I am an older gay guy in a long-term wonderful relationship. My spouse and I are in our 36th year together. I love politics and news. I enjoy civil discussions and have no taboo subjects. My pronouns are he / him / his and my email is Scottiestoybox@gmail.com
California became the first state to ban most law enforcement officers, including federal immigration agents, from covering their faces while conducting official business.
Federal agents stand guard while blocking a road leading to an agricultural facility in Camarillo, Calif., where federal agents and immigration officers carried out an operation on July 10.Daniel Cole / Reuters file
LOS ANGELES — The Trump administration filed a lawsuit Monday over California’s new laws banning federal agents from wearing masks and requiring them to have identification while conducting operations in the state.
The federal government has argued the laws threaten the safety of officers who are facing “unprecedented” harassment, doxing, and violence and said it will not comply with them.
California became the first state to ban most law enforcement officers, including federal immigration agents, from covering their faces while conducting official business under a bill that was signed in September by Gov. Gavin Newsom.
The law prohibits neck gaiters, ski masks and other facial coverings for local and federal officers, including immigration enforcement agents, while they conduct official business. It makes exceptions for undercover agents, protective equipment like N95 respirators or tactical gear, and it does not apply to state police.
Newsom also signed legislation requiring law enforcement to wear clear identification showing their agency and badge number while on the job. The laws require federal law enforcement agencies to issue a mask policy by July 1, 2026, and a visible identification policy by Jan. 1, 2026.
“California’s anti-law enforcement policies discriminate against the federal government and are designed to create risk for our agents. These laws cannot stand,” U.S. Attorney General Pam Bondi said in a press release.
The lawsuit said there have been multiple incidents where Immigration and Customs Enforcement officers were followed and their families threatened. It cites a case of three women in Los Angeles who are being accused of livestreaming while following an ICE agent home and posting the address on Instagram.
“Given the personal threats and violence that agents face, federal law enforcement agencies allow their officers to choose whether to wear masks to protect their identities and provide an extra layer of security,” the lawsuit said.
Newsom has called the practice of masked federal agents arresting people across the state “dystopian.”
Critics have raised concerns about the increased role of federal agents in local policing and often unidentified agents conducting immigration enforcement activities.
“If the Trump administration cared half as much about public safety as it does about pardoning cop-beaters, violating people’s rights, and detaining U.S. citizens and their kids, our communities would be much safer,” a spokesperson for Newsom’s office said in a statement.
The Federal Bureau of Investigation issued a memo in October to law enforcement agencies across the country advising officers to clearly identify themselves in the field. It cited several incidents where masked criminals posed as immigration officers robbed and kidnapped victims.
The federal government also said in its lawsuit that the laws violate the Supremacy Clause of the Constitution, which prohibits states from regulating the federal government. It said the law banning federal officers from wearing masks discriminates against the federal government because it exempts state police.
California Attorney General Rob Bonta’s office said it was reviewing the complaint.
“It’s problematic when Californians can’t tell the difference between a law enforcement officer who is charged with protecting them and a criminal who is attempting to cause them harm,” Bonta’s office said in a statement. “The FBI itself has warned that the practice of ICE agents obscuring their identity has led to a rise in copycats committing crimes, threatening public safety and eroding trust in law enforcement.”
Zohran Mamdani rides an A Train at 190th Street after speaking uptown Monday, Sept. 29, 2025, in Manhattan, New York City. (Barry Williams/New York Daily News/TNS)
Zohran Mamdani’s win as the mayor of New York represents a major victory for immigrants, the underprivileged, and the push for independence from billionaires and lobbyists. But his rapid ascent to becoming one of the most influential politicians in the United States should come as no surprise.
His populist economic message — that the few have much while the many struggle with very little — highlights the growing outrage over wealth inequality, greed and poverty. Mamdani’s landslide victory over former Gov. Andrew Cuomo sent a clear signal: People want a government that works for everyone.
