So, We Three Post A Great Deal Of


Monstrosity Plucked From Garbage Can: On Mae West’s early career as a controversial playwright.

Walker Caplan April 20, 2021

Mae West is an icon: literally, a representative symbol. In the popular imagination, Mae West stands in for a certain type of seduction—blonde, campy, one-liner-heavy. But though West is best known for her distinctive performances, she was also a controversial playwright; before West established the acting persona that would stick in the public’s minds for a century, she was offending critics and facing jail time for shows that she called “comedy-dramas of life,” illuminating elements of life yet to be popularized onstage.

West’s plays The Drag and The Pleasure Man brought a type of communal gay camp onstage that at turns scandalized and excited a largely straight audience. And back in 1926, before Diamond Lil, her play-turned-movie about a good-natured prostitute, launched West to bona fide stardom, she wrote and performed another play—SEX—which would lay the groundwork for the plot of Diamond Lil but polarized audiences in a way Diamond Lil never did.

In SEX, West starred as a prostitute named Margy Lamont. The plot is winding, complicated, and not the point; viewer response was created by the first two acts, where the audience saw Margy working in a brothel and then in a nightclub. Critics were universally horrified by SEXThe New Yorker described the script as “street sweepings”; the New York Herald Tribune said that “never in a long experience of theatre-going have we met with a set of characters so depraved”; the slightly more provocative New York Daily Mirror titled their review “SEX an Offensive Play, Monstrosity Plucked From Garbage Can, Destined to Sewer.”

It wasn’t that there had never been sex or representations of sex workers on Broadway before; but critics found SEX reminiscent of burlesque (stigmatized at the time), as well as uncomfortably realistic in its treatment of sex work and class. As Marybeth Hamilton puts it in “SEX, The Drag, and 1920s Broadway,” “Margy was . . . an ill-paid sex-worker who traded her body on the streets. West made that fact unmistakable. As West embodied her, Margy was palpably from the lower orders . . . Margy is bitterly conscious of herself as a member of the oppressed class, and the grimness and harshness of her manner are reflected in the world she inhabits.” Imagine Mae West’s characteristic delivery without the irony: that was Margy Lamont. Understandably (though not correctly), people were scandalized.

As usually happens when people freak out about a piece of art, ticket sales went up. Then, on February 9, 1927, SEX was raided by the acting mayor, and West spent $14,000 to bail herself and her fellow actors out of jail. As she refused to shut down the show, West was sentenced to ten days in jail for “corrupting the morals of youth.” She was released two days early for good behavior, and the jail time essentially operated as a publicity stunt, launching her in the media as a “bad girl” of theater.

West capitalized on the publicity of SEX and took it as an opportunity to retool her persona, creating Diamond Lil. West plays a sex worker in Diamond Lil as well, but this time, it was funny. Lil was constantly making jokes, and West played her with a veil of irony, so an audience could interpret all of the raunchiness as satire. Plus, the specter of class was never mentioned, making it easier to swallow for middle-class audiences. West called Lil “a little spicy, but not too raw”; this was the beginning of the West performances we know today. I’m grateful for West’s fame, and her later work; but I’m glad we know what was lost in translation.

We Haven’t Had “Cover Snark” Here In A While-

Cover Snark: Burger King and Bobbleheads

by Amanda ·

Welcome back to Cover Snark!

From M: Another cut and paste disaster. This guy’s head is not only too small for the rest of him, but someone removed his neck. And what the heck are those red circles? Leftover Christmas ornaments?

Sarah: I need the Harley community to weigh in on giant red jingleballs on your handlebars. Seems…unwise.

And I cannot stop laughing at this poor man’s pasted on head. My God the indignity. His unveiled desire is to have his own neck.

Amanda: His head looks like it’s going to bobble right off.

From Elizabeth S: I don’t even know what all crazy is going on here.

Sarah: Setting aside the completely distracting Y shaped torso, did Wonder Woman get him? Is that the lasso of truth? What do you think this guy is confessing to, dedicated steroid regiment? Stealing conditioner?

Claudia: Wow. Gym-rat Jesus!

