In this on Sam and crew show clips of tRump talking sexually about other world male leaders and make jokes about tRump’s sexuality. They also mention how he rambles disjointedly and his dementia seems worse. Hugs
Emma and Ken discuss the new memorandum on terrorism that targets activist, protestors, and people who post online. It is an attempt to stop people from expressing a negative opinion of the tRump administration and the horrific actions they are doing. They talk about how the administration really believes that just talking badly about ICE actions is doxing them and any doxing is terrorism. The administration feels that no one has 1st amendment rights and that anything done to protest the administration is terrorism. The fear it inspires is discussed along with the cost incurred by the defendants. Hugs
Sam and Emma are talking about how the tRump administration is using the FBI to attack and interfere with democratic voting groups who work to get voters to the polls, raise funds for democratic candidates, investigating civil rights some times with out warrants showing up on the doorsteps of volunteers implying they had committed a crime. The agents are demanding publicly sometimes in front of family members that people answer questions, give them communications, the agents are on fishing missions and intimidation. As Brian says telling people about an election is fraud. Hugs
I post this last one by Matt Binder filling in for Emma and Sam showing how Riley Gaines will say anything for money and just how stupid she really is. She has made money hand over fist using her hatred for trans people get right wing contracts and show deals talking about any talking point the right wing wants to push and emphasize. Hugs
While I detest the end song he plays I love Mark’s take on issues. He doesn’t pull his punches and lays out the facts. In this case it is important to watch to the end where he elaborates on the current attempt to genocide trans people by making them illegal as Russia has. Now requiring that no business, event or medical facility that takes any government money can allow any kind of support or positive affirmation of trans people. He talks about how important it is to let trans youth socially transition and live as the gender they identify with, and to get puberty blockers to not go through the wrong puberty. He mentions trans children figure out their gender the same way and ages that cis kids do. Hugs
Panic over the existence of LGBTQ+ people is becoming so ridiculous it’s almost impossible to tell if it’s satire or not. In this video we’ll look at some of the most ridiculous examples of right-wing hysteria over queer people. Well also talk about how conservatives have successfully weaponized their outrage against queer people and how culture influences politics.
The Humanist Report (THR) is a progressive political podcast that discusses and analyzes current news events and pressing political issues. Our analyses are guided by humanism and political progressivism. Each news story we cover is supplemented with thought-provoking, fact-based commentary that aims for the highest level of objectivity.
his summer, we are spoiled for choice when it comes to queer movies. From the long-awaited adaptation of Hayley Kiyoko’s novel Girls Like Girls — which was itself an adaptation of the music video of the same name — to Jane Schoenbrun’s Teenage Sex and Death at Camp Miasma, every vibe is covered, from romance to horror to comedy and beyond. Rarely has a summer movie season felt this varied and interesting when it comes to LGBTQ+ fare. To help you keep track of it all, we’ve compiled this helpful list, complete with release dates and information about where you can catch each title. After all, there’s no better way to beat the heat than in an air-conditioned movie theater.
She’s the He (2026) — in select theaters now, VOD to follow
She’s the He is a gender swap comedy about two cisgender boys who pretend to be trans girls in order to get laid before high-school graduation. If that sounds like a horribly regressive premise, fear not. This is a movie made by and for trans people, with the sort of knowing, raunchy comedy we’ve long been denied in the name of Representation.™ It’s riot, and you should see it, if not at this current moment, then during the promised summer VOD release window.
Blue Film (2026) — June 12, VOD
Although it premiered in the U.S. in May, the controversial Blue Film was only shown in a smattering of theaters and will finally arrive on VOD June 12. The movie, directed by Elliot Tuttle, follows a queer fetish camboy who shows up to an older john’s house, only to discover that his client is his former English teacher. It’s a film unafraid to touch the third rail, diving deep into both men’s loneliness and insecurities. We called it the best queer film of the year so far back in May, and that distinction still holds up.
