Florida Man Cites “Don’t Say Gay” Law In Lawsuit Over Pride Flag In Classroom: This Is Against Jesus [VIDEO]

Because rainbows make Jesus cry.  As I said in the last post on this guy, not everyone lives by his bible. Deliu said his family is Christian-Orthodox and considers homosexuality a sin, saying in the lawsuit it’s “not in accordance with their Bible.”  Gay people exist, and they have rights.   Gay kids exist and they have rights.   This child is in the 7th grade, he is quite aware of gender and sexual orientation, and sorry but not everyone is the same.   My rights, gay kids in the 7th grade don’t lose their rights because the bible says they are icky, and his daddy is a bigoted asshole.    Hugs

West Palm Beach’s NBC affiliate reports:

A Wellington father is suing the School District of Palm Beach County after he claimed his son’s teacher put up two LGBTQ pride flags in her classroom. Dr. Francisco Deliu’s 12-year-old son is in seventh grade at Emerald Cove Middle School.

Deliu filed a lawsuit on Oct. 12 against the school district, Palm Beach County School Board, the middle school, principal Dr. Eugina Smith-Freeman and teacher Rachel Raos. Deliu said his family is Christian-Orthodox and considers homosexuality a sin, saying in the lawsuit it’s “not in accordance with their Bible.”

Deliu claimed the teacher’s actions are a violation of Florida’s “Parents’ Bill of Rights” law, which went into effect in 2021. Deliu is asking for a jury trial and wants the court to declare the teacher’s [alleged] decision to discuss gay pride and homosexuality illegal.

Read the full article. Deliu also wants an apology from the school and the teacher to be posted on the district’s website. Wellington, it’s worth noting, is one of Florida’s wealthiest communities. Many of its homes include horse stables and Wellington hosts the annual US Polo Open as well as other equestrian competitions.

 

v

JoeMyGodMod • an hour ago

I’m mostly surprised that a doctor who lives in Wellington has a kid in public school.

vap JoeMyGod • an hour ago

He looks to be a lawyer
https://www.queerty.com/lit…

It surely isn’t his first go-round with making big accusations, either. In 2017, the New Zealand Lawyers and Conveyancers Disciplinary Tribunal found him guilty of nine different charges including “misconduct”, “unprofessional conduct” and “conduct unbecoming a lawyer”.

The misconduct charges resulted from a series of allegations the barrister made against two high court judges of “discrimination and racism by the Judges towards both counsel and clients, and corruption in carrying out their duties.”

Deliu was fined a quarter of a million dollars and his law license was temporarily suspended.

Paddycakes2001 JoeMyGod • 30 minutes ago

I love the part of the article where the guy says he’s a “libertarian.” I’m sure he has a great explanation for why libertarianism* means the state must affirmatively take actions to send the message that there is a lower caste of depraved people who must not be spoken about or acknowledged.

*We all know that real-world Ron Paul-style libertarianism wants exactly that, but it’s hilarious to watch them try to explain themselves.

Houndentenor JoeMyGod • 34 minutes ago

Some affluent areas have public schools that rival the best private schools in their area. So I’m not surprised. The high home prices and high property taxes that fund those schools keep out anyone they don’t want there.

Stoned and loving it JoeMyGod • an hour ago

when the legislature passes laws designed to allow the GQP to loot the treasury, one must establish standing before suit

TampaZeke • an hour ago

GO BACK TO ROMANIA where you can get all of the Orthodox Christianity you crave!

ChrisMorley TampaZeke • an hour ago

He’s also pissed of with Romania:

Romania decriminalised homosexuality in 2001

Jay Ryan in Illinois • 30 minutes ago • edited

“The dad, a self-described ‘live and let live’ libertarian”

So no neck here wants the state to impose rules against those he finds offensive. Yeah, that’s a real live and let live libertarian there. Lol

Thumbnail

ChristopherM • an hour ago

I guarantee you this concerned father has never once attended a PTA meeting, volunteered, or gone to a parent teacher conference in his child’s life.

Kieth ChristopherM • an hour ago

It’s also interesting that people had issues with Ye saying bad things about Jewish people but anyone is free to say horrible things about LBGT people and its ok because it’s your opinion yet both our people were in hitlers concentration camps

Jay Kieth • 24 minutes ago

It’s ok to be an open homophobe in our society. Whenever you see it racism is just below the surface though.

Jack Frost ChristopherM • an hour ago

Oh, those are the loudest ones. Not really a part of their kids education until they get to hate on a minority group.

Rebecca Gardner • an hour ago • edited

The law reads, prohibits classroom discussion about sexual orientation or gender identity in certain grade levels;

Ok, which grade? Is 7th grade too old to be covered by this? Also, it says nothing about a flag, it only prohibits discussion.

Jack Frost Rebecca Gardner • an hour ago

The law was written so poorly and so broadly that it allows for any parent to sue for anything and to let the courts or jury decide.

Its supposed to chill speech these asshats dont like so in this case they assumed all LGBTQ teachers/school officials would just pull all the “gay stuff” out of the classroom in advance.

Chris Baker Jack Frost • 35 minutes ago

Yes, it was more of a scare type law that was so vague that teachers would be afraid to do anything, even putting up a pride flag. I hope this is a test case that turns out well to knock down this law.

Why is saying that ‘straight people exist’ legal, but “gay people exist’ illegal?

