Dr Oz furious over โ€˜$150k penis surgeryโ€™ for trans youth โ€“ hereโ€™s the truth

https://www.thepinknews.com/2025/12/19/dr-oz-furious-over-150k-penis-surgery-for-trans-youth-heres-the-truth/

Dr Mehmet Oz, administrator for the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services.

ICE tore her away from her wife. Now sheโ€™s suffering in an endless legal limbo.

https://www.lgbtqnation.com/2025/12/ice-tore-her-away-from-her-wife-now-shes-suffering-in-an-endless-legal-limbo/

Photo of the author

Greg OwenDecember 21, 2025, 5:00 pm EST
Guard turning keys to a jail cellShutterstock

A same-sex female couple in Pennsylvania is suffering through a โ€œKafkaesque nightmareโ€ after one of the women was detained by Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) when she showed up for a regularly scheduled immigration check-in.

ICE agents detained her and shipped her to a detention center in California.

Xiomara Suarez, 28, arrived in the U.S. in 2022 seeking asylum after fleeing Peru, where she was stalked and endured a violent sexual assault based on her sexual orientation. In a sworn declaration to U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services officialsย reviewed byย Advocate, Suarez said Peruvian police refused to acknowledge her complaints or offer protection, and she feared for her life.

Suarez was admitted to the U.S. on โ€œparoleโ€ as her request for permanent status was processed.

In February, Suarez married her then-girlfriend, Grazi Chiosque, 29, an American citizen. The couple hoped to adjust Suarezโ€™s immigration status and smooth the way for her to obtain a green card. They filed the required documents in May.

Before that request was processed, however, Suarez was swept up in a wave of detentions by ICE at courthouses targeting immigrants scheduled for hearings โ€” only to be arrested and shipped to detention centers despite their legal non-criminal status.

Suarez was now one of them.

Chiosque says her wife is enduring degrading and isolating conditions at the Adelanto ICE detention facility in Southern California, where sheโ€™s been detained since September.

โ€œThereโ€™s mold in the food,โ€ Chiosque said. โ€œYou donโ€™t have any privacy.โ€

โ€œShe was put into shackles,โ€ Suarezโ€™s wife added. โ€œShe told me that crying because it really made her feel like she did something that was wrong, and she didnโ€™t.โ€

Far from expediting Suarezโ€™s immigration status, the coupleโ€™s decision to marry may have only complicated Suarezโ€™s legal claim.

Earlier this month, she was scheduled for back-to-back appearances with government officials. The first was with U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services to adjudicate her spousal petition. The second was before an immigration judge related to her detention and status in the country.

Chiosque flew from Pennsylvania to help Suarez through the process.

At the first appointment, a supervisor with Citizenship and Immigration Services told Chiosque, referring to her wife, โ€œUSCIS does not have jurisdiction because sheโ€™s detained.โ€

โ€œThe immigration judge would have to adjudicate on both,โ€ Chiosque was told.

But at that hearing, the explanation flipped, Chiosque said.

โ€œโ€˜No, I donโ€™t have jurisdiction on the I-130,โ€ the judge told Suarez, referring to her spousal petition. โ€œThereโ€™s nothing I can do.โ€

โ€œIf USCIS does not want to give you an interview,โ€ he added, โ€œcontact your congressman.โ€

The couple had hoped their marriage claim would help expedite Suarezโ€™s permanent residency. Now it was keeping her behind bars.

โ€œUSCIS says itโ€™s not them because sheโ€™s detained. And the judge says itโ€™s not them, itโ€™s USCIS,โ€ Chiosque said.

Suarez was returned to detention. Her next immigration hearing is scheduled for January 28.

The coupleโ€™s legal limbo is indicative of a broader, and intentional, pattern by ICE and the Trump administration, said รlvaro M. Huerta, director of litigation and advocacy at the Immigrant Defenders Law Center.

โ€œThis administration is separating and trapping families like Xiomara and Grazielli in a Kafkaesque nightmare, with the clear intention of making life so unbearable that they abandon all hope,โ€ Huerta said. โ€œItโ€™s not only a policy failure, but also a betrayal of LGBTQ immigrant families who deserve dignity, safety, and the chance to thrive.โ€

โ€œIt feels like weโ€™re begging,โ€ said Chiosque, whose wife sits in detention a continent away.

Subscribe to theย LGBTQ Nation newsletterย and be the first to know about the latest headlines shaping LGBTQ+ communities worldwide.


Greg Owenย writes about politics and culture for LGBTQ Nation. An award-winning writer, producer and journalist, he was recently recognized for Excellence in Online Journalism by NLGJA: the Association of LGBTQ Journalists for his coverage of the 2024 election. He’s written for Q Digital since 2015 and for LGBTQ Nation since 2022.

Trumpโ€™s gender-affirming care ban is why we need Congress to grow a spine

https://www.lgbtqnation.com/2025/12/trumps-gender-affirming-care-ban-is-why-we-need-congress-to-grow-a-spine/

Photo of the author

Faefyx Collingtonย (They/Them)December 21, 2025, 4:41 pm EST
May 14, 2024; New York, NY, USA; Speaker of the House Mike Johnson (center), and Vivek Ramaswamy (right) look on while former President Donald Trump speaks to the media alongside his lawyer Todd Blanche before his criminal trial at Manhattan criminal court at the New York State Supreme Court on May 14, 2024. Mandatory Credit: Justin Lane/Pool via USA TODAY NETWORKMay 14, 2024; New York, NY, USA; Speaker of the House Mike Johnson (center), and Vivek Ramaswamy (right) look on while former President Donald Trump speaks to the media alongside his lawyer Todd Blanche before his criminal trial at Manhattan criminal court at the New York State Supreme Court on May 14, 2024. Mandatory Credit: Justin Lane/Pool via USA TODAY NETWORK | Justin Lane/Pool via USA TODAY N

Yesterdayโ€™s announcement from Donald Trumpโ€™s Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) shows just why the 2026 midterms will matter so much, and why the 11 months of waiting to get there could be so disastrous. We need a Congress that will stand up and snatch back the purse strings as the Founding Fathers originally intended.

