A bunch of clips from The Majority Report on a verity of subjects

In this on Sam and crew show clips of tRump talking sexually about other world male leaders and make jokes about tRump’s sexuality.ย  ย They also mention how he rambles disjointedly and his dementia seems worse.ย  Hugs

 

 

 

Emma and Ken discuss the new memorandum on terrorism that targets activist, protestors, and people who post online.ย  It is an attempt to stop people from expressing a negative opinion of the tRump administration and the horrific actions they are doing.ย  They talk about how the administration really believes that just talking badly about ICE actions is doxing them and any doxing is terrorism.ย  The administration feels that no one has 1st amendment rights and that anything done to protest the administration is terrorism.ย  The fear it inspires is discussed along with the cost incurred by the defendants.ย  ย Hugs

 

Sam and Emma are talking about how the tRump administration is using the FBI to attack and interfere with democratic voting groups who work to get voters to the polls, raise funds for democratic candidates, investigating civil rights some times with out warrants showing up on the doorsteps of volunteers implying they had committed a crime.ย  The agents are demanding publicly sometimes in front of family members that people answer questions, give them communications, the agents are on fishing missions and intimidation.ย  As Brian says telling people about an election is fraud.ย  ย Hugs

 

I post this last one by Matt Binder filling in for Emma and Sam showing how Riley Gaines will say anything for money and just how stupid she really is.ย  ย She has made money hand over fist using her hatred for trans people get right wing contracts and show deals talking about any talking point the right wing wants to push and emphasize.ย  Hugs

The Rightโ€™s Anti-LGBTQ Hysteria is Now Indistinguishable From Satire

While I detest the end song he plays I love Mark’s take on issues.ย  He doesn’t pull his punches and lays out the facts.ย  In this case it is important to watch to the end where he elaborates on the current attempt to genocide trans people by making them illegal as Russia has.ย  Now requiring that no business, event or medical facility that takes any government money can allow any kind of support or positive affirmation of trans people.ย  He talks about how important it is to let trans youth socially transition and live as the gender they identify with, and to get puberty blockers to not go through the wrong puberty.ย  He mentions trans children figure out their gender the same way and ages that cis kids do.ย  ย Hugs

Panic over the existence of LGBTQ+ people is becoming so ridiculous itโ€™s almost impossible to tell if itโ€™s satire or not. In this video weโ€™ll look at some of the most ridiculous examples of right-wing hysteria over queer people. Well also talk about how conservatives have successfully weaponized their outrage against queer people and how culture influences politics.

The Humanist Report (THR) is a progressive political podcast that discusses and analyzes current news events and pressing political issues. Our analyses are guided by humanism and political progressivism. Each news story we cover is supplemented with thought-provoking, fact-based commentary that aims for the highest level of objectivity.

 

The Republican Front-Runner for Maine Governor Is Completely Unhinged

 

Republican gubernatorial candidate Bobby Charles is one of the leading contenders to become Maine’s next governor, and his recent comments should alarm anyone who values evidence, competence, or basic reality.

Charles has suggested he would personally counsel women out of having abortions, claimed transgender identities are impossible because of Noah’s Ark, repeated the debunked “litter box” conspiracy theory about schools, and embraced a culture-war agenda that seems ripped straight from social media misinformation.

Yet despite these bizarre remarks, he’s a serious candidate with a real shot at winning the Republican nomination.

โ€˜You canโ€™t cancel Pride, no matter how hard you tryโ€™: GLAAD CEO on some GOP rebranding June

As I have posted before on this subject this is an attempt to push a fundamentalist Christianity on the entire rest of the public.ย  It is an attempt to enshrine Christian nationalism and the doctrines of one sect into the laws we all must live by.ย  ย The people doing these attacks want to make any and all LGBTQ+ content seem dangerous and harmful which would require warning labels.ย  It is about demonizing the way other people live because the hyper religous don’t like it.ย  The Christians are free to live as they wish and think as they want but they can not be allowed to oppress and require everyone to live as they do.ย  They are a minority and the polls show the majority of the public doesn’t share these haters belief that LGBTQ+ people are dangerous or bad.ย  The majority of people are live the way they want to and let others live the ways they want to.ย  Republicans keep using attacks on trans and gay marriage to distract from real issues, to enrage their base to excite them to vote, and to demonize a minority group so that the status quo can go back to the 1950s cis straight white male hierarchy.ย  Hugsย 


 

Some GOP lawmakers are attempting to rebrand June, which has been nationally recognized as Pride Month, as โ€œNuclear Family Monthโ€ in some states. GLAAD CEO & President Sarah Kate Ellis joins Laura Barrรณn-Lรณpez to share her thoughts on this and a new poll around support for LGBTQIA+ communities.