It would be funny if some wise-ass elementary school let boys and girls use whichever bathroom they wanted to because “discussing gender identity was forbidden by law and discussing or asking students what gender they are might be illegal.”

Jack Frost Rebecca Gardner • an hour ago

Maybe he wants to expand on the grade levels. Maybe make it K-12?

I wouldn’t put it past anti-gay people to start with a wedge like K-3 and then work to expand that outward.

thatotherjean • an hour ago

That “Don’t Say Gay” law in Florida HAS to be unconstitutional. Besides, being “against Jesus” has no bearing on education, unless you’re a Christian religious school. I hope he’ll get told to go away and take his jury trial with him; but it’s Florida, so who knows?

Chucktech thatotherjean • an hour ago

“Against Jesus,” Jesus…

Yeah, Jesus was always ragging on those filthy queers…

Chris Baker tbj5 • 39 minutes ago • edited

Didn’t they just rule for freedom of speech of teachers in the ‘praying coach’ case? of course, they will contradict themselves in a case like this when they rule -against- freedom of speech.

Pence: You Have No Right To Freedom From Religion – JMG

When will we take seriously these religious fundies and their threats to force everyone to follow the dictates of their religion?    They want to end democracy and have already shown they will lie about history, science, medical facts, every part of reality to get their way.    They want control over every aspect of everyone’s lives.  Your private lives, your public lives, they demand the right to tell you how to live and what you must do.   You will pay to support their churches, you will worship as they say, you will educate your kids the way they demand, you will watch what they require you to, marry and have sex only the way they tell you, this is the world they are trying to create.    Think Iran, think Saudi Arabia, any other theocracy you can imagine.   Dogs that love gravy think of the Puritans and the Spanish inquisition.   Hello future if these people are not stopped now.  Notice how Pence words it, forcing you to follow their religion is “pro freedom”!    What freedom is that for the rest of us, the freedom to do as we are told and live according to the dictates / doctrines of their churches.    Hugs

“The radical left believes that the freedom of religion is the freedom from religion. But it’s nothing the American founders ever thought of – or generations of Americans fought to defend. 

“You know, I said today here in Houston that the source of our nation’s greatness has always been our faith in God, our freedom, and our vast natural resources.

“And the good news is, that after four years of the Trump-Pence administration, I’m confident that we have a pro-religious freedom majority on the Supreme Court of the United States.

“And I’m confident that come Election Day, November the 8th, you’re gonna see that freedom majority around the country turn out and vote pro-freedom majorities in the House, and in the Senate, and in statehouses around the country.” – Mike Pence, yesterday on Fox News.

 

Robert Conner • a few seconds ago

The goal of religion is to become the law. And no one’s above the law, amirite?

Hayseed • 4 minutes ago

Says the guy who doesn’t know what a scientific theory is.

The_Wretched • 39 minutes ago

“freedom from religion”

Well, yes. I don’t want to pray to your god(s) or give my tax dollars to your social clubs. I also don’t want you to get to groom kids into your religions, that should be upto parents.

M • an hour ago

Lying idiot. There can’t be freedom of religion without freedom from having someone else’s forced on you. Go live in Iran or Saudi Arabia where your religion has second class status and let us know how you like it Mikey.

BensNewLogin • an hour ago

‘ nation’s greatness has always been our faith in God, our freedom, and our vast natural resources. …“

Some people’s freedom, usually to control others.

DaveBusinesspersonArtcollector • an hour ago

He actually believes this unlike many pandering politicians

He actually believes there was no clarifying letter written to the Connecticut baptists. He actually believes the very obvious establishment clause is not prohibiting establishment. He actually believes religious freedom means freedom to impose religion on us

He can’t read and is really stupid therefore

These things are written. You can read and understand

The first says government cannot stop you from being religious nor can it force you to be religious. It’s so strong in the latter that it’s actually called the establishment clause. Government is not only barred from forcing religion, it is barred from any activity “make no law” that supports religion

The scotus was wrong in maine. Wrong in all the illegal words on our money cases. Wrong on the capital visitor center case. They are political hacks pandering but Pence is a delusional simpleton.

Gregory In Seattle • an hour ago

So when a neighborhood is majority Muslim, you are perfectly fine with them arranging the school year to accommodate Muslim holidays rather than Christian? You are perfectly fine with the local mosque amplifying the call to prayer five times a day, and all the shops closing down from Friday night to Saturday night?

Ecce Homo Jonathan Smith • 3 hours ago

Do not underestimate this creepy fanatic. He is a master of false sincerity and will lie and scheme fitting his party’s behavior pattern.

Chris Baker Jonathan Smith • 2 hours ago

Evangelicals have a history of portraying The US as the ‘“New Israel/God’s new chosen people”. They don’t put it so bluntly, but it was the common undercurrent of my evangelical upbringing. America was founded as an Anti-Catholic/Anti-Anglican Protestant paradise. They actually wanted to keep Catholics out.

I think Pence would have a different view on “freedom from religion” if there were several teachers at an elementary school pushing Islam, Buddhism, Hinduism to their students.

🔄arithrianos🔄 Chris Baker • 2 hours ago

The reason Maryland exists is because Catholics were persecuted, but the founders had had enough of established religions, which is why they made a rule against them.

doninkansas Ann Kah • 3 hours ago

And something he is not saying, at least not yet, is that they will also be saying only the right kinds of religions have freedom. This is something I keep reminding my Catholic and Mormon friends, when these folks come into full power, they will be up against the he wall right along with the Muslims, the gays and the liberals. They are just as hated as we are, but right now they need them.