Stop! That! Train! (2026) — June 12, theaters
If you love Airplane! and the Naked Gun but wish they were (even) gayer, Stop! That! Train! should scratch an itch. Starring a who’s who of Drag Race girls on a runaway train, along with Crazy Ex Girlfriend’s Rachel Bloom and RuPaul herself as President Judy Gagwell, the film is filled with the sort of inane jokes and sight gags that we don’t see nearly enough of in contemporary comedies. We should note the film has become embroiled in controversy about whether it used generative AI for certain VFX shots. Director Adam Shankman has stated on Instagram that every shot is “made by human hands” and that there are no shots “conceived by AI.”
Republican gubernatorial candidate Bobby Charles is one of the leading contenders to become Maine’s next governor, and his recent comments should alarm anyone who values evidence, competence, or basic reality.
Charles has suggested he would personally counsel women out of having abortions, claimed transgender identities are impossible because of Noah’s Ark, repeated the debunked “litter box” conspiracy theory about schools, and embraced a culture-war agenda that seems ripped straight from social media misinformation.
Yet despite these bizarre remarks, he’s a serious candidate with a real shot at winning the Republican nomination.
The bar she drank at, the bed she recuperated in, the canals she daytripped to, the studio she stormed out of, the easel she painted her final masterpiece at … ahead of a major Tate show, our writer finds Kahlo’s spirit alive in Mexico City
Today you’re going to eat art,” says Federico Valdez, a chef at the School of Mexican Cuisine and a man so passionate about food he has the word Queso (Cheese) tattooed on his forearm. “Today,” continues Valdez, “you’re going to eat history.” What unfolds, in a sun-filled dining room lined with Mexican flowers, books and artefacts, is a three-course feast inspired by Frida Kahlo, her life, her art and her loves, including her first lesbian affair.
The starter, rooted in her childhood fascination with revolution, is a lightly spiced Mexican take on Russian pirozhki. The main dish – served with pulque, an agave-derived drink Kahlo loved – taps into her rebellious spirit. “It’s called Frida Against the World,” says Valdez, as we are presented with a giant stuffed chilli that sits amid a nutty, beany sauce similar to the one eaten at Kahlo’s wedding to Diego Rivera, then the most famous artist in the world, now firmly in her shadow.
“I wanted this to be hot and horny,” says Valdez, explaining that halved figs were added to reference Kahlo’s sexuality. “Her first love, with a female teacher, happened at a time when Mexico wasn’t so open. I wanted to get in all that spicy gossip. I’m not a big fan of playing it safe.”
I’m in Mexico City with a Tate delegation just as the huge jacaranda trees are blooming purple and violet across its parks and boulevards – to follow in Kahlo’s footsteps ahead of Frida: The Making of an Icon, a show of more than 30 of her works at Tate Modern in London that seems destined to be a summer blockbuster, adding yet more fuel to Fridamania.
‘This is going to blow your mind’ … chef Federico Valdez. Photograph: Courtesy Andrew Gilchrist
One work, Self Portrait With Thorn Necklace and Hummingbird, was painted in 1940 after her painful divorce from Rivera. A spider monkey, similar to the one he gave her as a present, is pulling on her thorn necklace, drawing blood. The two soon remarried, Kahlo inscribing the clocks in their house with the years of their separation and reunion.
“The exhibition is like a movie,” says Tobias Ostrander, its curator. “Frida is the star but it’s also about her life, her people, her impact.” Charting Kahlo’s rise from unknown painter to global phenomenon, the show will also examine merch (expect a Kahlo Barbie) and gauge her influence on later artists.
On display, too, will be many of the artist’s treasured possessions, including her brilliantly patternedtehuana dresses. Graciela Iturbide’s ghostly photographs of her crutches, customised medical corsets and prosthetic leg will also feature. These were taken 50 years after Kahlo’s death, when all her belongings were finally freed from the bathroom in which Rivera had ordered them to be locked away.
Unseen for 50 years … Kahlo’s prosthetic leg, captured in Graciela Iturbide’s photograph. Photograph: Courtesy of the artist
This took place at Casa Azul, the house in Coyoacán (The Place of the Coyote Owners) where Kahlo was born and spent most of her 47 years. It’s now a beautiful, beguiling museum with smooth exterior walls painted a gorgeous blue. These border shiny red concrete paths that thread through fountains and lush gardens bursting with palm, yucca, cactus and bougainvillaea. Off in a corner, seen through trees, a maroon pyramid with yellow steps displays on its ledges Rivera and Kahlo’s pre-Hispanic, Aztec and Toltec artefacts.
