π’ππΏπβΉπ₯

π’ππΏπβΉπ₯

The president’s deportation agenda has failed in the courts. Now he’s trying to cheat the system
ByΒ Amanda MarcotteSenior WriterPublishedΒ
(Illustration by Salon / Getty Images / John Moore / Nikos Frazier / Omaha World-Herald / Compliant Technologies Manual)Since Markwayne MullinΒ took over the Department of Homeland SecurityΒ in March, Immigration and Custom Enforcement has dialed back on the trolling. Gone are the videos and memes, posted regularly under the leadership of Mullinβs predecessor Kristi Noem, that mocked detainees for crying and celebrated ICE agents for being recklessly violent. There have been no more showy βinvasionsβ of cities like Minneapolis or Los Angeles, as Mullin has aimed to draw less attention to ICEβs incompetent and legally dubious methods. His strategy has largely worked in getting the unpopular agencyβs name out of the headlines.But that doesnβt mean ICE has given up on fulfilling Donald Trump and Stephen Millerβs cruel fantasies. The xenophobic Miller agenda is still being treated as the vanguard in White House efforts to will an authoritarian police state into being, circumventing both law and tradition to attack due process and inflict fear on the nationβs immigrant population. In early August, DHS posted a notice that they plan toΒ buy $20 million worth of electrified shock glovesΒ that are euphemistically described as βconductive distraction and de-escalation devices.β The gloves are truly Orwellian, cheered on by police because theyΒ inflict painΒ but leave βno burn marks or scars,β making it easier for law enforcement to hide the abuse and cruelty they inflict. Amnesty InternationalΒ opposesΒ the use of these devices, arguing they are βreadily misused for torture.β
Trump, of course, has fantasized aloud about unleashing state violence on Americans, regardless of the laws against it. The gloves provide an avenue to hurt both immigrants and protesters, while avoiding due process and legal accountability.
The glovesβ torturous potential seems the biggest part of their appeal to the administration. Mullin has previouslyΒ defended the killingΒ of nonviolent anti-ICE protesters, while MillerΒ regularly paintsΒ progressive protesters and immigrants as apocalyptic threats thatΒ need be counteredΒ with violence. Trump, of course, hasΒ fantasized aloudΒ about unleashing state violence on Americans, regardless of the laws against it. The gloves provide an avenue to hurt both immigrants and protesters, while avoiding due process and legal accountability.Β
As the courts keeps getting in the way of Trumpβs desire to persecute people he doesnβt like, the pressure to find a way to cheat the laws guarding human rights is only intensifying. Liz Dye, legal analyst and host of the βLaw and Chaosβ podcast, told me that βU.S. Attorneys are being pressured to bring politically motivated cases based on shoddy or even fabricated evidence, with the predictable result that the cases implode on impact with the court system, sometimes spectacularly.β
The most recent high-profile example is the attempt by U.S. Attorney for the District of Columbia Jeanine Pirro toΒ prosecute David Hearn, a former Olympian who was accused of vandalizing the Reflecting Pool at the Lincoln Memorial. As it turned out, Hearn was being used as a scapegoat to hide Trumpβs embarrassment over ruining the pool byΒ hiring poorly qualified croniesΒ to renovate it. Pirro eventually had to admit that the case was without merit and dropped it, even though doing so meant a well publicized dressing-down from Trump at the White House.