Rex • 3 hours ago

It’s funny, because they claim to be Christian and their behavior isn’t like Christ. This isn’t about religion, it’s about control and always has been.

evanedwards Rex • 3 hours ago

Religion is and always has been a system for controlling gullible masses. It existed as sets of laws before other systems of law came into existence.

In the US, you are free to believe what you want and that includes having no religious beliefs at all. The radical far-right wants a theocracy based solely on their interpretation of Christianity. No other religious belief will be permitted, not even pro-equality Christianity.

What, me worry? weshlovrcm • 2 hours ago

And if they succeeded, the 2000-plus different christian sects will all be fighting over which batshit crazy interpretation of the buybull (and nevermind which edition) will be the BOSS of everybody. Westboro Baptist comes to mind.

The religious right is now targeting sexless marriages as “selfishness.” They want to ban those too

https://www.lgbtqnation.com/2022/10/religious-right-now-targeting-sexless-marriages-selfishness-want-ban/

It seems the religious right is on a push to have as many kids born as possible, even if it kills the woman.   I am not sure why?  The went after same sex marriage claiming they couldn’t be real because they did not produce offspring / children.   Now any childless marriage is not real because no children being born.   Is that because less and less people are religious in the US.   Are they worried that soon they will lose too much money in the collection plates if they don’t get the US to over populate?   Do they need more sacrificial lambs to the altar of their god?  And why do these people obsess with the marriages / sex lives of other people so much.   Are they jealous?   I just don’t get it.    Hugs

The religious right is now targeting sexless marriages as “selfishness.” They want to ban those too
Photo: Shutterstock

In July, the Supreme Court of Sweden ruled in a landmark case that a relationship doesn’t have to involve sex to be considered significant. In a case involving an asexual couple in which one of the two parties is deceased,  the court emphasized that a relationship should be characterized by a close community in personal terms that normally occurs between married people and that sex doesn’t have to be involved for that to happen. It was a significant win for asexual people in Sweden.

However, in America, a darker reality exists for asexuals even on this Ace Week, as religious nationalist groups are actively trying to block the Respect for Marriage Act from passing in the Senate. Not only is the religious right seeking to ban gay marriage once again, but they have also signaled a future attack against asexual marriages.

As obtained by Politico, some 83 Christian nationalist groups (led by the Alliance Defending Freedom) released a letter in July imploring  Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell (R-KY) to block the Respect for Marriage Act, because marriage equality somehow opens the door to further immorality, like platonic marriages.

“H.R. 8404 would require federal recognition of any one state’s definition of marriage without any parameters whatsoever. This would include plural marriages, time-bound marriages, open marriages, marriages involving a minor or relative, platonic marriages…”

It’s impossible to ignore calling out the perfidious groomer libel conservatives keep trying that is recycled garbage from the 1970s. However, we cannot ignore the religious right calling for platonic (asexual) marriages to be banned also!

There is an abundance of evidence to show asexual marriages are under threat, also.

The Ace Couple, an asexual married couple who runs a podcast discussing topics related to asexuality, did a four-episode series on the 83 religious groups who signed onto the letter to McConnell asking to block the Respect for Marriage Act.

Each group essentially states in no uncertain terms that asexuality is unacceptable to their religion and should be banned from having equal marriage rights.

The Witherspoon Institute, a right-wing think tank founded by Robert P. George (who founded the anti-LGBTQ hate group American Principles Project), came out with an op-ed entitled “Why We Should Push Back against Platonic Marriage.” The editorial’s author, Alan J. Hawkins, laments the idea of asexual marriages existing because he feels allowing asexual marriages will lead to a “marriage inferno.”

I think it matters deeply that we continue to define marriage as a sexual union. It matters because the continual pruning of marriage reduces its core purpose to something that does not really set it apart from other committed relationship possibilities. This ongoing thinning of marriage’s meaning leaves less and less of the concrete conjugal elements that can bind marriages together. Also, it seriously erodes the legal justification for the benefits, responsibilities, and protections with which the law endows marriage.

The Witherspoon Institute is not alone in this thinking.

No group stated this more than the Heritage Foundation, which wrote a 2016 article, “The Obligations of Family Life: A Response to Modern Liberalism,” in which they vocalized their hatred of autonomy and choosing not to have sex and procreate.

Autonomy has within itself the seeds of ever-greater radicalism because coercion can be given an ever-broader definition, beginning with physical coercion but ending with any external or natural consideration shaping one’s “choice.” Truly autonomous choices, on this ever more radical understanding, must be made without the influence of imposed habits, human reason, education, social pressure, legal pressure, cultural expectations, or any other external demand. Autonomous choices spring from within the individual, lest they be traceable to something oppressive or alien to the individual. One wonders, therefore, whether such choices are made in consideration of anything but selfishness.

The religious right views exercising freedom of choice as nothing more than being selfish. They view choosing individual happiness as somehow wicked and evil, and they want to remove the right to choose from us all, forcing us into sex on their terms.

It’s weird to me seeing the religious right come right out and attack sexless marriages.

Growing up in a purity culture right in the heart of the Bible Belt, all I heard as a youth were messages about abstaining from sex, with pastors and Christian leaders imperatively saying, “Don’t have sex! Don’t even think about it!”

Now, the commandment has apparently flipped, with the religious right commanding everyone to have sex.