In the United States Constitution, Congress is granted the power of the purse: the right to decide how much to spend and on what. Also, importantly, it gets to decide when to remove funding. In the 70s, that was used to pull funding from the Vietnam War. That power does not belong with the Executive Branch, which the Constitution says must โ€œtake Care that the Laws be faithfully executed.โ€

Unfortunately, the Founders likely never imagined people like House Speaker Mike Johnson (R-LA) or Senate Majority Leader John Thune (R-SD), who have been willing to roll over and allow Trump to usurp their power, in violation of the basic concepts behind the checks and balances built into the Constitution.

Trump has been doing plenty of ruling by threatening public funding. But the Trump administrationโ€™sย new plan to block gender-affirming care for trans youthย is possibly the most egregious example so far.

Congress is already working to block gender-affirming care. This week, the House of Representatives passed two gender-affirming care bans for minors,ย one from Rep. Marjorie Taylor Greeneย (R-GA) andย one from Rep. Dan Crenshawย (R-TX). Those bans are horrific, and we can only pray that the Senate will stop them, but they are at least going through some sort of democratic process.

The Trump administration has a way to move towards a gender-affirming care ban if that is in line with the will of the people and democracy. The HHS proposal doesnโ€™t represent a ban; instead, itโ€™s an end-run on democracy, hoping to conduct a scorched-earth funding pull that they should have no authority to do.

HHS hopes to pull federal fundingย for any hospitals that provide gender-affirming care to minors. HHS has coined the term โ€œsex-rejecting procedures,โ€ an inaccurate piece of nomenclature carefully designed to target only trans people, and not affectย cis people, who actually receive the majority of gender-affirming healthcare.

The HHS funding blocking proposal would pull all federal funding from any institution that conducts any gender-affirming care for trans people, even if patients pay for it without using federal funds. Hospitals will have to either comply with the HHS plans by ceasing gender-affirming care or risk losing all federal funding for all other treatments.ย Major hospital systems have already cut their programsย because of these sorts of threats.

Trans youth and their families would be left seeking institutions that only provide gender-affirming care and forgo all government funding, if such a place even exists. Additionally, theย removal of Medicaid coverage could see prices rise.

There will certainly be pushback against this plan, especially from cities and states that have marked themselves as trans sanctuaries. But those challenges will take time, and a small interruption in care or even just the threat of it does huge damage to trans youth. Denial of care has beenย linked to increased rates of depression and anxiety,ย and for those who have begun puberty, the physical changes that can happen in a short time can be extremely upsetting.

Trump keeps using threats of pulling federal funding to power his authoritarianism. That tactic is only working because Congress isnโ€™t stopping him and saying, โ€œNo, thatโ€™s our job.โ€ When Nixon pulled federal funds as a way to end programs with the Environmental Protection Agency (a process called impoundment),ย Congress passed the Congressional Budget and Impoundment Control Act, which closed loopholes and ensured that the president couldnโ€™t rule this way. The Supreme Court went on to rule in 1975 that the president did not have the power to overrule Congress by impounding funds.

Michael Dorf, a constitutional law professor at Cornell University Law School, spoke with ABC News early in the Trump presidency, when he first started using this trick. โ€œIf Congress says youโ€™re spending that much money on the federal programs, thatโ€™s how much is being spent. The president cannot stop it even temporarily,โ€ย he said. โ€œCongress passed this statue this very particular rules of what exactly the president has to do if he wants to not spend money on money Congress has spent. He can ask Congress to for a recission, but there is a 45-day clock and a bunch of procedures, none of which have been followed by Trump.โ€

Congressโ€™ move here wasnโ€™t just granting itself new powers, but providing a safeguard to ensure that the power of the purse remained where the Constitution had put it. Republicans are quick to wheel out the Constitution and the will of the Founding Fathers, but all of that seems forgotten under Trump. Instead, Congress is leaving decisions to be drawn out in protracted judicial battles, which ultimately run the risk of landing in the Trump-packed Supreme Court.

(While weโ€™re at it, Congress is also the institution that has the power to do things likeย rename The John F. Kennedy Memorial Center for the Performing Arts. But they seem to have forgotten that bit of power too.)

All of those federal funding threats work well for Trump, as he and his administration can wave their hands and claim that theyโ€™re standing by their promise to cut bloated government spending (all while spending millions in taxpayer money onย golfingย andย Kid Rock). But it all relies on a tactic that shouldnโ€™t even be part of the presidential toolkit.

There might be a lot of justifiable hope in 2026 that things will work out.ย Elections this year have already shown a big swing away from Trumpโ€™s party.ย Republicans are resigning, opening more seats that the party could lose between now and 2027. And while Congress might be voting on gender-affirming care bans themselves, it took a capitulation to a hardline anti-trans Republican as she was heading out the door to get that to happen.

But weโ€™re only halfway to those midterms, and thereโ€™s going to be a lot of pain if the current Congress canโ€™t remember why theyโ€™re there for another year.

Subscribe to theย LGBTQ Nation newsletterย and be the first to know about the latest headlines shaping LGBTQ+ communities worldwide.