The failed attempt to prosecute Hearn was just the latest in a series of high-profile prosecutions of people Trump hates for criticizing him or attempting to hold him accountable, including againstΒ former FBI director James ComeyΒ andΒ New York Attorney General Letitia James.Β
In a recent column for the New York Times, Jamelle BouieΒ observedΒ that βThe principal aim of President Trumpβs second term is revenge.β Worse, most everyone Trump fixates on is innocent of wrongdoing. Their only βtransgressionβ has been upholding the law, criticizing the president or, in many cases, simply being of a race or class of people he doesnβt like. But Trump, Bouie argued memorably, also wants revenge on the American peopleΒ βfor rejecting him in 2020 and dealing a grievous blow to his ego.β
As Dye explained, Trumpβs efforts to use the Justice Department to exact revenge have only backfired. It has βhemorrhaged staffβ because honest attorneys have rejected pressure to βdrop meritorious prosecutionsβ so they can βbring garbage political casesβ instead. The departmentβs reputation is in tatters. Zahid Quraishi, a federal judge in New Jersey, said it best. When throwing aΒ federal prosecutorΒ out of his courtroomΒ earlier this year, Quraishi said, βGenerations of Assistant U.S. Attorneys had built the goodwill of that office for your generation to destroy it within a year.βΒ
The new ICE gloves are part of this systemic destruction, representing the pathetic means the Trump administration will use, all so they can inflict maximum punishment before the judicial system lets their targets go. The immigration system is far easier to manipulate for authoritarian purposes than the federal justice system. Undocumented residents donβt enjoy the same legal rights as citizens, and deporting someone is a much lower lift, legally speaking, than prosecuting someone for a crime they didnβt commit. And yet, as POLITICOΒ reportedΒ this week, the administration is losing most of its deportation cases in court. Of the 20,500 tracked by the media outlet, the White House lost at least 17,600, or 85% of the time.Β
Unable to win in court, Trump and his officials are looking to turn the process itself into the punishment. Immigrants are held in detention camps for months, oftenΒ under torturous conditions, while waiting for their cases heard. ICE raids areΒ frequentΒ andΒ often violent,Β sometimesΒ targeting peopleΒ who have legal paperwork to be in U.S. The result is that immigrants are being kept in a constant state of psychological terror, especially with the knowledge that having legal status βΒ or even citizenshipΒ β may not provide sufficient protection. These electric gloves are just the latest part of what amounts to a torture campaign being waged by the administration β a way for ICE to hurt and punish immigrants and their defenders under the guise of βcrowd controlβ or βde-escalation.βΒ
While the situation is dire, itβs also a sign that Trump is weak. This is evident in theΒ special grand juryΒ Pirro recently convened in Washington following rumors that her job was at stake due to her inability to successfully prosecute a series of fall guys the presidents wants to blame for his own failures. But itβs doubtful she will be able to improve on her losing record. Since Trump canβt imprison people at the scale he wants, he has to settle for harassing them instead. Thatβs not the behavior of the all-powerful leader he was trying to be a year ago. They are the actions of a spoiled brat trying, and failing, to cover up the stench of losing.Β
ByΒ Amanda Marcotte
Amanda Marcotte is a senior politics writer at Salon and the author of “Troll Nation: How The Right Became Trump-Worshipping Monsters Set On Rat-F*cking Liberals, America, and Truth Itself.” Follow her on BlueskyΒ @AmandaMarcotteΒ and sign up for her biweekly politics newsletter,Β Standing Room Only.
I have to get back to responding to comments. But I woke at 2 am all upset.Β Later when he got up Ron told me I was loudly begging them to take their hands off me, to stop grabbing me,Β to stop hurting me, andΒ Ron said my voice was very strained, like I was trying to talk while someone had their hands around my throat.Β I can’t remember doing anything for the first few hours being up. I just watched videos and was in my own thoughts / head. I promise I will get back to comments.Β But I have to learn to function again while not seeing well, being so tired from not sleeping, and trying to do so much in the house. But I promise I will find a way.Β Even if I have to cut the cartoon / meme post to only a few days a week.Β Β Hugs
















































































































































Not much these days, end up walking in circles around the house.Β Β Hugs














































































































https://www.notus.org/health-science/nih-holding-up-medical-research-funding-status-19
Hundreds of grants, including for maternal health, contraceptives and drug abuse, are in limbo, subject to political reviews.
The Trump administration is implementing more political oversight of grants. Alex Brandon/AP
It used to be that once a National Institutes of Health grant award hit βstatus 19,β the money was about to go out the door.
Thatβs not the case anymore. The Trump administration has enacted an unprecedented political review process, pushing hundreds of awards into limbo. Status 19 β an administrative code describing awards with senior leadership sign-off β is being used as the holding cell.