The religious right states in no uncertain terms that anyone not entering into a sexual, procreative relationship should not be allowed to marry.

This has large ramifications on asexual people—many of whom desire companionship and love— as well as on asexual married couples who depend on the benefits marriage provides. The Respect for Marriage Act would be a vital help to asexual couples who now find themselves in the crosshairs of the culture wars.

Florida man sues son’s school for violating his “natural rights from God” by displaying Pride flags

https://www.lgbtqnation.com/2022/10/florida-man-sues-sons-school-violating-natural-rights-god-displaying-pride-flags/

And it begins.   This is what the Republicans and what Gov. DeathSantis wanted.  How is just seeing a rainbow flag being educated “in the ways of homosexuality.”  I keep saying the goal is to erase gay people from society.   Sorry your religion doesn’t give you the right to kick the people you don’t out of the country, you don’t get to make the people you don’t like hide the fact they are real, you don’t get to use your church doctrine to force people to live straight lives because you don’t want gays to live their lives freely.   What other things will it be illegal for a kid to see, that will instruct them in the way of …, how about icons of other religions?   For that matter I an atheist, I don’t like all the religious symbols and pictures I see, can I sue people for displaying a cross like wearing one around their neck?  They already banned the books that offended them, what next?   

The US is built on diversity and different cultures.    There is a drive on the right to roll back all advances in society over the last 70 years.   To return women to traditional stereotypical roles, to drive minorities back to a subservient roles, To erase the LGBTQ+ and remove representation of them.  They want a white Christian ethnostate, and they are pushing hard to get their way.   They are a minority that is getting their way, claiming my very existence as an openly gay man in a same sex marriage is wrong and instructing their kid in homosexuality.     They want me gone, erased, hidden, it offends their Christianity.   Tough shit, their religion offends me.   What about that.    No one has the right to not be offended.  

If this man wants his child isolated from the other people then send his child to a Christian school that follows his religion.   Gay kids are real, they go to school, they have the right to live their lives openly as do straight kids.   They have as much right to date, to have clubs, to see their symbols as much as Christians have the right to wear their crosses.  LGBTQ+ have as much right to be and to live openly as straight kids, as Christian kids, as Muslim kids, as atheist kids and so on.   This is not the first time this father has tried to force his religion on others and seems to also be a racist who demands the right to discriminate against others.   

People we need everyone to stand up and say enough and fight back against the attempt to remove others from society and existence.   We must fight against the attempt to force one religion in the laws and lives of everyone else.  These people are the US version of the Taliban.   Help us stop them.   Vote them out of office.    Hugs

 
students furries, Heidi Ganahl, Colorado, false claims, hoax, transgender
Photo: Shutterstock
 

A Florida father is suing his 12-year-old son’s school district over the fact that his son was exposed to Pride flags in his computer science classroom.

Dr. Francisco Catalin Deliu of Palm Beach County is arguing that Emerald Cove Middle School, principal Dr. Eugina Smith-Freeman, and his son’s teacher Rachel Raos have been “expressly and/or implicitly advocating for homosexuality as an alternative way of life,” reports CBS 12.

Deliu, a Romanian refugee who fled due to religious and political persecution, is an Orthodox Christian who believes being gay is a sin.

The lawsuit says that in early September, Deliu’s son informed him that Raos had hung two Pride flags in her classroom, searched online “about homosexual lifestyles,” and “proselytized to the students in the class.”

Deliu claims the principal dismissed him when he complained and said she’d have to speak to the Board to determine whether Raos was breaking the law. He also claims that after asking for his son to be removed from Raos’s class and placed in a different computer science class, the school instead moved his son to an art class without telling him.

The suit reportedly does not accuse the school of breaking Florida’s infamous Don’t Say Gay law. It argues that the school violated Deliu’s “substantive human rights” and “natural rights from God.” It accuses the state of “acting contrary to his religious beliefs” and says he has a right to prevent his child from being educated “in the ways of homosexuality.”

Deliu has also previously accused the school of spreading homosexuality through library books.

And these tussles are far from his first time getting involved with the law.

While living in New Zealand in 2017, Deliu’s law license was suspended for 15 months and he was ordered to pay over $250,000 due to “six charges of misconduct, one charge of unprofessional conduct, and one charge of conduct unbecoming a lawyer,” according to the New Zealand Law Society.

The charges were due to allegations of racism and discrimination he made against two judges, which the court reportedly said were “excessive, disgraceful, and baseless attacks on Judges made in provocative and intemperate language, and for the purposes of protecting the practitioner’s own interests.”

For the accusations against his son’s school, he reportedly is seeking a jury trial.

NOM: Our Fight Against Marriage Bill Is “On The Ropes”

Why has this man fought against rights for gay people all his adult life.   He has made it his quest to deny gay people the right to exist in society.   His crusade against same sex marriage is totally weird in that it is unreasonable the passion he has to destroy same sex marriage and gay rights.   He has traveled the world to try to stop this in other countries.   I don’t understand his hate for gay people, for the LGBTQ+.   But I do notice in each thing he says he begs for money.    Is it a scam, a grift, or a personal mission from his god.   He has 6 kids that I am aware of, statistically one or more of them are LGBTQ+.   How much he must be hurting them and how desperate they must be to hide it from him.    Hugs

Via email from hate group leader Brian Brown:

Right now, there are as many as half a dozen Republican Senators working on a potential backroom deal to impose gay ‘marriage’ on the entire country by codifying it in federal law. NOM is leading the opposition to this scheme, but we are on the ropes and need your help.