How Foxโ€™s OutKick Relentlessly Targeted a Michigan Teen Girl

This is just hate and bigotry.ย  It is a group of people who hate trans people for some unknown reason and have made their life / career the harassment of trans minors who play sports.ย  ย I can not see how this harms this reporter and his group in any way.ย  ย To make your life about harming others is a real petty way to exist.ย  Many conservatives use their religion to justify such hate but the Jesus of the bible never said a word against the entire LGBTQ+ community.ย  ย So their hate is internally driven and they must be such miserable people.ย  ย So Sad.ย  ย The drive to regress the world’s most progressive countries back to an uneducated straight cis white male controlled society is really causing a lot of damage to people and freedom to express your life as you wish.ย  It seems driven by two groups, the older people who are uncomfortable with the progression of society and younger religious people driven by wealthy religious hate groups.ย  ย  Hugs


 

https://www.unclosetedmedia.com/p/how-foxs-outkick-relentlessly-targeted

Dan Zaksheske has written 18 articles focused on a trans girl who plays high school volleyball. Why?

60 Minutes Abruptly Yanks Segment on Prisoners Sent By Trump to El Salvador Mega-Prison

Can’t air anything that might upset the dear cult leader right?ย  ย  All broadcast corporate media must please the dictator to make a profit, or pay the dictator tribute.ย  What a waste.ย  Again if a democrat had tried this republicans would have howled every few minutes on their paid media arms of their party.ย  Not a peep out of the democratic party about it?ย  Hugs


60 Minutes Abruptly Yanks Segment on Prisoners Sent By Trump to El Salvador Mega-Prison

(Photo Credit: 60 Minutes)

60 Minutesย postponed a segment on the maximum security prison in El Salvador that Presidentย Donald Trumpย sent suspected gangsters and illegal immigrants to, only a few hours before the report was set to air on Sunday.

The CBS program had been planning to air the segment titled โ€œInside CECOT,โ€ referring to El Salvadorโ€™s Centro de Confinamiento del Terrorismo.

Here is the brief editorโ€™s note thatย 60 Minutesย posted to X about the report getting bumped:

โ€œThe broadcast lineup for tonightโ€™s edition ofย 60 Minutesย has been updated. Our report โ€˜Inside CECOTโ€™ will air in a future broadcast.โ€

The CBS News website also yanked its teaser clip of the report down from its website. Here is what that page looks like now:

 

A CBS News spokespersonย toldย Puckย reporterย Dylan Byersย that its editorial team โ€œdetermined it needed additional reporting.โ€

The segment was being reported by correspondentย Sharyn Alfonsiย and produced byย Oriana Zill de Granados.

Paramount Skydance, the parent company of CBS, shared the following teaser for the report on Friday:

Earlier this year, the Trump administration deported hundreds of Venezuelan migrants to El Salvador, a country most had no ties to, claiming they were terrorists. This move sparked an ongoing legal battle, and nine months later the U.S. government still has not released the names of all those deported and placed in CECOT, one of El Salvadorโ€™s harshest prisons.

It added Alfonsi would be speaking to โ€œsome of the now released deportees, who describe the brutal and torturous conditions they endured inside CECOT.โ€

CECOT has been described by outlets like ABC News asย a โ€œmega-prison.โ€ย It opened in 2023 as part of Salvadoran Presidentย Nayib Bukeleโ€™sย push to arrest and imprison more gang members.ย Inmates tauntedย a handful of Democratic and Republican lawmakers when they toured CECOT in May.

President Trump said he was โ€œvery impressedโ€ with the prison earlier this year and thatย he would โ€œloveโ€ to send American crooksย there.

CBS did not mention when it plans on running the segment down the line.

US quietly removes sanctions from firms accused of supplying Russiaโ€™s military

I want to thank the personnelente site for the link to this article. Hugsย  https://personnelente.wordpress.com/2025/12/21/another-stab-in-the-back/

Is tRump a controlled asset or just a useful old idiot, does it matter.ย  ย  He is giving Putin everything he every wanted.ย  The fact is he has decided to be Putin in the west while he lets Russia and China divide up Europe and the Asia.ย  ย Hugs


 

https://euromaidanpress.com/2025/12/19/us-quietly-removes-sanctions-from-firms-accused-of-supplying-russias-military/

Treasury offers no explanation for lifting restrictions on Cyprus, Dubai, Turkish, and Finnish companies.

Commentary: The masking of ICE agents is indefensible

https://www.arcamax.com/politics/opeds/s-3886918

Amy Dru Stanley and Craig Becker, Chicago Tribuneย onย 

Published inย Op Eds

Commentary: The masking of ICE agents is indefensible

Amy Dru Stanley and Craig Becker, Chicago Tribuneย onย Published inย Op Eds

Last month, a federal judge observed that masked figures were creating terror on American streets โ€” not criminals but agents of Immigrations and Customs Enforcement. โ€œLaw enforcement in the United States has usually been performed in the open,โ€ wrote Judge William G. Young, a Ronald Reagan appointee to the U.S. District Court in Massachusetts.

โ€œImages of plain-clothed, masked federal agents โ€” faceless agents of the federal government โ€” snatching a non-violent person off the streetsโ€ have created โ€œfear in citizens and non-citizens alike.โ€

Weโ€™ve all seen the arrests in our neighborhoods and felt that fear. Weโ€™ve watched the raids unfold on the news: on the streets, on college campuses, in workplaces, in homes, outside courtrooms, in Home Depot parking lots. ICE agents wearing masks, violently detaining people, holding them captive, disappearing the suspects.