A Right-Wing Legal Group’s Lawsuit Over a High School Wrestling Match Falls Apart on Video

This is another Riley Gainesย  person trying to say she lost only because her opponent was trans.ย  They claim that the wrestler Kallie Keeler was sexually assaulted.ย  The issue is that all the wrestlers asked and the experts say the moves were standard wrestling moves.ย  ย Even the coach says that fingers often end up in places they don’t belong in normal activities in public.ย  I was not a wrestler, but I know someone who did wrestle in high school.ย  I had joked with him I couldn’t have done wrestling with all the hands on the crotch of the wrestlers touching each other’s cocks and balls or fingers in the butt.ย  He told me it was very common and if you watched many boys got up from the floor during or after a match with hard ons or wet spots on their uniforms where their dicks are.ย  ย The law suit is an over the top attempt to get wrestler Kallie Keeler a bunch of rewards that she did not earn and to punish all trans athletes.ย  It also is so she can repeat Riley Gaines track of using her anti-trans hate to be on TV and make a lot of money she wouldn’t make if she was not pushing bigotry and hate.ย  Plus if the opponent was a cis girl and accidentally did the same thing she wouldn’t have won either.ย  This is a Christian family who feels entitled to award seh did not earn.ย  Athe the end of the video he reads responses and comments from anti-trans people who said it was a commonly used move and sexual touching happens.ย  ย Hugs

 

The right-wing legal group Alliance Defending Freedom has filed a sweeping federal lawsuit on behalf of Washington high school wrestler Kallie Keeler, claiming she was sexually assaulted during a match against a transgender opponent.

The problem? There’s video of the match, and according to multiple wrestlers, coaches, and wrestling experts I spoke with, it shows nothing controversial. Just legal, routine wrestling techniques.

The lawsuit goes far beyond the match itself, targeting the Washington Interscholastic Activities Association (WIAA), school officials, coaches, and state authorities while demanding that Keeler’s losses to transgender athletes be erased from the record books and that trans athletes be barred from competing against her in the future.

Despite the dramatic allegations, Pierce County prosecutors declined to pursue criminal charges, and even some conservatives who oppose transgender participation in sports have criticized ADF’s characterization of the match.

Sodom & Gomorrah is not about homosexuality

Dan McCellan again goes to great lengths to explain that the bible doesn’t talk about homosexuality.ย  He first explains that the frame work of same sex attractions did not exist in the people’s worldview.ย  The social frame work for sex was not desire but power / authority over others with the penetrative man being the top of the hierarchy with the receiving person the woman was lower in status because she received the man as he penetrated her.ย  ย If a man penetrates another man the man doing the penatrator is emasculating and feminizing the man receiving the penetration, lowering that man’s status to the level of a woman.ย  In the culture of the time of the bible status as a man was paramount so to show dominance over another man they would rape them.ย  Simple.ย  He explains why they did not do to Lot’s daughters what they did to the Levite’s concubine.ย  ย He goes over the reasons that Genesis 19 is about males using dominance over the other.ย  He explains it a lot better than I can.ย  But the main thing to understand is it was not same sex orientation that was the issue it was one man dominating another by penetrating him, which caused a loss of status that was what they were trying to say was a sin.ย  In other words men don’t ruin the good thing we have going by making some men have a lower status or women will see we are not really so much better than them.ย  Hugs

 

Especially For Scottie, Because He

Nancy Mace Is The Riley Gaines Of Swimming Toward The South Carolina Governor’s Mansion!

Doktor Zoom

In the latest round of primary elections, voters in four states chose candidates for the November general elections, and something something national consequences, something something Donald Trumpโ€™s continued clammy grip on the Republican Party, yadda yadda. Primaries were held Tuesday in Maine, South Carolina, Nevada, and North Dakota. And in California, vote counting in last weekโ€™s primary for governor was complete enough that Republican Steve Hilton, a former Fox News host, secured the second spot in the at-large gubernatorial primary, so itโ€™ll be him and Democrat Xavier Becerra facing each other in November. Funny how Democrats somehow only frauded up the LA mayorโ€™s race, while the very same vote count process put Hilton on the ballot.

One might even think the cries of fraud were complete bullshit!

South Carolina: Nancy Mace Out, Lindsey Graham Persists Like A Bad Odor

In the Palmetto State, Rep. James Clyburn (D) easily won his primary and is likely to hold the seat, for an 18th term in the House. Clyburn benefited from the Republican-dominated state Legeโ€™s decision to not join the rest of the former Confederacy in redrawing every last majority-Black congressional district out of existence this year.

But before you get carried away and accuse South Carolina Republicans of having a fit of decency or ethics, several top Goopers in the Lege said last month they opposed redistricting because early voting was already underway for this very primary. Still, thatโ€™s better than Louisiana, slightly, in the voting rights race to the bottom. For this year.