“We don’t know exactly where the blue came from,” says Perla Labarthe Álvarez, the museum director. “But in her diary, Frida expressed what the colour meant to her: purity, electricity and love. Because of her health – she had surgery all her life, more than 30 operations – she was at home a lot so it had to be a comfortable place where she could rest. Many of her still lifes were done in the garden. She called her home A Place Full of Places.”
It’s a perfect description. For this is a breathtakingly evocative location, even leaving aside the fact that Trotsky lived here for two years with his wife, having a brief affair with Kahlo.
‘A place full of places’ … Kahlo’s kitchen and garden at Casa Azul; her bed with its overhead mirror; and the easel adapted so she could paint on her back or in her wheelchair. Composite: Bob Schalkwijk/Andrew Gilchrist
Tours begin in the living room, with its hefty pyramid-style fireplace designed by Rivera and, as an old photo shows, once flanked by two of his macabre Judas dolls, papier-mache devils that are stuffed with fireworks and set alight at festivals. Opposite is Kahlo’s mesmerising portrait of her beloved photographer father, painted 15 years after he died, his eyes as captivating as hers.
On the walls, photos and texts detail the polio Kahlo contracted at the age of six, leaving her with one shorter leg, and the trolley-bus crash at 18 that impaled her on an iron handrail and left her in pain for much of her life, as well as unable to have children.
She could never paint this accident, even though what she did paint was often deeply painful and personal – and these works were largely created at Casa Azul, upstairs in her studio, where visitors can see the easel adapted to allow her to use brushes lying on her back or seated in her wheelchair.
‘One kick and it could take the house down’ … Kahlo’s customised boot and her ashes in an urn. Composite: Courtesy Andrew Gilchrist
In the next room is the four-poster single bed in which her mother placed an overhead mirror, giving Kahlo, frequently confined there, both a distraction and a subject. “I paint myself,” she once said, “because I am so often alone and I am the subject I know best.”
As well as her corsets, she customised her orthopaedic footwear, turning one stepped-up mid-calf red boot into a work of art. Embroidered with patterns and adorned with a blue ribbon, the chunkily laced boot now proudly stands in its own case, extraordinarily alive, looking like it could take the whole house down with one kick. Meanwhile, on a dresser, Kahlo’s ashes sit in a delightfully playful ancient urn. Boasting cartoon-like arms and legs, it’s shaped like a toad, a nod to her affectionate term for Rivera. “You found me torn apart,” says a sign, “and you took me back full and complete.”
Across the courtyard, you can see Kahlo’s crutches and corsets, one decorated with a hammer and sickle. She painted herself in these corsets, too. In Marxism Will Give Health to the Sick, a 1954 work that hangs close by, the garment has morphed into her skin, her bare breasts. A bald eagle wearing an Uncle Sam hat is being throttled while Marx’s enormous hands reach out to cradle Kahlo. As ever, her penetrating, all-seeing eyes stare out beneath that monobrow.
Throttling Uncle Sam … Marxism Will Give Health to the Sick. Photograph: Artium/Alamy
The most stunning work at Casa Azul, though, is the last one she ever painted, completed eight days before her death in 1954. Called Viva la Vida, or Long Live Life, it portrays several sun-drenched watermelons, the de facto national fruit of Mexico. In some places, their flesh is as red as blood. One has been cut in half in a crisscross pattern, echoing the Vs of the title, which appears in big black letters on another slice. It’s as if the fruit itself, life itself, is talking to you, imploring you. Live, live.
What you take from Casa Azul is an almost overwhelming sense of Kahlo’s talent, resilience and rebelliousness. “Tell us about the bomb,” someone says to Álvarez at one point, but she is out of earshot. “Is it true Frida bombed her school?” Actually, what she and her friends planted was more of a firecracker, albeit one powerful enough to blow out several windows. No one was hurt and, unlike some, Kahlo escaped expulsion.