Among the Republican Senators scheming to pass the gay ‘marriage’ legislation are Mitt Romney, Susan Collins, Rob Portman and Thom Tillis. Their gambit is to include some fig leaf language “protecting” religious liberty in exchange for every state in the nation being forced to recognize homosexual ‘marriage.’

It is ironic that of these US Senate schemers, three come from states where voters enacted state constitutional amendments defining marriage solely as the union of one man and one woman – Utah, Ohio and North Carolina. So did voters in several dozen additional states.

Our only chance to prevent gay ‘marriage’ from being enshrined in federal law is to mobilize grassroots marriage supporters around the country. We have less than two weeks left before the midterm elections. After that, a lame duck Congress will return to Washington DC and the gay ‘marriage’ legislation will be taken up.

Please make an immediate donation to NOM to help us fight to stop the imposition of gay ‘marriage’ into federal statute. Your donation will be 100% matched thanks to a $100,000 matching fund that has been made available.

Chris Baker • 14 hours ago

I can’t wait till gay marriage is forced on everyone in the US. I have a few people picked out, but it’s hard to narrow it down just just one of them. So can we start working on polygamy now? That would solve a lot of my problems.

Boreal Outlaw Woman • 14 hours ago

Also Jesus hates divorce so it must be a til death do them part marriage.

Nic Peterson Chris Baker • 14 hours ago

We were promised polygamy. I have been quite patient waiting for it. I am not getting any younger, though. Tick tock muthafuckas!

rednekokie Chris Baker • 13 hours ago

That’s the whole problem — no one is trying to force “gay” marriage, or any other kind of marriage down any one’s throat. However, those who do want to participate in it resent highly those who don’t like it and want to bother others with their bigotry and stupidity.

James L. Greenlee rednekokie • 2 hours ago

How exactly do you get someone else’s marriage “shoved down your throat?” It has nothing to do with you. And what “bigotry and stupidity?”

Gigi • 14 hours ago

Most of Brian Brown’s adult life has been spent fighting to deny rights and marriage equality to the LGBTQ community. What a horrible person he is.

Randy503 Gigi • 13 hours ago

I remember one of his staffer defected when she went around the in the bus and saw the lack of interest. She realized that same sex marriage hurts no one, and there simply isn’t any reason to deny it.

Boreal • 14 hours ago

Their gambit is to include some fig leaf language “protecting” religious
liberty in exchange for every state in the nation being forced to
recognize homosexual ‘marriage.’

If your religion needs protecting from my marriage, you should be out shopping for a more powerful god right now.

Diogenes Onionpants Boreal • 13 hours ago

He knows damn well that religion is already protected; religious discrimination claims are subject to strict scrutiny, unlike sexual orientation. And yet, show up at a Catholic church and demand a Jewish wedding, and you won’t get it: the institution can refuse to perform a service outside its tradition.

So why does this lying sack of before-the-water-runs-clean anal-douche-extrusion think gays could sue for being refused?

He doesn’t. He’s lying because he’s a liar whose fortune rests on a throne of lies. (Also see above re: his soul being composed of anal douche water.)

ErnestMc • 14 hours ago

His wallet is “on the ropes” since the only place he was making a dime was in Russia and, for some reason, Russia ain’t so lucrative right now.

It’s also hilarious that he’s talking about “gay marriage” being imposed on the country when marriage equality has been the law of the land for 7 years and it’s supported by a solid majority of Americans.

Sumner County (TN) adopts rules based on myth of ‘Judeo-Christian values’

https://onlysky.media/hemant-mehta/sumner-county-judeo-christian-values-tn-rules-myth/

Again another flat out attempt to use made up history to force their religion on everyone.  Notice the one guy said he serves his god first the county second.    Preaching and forcing Christian doctrines comes before the needs of the county.   The right has tried hard to destroy public schools and force their god into them.   This is the result of home schooling and church schools that took off in the 1980s and became the Christian thing to do.   I remember when James was growing up he was forced to attend religious schools.   They pushed this nonsense hard, the country was Christian, the Founding fathers were highly religious Christians, the US was meant by god to his special country of chosen people to lead the world into following the Christian god.   These people don’t quit, ever.  They are still trying to deny evolution, they worked for 50 years to end Roe, they are doing everything they can to end LGBTQ+ rights, end same sex marriage.   They are driven.  It is all about controlling others and what others are allowed to do.    It is not them worshiping the god they want, letting that religion guide them.  No it is about controlling you, because some how their god is sad and cries if not everyone adores him.    The secular community must keep fighting back against this.  

Sumner County (TN) adopts rules based on myth of 'Judeo-Christian values' | The addition of this phrase could lead to a lawsuit against Sumner County

On October 17, the Sumner County Commissioners in Tennessee voted to codify a new set of “Standing Rules and Procedures” to guide their meetings that references their allegiance to “Judeo-Christian values.”

The updated rules of conduct for a local government meeting wouldn’t be much interest to anyone outside the community—and arguably very little within the community—but one of the changes involved the addition of a preamble (on page 24). The paragraph is nothing more than hyped-up language promising that commissioners will do the job they were elected to do—which shouldn’t need to be stated at all—but the bigger problem is that it says their work must be “reflective of the Judeo-Christian values inherent in our nation’s founding.”