And weโ€™ve heard the explanation that masking protects the ICE agents. โ€œIf you expose them,โ€ President Donald Trump has said, โ€œyou put them in great danger, tremendous danger.โ€

But that rationale is indefensible, as it would apply to every public official and employee involved in the criminal justice system, all of whom face the threat of retaliatory violence. Moreover, severe penalties exist for attacking or intimidating law enforcement officers. Surely a judge who sentences convicted criminals to prison is as much at risk as ICE agents, yet the notion is absurd that judges should be anonymous or allowed to mask their faces in the courtroom.

Anti-masking bills have been introduced in Congress โ€” including the โ€œNo Secret Police Actโ€ and โ€œNo Anonymity in Immigration Enforcement Actโ€โ€” but the measures have no chance of enactment under GOP control. Recently, Chicago and California banned masked arrests, but the U.S. Department of Homeland Security has stated: โ€œWe will NOT comply.โ€

What is needed is for the courts to act โ€” to declare masked arrests unconstitutional, as unreasonable seizures barred by the Fourth Amendment. The U.S. Supreme Court has held that โ€œreasonableness depends on not only when a seizure is made, but also how it is carried out.โ€ Guarantees exist against seizures without probable cause or warrants, and the court has found that law enforcement agents violate the Fourth Amendment if they seize someone with unreasonable force or execute a warrant to search someoneโ€™s home without first knocking and announcing their presence. Such protections, essential in a democracy, should be extended to bar the carrying out of masked arrests. That ban is necessary to identify bad actors, and reduce the risk of harm and thereby uphold constitutional guarantees against unreasonable seizures and interference with freedom of expression.

ICE use of masks has spread more than fear. It has led to criminal impersonation: men pretending to be ICE agents carrying out kidnappings and sexual assaults. But threats to liberty and security lie in masked ICE policing itself โ€” that faceless agents will use excessive force on immigrants or retaliate against witnesses who protest their raids by exercising free speech rights, and that no redress for the wrongs can be sought because the ICE agents canโ€™t be identified. That masked men can act with impunity, as in authoritarian regimes.

Aggressive recruitment of new ICE agents, who are deployed with little training, heightens the risks of the masked raids. As the crackdown spreads โ€” with the White House demanding 3,000 arrests by ICE a dayโ€” so, too, is protest against the masking. โ€œMore raids means more unidentified federal law enforcement intimidating and in some cases terrorizing our communities,โ€ states the American Civil Liberties Union, noting the difficulty of distinguishing ICE arrests from kidnappings.

Masking also presents dangers for the ICE agents, who may be mistaken for imposters. Obscuring identity has long been a tactic used in certain undercover operations. But as former ICE official Scott Shuchart warned about the masked arrests, there is now โ€œa kind of vigilante problem where people either donโ€™t know, or at least arenโ€™t sure, that these officers who are dressed up like bank robbers are actually law enforcement officers.โ€ In such circumstances, violent self-defense might result.

Judicial prohibition of masked arrests is supported by trends toward greater transparency in policing nationwide. โ€œIn evaluating the reasonableness of police procedures under the Fourth Amendment,โ€ the Supreme Court has, by its own account, โ€œlooked to prevailing rules in individual jurisdictions.โ€ ICE agentsโ€™ masking is sharply discordant with rules requiring local police to wear badges and nameplates and barring them from preventing the public from reading the information. The increasing use of body-worn cameras similarly serves police accountability.

 

According to the U.S. Department of Homeland Security, however, assaults on ICE agents are up by more than 1,000% this year and masking has been informally tolerated to prevent doxxing, harassment and violence. Meanwhile, the U.S. Justice Department has begun to prosecute people who follow agents or publicize their addresses. Yet ICE has issued no policy requiring mask use to protect agents โ€” nor any official guidelines on masking at all. Appearing on Fox News in July, the acting ICE director, Todd Lyons, equivocated. โ€œIโ€™m not a fan of the masks,โ€ he said. โ€œI think we could do better, but we need to protect our agents and officers.โ€

The unreasonableness of masked arrests is highlighted by state legislation outlawing the wearing of disguises by private individuals on public property. It reflects the understanding that masking promotes lawlessness โ€” and as the Supreme Court has recognized, โ€œDecency, security and liberty alike demand that government officials shall be subjected to the same rules of conduct that are commands to the citizen.โ€

Currently, some 22 states have anti-masking rules on the books, as do many local governments, rules now being enforced to suppress peaceful dissent rather than criminal activity. In extreme instances, felony charges have been threatened against masked students protesting the war in Gaza. No doubt the repressive use of the restrictions will broaden. Last June, Trump posted on social media: โ€œFrom now on, MASKS WILL NOT BE ALLOWED to be worn at protests. What do these people have to hide, and why???โ€

Anti-masking rules governing private conduct are almost a century old, with most originating in efforts to quell the terrors of the Ku Klux Klan. With much to hide, the Klan has attacked anti-masking laws in the very terms now used by ICE to defend masked arrests: โ€œMembers wear their masks to protect their anonymity,โ€ the Klan has argued, โ€œbecause of the harassment, threats of violence, violence.โ€

The depth of community protest against ICE agentsโ€™ masking may well be rooted in historical memory of faceless Klansmen riding through the night, seizing their captives. As Judge Young warned recently, โ€œMasks are associated with cowardly desperados and the despised Ku Klux Klan. In all our history we have never tolerated an armed masked secret police.โ€

We should not do so now.

____

Amy Dru Stanley is a history professor at the University of Chicago. Craig Becker is a lawyer with Democracy Defenders Fund.