‘It’s as if the fruit – life itself – is imploring you’ … Kahlo’s final painting, Viva la Vida. Photograph: The Artchives/Alamy
There’s a park not far off, now named after her, with a pyramid by a fountain and lifesize bronze statues of Rivera and Kahlo. She’s ahead of him, purposeful, her head half-turned, as he follows happily in her wake, smiling gently and clearly in awe of this woman, despite all his affairs. The bar they liked, La Guadalupana, still stands, a shrine to el toreo with the heads of bulls on its walls, as well as paintings and posters of fighters. Perhaps it’s more appealing if you’ve had, as Rivera and Kahlo sometimes did, “a tequila or 10”.
Downtown, we find, the streets are not so tranquil. Some are barricaded and hoarding has been placed around national monuments. These were erected in response to a recent march of 180,000 women, furious at the rates of femicide in Mexico. About 2,500 women are murdered a year, but less than a third are categorised as femicides even though there is evidence they should be. Less than a quarter of femicides are punished.
‘Clearly in awe of this woman’ … statues of Diego Rivera and Kahlo in the park named after her. Photograph: Courtesy Andrew Gilchrist
Would Kahlo have painted this outrage if she were alive today? She already did. In 1935’s Unos Cuantos Piquetitos, or A Few Small Nips, Kahlo recreates a story she read in the paper that left her incensed. A woman lies slashed and naked on a blood-splattered bed, murdered by her husband, who holds a knife and would later dismiss his crime to the police with the words of the title. Initially, Kahlo put the children in, as they witnessed the entire horror, but this was just too brutal and they have now gone.
Kahlo also painted in a studio across town, in the bohemian neighbourhood of San Ángel. It’s a beautiful, boxlike, three-storey building painted that signature blue. A rooftop bridge links it to Rivera’s much bigger workplace, a white-and-ochre structure where he would often put in 15-hour days.
Built on modernist Le Corbusier lines and now part of a museum, these studios caused a sensation when they first appeared, unadorned constructivist creations sitting among the elaborate residences of San Ángel. They’re still ringed by a superb perimeter fence of tall, perfectly placed pole-like cactuses, this being a way for both artists to bring Mexico and nature into their workplaces.
At one with nature … Kahlo’s studio with its cactus fence. Photograph: Courtesy Andrew Gilchrist
Rivera’s studio is magnificent, overflowing with ceramics and artefacts from his folk-art collection, all arranged alongside paintings and paintpots. There’s an almost party vibe: death masks sit grinning on chairs, crowds of Judas dolls leer conspiratorially around the windows, while chorus lines of strangely joyous skeletal figures dance wildly across the walls above. It feels appropriate: the parties here were legendary, attended by presidents, revolutionaries and exiles alike, as well as Hollywood stars such as Charlie Chaplin.
Over the bridge, above the bath in Kahlo’s studio toilet, you can see a copy of What the Water Gave Me, her 1938 painting of her feet as she bathed, with elements adrift on the water symbolising events in her life, from exotic plants to nude figures on a bed to an erupting volcano. There’s not a whole lot else to see in her studio, Kahlo having packed everything up and left after catching Rivera in bed with her sister. According to the museum guide, she told him: “I am going to get all my furniture and get out of here because I hate you.”
What the Water Gave Me is the favourite Kahlo painting of Helena Chávez Mac Gregor, writer of The Ribbon and the Bomb, a book about the artist’s continuing and even growing relevance. Its title refers to the words French surrealist André Breton used to describe Kahlo’s work – “a ribbon around a bomb” – although Mac Gregor thinks there’s “maybe no ribbon, only bombs” and they’re still exploding through times beyond her own, as new generations of (largely) women see themselves, their bodies, their sexualities and their struggles mirrored in her masterpieces.
“There’s the bomb of her illness,” says Mac Gregor, as she joins us for lunch at the fabulous San Ángel Inn, a former Carmelite monastery opposite the studios famed for its gardens and margaritas. “She’s vulnerable yet she’s strong and erotic, not what you might expect of someone so ill. And she was so ahead of her time, making the personal political, living on her own terms, playing with gender roles and cutting her hair. Then there are the bombs of femicide and abortion, her own.” This was chiefly to safeguard her damaged pelvis. “Frida painted these things people didn’t talk about. Even with this illness – and one year she managed only one work – she created such beauty.”
