who needs it must challenge misinformation and disinformation with the same vigor and coordination as the people and groups spreading it. To meaningfully push back, organizations committed to advancing reproductive health-care access must invest in sweeping digital campaigns—paid, organic, and partnerships—to combat misconceptions and reclaim the narrative around contraception.
I’m not the only one who believes these trends call for swift action to match the scale of the problem.

Power to Decide, an organization working to expand access to reproductive health services, is evolving its long-running hashtag campaign #thxbirthcontrol to meet the moment. What began in 2012 as a campaign on X to influence public perception of birth control has now expanded to other platforms including TikTok, where the group posts short videos that highlight the positive, everyday impacts of contraception.
Combatting stigma with content that’s compelling, relatable, and accurate is essential to combatting misinformation. So is getting that content directly to the people most swayed by misinformation.

At the launch of their new Health Misinformation and Trust initiative, KFF President and CEO Drew Altman explained, “Most Americans have encountered health misinformation, but a large group simply isn’t sure if it’s true or false. Most people fall into this muddled middle place—underscoring the real opportunities we have to counter misinformation but also the risks of inaction.”

While both of these efforts are promising, they cannot be effective in isolation; a coordinated, aligned response is necessary to effectively combat misinformation.

One encouraging approach is Advocates for Youth’s “The Busybodies Club.” This national campaign, which launched before I joined the organization, combines digital education with relational organizing to teach young people how to “spot fake facts, identify misinformation, and challenge misconceptions.” The Busybodies Club is structured to recognize that challenging misinformation requires more than facts—it requires trust, community, and creativity at the interpersonal and systemic levels. The organization’s guide to spot red flags on birth control posts is a great starting point for folks interested in being part of the solution.

And as more organizations join the fight to combat misinformation about birth control, it’s important to acknowledge that hormonal birth control may not be right for everyone. Depending on the method and hormone type, contraceptives may cause headaches, nausea, and mood changes. For people who experience adverse side effects, there are alternatives like the copper IUD, or different hormonal formulations. This kind of honesty is essential to rebuild trust in contraception and for people to truly exercise reproductive autonomy.

Autonomy means choice. Trouble arises, though, when young women use falsehoods to inform their decisions. Misinformation can convince young people, incorrectly, that everyone will have terrible side effects from hormonal birth control or that or that all non-hormonal methods are equally effective. The copper IUD is more than 99 percent effective. Tracking your cycle is not—it fails to prevent pregnancy up to 25 percent of the time.

The current landscape can make it scary for young people to start birth control, and it shouldn’t be. When a girl wants to take charge of her sexual and reproductive health, I believe she should feel empowered, informed, and supported—not frightened. In an era where reproductive autonomy faces relentless attacks online and in legislatures, arming young people with facts isn’t a luxury. It’s a matter of survival.

Disclosure: Shoshana Kaplan is a 2025 graduate fellow at Rewire News Group, focused on sexual health. She is a summer intern at Advocates for Youth, where she receives some funding for her work.

A look at what LGBTQ bills Ohio lawmakers have introduced so far

As I keep saying this is a small very loud mostly religious driven minority using ever tool and lie they can to change perception of the LGBTQ+ to erase them from society to create the cis straight society they want to force on everyone.  We must counter them by being as loud and forceful to not only refute their lies but also promote the joy of living freely as an inclusive society.  Hugs


https://ohiocapitaljournal.com/2025/07/24/a-look-at-what-lgbtq-bills-ohio-lawmakers-have-introduced-so-far/

By:  – July 24, 2025 4:50 am

 Close-Up of rainbow flag with crowd In background during LGBT Pride Parade. Getty Images.


Ohio lawmakers on both sides of the aisle have introduced several LGBTQ-related bills so far this General Assembly.

Republicans have put forth a drag ban bill, a piece of legislation that would make it harder for a student to use a different name or pronoun at school, and a bill requiring transgender political candidates to list their deadname, among others. 

On the other side of the aisle, Democrats have introduced the Ohio Fairness Act and a bill that would ban conversion therapy.

Lawmakers passed several anti-LGBTQ bills that became law during the last General Assembly — including prohibiting gender affirming care to transgender youth, blocking trans athletes from playing on teams that align with their identity, a transgender school bathroom ban, and requiring educators to out a students’ sexuality to their parents.

An Ohio court partially overturned a ban on gender-affirming care for LGBTQ youth earlier this year, meaning doctors can still prescribe puberty blockers and hormone therapy.

Anti-LGBTQ bills

Ohio House Bill 249 would ban drag performers from performing anywhere that is not a designated adult entertainment facility. State Reps. Angie King, R-Celina, and Josh Williams, R-Sylvania Twp., introduced the bill, which has had sponsor testimony.  

This is a re-introduction of a bill from the previous General Assembly that did not make it out of committee and faced much opposition.

Ohio House Bill 190 would require parental permission for schools to use different pronouns or different names for students that don’t match up with the biological sex or birth name. 

Williams and state Rep. Johnathan Newman, R-Troy, introduced the bill, which has had sponsor testimony.

Ohio House Bill 172  would ban children 14 and older from receiving mental health services without parental consent. Newman also introduced this bill, which has had sponsor testimony. 

Ohio House Bill 196 would require political candidates to list their former names on candidacy petitions. This, however, would not apply to names that have been changed due to marriage. King and state Reps Rodney Creech, R-West Alexandria, introduced the bill, which has had sponsor testimony. 

Three transgender candidates filed to run for state office in Ohio last year, but encountered challenges over the names they put on their paperwork. 

The ACLU is tracking nearly 600 anti-LGBTQ bills nationwide.

Ohio House Bill 262 would designate the weeks from Mother’s Day to Father’s Day as Natural Family Month. Williams and state Rep. Beth Lear, R-Galena, introduced the bill, which has had sponsor and opponent testimony. 

Pro-LGBTQ bills

Ohio Senate Minority Leader Nickie Antonio, D-Lakewood, has introduced a few bills that support LGBTQ people. Antonio is the only openly gay lawmaker in the Ohio General Assembly. 

Ohio Senate Bill 70, also known as the Ohio Fairness Act, would expand anti-discrimination laws to include sexual orientation and gender identity. House Bill 136 is a companion bill. 

Antonio has introduced the Ohio Fairness Act in every General Assembly since she was elected to the Ohio House of Representatives in 2011 and this is the first time since 2018 the bill has no Republican support.

Ohio Senate Bill 71 would ban any licensed health professionals from doing conversion therapy when providing mental health treatment to minors. Antonio and state Sen. Beth Liston, D-Dublin, introduced the bill. House Bill 300 is a companion bill. 

Ohio Senate Bill 211 would designate the first full week of June as “Love Makes a Family Week.” Antonio introduced this bill as well. 

None of these bills have had any hearings so far this General Assembly. Ohio lawmakers are on summer break and will come back to the Statehouse this fall. 

Follow OCJ Reporter Megan Henry on Bluesky.