Sarah: The lat bar is his shepherd? He shall not skip leg day?

Amanda: This man feels very familiar to me. We may have snarked his image before.

Sarah: This is giving me Perez Hilton vibes and never in a good way.

Elyse: I was going with the little crown kids get at Burger King

Amanda: I feel like this has a new illustrated cover. I recently featured it on the After Dark sales.

Sarah: At least on this one, I can read the Wine Mom Font correctly.

Elyse: “Smell my finger.”

Sarah: Nooooooo

Amanda: Welp, now that’s all I can think about.

(snip-comments, etc. on the page, linked in the title)

Canada’s Proposed Hate Speech Law – Don’t worry you can still humiliate, discredit, hurt and offend

I have the same idea as the Reverend on this issue.  It is how I handle my comments on my blog.  Attack the ideas, not the person expressing them.  Hugs

Trans Children’s Lives Were Endangered Based on a Lie

I did some reviews on the Cass report because it was supported by so many anti-trans bigots. Turns out there were so many lies and errors in the report that it became clear the purpose was to discredit the clinic and get it shut down.  The report was driven by anti-trans people and even Cass herself was well known to be anti-trans.  But what is so irksome is the lies still get told and circulated repeatedly even when they are pointed out.  The idea of social contagion was found to be entirely made up by people desperate to keep their child from transitioning.  The idea came from a website set up for parents that had kids transitioning and they hated it.  The Cass report used lies from that site as if they were medical facts saying that parents were not told and children were being rushed to transition, when even the parents admitted they had all the information in writing that they had to sign and the biggest complaint was how long it took to get seen by the clinic with many kids going through puberty before they got gender affirming care.  The idea of large amounts of detransitioners is totally made up as real studies have found it is less than 2% and the regret levels are well below any other medical procedure.  I wish haters and bigots would understand if they have to make up stuff and lie to prove their point then they have no point to make.  They just hate the idea of people not accepting they are the gender / sex assigned at birth and don’t want to accept new medical data.  Hugs

Let’s talk about a 25th Amendment Commission being set up for Trump….

Congress can set up a 22nd amendment and this video explains how.  Hugs

 

Surprise inspection catches shocking state of ICE immigrant prison

From Friend Of Playtime, ‘The Bee Writes’:

Just A little Dittie

Beatrice Halton – Bee Writes Apr 14, 2026

“He’s done it at last?”

“I guess so, look at how he is jumping around!”

“Like a rabbit on speed!”

“There is this rumour he had trouble with drugs back in the ’80s.”

“Is that when he started building this… this well… I know it’s what they called a house on earth”

“Yes, I remember when he pulled the whole planet out of the other dimension. I think he had planned to build the house on the planet but of course, that’s not possible. You can’t build from one dimension to another. ”

“But it’s in this dimension!!!!”

“No, it’s not. See that’s the problem with quantum physics. Nothing is how it seems.”

“Ah. So he got frustrated and into drugs?”

“Probably.”

“He managed somehow though…”

“As we can see but he has a planet stuck on his entrance door.”

“Stupid!”

“Yes, really stupid”
🏠🤣🏠🤣🏠🤣🏠🤣🏠🤣

„Hat er es endlich geschafft?“

„Ich glaube schon, schau mal, wie er da herumhüpft!“

„Wie ein Kaninchen auf Speed!“

„Es gibt dieses Gerücht, dass er in den 80ern Probleme mit Drogen hatte.“

„Ist das die Zeit, als er angefangen hat, dieses … dieses … nun ja … ich weiß, man nennt so etwas auf der Erde ein Haus.“

„Ja, ich erinnere mich, als er den ganzen Planeten aus der anderen Dimension geholt hat. Ich glaube, er hatte vor, das Haus auf dem Planeten zu bauen, aber das ist natürlich nicht möglich. Man kann nicht von einer Dimension in eine andere bauen.“

„Aber es ist doch in dieser Dimension!!!!“

„Nein, tut es nicht. Siehst du, das ist das Problem mit der Quantenphysik. Nichts ist so, wie es scheint.“

„Ah. Also war er frustriert und hat mit Drogen angefangen?“

„Wahrscheinlich.“

„Er hat es aber irgendwie geschafft …“

„Wie wir sehen können, aber er hat einen Planeten an seiner Eingangstür hängen.“

„Dumm!“

„Ja, wirklich dumm.“

From Jenny Lawson, Between Tour Appearances

Mentally though, I’m here

Jenny Lawson (thebloggess)

Hello friend!