‘The parties were legendary’ … Judas dolls, paintings, skeletons and death masks at Rivera’s studio. Photograph: Courtesy Andrew Gilchrist
Clearly delighted, Mac Gregor adds: “Frida is more important than Diego Rivera now, which is weird because she was the artist she was because of him. He was a macho Mexican womaniser but he loved and supported her. And the essays he wrote about her work are amazing, talking about her representations of the interior and the exterior. He said she was going to be the most important artist in Mexico.” Kahlo didn’t stop there. When The Dream (The Bed) fetched $54.7m in 2025, this set a new world record for a female artist.
The Tate has been lucky to get any works at all, given how proud and protective Mexicans are of Kahlo, especially with the World Cup having just kicked off in their country. This was brought home to me at the Museo de Arte Moderno, where you can linger all you want in front of, say, a María Izquierdo – but gaze too long at a Kahlo and you’ll soon start to feel the pressure from other visitors to move on.
This happened to me twice: first in front of The Two Fridas, in which she explores her mixed heritage, dressing one self in European attire, the other in Mexican; and secondly at Self-Portrait with Monkeys (see top), in which Kahlo, faintly moustached, is seen with four of the creatures she kept as pets. They are often seen to represent the four pupils, nicknamed Los Fridos, who stuck with her even as her health made teaching harder and harder. Kahlo would also say that the monkeys in her work symbolised the children she could not have.
No visit to Mexico City is complete without a trip south to the floating gardens and canals of Xochimilco, for a voyage on one of the 500 colourful big gondola-like boats that ply its busy waterways. Kahlo loved to come with her family to these canals, which were created by the Aztecs. There’s a famous photo of her face hovering over the water, looking serene as she dips her arm in up to the elbow.
A song for £10 … the Axolotls board Rosamaria. Photograph: Courtesy Andrew Gilchrist
“Every boat has a female name,” says the captain of Rosamaria, our vessel, “because they are like flowers.” As we set off, smaller, faster boats speed by, bearing vendors of pulque and tacos. Before long, we are being pursued by two very loud mariachi bands, one called the Pintorescos, meaning the Picturesques, the other the Axolotls, named after the tiny, endangered and ridiculously cute species of salamander native to these waters. The Axolotls win, boarding our boat in seconds and performing for £10 a song, first Cielito Lindo (Lovely Sweet One) with its rousing singalong chorus, and then of course La Bamba.
As the Axolotls speed off in a blur of strings, brass and tight trousers, peace returns and we idle along as the afternoon sun beats fiercely down. I dangle my arm into the cool water, just like Kahlo did, and remember something Federico Valdez said as he unveiled the final course of his feast, a rice-pudding-like dish in a watermelon sauce, washed down with a liquor made from Chihuahua apples.
“This dessert is going to blow your mind,” he said, as a picture of Kahlo’s funeral appeared on the screen behind him. “Frida died – but she didn’t pass away. She was like a rocket. She just went up and up.”
As I have posted before on this subject this is an attempt to push a fundamentalist Christianity on the entire rest of the public. It is an attempt to enshrine Christian nationalism and the doctrines of one sect into the laws we all must live by. The people doing these attacks want to make any and all LGBTQ+ content seem dangerous and harmful which would require warning labels. It is about demonizing the way other people live because the hyper religous don’t like it. The Christians are free to live as they wish and think as they want but they can not be allowed to oppress and require everyone to live as they do. They are a minority and the polls show the majority of the public doesn’t share these haters belief that LGBTQ+ people are dangerous or bad. The majority of people are live the way they want to and let others live the ways they want to. Republicans keep using attacks on trans and gay marriage to distract from real issues, to enrage their base to excite them to vote, and to demonize a minority group so that the status quo can go back to the 1950s cis straight white male hierarchy. Hugs
Some GOP lawmakers are attempting to rebrand June, which has been nationally recognized as Pride Month, as “Nuclear Family Month” in some states. GLAAD CEO & President Sarah Kate Ellis joins Laura Barrón-López to share her thoughts on this and a new poll around support for LGBTQIA+ communities.