The really big outcome from South Carolina was that Rep. Nancy Mace, of the House Republican Batshit Awful Caucus, finished fifth โ€” dead last โ€” in the stateโ€™s gubernatorial primary. After this year, sheโ€™s both out of Congress and maybe even out of elected office forever, though here we note that the evil baddies in slasher flicks never seem to stay dead, either.

True to hateful bigoted form, Mace was an asshole right up to the final days of the primary, pandering to xenophobes by introducing a constitutional amendment that would ban naturalized citizens from serving in Congress, serving as federal judges, or serving in any position requiring Senate confirmation. She insisted that three of her Democratic colleagues in the House โ€” Reps. Ilhan Omar (Minnesota), Shri Thanedar (Michigan), and Pramila Jayapal (Washington) โ€” are โ€œall making clear every single day their loyalty is not to America.โ€ Jesus, what a vile person.

While campaigning in Greenville County earlier this month, Mace screeched, โ€œI didnโ€™t come out of a slum in India. I am born and made here in America.โ€ Gosh, we sure feel bad about Trump turning against her after she called for releasing the Epstein Files.

Trumpโ€™s endorsed GOP candidate in the governorโ€™s primary, Lt. Gov. Pamela โ€œnot Nancy Maceโ€ Evette, wasnโ€™t able to get enough votes to secure the nomination outright, and will go up against state Attorney General Alan Wilson in a runoff on June 23. Mace endorsed Wilson, probably out of spite, although last year she had attacked Wilson, baselessly claiming he was protecting defendants accused of child sex abuse.

Always being very mature, after Trump endorsed Evette, Mace immediately went to Twitter and Facebook to lie about it in an attempt to gaslight voters.

โ€œPamela Evette is NOT ENDORSED by DONALD TRUMP,โ€ Mace wrote, incorrectly. โ€œDo not believe her LIES.โ€ Mace posted an AI-generated image of herself posing with Trump.

Peanuts cartoon of Lucy sitting in front of a big TV; her original speech bubble has been replaced so she's saying 'Christ, what an asshole.'

Oh, and speaking of assholes, Lindsey Graham easily fended off a primary challenge from self-funded business guy Mark Lynch, clearing the 50-percent threshold to avoid a runoff with 56 percent of the primary vote. Trump had unironically warned that itโ€™d be a โ€œDISASTER for the Republican Partyโ€ if Lynch won, which, hmmm, sounds vaguely familiar to something we heard a decade ago โ€ฆ what was that?

Screenshot of May 3, 2016 tweet by Lindsey Graham: 'If we nominate Trump, we will get destroyed.......and we will deserve it'

Oh yeah, that.

In the Democratic primary for Senate, Dr. Annie Andrews, who we like a hell of a lot, won the chance to run a long-shot bid against Graham. Itโ€™s a weird year, but probably not weird enough to dislodge Graham from the seat heโ€™s clinging to like a goddamn candiru fish.

Let’s talk about DOD trashing the Constitution and Latter-day Saintsโ€ฆ.

As I have written about before this is simply a move by Christian nationalists in the military and government to force everyone to conform to their religious beliefs and desires.ย  This is again to return to the 1950s when it was normal for Christianity to seem like the dominant religion of the majority of people in the country.ย  The reasons stated make so sense for the purpose claimed as Belle points out.ย  This is a minority fundamentalist / evangelical believers trying to force their rule and beliefs onto the majority.ย  ย Hugs

 

M*A*S*Hโ€™s Revolutionary Gay Episode

 

Chris Geidner Regarding DOJ Subpoenae For Gender-Affirming Care Patients:

Arguing that DOJ’s trans care subpoenas have no precedent, challengers on both coasts push back

A pair of hearings on Tuesday highlighted the extreme nature of DOJโ€™s requests โ€” and the speed with which DOJ has moved to try and get the invasive patient data in recent weeks.

Chris Geidner

The Trump administrationโ€™s actions aimed at making it more difficult for transgender minors to receive gender-affirming medical care regardless of state policies allowing or even protecting such care are facing strong pushback. And while the Justice Department has described a โ€œnationwideโ€ investigation into the care, it was those challenging DOJ who prompted hearings on both coasts on Tuesday.

The Justice Departmentโ€™s efforts to obtain information about patients who received gender-affirming medical care by way of administrative subpoenas and, more recently, grand jury subpoenas are extreme โ€” and lawyers say, unprecedented.

The pair of hearings Tuesday highlighted the extreme nature of DOJโ€™s requests โ€” and the speed with which DOJ has moved to try and get the invasive patient data in recent weeks after nearly a year since the first requests went out in July 2025.

The administrative subpoenas have been blocked when challenged, leading a set of patients to seek a class-action order quashing the patient-specific requests in all of the administrative subpoenas.