We Found That More Than 170 U.S. Citizens Have Been Held by Immigration Agents. Theyโ€™ve Been Kicked, Dragged and Detained for Days.

Please note that this is from October so a lot more US citizens have been detained and abused by ICE.ย  ย Hugs

We Found That More Than 170 U.S. Citizens Have Been Held by Immigration Agents. Theyโ€™ve Been Kicked, Dragged and Detained for Days.

A man in jeans and a light hoodie stands at the entrance to a house, surrounded by bright red dirt.
Leonardo Garcia Venegas was detained by immigration agents while filming a raid on his worksite, despite having a REAL ID on him and telling the officers he was a citizen.

Reporting Highlights

  • Americans Detained:ย The government doesnโ€™t track how many citizens are held by immigration agents. We found more than 170 cases this year where citizens were detained at raids and protests.
  • Held Incommunicado:ย More than 20 citizens have reported being held for over a day without being able to call their loved ones or a lawyer. In some cases their families couldnโ€™t find them.
  • Cases Wilted:ย Agents have arrested about 130 Americans, including a dozen elected officials, for allegedly interfering with or assaulting officers, yet those cases were often dropped.

These highlights were written by the reporters and editors who worked on this story.

When the Supreme Court recently allowed immigration agents in the Los Angeles area to take race into consideration during sweeps, Justice Brett Kavanaugh said that citizens shouldnโ€™t be concerned.

โ€œIf the officers learn that the individual they stopped is a U.S. citizen or otherwise lawfully in the United States,โ€ย Kavanaugh wrote, โ€œthey promptly let the individual go.โ€

But that is far from the reality many citizens have experienced. Americans have beenย dragged,ย tackled,ย beaten,ย tasedย andย shotย by immigration agents. Theyโ€™ve had theirย necks kneeled on. Theyโ€™ve been held outsideย in the rain while in their underwear. At least threeย citizensย wereย pregnantย whenย agents detained them. One of those women had already had theย door of her home blown offย while Department of Homeland Security Secretary Kristi Noemย watched.

About two dozen Americans have said they were held forย more than a dayย without being able to phone lawyers or loved ones.

Videos of U.S. citizens being mistreated by immigration agents have filled social media feeds, but there is little clarity on the overall picture. The governmentย does not track how oftenย immigration agents hold Americans.

So ProPublica created its own count.

We compiled and reviewed every case we could find of agents holding citizens against their will, whether during immigration raids or protests. While the tally is almost certainly incomplete, we found more than 170 such incidents during the first nine months of President Donald Trumpโ€™s second administration.

Among the citizens detained are nearly 20 children, including two with cancer. That includes four who were held for weeks with their undocumented mother and without access to the familyโ€™s attorney untilย a congresswoman intervened.

Immigration agents do have authority to detain Americans in limited circumstances. Agents canย hold people whom they reasonably suspect are in the country illegally. We found more than 50 Americans who were held after agents questioned their citizenship. They were almost all Latino.

Immigration agents alsoย can arrest citizensย who allegedly interfered with or assaulted officers. We compiled cases of about 130 Americans, including a dozen elected officials, accused of assaulting or impeding officers.

These cases have often wilted under scrutiny. In nearly 50 instances that we have identified so far, charges have never been filed or the cases were dismissed. Our count found a handful of citizens have pleaded guilty, mostly to misdemeanors.

Among the detentions in which allegations have not stuck, masked agentsย pointed a gun at, pepper sprayed and punchedย a young man who had filmed them searching for his relative. In another, agentsย knocked over and then tackledย a 79-year-old car wash owner, pressing their knees into his neck and back. His lawyer said he was held for 12 hours and wasnโ€™t given medical attention despite having broken ribs in the incident and having recently had heart surgery. In a third case, agents grabbed and handcuffed a woman on her way to work who was caught up in a chaotic raid on street vendors. In a complaint filed against the government, she described beingย held for more than two days, without being allowed to contact the outside world for much of that time. (The Supreme Court hasย ruledย that two days is generally the longest federal officials can hold Americans without charges.)

A man with a mustache wears a white T-shirt and stands with his arms crossed on an empty road.
George Retes, an American combat veteran, at the site of his arrest by immigration agents on Californiaโ€™s Central Coast. Retes was detained for three days without access to a lawyer and missed his daughterโ€™s third birthday.

In response to questions from ProPublica, the Department of Homeland Security said agents do not racially profile or target Americans. โ€œWe donโ€™t arrest US citizens for immigration enforcement,โ€ wrote spokesperson Tricia McLaughlin.

A top immigration official recently acknowledged agents do consider someoneโ€™s looks. โ€œHow do they look compared to, say, you?โ€ Border Patrol chief Gregory Bovinoย said to a white reporterย in Chicago.

The White House told ProPublica that anyone who assaults federal immigration agents would be prosecuted. โ€œInterfering with law enforcement and assaulting law enforcement is a crime and anyone, regardless of immigration status, will be held accountable,โ€ said the Deputy Press Secretary Abigail Jackson. โ€œOfficers act heroically to enforce the law, arrest criminal illegal aliens, and protect American communities with the utmost professionalism.โ€

A spokesperson for Kavanaugh did not return an emailed request for comment.

An immigration raid on 79-year-old Rafie Ollah Shouhedโ€™s car wash left him with broken ribs.ย Courtesy of Rafie Ollah Shouhed. Compiled by ProPublica.

Tallying the number of Americans detained by immigration agents is inherently messy and incomplete. The government has long ignoredย recommendationsย for it to track such cases, even as the U.S. has aย history of detaining and even deporting citizens, including during the Obama administration and Trumpโ€™s first term.