This is another Riley Gaines person trying to say she lost only because her opponent was trans. They claim that the wrestler Kallie Keeler was sexually assaulted. The issue is that all the wrestlers asked and the experts say the moves were standard wrestling moves. Even the coach says that fingers often end up in places they don’t belong in normal activities in public. I was not a wrestler, but I know someone who did wrestle in high school. I had joked with him I couldn’t have done wrestling with all the hands on the crotch of the wrestlers touching each other’s cocks and balls or fingers in the butt. He told me it was very common and if you watched many boys got up from the floor during or after a match with hard ons or wet spots on their uniforms where their dicks are. The law suit is an over the top attempt to get wrestler Kallie Keeler a bunch of rewards that she did not earn and to punish all trans athletes. It also is so she can repeat Riley Gaines track of using her anti-trans hate to be on TV and make a lot of money she wouldn’t make if she was not pushing bigotry and hate. Plus if the opponent was a cis girl and accidentally did the same thing she wouldn’t have won either. This is a Christian family who feels entitled to award seh did not earn. Athe the end of the video he reads responses and comments from anti-trans people who said it was a commonly used move and sexual touching happens. Hugs
The right-wing legal group Alliance Defending Freedom has filed a sweeping federal lawsuit on behalf of Washington high school wrestler Kallie Keeler, claiming she was sexually assaulted during a match against a transgender opponent.
The problem? There’s video of the match, and according to multiple wrestlers, coaches, and wrestling experts I spoke with, it shows nothing controversial. Just legal, routine wrestling techniques.
The lawsuit goes far beyond the match itself, targeting the Washington Interscholastic Activities Association (WIAA), school officials, coaches, and state authorities while demanding that Keeler’s losses to transgender athletes be erased from the record books and that trans athletes be barred from competing against her in the future.
Despite the dramatic allegations, Pierce County prosecutors declined to pursue criminal charges, and even some conservatives who oppose transgender participation in sports have criticized ADF’s characterization of the match.
Political action committees focused on LGBTQ+ issues have already spent big in the 2026 election cycle. They have doled out hundreds of thousands of dollars to support congressional candidates who identify as sexual or gender minorities, as they seek to both defend and expand representation.
Ten LGBTQ+-focused PACs contributed a combined $637,849 to congressional candidates so far in the 2025-26 cycle (through March 31), supporting incumbent lawmakers, candidates pursuing historic firsts and contenders in open-seat and other competitive races. The top five PACs gave $593,041, or 93%, of that total.
(The chart coded below can be seen on the story page, linked in the title above, or at the end of the article.)
(function(){function e(){window.addEventListener(`message`,function(e){if(e.data[`datawrapper-height`]!==void 0){var t=document.querySelectorAll(`iframe`);for(var n in e.data[`datawrapper-height`])for(var r=0,i;i=t[r];r++)if(i.contentWindow===e.source){var a=e.data[`datawrapper-height`][n]+`px`;i.style.height=a}}})}e()})();
Equality PAC, the political arm of the Congressional Equality Caucus, is responsible for 29% of the contributions to candidates from LGBTQ+ PACs ($185,000). It works to elect openly LGBTQ candidates and allies committed to passing the Equality Act, which would prohibit discrimination based on sexual orientation and gender identity in areas including housing, employment and lending.
The Human Rights Campaign, which describes itself as the nation’s largest civil rights and LGBTQ lobbying organization, gave $141,541 to many of the same candidates and accounts for 22% of this total. Equality Project PAC, which has also been associated with the Equality Caucus, has contributed $115,000 (18%). No Vote Left Behind PAC, which describes its mission as developing and funding voter registration and get-out-the-vote programs targeted to the LGBTQ community in battleground states, contributed $84,000. Christopher Street Project, which focuses on electing candidates committed to advancing trans rights, contributed $67,000.