We, the Sumner County Board of Commissioners as the legislative branch of Sumner County, recognize that all powers are reserved by the citizens of this county. In order to perfect the operation of our County government, to ensure that it is just, orderly, efficient, cost-effective and most importantly reflective of the Judeo-Christian values inherent in our nation’s founding, as well as responsive and transparent to the people of Sumner County, our goal in serving the citizens of Sumner County is to exceed the requirements established in Tennessee state law and do hereby adopt these Standing Rules and Procedures.

Honoring supposed “Judeo-Christian values” isn’t just something they aspire to. It’s the most important thing they aspire to. And what are those values? Who knows. They don’t spell it out. But it certainly sends a clear message to non-Christians (and non-conservative Christians) that their needs will always be considered a lower priority.

Even at the meeting where these rules, including the preamble, were adopted 20-4, a few voices pointed out how this wording could be a problem:

Just minutes earlier, the county’s interim law director, Ben Allen, advised the group that the change could set the county up for costly discrimination lawsuits.

“I just believe that this would be a violation of the First Amendment establishment clause,” Allen told the commission. “The supreme court could change their mind on what ‘violation of the establishment clause’ means tomorrow. It’s very expensive to be the ones to find out if that’s the case.”

Nashville Attorney David Raybin says including language about Judeo-Christian values in the commission’s rules preamble is a clear violation of the first amendment’s ban against the government endorsing religion, and that it would be a “slam dunk” case in court.

“I think we need to be very careful we don’t cross over to something that ends up, taking more of our tax citizens’ dollars over the next coming years in litigation,” said Commissioner Danny Sullivan.

Allen, the interim law director, also said the phrasing could possibly be used in a complaint in case a county employee was ever fired. A hypothetical person could say she was let go because of her non-Christian faith, fairly or not, pointing to the wording as evidence the county discriminated against her.

The Christian nationalists on the Commission, including Matthew Shoaf, pushed back, saying they were just acknowledging history (which is false) and that they supported secularism. but shoving Christian references in places where they’re not needed is a hallmark of Project Blitz, the Christian nationalist playbook.

A few commissioners suggested this was a completely reckless and unnecessary move. If their legal director is warning them about the problem, and they’re opening the door to possible litigation, and all of it is is occurring by choice, what the hell are they thinking?

Those wise words were ignored.

The Freedom From Religion Foundation has already written a warning letter to the Commission, letting them know this is both unconstitutional and ahistorical:

… It is erroneous to assert that our nation was founded on Judeo-Christian values. The concept of “Judeo-Christian values” did not even exist until the mid 20th Century, let alone at the time the United States was founded. To the contrary, the United States was founded by Enlightenment-inspired thinkers who valued reason and skepticism.

By adopting a Preamble officially promoting Judeo-Christian values, the Board violates the Establishment Clause of the First Amendment, disregards the wall of separation between state and church, and disrespects the diversity of Sumner County’s citizens. We request that the Board immediately correct this constitutional violation and remove any reference to Judeo-Christian values or other religious ideologies from the Preamble.

None of that means a lawsuit is forthcoming. But the groundwork has been laid. The bottom line is that these commissioners adopted Christian nationalist language despite the advice of their legal counsel. And the statements made at the meeting itself, beginning at the 3:07:01 mark here, make it abundantly clear that the goal is to promote the false belief that conservative Christianity is foundational to our nation’s history and that it must be the basis for the county’s future.

Just consider the comments from Commissioner Tim Jones, who said, “As a Christian, I cannot operate from a position of fear. I serve God first, this county second,” before adding that the county would continue failing because people were not “standing up for what every one of you know is right, that claim to be Christians.” Commissioner Jeremy Mansfield also made it clear that they live in a Christian-majority community, so there was no need to pay any lip service to Muslims, Hindus, or anyone else.

These people are angling for praise from right-wing propaganda outlets.

They don’t give a damn about the people they were elected to serve.

 

Unshocking Study: Right Wing Policies Cost US Lives

Need I say more.  We all knew this.    Why elect these people to office, their polices hurt the public, the working persons, the poor.    Hugs

Unshocking Study: Right Wing Policies Cost US Lives

 

From the study’s abstract:

The rise in working-age mortality rates in the United States in recent decades largely reflects stalled declines in cardiovascular disease (CVD) mortality alongside rising mortality from alcohol-induced causes, suicide, and drug poisoning; and it has been especially severe in some U.S. states.

Building on recent work, this study examined whether U.S. state policy contexts may be a central explanation. We modeled the associations between working-age mortality rates and state policies during 1999 to 2019.

We used annual data from the 1999–2019 National Vital Statistics System to calculate state-level age-adjusted mortality rates for deaths from all causes and from CVD, alcohol-induced causes, suicide, and drug poisoning among adults ages 25–64 years.

We merged that data with annual state-level data on eight policy domains, such as labor and taxes, where each domain was scored on a 0–1 conservative-to-liberal continuum. Results show that the policy domains were associated with working-age mortality

Especially strong associations were observed between certain domains and specific causes of death: between the gun safety domain and suicide mortality among men, between the labor domain and alcohol-induced mortality, and between both the economic tax and tobacco tax domains and CVD mortality.

Simulations indicate that changing all policy domains in all states to a fully liberal orientation might have saved 171,030 lives in 2019, while changing them to a fully conservative orientation might have cost 217,635 lives.

Read the full abstract.