At 10:00 a.m. ET Tuesday, U.S. District Judge Julie Rubin held a hearing related to that request at the Edward A. Garmatz U.S. District Courthouse in Baltimore.

Rubin, a Biden appointee, was one of the judges who had previously quashed the patient-specific requests, as to those who moved to quash the administrative subpoena issued to Childrenโ€™s National Hospital (headquartered in D.C. but with locations in Maryland as well), finding that the โ€œSubpoena lacks a legitimate purpose.โ€œ

The bulk of Rubinโ€™s questions to Rachel Berg from the National Center for LGBTQ Rights on Tuesday related to whether Rubin could certify a class in a motion to quash an administrative subpoena and, if not, how far relief could go.

Ultimately, Berg acknowledged that, if Rubin did not certify a class, relief could only reach those with a connection to Maryland. In their filing, they had noted that โ€œ[a]t least two Movants currently reside in Maryland and four families received services from Childrenโ€™s National Hospital in Maryland.โ€œ

That would, however, not accomplish what the litigation is seeking to do โ€” stop DOJ from getting any of the patient-specific information in response to any of the administrative subpoenas. As such, if Rubin denies this request, there likely would be a further effort to accomplish that goal.

At the same time, Rubin pushed DOJโ€™s Scott Dahlquist on the opposite side nearly as strongly as sheโ€™d pushed Berg. When he insisted that the patients were seeking โ€œsweeping, nationwideโ€ relief, Rubin asked how thatโ€™s different from any class-action litigation. Dahlqustโ€™s response was, essentially, that you canโ€™t get class relief for an administrative subpoena.

On rebuttal, though, Berg responded that, though the patientsโ€™ request to the court might be without a perfect match from past litigation, the reason that is so is because there is no precedent for the Justice Departmentโ€™s actions here.

Although it is not clear how Rubin will rule, the relevance of the administrative subpoena fight could be taking on less importance in short order. As Law Dork has covered in depth, DOJโ€™s apparent move to grand jury subpoenas issued in the Northern District of Texas in May is reaching a head โ€” with at least two grand jury subpoenas having initially had a return date of Wednesday, June 10.

Over the past week, patients of Lucile Salter Packard Children’s Hospital at Stanford have made efforts to block the grand jury subpoena issued to Packard. After a first attempt to block Packard from turning over the information โ€” in a lawsuit filed only against Packard โ€” was rejected over the weekend, the patients filed an expanded lawsuit on Monday. In that, they added the Justice Department and Acting Attorney General Todd Blanche as defendants and asking for class-action relief for all who received gender-affirming medical care as minors in California and, specifically, Packard patients (similar to litigation in New York City). They also filed a request for a temporary restraining order barring DOJ from receiving patient-specific information, given the forthcoming return-date deadline.

At 10:00 a.m. PT Tuesday, U.S. District Judge Casey Pitts held a conference related to that request. Pitts was presiding over the remote hearing from his courtroom at the Robert F. Peckham Federal Building and U.S. Courthouse in San Jose.

The hearing before Pitts, another Biden appointee, ultimately, was less adversarial โ€” for now โ€” than the Baltimore hearing.

Late Monday, Pitts had issued a temporary order blocking Packard from turning over any more documents to the government and blocking DOJ from taking any further action to enforce any grand jury subpoenas that would affect the would-be class here while he considered the matter.

Everyone, more or less, was OK with keeping that status while taking up the TRO request on a slightly less rushed timeline.

Although it took a few minutes at the status conference for everyone to agree that everyone was on the same page, ultimately John Wollman, the assistant U.S. attorney from the Northern District of California representing the government at the hearing, while not acknowledging any grand jury subpoena, agreed to push back any Packard subpoena response date to June 25 to allow time for briefing and arguments on the patientsโ€™ request.

Although the parties need to submit a briefing schedule to Pitts for how to proceed, the outcome is similar to that reached temporarily as to the grand jury subpoena challenge in New York City, where the next hearing is set for June 22.

In short, the grand jury subpoenas that are known to have been challenged are on hold for now by agreement of the government while the litigation is considered.

Despite that, though, the return date was June 10 on both published grand jury subpoenas, so it is possible that others are out there that have not been challenged and will lead to productions on Wednesday. (Of course, it is also possible there are other challenges that have just flown under the radar.)

Regardless, and as NCLRโ€™s Berg detailed Tuesday in Baltimore, this is an unprecedented, multi-pronged attack on a small handful of children. Whatโ€™s more, given the way DOJ is going about this, they and their families might not even know that their records might be turned over to the government โ€” or if their provider has even been subpoenaed.


Law Dork will continue to cover this story. If you know about any previously unreported subpoenas, other related DOJ efforts, or other challenges to those efforts, please reach out. Chris Geidner is available on Signal at crg.32 for more secure communications.