His victory honors the foundation of this nation, strengthening us by embracing the talents, skills and ideas of immigrants rather than succumbing to fear or prejudice. Mamdani achieved a historic win with a record number of votes, including support from Jewish communities, despite facing challenges like Islamophobia and accusations of antisemitism, fostering a much-needed multicultural spirit in these divisive times.
Mamdani fostered a sense of unity with a “we are all in this together” approach, visiting synagogues, temples and community celebrations like Diwali and Eid; joining parades; tackling issues like poverty, housing and disparities in health and education; and working alongside justice organizations and police departments.
He’ll oversee the nation’s largest police force, run the biggest education department, and manage a $115 billion budget with 300,000 employees, all while dealing with potential disruptions from President Donald Trump.
A diverse coalition of voters powered his historic victory, supported by noncitizens who, despite being unable to vote, felt represented and contributed through canvassing and donations.
It’s crucial to emphasize what made Mamdani’s victory so remarkable.
He presented a compelling vision for New York, a stark contrast with Cuomo’s message.
Thirty-seven percent of New York’s population, around 3 million people, are immigrants. This vibrant community hails from Europe, the Caribbean, China, South Asia, the Middle East, Mexico, and beyond, greatly enriching the city’s economy and culture, with some neighborhoods having half their residents as immigrants.
Mamdani wasn’t defined by his Muslim identity, despite being part of the largest minority religion in New York and the United States.
What truly stood out was his background as the son of filmmaker Mira Nair, his upbringing as a social democrat, his work as a community organizer, and his rise as a council member. Additionally, his father, Mahood Mamdani, is a prominent professor at Columbia, known for his writings on colonialism and post-colonialism. Among his many books, “Good Muslim, Bad Muslim” is taught at several universities.
Mamdani’s political views are shaped by a family history rooted in anti-colonial and pro-Palestinian activism. His middle name, “Kwame,” highlights his pan-African heritage, a legacy from his father. It pays tribute to Kwame Nkrumah, Ghana’s first president and a prominent leader in the anti-colonial and pan-African liberation movements.
Building on his free juice pledge for students when he ran for vice president of his high school class, Mamdani now promises bold initiatives for New Yorkers — free buses, free child care, a rent freeze and city-run grocery stores. Mamdani’s proposals rattled the business elite, real estate moguls, and the capitalist establishment, enduring millions of dollars in attack ads labeling him as antisemitic and a socialist extremist.
Mamdani has promised to arrest Benjamin Netanyahu if he comes to New York City, site of the United Nations. According to a recent poll, a third of voters support Mamdani’s commitment to uphold the International Criminal Court warrant against the Israeli prime minister.
Mamdani stood firm on his stance despite criticism, even speaking directly to Jewish voters: “I believe our city should comply with international law,” he said at a town hall in May put on by UJA-Federation of New York and the Jewish Community Relations Council . “If someone asked me the same question about Vladimir Putin, my response would be the same. It’s about showing the leadership I believe is missing both in our city and our country.”
Mamdani co-founded the Bowdoin College chapter of Students for Justice in Palestine, supports Black Lives Matter and is actively involved with Within Our Lifetime, a grassroots pro-Palestinian organization. These connections link him to global activism and align him against the American Israel Public Affairs Committee and other lobbying groups that support Israel.
Mamdani faces criticism for his progressive views, activism and comments about Israel. Nevertheless, he enjoys strong support from younger activists, including some Jewish allies (exit polls indicate about a third of New York City’s Jewish population voted for him), while encountering opposition from the older Democratic Party establishment and influential pro-Israel lobbies.
Is Mamdani’s victory the wave of the future?
This is a contributed opinion column. Mohammed Khaku is past president of Al Ahad Islamic Center in Allentown. The views expressed in this piece are those of its individual author(s), and should not be interpreted as reflecting the views of this publication. For more details on commentaries, read our guide to guest opinions at themorningcall.com/opinions.
Scottie's Playtime 