 

Case in point:

Also unshocking: the safest 10 states in the US (except Utah) are all blue; the 10 least safe ones are all red.

https://www.thestreet.com/l…

 

Both their senators and all their Republican representatives in the House voted against aid for the last hurricane. They shouldn’t get any then. If they don’t like that, then they should vote for representatives who agree with them. They shouldn’t get to vote against funding, then take the funding, then brag about getting the funding for their constituents. I feel like I have walked through the looking glass. I can’t believe this is what our country is now and all of it aided and abetted by the media, even the “liberal” outlets.

 

Tell me where the evacuation will take place and what time and I will be there

 

I just read a report that proved that many people would rather die “free” than wear a mask. Many people would prefer go without health care and die than obtain universal health care “because I don’t want my tax dollars going to welfare queens and mexicans.” Many people would prefer dying early of a heart attack than not eat meat.

I was shocked/not shocked to read this. This shows a severe mental illness among people who believe their lives are worth less than their ideology and their imaginary notion of freedom.

Related: Donald Trump is, literally, a mass-murderer.

Medical experts have carefully studied the data and have concluded that had Trump, in 2020, urged people to take the Covid-prevention steps urged by the CDC and others, countless thousands of American lives could have been saved. Instead, the monster downplayed or ignored vaccinations, face masks and social distancing.

Donald Trump is a mass-murderer.

He must be brought to justice.

 

I remember having a discussion online with a self proclaimed right to life Christian, who objected to any and all Covid restrictions. As far as he was concerned, if people would get sick and die, that was their look out, not his. He had money to make.

 

 

 

 

 

Why We Are DOOMED

School board proposes banning furries after rumors of litter boxes in schools spread

https://www.lgbtqnation.com/2022/10/school-board-proposes-banning-furries-rumors-litter-boxes-schools-spread/

Lets be honest what the furries thing is about.  It is about attacking trans kids without using the word trans.  It is adults mocking the idea of identifying with a different gender than your born identified sex.  It is stupid and another example of the right making up something that is not happen and not real simply to create outrage to be offended over.    Hugs

 
April 14, 2018, European furry walk at Volkspark Friedrichshain in Berlin
April 14, 2018, European furry walk at Volkspark Friedrichshain in Berlin Photo: Shutterstock
 

A school board in North Carolina considered a proposal to ban furry costumes in schools after they say they received numerous complaints about students dressing up as animals and using litter boxes in school restrooms.

Jeff James, superintendent of Iredell-Statesville Schools, said that he’s spent hours responding to emails and messages on social media about the rumor. He said that the rumors are false and that there is no evidence that students are bringing litter boxes into school restrooms.

But that didn’t stop school board member Bryan Shomaker from supporting the proposal to ban ears, tails, gloves, collars, or full furry costumes from being worn in schools. The proposal has exceptions for school spirit days and theater.

“We’re trying to address it before it becomes a major problem,” he said at a school board meeting.

But some parents were angry that it was even being discussed.

“We have classrooms without teachers, and you’re wasting your time focusing on a kid at a Scotts Elementary Panthers basketball game who wants to wear a cat ear headband,” said parent Jean Foster.

“We’ve spent a lot of time on masks over the past few years,” a frustrated Foster told Queen City News after the meeting. “We’ve spent a lot of time talking about which books we are wanting to ban. All of that is a distraction from what’s important. This was just something else – something ludicrous.”

“You may not want it to be a distraction, but it was a distraction. A large distraction,” school board member Martin Page said.

Lincoln County Schools in North Carolina was also the subject of furry rumors.

“There is nobody identifying as a cat at North Lincoln High School and we have no litter boxes!!!” an employee wrote in a Facebook group. “Quit spreading this stupidity!”

spokesperson for Lincoln County Schools told The Charlotte Observer that there have never been litter boxes in any of its schools.

An early example of the stories about students identifying as house pets and demanding litter boxes was Michigan activist Lisa Hansen. Because Hansen opposed federal regulations allowing trans students to use school restrooms matching their gender identities, she claimed that students who identify as cats were allowed to use litter boxes in one school’s unisex restroom.

A Michigan school superintendent was forced to write an email to parents debunking such a lie. An Oregon public school district superintendent was also forced to send a similar email after one social media user claimed that furries were wearing leashes and being petted by other students at local schools.

Nevertheless, the lie has been repeated by right-wingers, including by Nebraska Sen. Bruce Bostelman (R).

During a televised debate, Bostelman claimed that student “furries” were allowed to interact with teachers by meowing and barking. He also said that one student who was denied a litter box later defecated on a classroom floor. Bostelman later admitted that the story wasn’t true.

It has been spread online by anti-LGBTQ activists like Chaya Raichik of LibsofTikTok, when she pushed a lie that a second grade Texas schoolteacher encouraged students to become furries. The Austin school district disavowed the claim as misinformation.

Similarly, Christian hate pastor Aaron Thompson and anti-LGBTQ televangelist Andrew Wommack both said that schools allow students to identify as animals and demand litter boxes in classrooms. Michigan Republican Party Co-Chair Meshawn Maddock also repeated the lie, as did Heidi Ganahl, the Republican candidate for governor of Colorado. She claimed that student “furries” are identifying as cats in over 30 different schools in the state.

Rep. Lauren Boebert (R-CO) has claimed that a father in Michigan told her that his son got into trouble when he stepped on the tail of a student who identified as a furry.

Reuters published a fact check in July that said there is “no evidence of them disrupting classrooms or schools developing a policy of including them as a formal identity.”