We compiled cases by sifting through both English- and Spanish-language social media, lawsuits, court records and local media reports. We did not include arrests of protesters by local police or the National Guard. Nor did we count cases in which arrests were made at a later date after a judicial process. That included cases of some people charged with serious crimes, likeย throwing rocksย or tossingย a flare to start a fire.

Experts say that Americans appear to be getting picked up more now as a result of the government doing something thatย it hasnโ€™t for decades: large-scale immigration sweeps across the country, often in communities that do not want them.

In earlier administrations, deportation agents used intelligence to target specific individuals, said Scott Shuchart, a top immigration official in the Biden, Obama and first Trump administrations. โ€œThe new idea is to use those resources unintelligentlyโ€ โ€” with officers targeting communities or workplaces where undocumented immigrants may be.

When federal officers roll through communities in the way the Supreme Court permitted, the constitutional rights of both citizens and noncitizens are inevitably violated, argued David Bier, the director of immigration studies at the libertarian Cato Institute. He recentlyย analyzed how sweeps in Los Angelesย have led to racial profiling. โ€œIf the government can grab someone because heโ€™s a certain demographic group thatโ€™s correlated with some offense category, then they can do that in any context.โ€

Cody Wofsy, an attorney at the American Civil Liberties Union, put it even more starkly. โ€œAny one of us could be next.โ€

The video Garcia Venegas made of an immigration raid on a construction site shows him walking away from the officer while trying to film and then stating that heโ€™s a citizen before being detained.ย Courtesy of Garcia Venega

When Kavanaugh issued his opinion that immigration agents can consider race and other factors, the Supreme Courtโ€™s three liberal justices strongly dissented.ย They warned that citizens risked beingย โ€œgrabbed, thrown to the ground, and handcuffed simply because of their looks, their accents, and the fact they make a living by doing manual labor.โ€

Leonardo Garcia Venegas appears to have been just such a case. He was working at a construction site in coastal Alabama when he saw masked immigration agents from Homeland Security Investigations hop a fence and run by a โ€œNo trespassingโ€ sign. Garcia Venegas recalled that they moved toward the Latino workers, ignoring the white and Black workers.

Garcia Venegas began filming after his undocumented brother asked agents for a warrant. In response, the footage shows, agents yanked his brother to the ground, shoving his face into wet concrete. Garcia Venegas kept filming until officers grabbed him too and knocked his phone to the ground.

Other co-workers filmed what happened next, as immigration agents twisted the 25-year-oldโ€™s arms. They repeatedly tried to take him to the ground while he yelled, โ€œIโ€™m a citizen!โ€

Officers pulled out his REAL ID, which Alabama only issues to those legally in the U.S. But the agents dismissed it as fake. Officers held Garcia Venegas handcuffed for more than an hour. His brother was later deported.

A man with a small goatee seated on the steps of a single-wide home, wearing a blue shirt, jeans and a pair of sandals.
Leonardo Garcia Venegas told agents he was a citizen both times he was detained. His REAL ID was dismissed as a fake.

Garcia Venegas was so shaken that he took two weeks off of work. Soon after he returned, he was working alone inside a nearly built house listening to music on his headphones when he sensed someone watching him. A masked immigration agent was standing in the bedroom doorway.

This time, agents didnโ€™t tackle him. But they again dismissed his REAL ID. And then they held him to check his citizenship. Garcia Venegas says agents also held two other workers who had legal status.

DHS did not respond to ProPublicaโ€™s questions about Garcia Venegasโ€™ detentions, or to a federal lawsuit he filed last month. The agency hasย previously defendedย the agentsโ€™ conduct, saying he โ€œphysically got in between agents and the subjectโ€ during the first incident. The footage does not show that, and Garcia Venegas was never charged with obstruction or any other crime.

Garcia Venegasโ€™ lawyers at the nonprofit Institute for Justice hope others may join his suit. After all, the reverberations of the immigration sweeps are being felt widely. Garcia Venegas said he knows of 15 more raids on nearby construction sites, and the industry along his portion of the Gulf Coast is struggling for lack of workers.

Kavanaughโ€™s assurances hold little weight for Garcia Venegas. Heโ€™s a U.S. citizen of Mexican descent, who speaks little English and works in construction. Even with his REAL ID and Social Security card in his wallet, Garcia Venegas worries that immigration agents will keep harassing him.

โ€œIf they decide they want to detain you,โ€ he said. โ€œYouโ€™re not going to get out of it.โ€

A plywood shell of a house with men on top of it adding roof framing.
Men building a home in rural Baldwin County, Alabama. Garcia Venegas was detained by immigration agents twice while working on homes in the area.

George Retes was among the citizens arrested despite immigration agents appearing to know his legal status. He also disappeared into the system for days without being able to contact anyone on the outside.

The only clue Retesโ€™ family had at first was a brief call he managed to make on his Apple Watch with his hands handcuffed behind his back. He quickly told his wife that โ€œICEโ€ had arrested him during aย massive raid and protestย on the marijuana farm where he worked as a security guard.

Still, Retesโ€™ family couldnโ€™t find him. They called every law enforcement agency they could think of. No one gave them any answers.

Eventually, they spotted a TikTok video showing Retes driving to work and slowly trying to back up as heโ€™s caught between agents and protestors. Through the tear gas and dust, his family recognized Retesโ€™ car and the veteran decal on his window. The full video shows a man โ€” Retes โ€” splayed on the ground surrounded by agents.