I am leaving for the second part of my book tour in 10 hours and I have not done laundry, packed, or (if I’m being honest) unpacked from the first leg of book tour. In spite of the fact that the first stops were so lovely and fun and filled with fellow weirdos who completely understood my anxiety, I am once again convinced that everyone will hate me and no one will show up and probably I will be eaten by sea lions. So right now I am writing this to you and reminding myself that everything will be okay.

I did lots of little drawings this week but Hunter S. Thomcat is laying on my sketch pad and I don’t want to move him so instead I’m sharing a drawing from the book because I drew it when I was having a high anxiety week and it feels fitting to come back to it now. Just a reminder that even when things feels scary, you can always make a little oasis in your mind. My spell check tried to change that to “you can always make a little oatmeal in your mind” and I’m feeling very relieved that I caught that because that’s even weirder than my normal letters to you.

WAIT, DID I TELL YOU HOW TO BE OKAY WHEN NOTHING IS OKAY IS #4 ON THE NYT BESTSELLER LIST?

Sorry. Didn’t mean to yell. It’s just late and my meds have worn off.

If you’re in California, Oregon or Austin, come join me?

Barnes & Noble in California

Powell’s in Oregon

Book People in Austin

I super crazy love you,

~ me

Olympic Athletes Rapinoe and Bird Slam IOC Trans Ban: “I’m Sickened By It”

https://www.erininthemorning.com/p/olympic-athletes-rapinoe-and-bird

“It’s just a total acquiescence to the Trump Administration,” Rapinoe said.

Federal court OKs Iowa’s “cruel” book ban law in stunning LGBTQ+ defeat

The idea behind these laws seems to be if they can hide that LGBTQ+ people / kids exist they can prevent the acceptance and tolerance of LGBTQ+ kids / people. In the minds of the haters who write these bills hopefully that will force people who are not straight or cis to stay hidden from society.  They are desperate to return to the 1950s when LGBTQ+ people had to stay hidden or risk losing everything they had, their job, housing, and friends.   They are pathetic in their need for everyone to be the same as they are, feel the same as they do, and to live as they do.  Why I did not know or understand.  The irrational hate for LGBTQ+ kids is really weird.  That they would rather have kids hurt, harmed, assaulted, ostracized, and possibly driven to suicide rather than give them acceptance or simply tolerance.   I don’t undestand what their gain is in this?   Hugs  

https://www.lgbtqnation.com/2026/04/federal-court-oks-iowas-cruel-book-ban-law-in-stunning-lgbtq-defeat/

April 2026

Photo of the author

John Russell (He/Him)April 7, 2026, 1:00 pm EDT· Updated on April 8, 2026
An empty classroomShutterstock

The U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit has ruled that Iowa can enforce a 2023 law restricting classroom instruction on LGBTQ+ topics and access to certain books while legal challenges against the law proceed.

On Monday, the three-judge panel overturned injunctions previously issued by lower courts in two separate lawsuits challenging aspects of the Senate File 496, according to the Associated Press and The Des Moines Register.

Passed by the Iowa state legislature and signed by Republican Gov. Kim Reynolds in 2023, the law prohibits “any program, curriculum, test, survey, questionnaire, promotion, or instruction relating to gender identity or sexual orientation” in kindergarten through sixth grade. It also bans materials featuring “descriptions or visual depictions of a sex act” from school libraries and classrooms — a provision which critics say is intended to ban books featuring LGBTQ+ characters and themes.

The law went into effect on July 1, 2023. The following November, the ACLU of Iowa and Lambda Legal sued the state on behalf of LGBTQ+ advocacy organization Iowa Safe Schools and seven students and their families, challenging SF 496’s classroom instruction ban.