Equality PAC leaders are also its recipients
Reps. Becca Balint (D-Texas) and Julie Johnson (D-Texas) serve as the PAC’s vice chairs and have received $7,500 and $5,000 from the PAC, respectively. Two co-chairs, Reps. Ritchie Torres (D-N.Y.) and Mark Takano (D-Calif.) each received $10,000 from the committee.
Balint is the first woman and openly LGBTQ+ person to represent Vermont in Congress and has supported numerous pieces of legislation that protect LGBTQ+ Americans and their access to healthcare. In 2025, she introduced the Transgender Health Care Access Act, which would fund programs to train medical providers in providing gender affirming care.
Balint has received a total of $22,000 from LGBTQ+ PACs, including the $7,500 from Equality PAC, $5,000 from No Vote Left Behind PAC and $4,500 from Equality Project PAC. She also received $2,500 from both the Christopher Street Project and the Human Rights Campaign.
Johnson, who was running for reelection in Texas’ 33rd district, received over $40,000 in donations from various LGBTQ+ PACs, the most of any candidate, yet lost in the Democratic primary runoff on May 26.
In a statement about Johnson’s loss, Equality PAC said, “Texas – and likely the entire South – will lose openly LGBTQ representation in Congress. Many in our community remain deeply hurt by Colin Allred’s decision to challenge one of our own. As he moves forward, he bears a responsibility to help heal those divisions and rebuild trust with the communities impacted by this race.”
In 2023, he was selected to serve as a co-chair of the Equality PAC. “Congressman Torres is one of Equality PAC’s greatest and proudest success stories. We all know that representation matters – and that is why Equality PAC was the first major national organization to endorse his congressional campaign in 2019,” said fellow co-chair Takano. “As the first LGBTQ Afro-Latino ever elected to Congress, Congressman Torres is a living example of Equality’s PAC mission to make Congress look like America — and that includes LGBTQ America.”
This cycle, Torres received $10,000 from both Equality PAC and Equality Project PAC. He also received $10,000 from No Vote Left Behind PAC and another $2,500 from the Human Rights Campaign.
In 2012, Takano became the first openly LGBTQ+ person of color elected to Congress. Takano serves as the chair of the Congressional Equality Caucus and is the lead sponsor of the Equality Act, the caucus’s flagship bill.
PACs focused on gay and lesbian rights donated $35,000 to Takano, who represents California’s 41st district. Contributions from Equality PAC, Equality Project PAC and No Vote Left Behind PAC compose a majority of this, with each organization donating $10,000 to Takano’s campaign.
Takano also received $2,500 from the Christopher Street Project and $2,500 from the Human Rights Campaign.
Garcia, who represents the Golden State’s 42nd district, has received $22,000 from PACs focused on LGBTQ+ issues so far this cycle. Equality PAC, the political arm of the Congressional Equality Caucus (of which he is a co-chair) contributed $7,500 to Garcia’s campaign.
Equality PAC has maintained its support for Garcia since 2024, having donated $7,500 to his campaign that cycle.
Rep. Emily Randall (D-Wash.) is the first openly LGBTQ+ Latina to serve in Congress and is the first woman to represent the state’s 6th district. Randall has championed the reintroduction of the Equality Act, which ensures nondiscrimination protections for LGBTQ+ Americans, and national LGBTQ+ organizations have continued to support her as she seeks reelection.
Randall, who will not face any challengers in the Aug. 4 primary, has received $11,500 from LGBTQ+-focused PACs this cycle. She received $5,000 from Equality PAC, as well as $3,500 from Human Rights Campaign and $3,000 from Equality Project PAC.
Equality PAC first endorsed Randall’s run for Congress in 2023, stating that she has “worked tirelessly” in the State Senate to make Washington one of the most inclusive and accepting places for LGBTQ Americans.
Marni von Wilpert, an LGBTQ+ member of the San Diego City Council and a former civil rights attorney, is running for California’s 48th district. She has raised $1.2 million so far, with $32,500 coming from LGBTQ+ PAC contributions.