George Retesโ€™ family noticed his car in a compiled video posted to TikTok. This clip from that longer video shows his white vehicle surrounded by tear gas. Immigration agents later pinned him on the ground.ย nota.sra/TikTok

Retesโ€™ family went to the farm, where local TV reporters were interviewing families who couldnโ€™t find their loved ones.

โ€œThey broke his window, they pepper sprayed him, they grabbed him, threw him on the floor,โ€ย his sister told a reporterย between sobs. โ€œWe donโ€™t know what to do. Weโ€™re just asking to let my brother go. He didnโ€™t do anything wrong. Heโ€™s a veteran, disabled citizen. It says it on his car.โ€

Retes was held for three days without being given an opportunity to make a call. His family only learned where he had been after his release. His leg had been cut from the broken glass, Retes told ProPublica, and lingering pepper spray burned his hands. He tried to soothe them by filling sandwich bags with water.

Retes recalled that agents knew he was a citizen. โ€œThey didnโ€™t care.โ€ He said one DHS official laughed at him, saying he shouldnโ€™t have come to work that day. โ€œThey still sent me away to jail.โ€ He added that cases like his show Kavanaugh was โ€œwrong completely.โ€

DHS did not answer our questions about Retes. It did respond on X afterย Retes wrote an op-edย last month in the San Francisco Chronicle. Anย agency postย asserted he was arrested for assault after he โ€œbecame violent and refused to comply with law enforcement.โ€ Yet Retes had been released without any charges. Indeed, he says he was never told why he was arrested.

The Department of Justice has encouraged agents to arrest anyone interfering with immigration operations,ย twiceย orderingย law enforcement to prioritize cases of those suspected of obstructing, interfering with or assaulting immigration officials.

But the governmentโ€™s claims in those cases have often not beenย borne out.

Daniel Montenegro was filming a raid at a Van Nuys, California, Home Depot with other day-laborer advocates this summer when, he told ProPublica, he was tackled by several officers who injured his back.

Bovino, the Border Patrol chief whoย oversaw the LA raidsย and has since taken similar operations to cities likeย Sacramentoย and Chicago,ย tweeted out the names and photosย of Montenegro and three others, accusing them of using homemade tire spikes to disable vehicles.

โ€œI had no idea where that story came from,โ€ Montenegro told ProPublica. โ€œI didnโ€™t find out until we were released. People were like, โ€˜We saw you on Twitter and the news and you guys are terrorists, you were planning to slash tires.โ€™ I never saw those spike tire-popper things.โ€

Officials have not charged Montenegro or the others with any crimes. (Bovino did not respond to a request for comment, while DHS defended him in a statement to ProPublica: โ€œChief Bovinoโ€™s success in getting the worst of the worst out of the country speaks for itself.โ€)

The governmentโ€™s cases are sometimes so muddied that itโ€™s unclear why agents actually arrested a citizen.

Andrea Velez was charged with assaulting an officer after she was accidentally dropped off for work during a raid on street vendors in downtown Los Angeles. She said in a federal complaint that officers repeatedly assumed she did not speak English. Federal officers later requested access to her phone in an attempt to prove she was colluding withย another citizen arrested that day, who was charged withย assault. She was one of the Americans held for more than two days.

DHS did not respond to our questions about Velez, but it has previously accused her of assaulting an officer. A federal judge has dismissed the charges.

Other citizens also said officers accused them of crimes and suddenly questioned their citizenship โ€” including a man arrested afterย filming Border Patrol agentsย breakย a truck window, and a pregnant womanย who tried to stop officersย from taking her boyfriend.


The prospects for any significant reckoning over agentsโ€™ conduct, even against citizens, are dim. The paths for suing federal agents are even more limited than they are for local police. And thatโ€™s if agents can even be identified. Whatโ€™s more, theย administration has gutted the office that investigates allegations of abuse by agents.

โ€œThe often-inadequate guardrails that we have for state and local government โ€” even those guardrails are nonexistent when youโ€™re talking about federal overreach,โ€ said Joanna Schwartz, a professor at UCLA School of Law.

More than 50 members of Congress have also written to the administration, demanding details about Americans whoโ€™ve been detained. One is Sen. Alex Padilla, a California Democrat. After trying to question Noem about detained citizens, federal agents grabbed Padilla,ย pulled him to the ground and handcuffed him. The department later defended the agents, saying they โ€œacted appropriately.โ€


How Moms for Liberty Took Over One Florida County

I can’t understand living just to hate and harm others who are not doing anything that harms you.ย  ย  To carry that bitterness and to work so hard to deny to others what you demand for yourself seems like poisoning one’s self.ย  With so much to enjoy in diversity and inclusion why work so hard to create a homogeny of everyone being the same.ย  ย Hugs

https://www.unclosetedmedia.com/p/how-moms-for-liberty-took-over-one

As the M4L annual summit kicks off this weekend, hereโ€™s how one of the groupโ€™s original chapters is sowing chaos and pushing anti-LGBTQ policies in Indian River County.

The GOP plot to gain 40 seats without winning any more votes

https://www.yahoo.com/news/articles/gop-plot-gain-40-seats-103002297.html

Russell Payne
6 min read
Steve Bannon, former advisor to U.S. President Donald Trump, arrives for a hearing at Manhattan Criminal Court on February 11, 2025 in New York City. Michael M. Santiago/Getty Images
Steve Bannon, former advisor to U.S. President Donald Trump, arrives for a hearing at Manhattan Criminal Court on February 11, 2025 in New York City. Michael M. Santiago/Getty Images

Withย Republicansย andย Democratsย embroiled in a fight over redistricting around the country, GOP operatives are beginning to openly discuss their plan to leverage institutional power โ€” from statehouses to the Supreme Court โ€” to usher in a near-unbreakable House majority.