Earlier this month, conservative radio host Joe Rogan told former Rep. Tulsi Gabbard (D-HI) that he knows someone who knows someone who said that “there’s a girl who’s a furry, who identifies as an animal and her mother badgered the school until they agreed to put a litter box in one of the stalls.”

“So this girl goes into the litter room or to the girl’s room and urinates or whatever — I don’t know if she poops in it, that’s pretty gross.”

 

County bans all volleyball games with school because a trans student is on their team

https://www.lgbtqnation.com/2022/10/county-bans-volleyball-games-school-trans-student-team/

I want to point that the coaches said that the cis girls had hit the ball harder than the trans gender girl did.  The anti-trans hate came through loud and clear, with one guy says no one should play against the team “based on their morals, ethics, and Christian upbringing.”  These people were just waiting for an excuse to attack the trans girl.   Despite the other teams wanting to play against the team with the trans girl, the coaches wanted to play against the team, despite the fact that the trans girl has been on the team for four years without any issues, the bigots claim this must be done to protect the girls.   What a crock.   They did not listen to any thing they were told instead wanting to show how bad the trans people are.   They couldn’t stop the trans girl from playing so what they did was make sure her teammates couldn’t play, her entire team was not banned from anyone playing against them so that the team will turn on the trans girl and force her off the team.   That is their out.   Make the team do what they legally can not do.    Hugs

 
Volleyball players
Photo: Shutterstock
 

Nearly two months after a North Carolina girls’ high school volleyball game resulted in a one team’s player being “forcefully struck” by a spiked ball, and later a ban on playing any more games with the opposing team, a school board’s meeting notes reveal the opposing team’s high school is being barred from competing against county schools for allowing a transgender girl to play on their team.

On September 2, the two girls’ volleyball teams, from Hiwassee Dam High School in Cherokee County and Highlands School in Macon County, faced off at Highlands in an early evening match. A recording posted to high school sports site Maxpreps, published on September 9, reveals during one game, a player from Highlands spikes the ball from the near side of the court to Hiwassee, striking a player, who drops to the floor.

The video shows coaching staff attending to the Hiwassee player, while the Highlands players huddle, waiting for the outcome. Moments later, the injured player rises to her feet with the help of staff and walks off the court, cheered on by players and fans from both sides.

Two weeks later, the Cherokee County Board of Education met in regular session, where concerns over the incident were aired by attendees and principals from the district’s three high schools, including Hiwassee.

A statement issued by the board summed up the result: “On Wednesday (September 21, 2022) the Cherokee County Board of Education determined the varsity and junior varsity volleyball teams within Cherokee County’s high schools will not play the Highlands School volleyball teams due to safety concerns for Cherokee County Schools’ athletes.”

Those “safety concerns” centered on the player who spiked the ball, who is transgender.

It’s unclear from meeting notes how or when the player’s transgender status became known to the board.

“The competitive advantage issue certainly has to come up in any scenario with that type of transgender conversion, per se,” said school board vice-chair Jeff Martin, according to Christian Education First Alliance North Carolina. “I can tell you that the board wasn’t searching out this kind of thing. It was brought to our attention based on safety concerns.”

Board chair Arnold Mathews described the injured player as “forcefully struck” for Channel 9 News. Board member Jeff Tatham claimed the video of the injury was conclusive.

“The biggest thing for us, especially after seeing the video of the injury, we felt very strongly that it was a safety concern,” Tatham said. “I think most of the board members also felt like there’s a competitive advantage issue.”

Sentiment in the meeting was not universal. Joseph Watson, Athletic Director of Murphy High, advised the Board that feedback from his players and parents revealed the majority wanted to play Highlands and none of his parents expressed concerns. Jordan Lovingood, the school’s volleyball coach, said their school’s team had played against Highlands, including the player in question, for four years running, and that none of her players wanted to forfeit games against the school.

Another Murphy High volleyball coach, Amanda Johnson, said there was always risk of injury, no matter the player, and she’s seen other girls hit the ball harder than the one on the video. She added that a Murphy football player was recently injured playing on turf-field, and “because we aren’t used to playing on turf-fields, should we not play that game because it’s unsafe and our players aren’t used to that type field?” she asked, according to the board meeting notes.

Attendee Dean Shatley said that based on his conversation with the president of the North Carolina High School Athletic Association, the president of the group was unaware of any other injuries resulting from athletic play with a transgender athlete.

But sentiment against the trans player and Highlands School was high. Andrews High School principal Lance Bristol said he would decline to play Highlands based on feedback about safety and fairness, and said, “AHS is willing to take that on and they will embrace it.”

Jason Murphy, a Republican running for a seat on the board in November’s election, said the board should vote on forfeiting all games against Highlands “based on their morals, ethics, and Christian upbringing.”

After additional discussion and comment, according to meeting notes, the board considered the question of allowing continued competition with the Highlands volleyball team. Jeff Tatham made a motion that “we as a county not participate in any upcoming games with varsity and junior varsity against Highlands due to safety concerns.” The motion was carried, 5-1.

When reached for comment, Murphy High volleyball coach Amanda Johnson, also a counselor at the school, told LGBTQ Nation, “I’m sorry. I cannot comment about that.” Highlands School principal Brian Jetter also declined to speak about the issue: “I don’t have any comment on that, but thanks for calling.” A message to Keesha Curtis, the lone dissenting vote on the Cherokee School Board to forfeit all games with Highlands School, went unanswered.