Equality PAC donated $10,000 to von Wilpert’s campaign and stated in its endorsement that she “represents one of our best chances to elect a new LGBTQ woman to Congress this year.” Wilpert also received $10,000 from both Equality Project PAC and No Vote Left Behind.
Von Wilpert has also been added to the Democratic Congressional Campaign Committee’s Red to Blue program, which provides Democratic candidates in particularly competitive races with organizational and fundraising support.
Rep. Chris Pappas (D) became New Hampshire’s first openly gay member of Congress when he was elected in 2018 to represent the 1st district. Now, as he runs for Senate, Pappas has become a focus for LGBTQ+ PACs looking to support increased representation in a chamber that has had very few openly LGBTQ+ members in its history.
If elected, Pappas would become the first openly gay man elected to the Senate, making the race particularly significant for PACs seeking to expand representation.
In its endorsement of Pappas, Equality PAC said New Hampshire “needs a fighter in the Senate who will put the Granite Staters first, and Chris Pappas has proven time and time again that he is that leader.”
LGBTQ+-focused PACs have contributed $11,050 to Pappas in 2025-26, including funding from LGBTQ Victory Fund, the Human Rights Campaign, No Vote Left Behind PAC and Equality Project PAC.
This article was originally published by OpenSecrets, a nonpartisan, nonprofit organization that tracks money in politics. View the original article.
Dan McCellan again goes to great lengths to explain that the bible doesn’t talk about homosexuality. He first explains that the frame work of same sex attractions did not exist in the people’s worldview. The social frame work for sex was not desire but power / authority over others with the penetrative man being the top of the hierarchy with the receiving person the woman was lower in status because she received the man as he penetrated her. If a man penetrates another man the man doing the penatrator is emasculating and feminizing the man receiving the penetration, lowering that man’s status to the level of a woman. In the culture of the time of the bible status as a man was paramount so to show dominance over another man they would rape them. Simple. He explains why they did not do to Lot’s daughters what they did to the Levite’s concubine. He goes over the reasons that Genesis 19 is about males using dominance over the other. He explains it a lot better than I can. But the main thing to understand is it was not same sex orientation that was the issue it was one man dominating another by penetrating him, which caused a loss of status that was what they were trying to say was a sin. In other words men don’t ruin the good thing we have going by making some men have a lower status or women will see we are not really so much better than them. Hugs
maga influencer Riley Gaines sparked controversy after a behind-the-scenes video of her practicing a spot for Patriot Mobile and repeatedly asking what conservative talking points she should hit went viral.
Fifth place collegiate swimmer turned anti-trans activist turned MAGA trad-wife influencer Riley Gaines is drawing new backlash and mockery online after requiring her sponsor, Patriot Mobile, to tell her what she “feels very passionately about” in a recently leaked behind-the-scenes video from an ad campaign video shoot.
In the clip, Gaines asks what the MAGA brand Patriot Mobile wants her to say, asking what the “pillars” of her beliefs are and counting on her fingers as she repeats them. An offscreen company representative can barely be heard answering her questions.
The pillars listed include the First Amendment, Second Amendment, reproductive freedom is bad, and something about veterans. Gaines then does a quick take before stopping again and asking how exactly to state the beliefs Patriot Mobile told her to have.
The clip quickly went viral across social media.
You can watch the clip here on multiple platforms:
(snip-above is YouTube; there are BlueSky and other social posts embedded on this story’s page, linked in the title above. The posts are hilarious, as one would infer. Enjoy!)
Gaines was once the darling of the MAGAsphere, garnering invitations to the White House, CPAC, and MAGA rallies, but has lost some of her shine. She’s since even drawn criticism from MAGA Republican President Donald Trump and ridicule from both the right and left.
An ad campaign for anti-trans clothing line XX-XY Athletics drew widespread mockery instead of the sympathy it was aiming for. The brand, who made transphobia their brand—literally—released an ad on X featuring Gaines claiming she had been “silenced” by trans rights activists.
With her single focus of anti-trans bigotry and hatred no longer paying off like it had in the past, Gaines has tried to branch out to embrace other MAGA core values, but with very limited success.
Since it’s a new angle for her, no wonder she needs to be told what it is she now believes.(snip-end)