Inย Texas, Republicans are pushing forward a plan to create five new GOP House seats, which alone could be enough to prevent Democrats from retaking the House in the 2026 midterms. The new Texas maps are part of a largerย redistrictingย play, in which Republicans think they can squeeze out a dozen new GOP seats from states such as Texas, Florida, Missouri and Indiana.

Theย redistrictingย play from Republicans, however, is only part of a larger campaign to totally change the state of play in the House of Representatives. If successful, that effort could see Republicans pick up more than 40 seats without having to win any more support from voters, according to GOP operatives.

GOP strategist Alex deGrasse, an advisor to Rep. Elise Stefanik, R-N.Y., spoke about the emerging plan on Steve Bannonโ€™s โ€œWar Room,โ€ outlining three changes that Republicans are counting on to bail them out of potential democratic accountability: partisan gerrymandering; a Supreme Court ruling that guts the Voting Rights Act; and an unprecedented andย unconstitutionalย mid-decade Census.

โ€œYouโ€™ve got these three vectors,โ€ deGrasse said. โ€œBack of the envelope map this morning โ€” when I woke up with a smile โ€” was Democrats could lose 42 seats.โ€

Potentially the most important part of this plan hangs on the fate ofย Section Twoย of the Voting Rights Act of 1965. This section of the landmark civil rights law generally bans race-based discrimination in voting laws, and has been an important part of the legal framework that currently guarantees House districts where the majority of the voters are a minority group. This then allows members of that minority group the ability to elect their chosenย representative.

The case before the court directly concerns one of Louisianaโ€™s two majority-Black districts, with the group of voters who brought the case seeking to overturn the current map used in the state. Republicans, however, are hoping the Supreme Court will issue a maximalist ruling that would allow their party to dilute minority voters in the South, effectively eliminating Black representation in Congress in swaths of the country. This would also, in effect, eliminate many Democratic seats across the South.

The Republican dominated Supreme Court has steadily dismantled the Voting Rights Act in recent decades, with Shelby County v. Holder in 2013ย allowingย some states, mostly concentrated in the South, to change the rules and procedures around voting without a federal review.

The potential gains for Republicans here are huge. In 2024, there were 141 majority-minority House districts;119 of these districts elected Democrats to represent them.

The specific number of seats that Republicans would be able to pick up through a change in the Voting Rights Act would depend on the specifics of the ruling, as well as practical constraints on the GOPโ€™s ability to gerrymander. Still,itโ€™s clear Republicans are hoping to be given a free hand to eliminate majority-minority districts altogether.

โ€œThe other third aspect that weโ€™re talking about here, Steve, is that voting rights are up in the Supreme Court; they said, โ€˜Hold on, do we need race-based seats? Does this go against the 14th and 15th Amendments? And does the Constitution supersede racial seat drawing?โ€ deGrasseย said.

The third part of the GOP plan, alongside the current round of redistricting and their hopes at the high court, has to do with President Donald Trumpโ€™s ordering of a new mid-decade Census.

Stephen Miller, Trumpโ€™s White House deputy chief of staff, signaled at the purpose of Trumpโ€™s mid-decade Census plan when heย claimedย on Fox News that โ€œDemocrats rigged the 2020 Census by including illegal aliens.โ€ Miller made these claims despite the fact that Trump was president and in charge of the 2020 Census.

For context, non-citizens have been counted in every Census since 1790, and the framers of the Constitution explicitly included non-citizens in the Census by stating in Article One that itย shallย count the โ€œwhole number of persons in each state.โ€ For the 2020 Census, Trump also pushed to have a question about citizenship included in the Census, acknowledging that the Census was meant to count all persons in the United States, including noncitizens.

Miller went on to reveal the goal of Trumpโ€™s mid-decade Census plan, saying that โ€œ20 to 30 House Democrat seats wouldnโ€™t exist but for illegal aliens.โ€

Charlie Kirk, the right-wing activist who maintains aย personalย line of communication with Trump, indicated in anย interviewย with the Daily Caller that the Census scheme would also help to lock Democrats out of the presidency and โ€œpotentially subtract 20 electoral votes from Democrats in the electoral college system, as congressional seat appropriation is directly correlated with Electoral College totals.โ€ Kirk is a co-founder of Turning Point USA, an organization dedicated to indoctrinating high school and college-age students in conservative ideology. The organization was also among the groups Trumpโ€™s 2024 campaign delegated get-out-the-vote efforts to.

The GOPโ€™s Census plan will almost certainly be challenged in court. Federal lawย holdsย that a mid-decade Census can be conducted, but not used for apportionment. And, since the countryโ€™s founding, the U.S. has conducted a Census once a decade for the purposes of apportionment.

Democrats in Texas say that this current push from the Republicans โ€” to totally reconfigure American elections to retain power โ€” should be a wake-up call.

Texas state Rep. Venton Jones, the House minority whip in Texas, told Salon that national Democrats need to realize that โ€œthereโ€™s a bigger plan at play and we need to wake up and address that as a nation.โ€

โ€œWe have to continue to overperform to at least get back the majority and be ready for an electoral fight when that happens, because weโ€™ve already seen what happens when this president, or even this Congress, doesnโ€™t get what they want,โ€ Jones said. โ€œThey donโ€™t always play by the rules. They just change the rules to make it benefit them.โ€

The postย The GOP plot to gain 40 seats without winning any more votesย appeared first onย Salon.com.