Current and former career staff say this extra review by senior leaders is occurring after grants have undergone peer review, been approved by multiple offices in NIH, and screened for red-flag words around race, gender or other behavioral and social sciences. The extra political reviews are required not only for newly funded grants but also for annual payment installments for previously awarded projects.
As a result, some grants are lingering in status 19 for weeks or even months, gumming up the works as grant officers try to get awards out the door ahead of the new fiscal year starting in October. Flagged grants reviewed by NOTUS had to do with maternal health, contraceptive use, aging, dementia and opioid abuse.
βThe notion that Francis Collins or Mike Lauer would ever have reviewed individual grants like this is so beyond the realm of comprehension,β a senior career staffer said, referring to the former directors of NIH and its Office of Extramural Research. βItβs laughable to me.β
A second senior NIH official called status 19 a βgraveyard for grants.β The NIH staffers were granted anonymity because they werenβt authorized to speak to the media.
As one of the largest grant funders in the federal government, NIHβs process is a prime example of how the Trump administration is implementing more political oversight of grants across a wide swath of agencies, even as its efforts to formalize those reviews face pushback.
Senate RepublicansΒ votedΒ to temporarily block a White House regulation to formalize political review, which has already led to delays in posting and awarding grants at theΒ Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, the Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration, theΒ Department of InteriorΒ and other agencies.
Researchers, patient advocates and biotech companies are outraged by the proposed regulation, which the White House is seeking to implement by Oct. 1 but could be blocked until December if the House also approves a delay.
Senior NIH leaders sent around a new agency review flowchart in May outlining additional steps once an award hits status 19. The flowchart, viewed by NOTUS, mandates a review by the NIH Office of Extramural Research (OER) and an HHS counselor before grantees are given a notice of award. There are no political appointees at OER, but its director reports to NIH Director and Trump appointee Jay Bhattacharya.
As a result of the extra reviews, the number of grants sitting for weeks in status 19 have surged. Around 8% of new grant awards are sitting in status 19 for anywhere from two to seven weeks, according to internal data shared with NOTUS.
In past years, around 11% of first-time awards had been released to the recipients within a week. This year, itβs 2%.
The delays are even more pronounced for annual payment installments for ongoing grants. The vast majority previously left status 19 within three days; now it takes 53 days to get 90% of payments out the door.
Lauer, who served as NIHβs extramural research director from 2015 to February 2025, said he couldnβt recall a time when a political appointee β including the NIH director β halted awarding of a research grant after it had gone through the review and approval process.
βStatus 19 was not something I thought about,β Lauer told NOTUS.
NIH career staff stress that by the time grant awards reach status 19, they have been through dozens of editing and review steps. Theyβve undergone peer review and a second look by an advisory council. Grant officers have gone through a checklist, including confirming that women and racial minorities have been appropriately included, something required by statute.
In grants reviewed by NOTUS, HHS or EOR staff flagged words including βdiverse,β βequity,β βstructuralβ and βunderrepresentedβ and asked for clarification about what the researchers meant by them. In one project, a staffer wrote that the word βstructuralβ could include concepts that are inconsistent with NIH priorities.
They asked for more clarification in projects that focused on health disparities or racial groups. Officials wrote that focusing on specific racial groups required more justification. In one project that expressed support for scholars and researchers from a variety of backgrounds, an official responded that the language could raise legal concerns if interpreted as targeting people based on demographics.
In multiple flagged grants, officials expressed concerns that they werenβt worth funding because their only practical use might be to support the writing of new laws.
HHS spokeswoman Emily Hilliard disputed the notion that status 19 is being used to hold up grants under extra political reviews. She said grants can remain in status 19 for five to 10 days while they are given final review by the Office of Extramural Research.
βThere is no political appointee review stage in the NIH grant review process,β Hilliard said in a statement. βOERβs review is a longstanding part of NIHβs grant review process.β
Lauer said releasing grant money might face occasional delays, but it was almost always because Congress had failed to pass a budget for NIH, leading to uncertainty about how much total grant funding would be available.
Trump appointees are also conducting extra layers of review to the notices posted by the government to let researchers know money is available for specific projects or programs. Researchers say theyβve seen more delays in posting those notices β another obstacle in getting grant funding out the door.
βItβs this black box of HHS review,β said Colleen Kelley, an associate dean for research at Emory University.