Last May, a federal judge issued a split decision, upholding the law’s ban on discussion of gender identity and sexual orientation in K–6 classrooms, but blocking its ban on school “promotions” and “programs” that acknowledge the existence of LGBTQ+ people. U.S. District Judge Stephen Locher also blocked a provision of the law banning schools from providing “accommodation that is intended to affirm the student’s gender identity” without notifying their parents, writing that S.F. 496 was impermissibly vague about what constitutes an “accommodation.”

Writing for the Eighth Circuit on Monday, Judge Ralph Erickson held that the state’s interpretation of the law as requiring school “programs” and “promotions” to only encompass curricular activities does not violate the U.S. Constitution. However, the court did not address whether it is constitutionally permissible for the state to ban specific groups and extracurricular programs, such as Gender & Sexuality Alliance groups, because the Iowa Safe Schools lawsuit did not challenge specific applications of the law, according to the Register.  

The court also disagreed with Judge Locher’s ruling that the law’s language around “accommodations” was too vague, restoring S.F. 496’s ban on schools accommodating students’ gender identities without outing them to their parents.

In a separate November 2023 lawsuit, the Iowa State Education Association was joined by publisher Penguin Random House and several prominent authors of banned books in a challenge to S.F. 496’s book-banning provision. Last March, Judge Locher sided with the plaintiffs, issuing a preliminary injunction preventing schools from removing books it considers “obscene” from classrooms and libraries.

Again, writing for the Eighth Circuit in a separate decision Monday, Judge Erickson disagreed w  ith Locher’s ruling that school library books are not part a school’s curriculum. Erickson wrote that a school’s library catalogue constitutes government speech and can be restricted by state law, according to the Register.

The decisions on both cases send them back to the district court. But as the Register notes, the Eighth Circuit indicated in both rulings that the plaintiffs could not show a “likelihood of success on the merits” in their challenges to S.F. 496.

At the same time, in a joint press release the ACLU of Iowa and Lambda Legal noted that the rulings narrow “where and how the law may be applied.”

“The prohibition regarding sexual orientation and so-called gender theory applies only to specific, mandatory instruction on these topics during class time. The law, as currently interpreted, does not require schools to prohibit student expression of LGBTQ+ identity nor does it limit the sponsorship or promotion of GSAs,” ACLU of Iowa Senior Staff Attorney Thomas Story said.

“The court’s interpretation of the provision on banning books is that it applies only to those that specifically describe or depict one of those sex acts defined in Iowa’s criminal law. And with the forced outing provision, a report would be made to parents or guardians only if a student specifically requests a school accommodation for the stated purpose of affirming a gender identity different from their registration forms,” Story added.

In a statement responding to the court’s decision, Iowa State Education Association president Joshua Brown told the Register that the case was “about much more than legal technicalities.”

“It is about protecting the freedom of speech and the right to share ideas — values guaranteed by the First Amendment,” Brown said. “Our schools should be safe spaces where students are free to learn, teachers can use their professional expertise without fear, and families can trust that education is based on open inquiry rather than government censorship.”

A spokesperson for Penguin Random House indicated in a statement to the Register that the company intends to keep fighting against S.F. 496. Similarly, Lambda Legal Senior Attorney Nathan Maxwell called the ruling “a setback,” but noted that “it is not the end of this fight.”

“Iowa’s SF 496 is a cruel and unconstitutional law that silences LGBTQ+ children, erases their existence from classrooms, and forces educators to expose vulnerable students to potential harm at home,” Maxwell said in a statement. “We will continue to use every legal tool available to protect these young people. They deserve nothing less.”

Subscribe to the LGBTQ Nation newsletter and be the first to know about the latest headlines shaping LGBTQ+ communities worldwide.


John Russell is a writer and editor based in New York City. In addition to covering politics and entertainment for LGBTQ Nation, he has written for Vanity Fair, Slate, People, Billboard, and Out. He also writes about film, TV, and pop culture in his free newsletter Johnny Writes…